Another Child Found Dead (Opinion: Illinois Safe Haven Law Tramples Children’s Rights)

2009-03-04
By

A mother recently regained custody of her newborn baby from DCFS after being accused of placing her baby face-down in a water-filled toilet bowl during a family party. Last week, the body of a decomposed newborn was discovered in the same mother’s Belleville, Illinois home. The Illinois “Safe Haven” law (Abandoned Newborn Infant Protection Act, 325 ILCS 2/1, et seq.) is an emotional reaction to this type of tragedy. We can no longer continue to ignore the rights of disenfranchised fathers to protect their children from neglect and worse.

Since “Safe Haven” became a law in Illinois in August 2001, 54 Mothers illegally abandoned their babies in non-approved locations, with 27 of the babies dying.

The Illinois “Safe Haven” law was born out of good intentions to protect infants from literally being thrown into garbage cans and otherwise left to die. However, the manner in which this law and others throughout America are written have created a number of problems for both children and their fathers.

First, the anonymity given to the mother by the “Safe Haven” laws leaves little or no chance that the father will be contacted so that he can pursue custody or protect his child from harm. In fact, in the case of a mother dropping off a child forever pursuant to a “Safe Haven” law, the father does not even need to really be notified. In contrast, in a legal adoption proceeding, the father has to formally relinquish his parental rights.

Secondly, there is an unhealthy gender disparity in our system. Fathers who walk away from parenthood are labeled “deadbeat dads”, or may even go to jail for failing to fulfill their financial responsibilities. On the other hand, mothers who walk away from their babies are protected by the “Safe Haven” laws from any legal and financial accountability and are often viewed as courageous.

Finally, and most importantly, the impact “Safe Haven” laws have on abandoned children must be addressed. The children are denied the chance to grow up with their dads or any other biological family members. They are also denied the right to know their true identity and medical history, which can create a potentially life-threatening situation.

Statistics show that in spite of “Safe Haven” laws, children continue to be thrown away in dumpsters. The “Safe Haven” laws need to be rewritten to protect the children whose mothers are disposing of them; and to protect the fathers who have the right to know that their children exist so they can protect them from harm, death and abandonment.

Jeffery M. Leving is one of America’s most prominent family law attorneys. His website is www.dadsrights.com.

Tags:

628 views

  • http://bastardette.blogspot.com Marley Greiner

    You’re being too kind about baby dump laws. Although they have since taken on a life of their own, the intentions were never good. SH laws are the product of the National Council for Adoption, a well-funded beltway lobby, made up of some of the largest adoption agencies in the country and LDS Social Services. They were developed as a response to the success of the adoptee rights movement which is getting birth records access restored to adoptees across the country. Other factors were the growing numbers of father-contested adoptions the Indian Child Welfare Act. SH is about hiding babies and moving product into the adoption mill. Some are anonymous, many are not, no matter what the pushers claim. Unfortunately, many of the people who fall for this scam don’t know any better. They have no idea what their rights are, they don’t know they are defaulting at their own hearings, and they often don’t even speak English.

    SH bills passed through gullible legislatures as baby-saving measures. Dumpsters and toilets, oh my! Little thought was given to the consequences, not only on the rights of the adopted, but on the health of pergnant women, new mothers, and their babies. It’s OK to give birth over a toilet or in a motel. Nobody has to know oops. Somebody dies. We never thought of that

    Some leggies held their noses and voted in favor. If they didn’t, they’d be labeled baby killers. When I testified against Ohio’s law in 2000, the sponsor of the bill, who was also the chair of the committee, called me a baby killer and a liar. Last year Erik Smith and I testified against an expansion bill before a Senate committee and were ignored–even when we pointed out that Ohio’s law had already been ruled unconstitutional by a judge in Cuyahoga County.

    Bastard Nation: the adoptee rights organization, which a chair, has been fighting these laws since 2000. Not one single adoption reform organization in the US supports them.

    At least in Illinois you’re dealing with sane people (Save Abandoned Babies Foundation.) In some states crackpots are running the show. They are probably reading this article.

    BTW, I have written a scholarly article on baby dumps and fathers rights. It needs fixed a little and footnoted and it’s ready for publication….someplace.

    Keep on posting about SH atrocities. The public needs to know the truth.

  • Kevin Merck

    A child and its father’s rights begin at the moment of conception, not at the moment a child is found in a dumpster. The fact that neither the child nor the father has any rights, even after the mother has left the child for dead, is testament to the criminal insanity that we have allowed our government to perpetrate against our citizens under color of law.

    Allowing this to happen to children under any circumstances can only be described as diabolical.

    http://www.priestsforlife.org/resources/abortionimages/abort29.jpg

  • http://bastardette.blogspot.com Marley Greiner

    Anti-aborts love legalized baby dumping. It stops abortion, doncha know.






Search