lumigan tramadol tadalafil

DNA Test All Newborns

2009-09-04
By

We’ve all heard jokes where the punch-line informs us that the mailman, and not the husband of the mother, is the biological father. “Mailman jokes” are harmless for the most part, and often give us a good laugh. However, it is no coincidence that these jokes exist to the extent that they do.

Women have always known for sure that the children they raise are their own; maternity never needs to be doubted, even in the most primitive of societies. Paternity, on the other hand, has always been something that men have doubted, consciously or unconsciously. In the absence of reliable scientific testing, how is a man to know for sure whether he is really the father of a certain child?

How Legal Paternity Arose

When human beings started to become more civilized, and traditional societies replaced the chaos of warring tribes, marriage became a cornerstone of society. A key reason for promoting marriage and monogamy was to ensure that each child had a father who would be legally bound to support that child no matter what the circumstances.

In most Western countries, legislators went as far as proclaiming that the father of the child was the husband of the mother, regardless of whether the husband was actually the biological father. These laws stay with us until the present day, meaning that it can be very difficult for a married man to challenge paternity, even when you have a DNA test that proves you cannot possibly be the father!

In my opinion these paternity laws, though valid and needed at one point in time, are quickly becoming outdated in modern and postmodern societies. Far from all couples get married these days, and both sexes pursue the kind of sexual freedom that easily leads to “the wrong man” becoming the father of a child. Being married is no longer a sufficient criterion to determine who the father is, or who should be assigned the rights and responsibilities of fatherhood.

An Active Father Is a Good Thing

We have always known who the mother of a child is, this is considered normal and natural for obvious biological reasons. Throughout history however, it has been impossible for men to have the same kind of certainty around paternity, for purely biological reasons. However, the seeming destiny of men to always be uncertain about whether they are really the father changed more than a decade ago, with the advent of DNA testing.

DNA testing is a cheap and readily available tool that can be used to quickly, and with pretty much complete certainty, establish who the father of a child is. Now that such a method exists, wouldn’t it be great to have all uncertainty around paternity be removed?

If we want men to be good fathers, do not men deserve to be 100 percent sure that they are pouring out their hearts and souls to raise their own child, and not another man’s child? I’m not saying that you cannot love a non-biological child just as much (eg an adopted child), but I do think that every individual deserves to know the truth, before deciding whether to help raise a child or not.

Children would benefit substantially from having maternity and paternity be established from the start, since there would be no doubt who the two adults responsible for the child’s welfare were. DNA testing would also increase the likelihood of the man stepping into the role of father, and should he choose to avoid this, it would be easier to enforce child support.

Caring About Men’s Rights

DNA testing all children would also do away with a system where many men unknowingly raise children that aren’t their own, and where men are forced to pay child support for children that other men have fathered.

1.9 to 3.3 percent of men with high paternity confidence aren’t really the father of their child, and the figure for men with low paternity confidence is a whopping 29.8 percent (source).

Sexual Accountability

Knowing that all newborns undergo DNA testing would force men and women alike to act more responsibly when having a sexual relationship. A man having an affair would have to consider whether he wants to risk being named as the father of a child outside of his family. A woman having an affair would risk becoming pregnant with another man’s child, and having her husband find out about this once the DNA testing is done.

I have no desire to limit each individual’s right to his or her own sexuality. But every right and every freedom comes with a responsibility too, and DNA testing all children would indirectly force every adult to be accountable and accept the consequences of his or her actions.

However, the primary reason I advocate DNA testing is not to enforce sexual accountability. The reasons I want to see this happen are two-fold:

  • Children are much better off knowing who their parents are. If a false paternity is uncovered at some point in a child’s life, then the stability of that child’s life will be uprooted.
  • DNA testing would give men the peace of mind that women have always had. If we want men to have certain responsibilitites, then we have to match those responsibilities with rights; in this case the right to know for certain that the child you are investing in emotionally and financially is yours.

Pelle Billing is an M.D. who writes and lectures about gender liberation beyond feminism.

1,174 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Snuffy Smiff

    Hey, you’ll put Jerry Springer out of buisness with that policy. He makes a good living helping loose women figure out which one of the several men they boinked are the actual father of their child.

  • Trust

    I think the “best interest of ____” is often an unintended consequence in and of itself. It can make any entity into Robin Hood for another. It is the logic that has given us the welfare state and the family court system that continues to destroy the family.

    It is true that it is in the best interest of a child if a quality husband never knows that he is not the biological father, and that a drunk and high unemployed bad boy is.

    It is also true that it is best for the child if the mother does not abort (feminists never argue this truth), even in the rare case the mother might die (as opposed to the child certainly dying).

    The real reason we should DNA test newborns is that this is supposed to be a free country, people should not be forced by the government to sacrifice for someone else for no reason, especially when it is due to someone else’s sin against them (not sin in the religious sense).

    Men should enjoy the same reproductive freedom that women enjoy. That means if they did not conceive the child, they should have no obligation to it unless they adopt it. No one would dream of having a wife pay child support to their ex husband and his girlfriend for a child conceived outside of the marriage. They woudln’t even expect her, if wealthier, to pay alimony while he shacked up jobless with his mistress and their offspring. Why should men?

    In a free country, people are not mandated to do the right thing. We punish them for the doing wrong thing, but we should not punish them because their wife got pregnant by another man. No matter how much better it is for the child.

    And here is an unintended consequence for you… due to the landscape of the family courts, there are far more illegitimate children and children living in divorced homes than there would be if we did it fair.

    The end does not justify the means. And that means often has a worse end.

  • Amfortas

    You have a point, Virtue. But there are always consequences unknown at the time and the intended consequences more often than not outweigh them. While some problems may arise with quarantining the information from misuse by such as the FBI or police, the ‘cure’ of many injustices would result nonetheless.

  • Virtue

    Watch out for the law of unintended consequences…….the FBI would LOVE to have a national DNA database and they would find an excuse to get the DNA information from mandatory DNA testing at birth.

  • http://www.pellebilling.com Pelle Billing

    Amfortas: Good point about genetic history. The importance of knowing your genetic history will increase as medicine advances.

    Harry: Thanks :)

    daveinga: Yes, the argument for DNA testing all children could be made even without addressing men’s rights. It’s far better for the child to know who the parents are, for a number of reasons.

  • daveinga

    we all constantly hear the excuse that all the one sided custody, c.s., and many other laws are “for the best interests of the child’. however, for a child, and entire families, to be lied to about paternity harms a child in all the ways listed herein, and probably many more. feminists have fought this testing of all children for years for one reason, they care more about what women want than what is best for children. typical. just one more way they get men to do their bidding, while playing them for chumps. and you are right, these type dishonest manipulative people don’t need to get custody of children after divorce, if it can be helped.

  • http://www.angryharry.com Harry

    Brilliant article.

  • Amfortas

    All good and rational reasons, Pelle. This is the ‘Information Age’ we are told, and this is human information that everyone has a perfect and natural right to.

    One aspect you didn’t mention – genetic history. As an MD you will be more aware than most that sound knowledge of the genetic heritage a person (child) has may save its life. Everyone has a ‘right’ not to have that knowledge witheld or buggered up by one person’s (mother’s) intransigence.

    But on the gender issue we can also forget that while mistakes can sometimes be made, many if not most false attributions are deliberate, which means the child’s mother is morally unsound – a liar and a fraudster – and it is not in the child’s best interest to be raised by such a person.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search