lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Childless Men Jailed for Non-payment of Child Support

2009-07-22
By

Frank Hatley spent the past year in Cook County jail in South Georgia for falling behind in child support payments. However, as the court was aware, he had no children according to court documents. A DNA test even confirmed that there was no chance he was the father.

Walter Sharpe, from Philadelphia, was forced to pay more than $12,000 in child support for another man’s daughter. He spent two years in jail for falling behind in child support payments. Sharpe’s Petitions filed for DNA testing were denied by the judge. However, the paternity order against him was finally overturned after the girl’s mother failed to show up to a court hearing.

Paternity Fraud victims need justice. Our system is broken.

A report issued by the American Association of Blood Banks found that nearly 30 percent of paternity tests conducted in the U.S. reveal that the man being tested is not the biological father. Partially as a result of the availability of DNA paternity testing, thousands of fathers are discovering that “their” child is someone else’s. But, many of these “duped dads” continue to be responsible for the payment of child support or suffer the consequences of jail.

Too many states adhere to an archaic 500-year-old English common-law doctrine that a married man is always legally presumed the father of a child born of the marriage, even if he is not the biological father. Unmarried men can be court ordered to pay child support for children they did not father through default paternity and child support judgments. Such judgments can be court ordered without the alleged father’s knowledge.

Ignoring paternity fraud is not different than ignoring DNA testing showing a convicted murderer wasn’t guilty. It’s time to correct this injustice. Paternity fraud is just as reprehensible as any other kind of fraud from which the public needs protection.

Tony Jackson is a California father who had to work two jobs to pay back approximately $13,000 in back child support for a child proven by DNA testing not to be his. It’s time to release men like Jackson from this blatant injustice.

Opponents of paternity fraud legislation needed to correct this problem say we must prevent “duped dads” from abandoning children that are not theirs biologically. In many cases I’ve seen, the “duped dad” does not want to abandon the child he has come to love as his own. It was the system that drove him off as well as the biological father. For example, in one outrageous case in Texas, the judge ordered a man to pay child support for another man’s three children and cut off his visitation with all of the children.

Who is really hurting the children in cases such as this?

To those who say children will be left unsupported if men are not forced to pay support, I say that the men who should support the children should be the biological fathers. Making men pay child support for children proven by DNA testing not to be theirs is not in the best interests of children and families. It can also deprive children of ever knowing their true biological fathers.

The real fear underlying the arguments of many of the dwindling number of opponents of this legislation is losing a cash cow for agencies and institutions that benefit financially by preserving the status quo. In reality, it has little to do with protecting the interests of children.

States benefit by collecting financial incentive payments from the federal government for child support collected. It is easier for child support agencies to financially squeeze the “duped dad” than to find the biological dad, who may not even know he has a child and would welcome the opportunity to step up to the plate and be Dad.

I encourage all state legislatures to pass fair paternity fraud bills requiring courts to order DNA testing when requested. I also encourage the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the next Paternity Fraud case that comes before it. A correct ruling by the high court would speed justice along for everyone. This is clearly what is right.

Jeffery M. Leving is one of America’s leading family law attorneys. He is the founder of dadsrights.com.

672 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Marsha Cerda

    I can’t agree with you more!! I hate the way men are having their dignity taken. Their lives are being ruined over children that aren’t even theirs. My brother in law has had a $56,000 balance for back child support. Every week they took half of his income then deducted taxes and he recieved what ever was left over to live on. Obviously it wasn’t enough because he was unable to keep his apartment, and now lives with his mother. I just don’t see how ruining these men’s lives are making a difference. Maybe if these sluts kept their legs closed…….. Quit blaming the men!!

    Marsha
    P.S.
    I am married to my husband and we have 2 children together. We all live under the same roof and every week child support payments are taken from my paycheck before i even recieve it. I hate the system!!!

  • Marsha Cerda

    I can’t agree with you more!! I hate the way men are having their dignity taken. Their lives are being ruined over children that aren’t even theirs. My brother in law has had a $56,000 balance for back child support. Every week they took half of his income then deducted taxes and he recieved what ever was left over to live on. Obviously it wasn’t enough because he was unable to keep his apartment, and now lives with his mother. I just don’t see how ruining these men’s lives are making a difference. Maybe if these sluts kept their legs closed…….. Quit blaming the men!!

    Marsha
    P.S.
    I am married to my husband and we have 2 children together. We all live under the same roof and every week child support payments are taken from my paycheck before i even recieve it. I hate the system!!!

  • Vince T

    How about the fact that a woman has lived a lie with her “man” for all the years he helped raise “her” child. Does he even want to have anything to do with her anymore. This seems to be the ultimate cuckhold. Modern thought says that we should get with the times(modern science) and change our way of thinking. Why not when it comes to DNA testing. We have to keep making men, who have been deceived, pay for the rest of their lives. How can anyone really believe this. 30% of DNA testing results in a negative rating. Outrageous!!!

  • Kevin Merck

    “The real fear underlying the arguments of many of the dwindling number of opponents of this legislation is losing a cash cow for agencies and institutions that benefit financially by preserving the status quo. In reality, it has little to do with protecting the interests of children.”

    Thanks for telling it like it is. Our system is defiantly broken and the “best interests of children” pretence is a heinous lie. It’s nice to hear you say that.

    The payment of federal dollars for the collection of child support, and a total lack of accountability on the part of lawmakers, is what fuel the worst civil rights violation since slavery.

    However, the injustice doesn’t end with paternity fraud.

    Men need to have the same options as women when it comes to decisions about parenting. If women are to retain their right to give a child up for adoption, then men must have the same option. The practice of illegally forcing paternity on men; while offering women several options to avoid responsibility, (including legally murdering the child) needs to stop. Men also need to have equal custody after divorce.

    Ultimately, the criminals running our Family Courts need to be brought to justice. We cannot allow this type of injustice to go unpunished. There is no reason for this except profiteering. It’s a criminal racket, and the criminals need to pay dearly, for all the pain and suffering of the victims.

  • Barry

    This man was jailed because of the Bradley Amendment. Our useless elected officials came up with this amendment.

    The Bradley Amendment also forbids judicial consideration of a person’s clear inability to pay. In Frank Hatley’s case, he paid $6,000 he did not owe before being laid off from his job of unloading charcoal grills from shipping containers. Although he ended up living in his car, he made another $3,500 of payments from his Unemployment Insurance.

    Neither Republican nor Democratic Administrations have proposed to repeal the patently unjust Bradley Amendment. Why? The $28 billion collected from largely non-resident fathers, reimbursed the government for $24 billion of its cost of welfare payments to mothers.

  • Jimmy

    The lawmakers need to write legislation that states that any woman who gives birth to a child, and knows without a doubt that she had sex with more than one man around the time of conception, and makes a definitive claim that one man is the father, and it is proven later that he is in fact not the father, then she will be, not could be, but WILL BE guilty of fraud.

    This practice of ruining mens lives has got to stop, and the women perpetrating this ruin need to be the one’s held accountable. Not the man that isn’t the father of the child.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search