<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN&#8217;s Hypocritical Disregard for Employee Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/11/25/cnns-hypocritical-disregard-for-employee-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/11/25/cnns-hypocritical-disregard-for-employee-rights/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:53:53 -1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: merck</title>
		<link>http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/11/25/cnns-hypocritical-disregard-for-employee-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-67746</link>
		<dc:creator>merck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=83435#comment-67746</guid>
		<description>If Iâ€™m reading this right, CNN hired the subcontractorâ€™s employees, who were still card carrying members of local 11, as non-union replacement workers. The judge decided that even though CNN hired them without a contract, they are still required to bargain with the union. 

If thatâ€™s the case, good for the judge. 

The NLRB *made sure* the case took a long time, because itâ€™s the only way they can guarantee themselves a job. The decision was fair, but it cost the taxpayers a small fortune to reach, and thatâ€™s not fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Iâ€™m reading this right, CNN hired the subcontractorâ€™s employees, who were still card carrying members of local 11, as non-union replacement workers. The judge decided that even though CNN hired them without a contract, they are still required to bargain with the union. </p>
<p>If thatâ€™s the case, good for the judge. </p>
<p>The NLRB *made sure* the case took a long time, because itâ€™s the only way they can guarantee themselves a job. The decision was fair, but it cost the taxpayers a small fortune to reach, and thatâ€™s not fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
