I’m being entirely selfish. (Well, maybe not entirely.) The presumption of innocence is something I want for myself, so I’m leading by example. Accusations by Palin’s political rivals and disgruntled employees aren’t evidence. Newsweek’s spin on the judge’s comments generally re: feuding relatives isn’t evidence either.

The only reason I can think of for using the commission report as “evidence” is to take their side politically and engage in a political attack against Palin. The commission has no credibility and use of their material contaminates any argument that might be produced from it.

BTW: If I were in Sarah Palin’s shoes, I’d fire Walt Monegan. He’s causing too much of a distraction and has stated publically that he intends to continue to cause trouble. For the same reason, Bush should have fired James Hansen from NASA years ago (Gore’s political advisor re: the climate hoax).

Palin did things far worse than what the average relative does to manipulate court cases. That she happened to become the darling “savior” of the Republican party only emphasizes the vast importance of her behaving like a real social conservative, not another barnyard feminist neocon.

I find it quite interesting that so many folks so deeply aware of the horrid things feminists do want to give her a free pass. At minumum, she should have been arrested for tampering with witnesses (which the three reports did not consider).

If Palin had not behaved like a rabid radical feminist, I would have supported her. I simply cannot support anyone who plays dirty pool to screw men to the wall.

There is much teaching to do in the Republican Party. Huston is just one classic Reagan conservative who knows nothing about social issues or what they mean.

We better get our ducks in a row and sing a consistent tune about what we expect from the Republican party. If we do not do this now, we will get what we deserve later, and the Party will fall flat on its face again and again until it gets it right.

I really don’t get it. You and one or two others are obviously out to get Sarah Palin. I don’t know why. There was a he-said, she-said kind of thing and the “charges” against Palin were just accusations – supported by what even Monegan characterises as “circumstantial evidence.”

The Republican accuser was a guy who lost the election to her – whose reputation she ground into the ground with accusations of corruption. The political committee that found fault was lead by and stacked with Obama Democrats. The few Republicans involved were part of the old boy network that had been partially ousted.

What is it that’s driving you to misrepresent the situation in order to attack Sarah Palin?

FACT: Palin’s very public claim that Wooten physically threatened her father was 100% mierda de toro. If Wooten had done so, Wooten would have been immediately arrested, fired, and he would still be in jail. Folks who actually threaten the families of governors find themselves locked up faster than an Obama one-liner.

I won’t bother debunking the rest of Palin’s baloney, because it holds no more water than the stripper’s allegations in the Duke Rape Case.

The first two Committee findings, both of which were conducted by Republican majority committees, found that she had way overstepped her boundaries.

Those findings did not titrate the fact that her persistent activities were specifically intended to manipulate the outcome of a court proceeding, both by doing dirty things behind closed doors, and waging a war of terror from the Governor’s office. The last time I checked, tampering with or harassing witnesses in a court proceeding is a felony. If you bother reading the court transcripts in the custody proceeding, the judge hauled off Palin and the wife’s attorney, in very strong language, a number of times for their orchestrated attempt to run the case by remote control.

Those committees did not sit in a capacity to make a finding of criminality. The last committee report was done by Palin’s people, and was an internal whitewashing of the whole affair.