The lamestream media told you:
“The White House says president Barack Obama’s adviser Van Jones is resigning amid controversy over past inflammatory statements… including comments about Republicans… Jones issued an apology Thursday… White House press secretary Robert Gibbs would say only that Jones, ‘continues to work in the administration’.”
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
Self-avowed communist Van Jones, selected by Mr. Obama to be a government czar, has been forced from office by public outcry, proving the crucial principle once again that the public, when sufficiently aroused, can force its will even on the federal government.
Jones reportedly had not passed FBI background checks because he was subjected to them, even though communists are the arch enemy of every good thing America represents. The reasons for the reported absence of a vetting process could not be determined at press time.
The controversy over this Obama-appointed communist raged for weeks on the internet, free radio broadcasts and in person-to-person conversations nationwide. Lamestream reports of the growing political disaster for Mr. Obama were less robust, with independent research from a Nexis search prior to the dismissal showing:
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the New York Times: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy in the Washington Post: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on NBC Nightly News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on ABC World News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CBS Evening News: 0.
Total words about the Van Jones controversy on CNN: 0
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/bios/byron-york.html
Perhaps the biggest story in this story is why or how the pillars of the “news” business could so thoroughly suppress a story of such tremendous signficance. It makes you wonder what else they suppress, if a communist eagerly embraced by the administration is completely blacked out.
The Washington Post published a story after the mierda hit the fan, “White House Says Little on Embattled Jones,” on page A-3 of its Saturday edition. Other reports immediately after the fact remained abysmal, with the New York Times maintaining silence on the story, along with ABC’s “World News” and “NBC Nightly News” for a period too long to qualify as “good journalism.” And they wonder why their credibility is in cinders.
