A Plea to the President to Attend Church

Wednesday, September 16, 2009
By Dr. Gary Scott Smith

Dear Mr. President,

Remember all the analysis immediately after your election this past November regarding where you and your family would attend church? Newspapers and websites were filled with stories about where you would go, and numerous congregations in Washington invited you, your wife, and children to attend their Sunday morning services. Although Americans have usually displayed substantial interest in where their presidents attended church while in office, never before had there been such fascination with this issue before a president was inaugurated. At present, this focus seems ironic because you and your family have attended church in Washington only once—on Easter Sunday—since you took office (although you have attended a few services at Camp David).

Americans acknowledge that you are a very busy man with incredibly important responsibilities. We also recognize the typical reasons some of your predecessors have given for not attending church regularly and you have sometimes used: they did not want to divert other worshippers’ attention from God to themselves, they did not want to subject other congregants to metal detectors and security concerns, they found it difficult to worship when others appeared to being watching them, or they wanted to use Sunday morning for other activities such as golf or stamp collecting. However, these reasons have not deterred several of your recent predecessors, and the benefits of attending more than compensate for the problems they involve.

As you know, attending Sunday morning worship enables you to worship God, which for Christians is both a responsibility and privilege. These services help supply you with moral inspiration and spiritual strength, which are vital to your work as president. Attending habitually will also enable your wife and children to receive biblical instruction and Christian nurture. You have repeatedly claimed that your faith is important to you and helps guide your political priorities, policies, and work. You have frequently used religious rhetoric and scriptural principles and passages to support legislation you are promoting. You have also sought to enlist clergy, committed lay Christians, and religious organizations to work to achieve causes in which you believe strongly. Moreover, attending church faithfully would testify to your professed values and help you gain greater credibility with religious Americans.

Equally important, your regular attendance would set a good example for our nation. In other ways your actions have been exemplary. Through White House initiatives, commercials, and magazine interviews you have exhorted men to be good fathers and spend time with their children. Addressing the NAACP this summer, you challenged African Americans not to accept the sense of limitation that discrimination has tried to force upon them and to stop expecting “so little from the world and from themselves.” You instructed parents to take responsibility for their children, help them learn, and encourage them to aspire to be scientists, engineers, doctors, and teachers rather than athletes and rappers. Your recent speech to schoolchildren urged them to develop their “talents, skills and intellect,” set high goals, work hard, and persevere when they fail. You pushed them to do all their homework, pay attention in class, and read a book every day.

As our nation’s first African-American president, you obviously care about being a positive role model. You often use your own experiences, struggles, and accomplishments to prod and inspire others. You invite others to look at your life as an example. Thus, it is especially important to support your profession of Christian faith by fellowshipping and worshipping with other believers.

Before your inauguration, a reporter asked me if you might choose not to attend church. I responded that this was very unlikely because you frequently claimed that your faith is genuine and that you derived insight and direction from worship and prayer. Moreover, you appeared to want to provide a church home and experience for your family. I added that your desire to set a good example and maintain positive relations with religious conservatives, many of whom criticize your positions on various moral and political issues, also made your regular church attendance likely. So far, Mr. President, I have been wrong.

Many of your predecessors attended church faithfully, including several (most notably George Washington and Dwight Eisenhower) who went only sporadically before taking office. They did so in large part to help them deal more effectively with the burdens of their role, gain spiritual strength, and supply a positive example.

In an ABC interview in January, you said, “I’ve got a wonderful community of people who are praying for me every day … but it’s not the same as going to church” and hearing a choral anthem and “a good sermon.” One excellent way to demonstrate your Christian commitment, which some Americans question, and provide spiritual nurture for yourself and for your family, is to attend church consistently.

Sincerely,

Gary Scott Smith

Dr. Gary Scott Smith chairs the history department at Grove City College and is author of “Faith and the Presidency: From George Washington to George W. Bush” (Oxford University Press, 2009). He is also a fellow for faith and the presidency with The Center for Vision & Values.

| More from Dr. Gary Scott Smith

Stumble It!

Share/Save/Bookmark

How to survive the coming food shortage.

5 Responses to “A Plea to the President to Attend Church”

  1. 1
    Tarrou Says:

    Yeah, thats what we need, not only a socialist who is packing his government with idiot conspiracy-mongers and crackpot social theorists, but one who reliably demonstrates his further irrational belief in an invisible, ephemeral power. If this is the best option you have to correct the president’s current course, you, my dear sir, fail.

