Comments on: Homosexuality, Fascism and The Pink Swastika: A Rebuttal http://mensnewsdaily.com/2009/06/30/homosexuality-fascism-and-the-pink-swastika-a-rebuttal/ Men's Rights Activism, MRA Politics, Analysis, Commentary and Global News Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:02:46 -1000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: cadbad http://mensnewsdaily.com/2009/06/30/homosexuality-fascism-and-the-pink-swastika-a-rebuttal/comment-page-1/#comment-76248 cadbad Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:46:23 +0000 http://mensnewsdaily.com/?p=86179#comment-76248 I think he did say that not all nazis are homos or all homos are nazis. There is so much amazing information here why do you dismiss it outright on a straw premise? aside from your interpolated causal relationship between gays and fascism, what do you say about the rest of the book? Is he correct in his disposition that many fierce raping pillaging armies were filled with homos? Is he wroong to say the nazi movement was born from the gay rights movement? The problem I have with the book is similar to your view but from a different angle. I think part of the problem is an over zealous religious imposition of morality. The overly zealous punishments and laws and religious retributions served only to create an explosive situation. Why do you ignore all of the rest of the points of the book? do you disagree with the author entirely? Is this book complete and total absolute bs or what are you saying? I think he did say that not all nazis are homos or all homos are nazis. There is so much amazing information here why do you dismiss it outright on a straw premise?

aside from your interpolated causal relationship between gays and fascism, what do you say about the rest of the book?

Is he correct in his disposition that many fierce raping pillaging armies were filled with homos? Is he wroong to say the nazi movement was born from the gay rights movement?

The problem I have with the book is similar to your view but from a different angle. I think part of the problem is an over zealous religious imposition of morality. The overly zealous punishments and laws and religious retributions served only to create an explosive situation.

Why do you ignore all of the rest of the points of the book? do you disagree with the author entirely? Is this book complete and total absolute bs or what are you saying?

]]>