Nancy Pelosi Woosies Back on Political Violence
Barack Obama and the Democrats took the country by storm in January – really they did. They and their large following issued statements about their power over others, threw hundreds of billions in public money out windows to friends, signed support organizations up for special powers and public funding, completed and announced further plans for government take-overs of every segment of the economy (going so far as to dictate new terms of existing private contracts and systematically breaking them), new programs that would bankrupt citizens through high taxes and consumer prices and deal a death blow to capitalism through direct intervention.
A group of real-life made for low-budget TV mini-series type crooks and commies were brought in to run things and plans were unveiled to start a Hitler Youth type organization to force children into the hive. Opposition immediately got their labels: “far-right,” “extremists,” “racists,” and “Republicans” among others, and before long the intimidation campaign began.
The most shocking came via misuse of the FBI for political purposes. In April, with no analysis or data available, the agency under Obama’s command issued an “assessment” entitled “Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” It wasn’t particularly subtle. If you support Constitutional rule – the rule of law – over Obama’s authoritarian reign, you will be on the government’s domestic terrorist list. Any organization promoting Constitutional rule is considered a terrorist organization. It was a threat to put-down political opposition with violence, supported by announced plans to build a separate national army under Obama’s command to be used domestically.
In recent weeks, intimidation tactics have become slightly more subtle – aimed at gently turning tender psyches more effectively than with blatant threats. For example, the left has been quite concerned lately over a White House decision to archive comments from their interactive Facebook page. Regardless of who mentioned it first, yes, I said the left – the Barack Obama and the Democrats can do no wrong subservient left – very concerned. They’re afraid that anyone leaving a critical comment at the Facebook site might face political repercussions. Well, anyone who writes a critical comment in a public forum likely wants their criticism read. It would take a real tin-head (if they think about it) to believe their comments will seem more interesting to a computer archive than the human who was supposed to read it in the first place. The message isn’t one given out of concern for Facebook users. The message is – hey, if you’re considering criticizing the president on Facebook (or anywhere else for that matter) – worry about repercussions from the crazy crooks and commies in the White House. Given that you could be classified as a domestic terrorist, it could get pretty rough.
But this whole sabre rattling, machete swinging, shoe-banging, brain-washing, and forcing “change” that Americans oppose thing seems to be making the Democrats’ first madam of the House, Nancy Pelosi, a bit nervous. She hasn’t actually seen violence from their opposition yet, but she knows it can happen. She’s seen her clan of “moderate humanist caring liberals” from the San Francisco area turn violent at the drop of a hat.
Choking back tears, she generously shared her wisdom to council the news media to spread fear about the hordes of middle- and retirement-aged folks who’s lives they plan to destroy. She and other Democrats have seen rude signs here and there, and rudeness isn’t polite. She supports freedom of speech because it makes our country great, but thinks the opposition should “curb their enthusiasm.” She fears that “the ears it is falling on are not as balanced as the person making the statement might assume.” Is she really expecting to get re-elected in San Francisco after calling them loonies?
Her statement ends by assigning “responsibility” for any violence that occurs to the political opposition; falling not particularly distant from the fake FBI assessment’s ideas about domestic terrorist organizations. Except, apparently there’s no need for protesters to intend any violence themselves or engage in any type of organized recruiting for that or any other purpose. You’re still a potential domestic terrorist just for saying what you think.
Link to video on YouTube
| More from Roger F. Gay
Stumble It!
September 18th, 2009 at 5:51 am
“You’re still a potential domestic terrorist just for saying what you think.”
The new legislation in Australia declared anyone who ‘forwards a political agenda’ a ‘terrorist’. This would, of course, include all existing politicians…which would actually be right given that the guvment organised the Port Arthur Massacre.
September 18th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
@ Globalman: “…given that the guvment organised the Port Arthur Massacre.”
The Govment HAD to ‘coz it was demanded by the Democrats to let the GST through and Meg Lees had a day out at Port Arthure ruined by rain. I have a mate whose wife’s cousin’s girlfriend was on this chat-room one day and overheard it from two woman in FNQ who were talking in an Aboriginal language. Tony Abbot was against it, apparantly.
September 19th, 2009 at 1:47 am
Author: Amfortas
“The Govment HAD to ‘coz it was demanded by the Democrats to let the GST through”
Amfortas, the evidence that the government sponsored the port arthur massacre is solid. Why would you make what appears to be a sarcastic remark on a topic so serious as government sponsored mass murder? Please correct me if you intended it to be serious. We are talking about very serious issues.
Everyone who checks it out comes to the same conclusion. The assissinations were done by someone who was elite military. Experts agree very likely above SAS level training. People who have been in the miliary for many years have made that statement. They all say words to the effect ‘no normal military trained person could have committed Port Arthur. The skill level demonstrated was too high.’
A little further tidbit is that while Martin Bryant was on the phone to the police and the police were talking to him rifle shots can be heard in the background. There was a second shooter. This evidence was widely circulated on radio and TV before being shut down by the guvment. No-one denies that evidence. The government coverup of the whole thing is so amateurish that any idiot with 2 hours to spare can read through the evidence and realise Martin Bryant is a patsy. Only thing is, most people would prefer to read their newspaper than read something true for two hours.
Oh…and did you know the tasmanian government bought a refrigerated vehicle to transport 20 bodies six months prior to port arthur when the murder rate was about one person per year? Then sold it as soon as PA was over. What an ‘amazing co-incidence’ that the guvment knew it was going to need to transport a whole lot of bodies. I guess you didn’t know that. But I am sure it’s just one of those funny co-incidences. Like all the comments from Barry Unsworth on ‘We will not get gun control laws in Australia until we have something like a massacre in Tasmania’. Gee, Barry was clarevoyant? What another ‘amazing co-incidence’.
There is a mountain of evidence that the guvment did Port Arthur. I was pretty pissed off when I read it. A good friend of mine died there that day. The purpose of Port Arthur was to take the guns off the people in Australia. I think you might want to put sarcastic comments aside when refering to government sponsored mass murder like Port Arthur, Bali, 911, London and Madrid.
September 19th, 2009 at 5:14 am
[...] Nancy Pelosi and the Psychology of Hate 2009 September 19 tags: Leftist Wimps, Pelosi by Mark Epstein A group of real-life made for low-budget TV mini-series type crooks and commies were brought in to run things and plans were unveiled to start a Hitler Youth type organization to force children into the hive. Opposition immediately got their labels: “far-right,” “extremists,” “racists,” and “Republicans” among others, and before long the intimidation campaign began….If you support Constitutional rule – the rule of law – over Obama’s authoritarian reign, you will be on the government’s domestic terrorist list. from Nancy Pelosi Woosies Back on Political Violence [...]