  2. 2
    Sean McCabe Says:

    That’s it. I’m deleting MND from my Bookmarks immediately. It’s about time you people understood that there are PLENTY of conservatives and freedom fighters that want NOTHING to do with religion, and want more than many other things SEPERATION of church from state. America is no more a “Christian” nation than Canada is a duck nation, and I certainly can’t wait for an atheist president, or even a congressman who is willing to admit to being a free thinker.
    I started reading this site daily a month ago, and I have come to the realization that the Republican party has indeed been hijacked by the pious, ignorant, the “them against us” inciters that are sure to be the ruin of this country for the rest of us.
    Small government, few laws, and NO RELIGION will make America great again!

  3. 3
    Amfortas Says:

    The President has a huge variety of ‘Churches’ that he can chose from to attend. Most have a common denomination – undercut the One Church.

    A great fighter for Men’s Rights – as well as Family rights and Children’s rights and Women’s rights – is Dr Jennifer Morse. She writes in her recent newsletter, thus:

    Caritas in Veritate: The Truth about Humanity

    by Jennifer Roback Morse
    (Note: There is a very lively discussion going on at the Acton.org blog over this article. Check it out!)

    Many commentators read Pope Benedict XVI’s Caritas in Veritate as if it were a think tank white paper, and ask whether he endorses their particular policy preferences. It is a mistake to read the encyclical in this way. A close look at the document’s introduction makes plain that Benedict is not a man of the Left or of the Right: He is a non-ideological man of God.

    The opening sentence soars above any political platform: “Charity in truth, to which Jesus Christ bore witness by his earthly life and especially by his death and resurrection, is the principal force behind authentic development of every person and of all humanity.”

    This is our first clue that we are not dealing with a technocrat or ideologue. “Authentic development” points away from the deliberations of politicians and policy wonks.

    Benedict does not define his objectives in material terms, such as maximizing GDP. Neither does he conduct focus groups or consult experts to figure out what people want. Rather in this encyclical, Benedict reflects on what it means to be authentically human and what the human good actually entails. That is to say, he seeks the truth about man in society.

    Some readers will no doubt assume that it is hubris to believe that one can know Truth with a capital “T.” Others may fear that Benedict will somehow impose his “ideology” on the rest of the world. Now, how a city state a few miles across, defended by a handful of guys with medieval weapons is going to impose its will on anyone is beyond my imagining, but put that to one side. Truth has taken such a beating in our time that our contemporaries routinely flinch at its mere mention.

    But Benedict is not now, nor has he ever been, afraid of the concept of truth. He is not intimidated by postmodern doubts. He knows where the truth is to be found.
    …………………………..

    But does the US President care a jot about Truth? One can get the measure of a man by the company he keeps.

    He doesn’t measure up.

  4. 4
    Mike LaSalle Says:

    For Sean (#2):

    MND has a long history of acknowledging the importance of religion in the decision-making process of billions of human beings across the globe. To ignore these adherents — to ignore their assumptions, ideals and POV — would be a gross denial of the fact.

    The pressure and tendency among publishers now — following Richard Dawkins’ strategy to belittle religion as an anthropological anomaly — is to ignore it out of the mainstream.

    I see this as a conscious attempt to conflate the range of human ideations to a controllable range of acceptable thoughts.

    For this reason MND will never bow to any demand to remove religiously themed articles from this publication. Religion is a legitimate topic, and cultural opinions shaped by religion are likewise permitted.

    This publication supports freedom of religion — even the freedom to believe in Mindless Randomness if that is your affinity.

    But MND does not support the supremacy of professor Dawkins’ Atheist Meme.

  5. 5
    Laura Says:

    I think you should go get busy in your own churches and quit worrying about everyone else. Spend your wasted time praying for Obama and doing your part to make a difference, not criticizing him.

Leave a Reply

International Mens Day and Fathers Day in Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden

Search MND

Introducing MRm: A New Men's Rights Magazine in PDF format

Download PDF Here

Support Our Sponsors!

Please support MND

Subscribe today:

SUSTAINER: $5/mo.


CONTRIBUTOR: $20/mo.


SUPPORTER: $50/mo.


Or Donate Any Amount

Archives

privacy policy | terms of service


Site Meter

MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache!