lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Shattering Rampant Abuse Myths

2009-05-11
By

Imagine a world where ideology takes the place of truth and laws are rooted in dubious factoids from nowhere. That pretty much sums up the fact-challenged, hysteria-mongering domestic violence industry that is propped up by $1 billion of federal money each year.

Industry ideologues are loathe to admit the fact, but they truly believe the cause of partner abuse is patriarchal oppression. Not convinced? Just take it on the authority of feminist Gloria Steinem who once made this randy claim, “The patriarchy requires violence or the subliminal threat of violence in order to maintain itself.”

In her now-famous PBS interview, Steinem expounded on her conspiracy-laced worldview: “It starts with the slippery slope of the supposition [of] gender that sexual relations between men and women are dominant-passive… And then it goes all the way up the scale to beatings, torture, [and] murder.” www.pbs.org/kued/nosafeplace/interv/steinem.html

That’s right, share a few tender moments with your romantic heart-throb and next thing you’ll end up a statistic in the newspaper obituaries.

Journalist Philip Cook has recently come out with a book titled Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence. Cook probes the patriarchy-equals-violence theory and concludes it has more holes than a rotted-out rain barrel.

Take lesbian battering, which experts say is more common than heterosexual abuse. Remember Lindsey Lohan coming to blows with her girlfriend in a London nightclub last November? Recall Jessica Kalish of Florida who was stabbed with a screwdriver 200 times by her former female lover? And Raina L. Johnson who last year was sentenced to 28 years behind bars for the shooting of her ex-girlfriend in Washington, DC?

It’s pretty loopy to explain away female-on-female brutality by casting aspersions on the loathsome patriarchy, so it’s easier to pretend such incidents never happen, I guess.

In that same PBS interview, Steinem also made the claim that domestic violence is “the major cause of physical and psychological injury to women.” Everyone knows Steinem is an authority in such matters, so everyone assumed she was telling the truth.

Except for Phil Cook, who decided to trace the origin of the canard.

Back in 1985, advocates Evan Stark and Anne Flitcraft poured through a stack of hospital emergency room records. Without rhyme or reason, they tallied every case of injury as caused by domestic violence, unless the chart specifically said a stranger had caused the harm. When later pressed to explain his unconventional methodology, the best Stark could say was, “maybe domestic violence is the leading cause of injury and maybe it isn’t.”

That’s right, and maybe the moon is made of cheese so the Man in the Moon can have something to eat. Or maybe it isn’t.

But that logic didn’t stop former senator Joseph Biden from becoming a True Believer. “The single greatest danger to a woman’s health is violence from men. Something is sick in our society,” he once admonished. That line of thinking is reflected in the federal Violence Against Women Act that Biden succeeded in passing in 1994.

The DV-as-the-leading-cause-of-injury legend soon became a dependable applause line as President Bill Clinton and senators Olympia Snowe and Ron Wyden joined in the sing-along.

And sure enough, look at the Security and Financial Security Act that Rep. Roybal-Allard of California introduced just a few months ago. Peruse the bill’s findings, and once again you see the lie standing straight and tall: “Violence against women has been reported to be the leading cause of physical injury to women.”

Once such myths are embedded in the national psyche, they become ferociously difficult to remove. Take a Department of Health and Human Services website that once featured the “Domestic Violence is the leading cause of injury to women” claim.

“It took two years, letters from a congressman, and an inquiry from a Senator’s office, plus numerous letters, which mostly went unanswered, for an undersecretary at HHS to finally respond that maybe ‘the’ leading cause was erroneous, but it was ‘a’ leading cause. The truth, of course, is that is was neither,” recounts an exasperated Philip Cook. “Eventually the HHS removed the statement from its Website site but refused to issue a retraction, even after eight years of perpetrating an outrageously false ‘health’ statement.”
Curious to know what are the leading causes of injury to women? Here they are: unintentional falls, car accidents, and overexertion. Domestic violence did not even make the list: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/whusa08/hstat/hi/pages/226i.html

So relax ladies, everything you’ve heard about the “epidemic” of domestic violence is mostly hype calculated to stampede you into divorcing your husband and voting for yet another taxpayer-funded, ideologically-charged abuse reduction program.

145 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://www.stingergirlz.com suzee

    Part II

    Go the Bureau of Justice and do the math on the crime statistics – you're a professor, I'm sure you can handle that. My opinion on the remedy to solve violence against women is for us ladies to get self defense training and buy a personal defense device such as a taser, pepper spray, mace and stun gun. A couple 1,000,000 volts from a Hottie Small Fry will take care of those creeps out there who think they can intimidate women with violence and threats. It's about time that women defend themselves because obviously, people like you do not take violence against women seriously and that it's all a bunch of rubbish. Guess what Professor Roberts, your opinion is a bunch of rubbish. Ladies – go to http://www.stingergirlz.com for more information on how you can stay safe despite the horse crap coming from Carey Roberts.

  • http://www.stingergirlz.com Suzee

    You are right, the statistics on violence against women are incorrect because there are thousands of crimes that are not reported due to the victim's lack of faith in the justice system, being afraid because of retaliation from the abuser or just plain embarrassed. The numbers are actually much higher than what is being reported. Where do YOU get off saying that the epidemic of violence against women is a myth and tell us ladies to "relax" and that it's just another way of getting us to divorce our husbands? You sound like a pompous ass with all of your psyco-analylic mumbo-jumbo.

  • amfortas

    Yes, but…. Why do such myths become so entrenched? Carey, you are a Psych Prof. What's your theory? It is high time someone with the skills and professional knowledge made a sound effort to knit together the strands. Societies being simply a second order, up the chain version of an individual perhaps, and subject to neuroses? Cognitive dissonance cementing attitudes despite behavioural evidence? Is there a biological 'law' that leads inexorably to feminism as just one expression of the way civilisations decay, as was the view of General Sir John Glubb? Is modern feminism and expression of projected guilt by womanhood for all the male deaths of the last few century's wars on their behalf? Or perhaps a resentment at the loss of so many men from the gene pool of several generations that took away motherhood and marriage chances from so many woman and forced them to be responsible for their own livlihood? Is the modern cult of abortion, contraception and the consequent population decline in the west a form of civilisation-suicide brought about by profound disappontment from 'over-reach'?.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search