lumigan tramadol tadalafil

West Virginia Hands Family Services a Resounding Defeat

2009-10-07
By

It’s long overdue. In an October 2nd ruling, the honorable Judge Stucky handed the Family Services Board of West Virginia a resounding defeat, often citing gender bias and lack of science to their approach, quoting “a substantial chilling effect of suppressing their members expression of speech, thoughts and ideas relative to domestic violence by depriving them “even of the opportunity to obtain certified services”. This often included preconceived untruths promulgated by the falsehoods of the domestic violence “experts” within these services. It also found that services  “excluded Men and adolescent males from their statutory right to safety and security free from domestic violence for no other reason than their gender”.

The ruling can be viewed here.

The ruling has an effect upon the funding of the Family Services division, which has been practicing these gender biased policies outside of state mandated authority and, until recently, control. It further stated that these state mandated policies have been undermined by the determined efforts and gender biased policies of Family Services, which has been operating in an out-of-control fashion since its inception. This decision is long overdue and highlights what is happening across this great country of ours. Fundamental rights have been usurped by the practices of these agencies and o unchecked on a daily basis. MAWAD (Men and Women Against Discrimination) has shown us the way with their leadership and has done what is necessary here. And that is by challenging these laws in court. We have already shown the more than abundant evidence through the practices of these agencies, who think they are above the law, until now. Rules set forth by these state agencies, as found by this court “often exceed the authority granted to them”. One example of this is the setting of standards off licensed facilities to private Coalitions, which in turn, excludes any person who does not adhere to their gender biased agenda. This also excludes them from funding and insures that only those who adhere to their belief system, and their belief system only, receive funds. This would include groups that are staffed by the most prominent professional in the field of domestic violence, who are often attacked by these coalitions for their scientific and CLINICAL approach, which includes data that is excluded from ever making it to policies that are created these gender-biased laws in the first place.

This is how these coalitions defeat the opposition and institute their “truth” via gender biased “statistics” to gain “credibility”.

This has stopped in West Virginia for now, and will hopefully happen soon elsewhere where these laws are not being used as intended, and instead, are being used as weapons against men and boys. In the mean time, true victims of domestic violence are being denied services due to these abhorrent practices, because they do not subscribe to a preset agenda that usurps their constitutional rights as citizens.

Hats off to MAWAD for their positive actions, which have resulted in positive results for victims of domestic violence. They, along with the White House, realize that these laws are failing. Please visit MAWAD’s website and support them. Drop The American Coalition For Fathers And Children a line here and let them, know what you think of their efforts here as it is related to this decision. They should be both applauded and rewarded with YOUR donation dollars, as well as funding money meant for true support for domestic violence victims.
WADVPress

http://wadvpress.org

595 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Pingback: A Letter to Jennifer Kaplan of the Office on Violence Against Women | MND: Your Daily Dose of Counter-Theory

  • Pingback: How DV Coalitions Usurp The Law

  • Mr.K

    Glenn Sacks,
    Did you see this feminist post against you about the Calfornia ruling?You deserve accolades, not feminist slurs. Link
    http://www.womanist-musings.com/2008/11/mehnz-love-womens-spaces-beware-mra.html

  • Mr.K

    @ Calfornia Guy,
    Even though Google found a post on MND about Woods v Shewry, it had no explanation, only PDF link to about 33 pages of small print.
    But apparently the feminist have noticed. In their post the critics belittle the ruling. Your post indicate that feminist have not taken concrete measures to comply with the court order. Since the plaintiffs’ had to have good lawyers in order to win a difficult case, could not they file a contempt of court order against the defendants?
    Link to feminist reaction.
    http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/11/18/woods-v-shewry-california-court-bans-public-funding-of-women-only-domestic-violence-services/

  • Bob

    It is only a matter of time before other states follow in West Virginia and California’s footsteps. Before long men will be receiving these services and better and more accurate data will be collected from them. Then the public will know what very few have known all along: that women are just as prone to violent and abusive behavior as men and to paint men as the sole perpetrators of domestic violence is just nothing but hates speech.
    Feminists are not going to take kindly to this and I anticipate that there will be some trouble coming from them. There is a well documented history of violent behavior coming from feminists when it comes to this particular issue. The truth threatens their view of reality and that scares them very much.

  • CaliforniaGuy

    Our local shelter here in Northern California, apparently in response to Woods v. Shewry, appears to be doing nothing more than adding a module to their offender program for men (“education on the feminist perspective on domestic violence, role of patriarchy, anger management and men’s attitudes and behavior about control and power that lead to abuse of women.”) so that men who are “victims” of DV can explore how their behavior co-created the violence they experienced.

    We still have a long way to go.

  • http://wadvpress.org John Lucas

    Hear, hear, Julie.

    On a side note, I called around to different shelters in WV today to ask if they had any mandated changes ome down from this decision. 8 of the 10 people that I called (including board, coalition and shelter office managers), weren’t there to handle my requests. Of those that were there, none knew of any changes and one office manager let me know that this decision was just given to her today, meaning that none of them knew what was going on. No changes have been mandated as of yet and there are currently no plans for appeal that I know of. I’ll be speaking with them again next week, seeing that they just received information of this today.

    I already know of the transcripts of the depositions that were taken during this process, and frankly some of the board’s answers were shocking.

    I plan on following up on this to see what actions will be taken from this point forward.

    John Lukas
    WADVPress
    http://wadvpress.org

  • julie

    Excellent news!

    Here is another group doing similar to change things.

    Respect has run the Men’s Advice Line since the end of 2006. It is available in England and Wales but we don’t reject callers from Scotland and Northern Ireland. The group regularly give presentations, speak at conferences and give interviews on male victims of domestic violence and the work we do on the helpline. We recently published a booklet for male victims, which, to the best of my knowledge, is the only one of its kind in the UK. You can download it through this webpage: http://www.mensadviceline.org.uk/pages/subpage1.html .

    This website was re-designed recently to make it more user friendly for male victims. We also extended the opening hours of the Men’s Advice Line from 16 to 30 a week, we have a dedicated email service attached to the helpline and people call us on a freephone number. We speak to a lot of professionals too, who need advice and training and for that purpose we developed a toolkit for work with male victims. This will be uploaded on our website soon, meanwhile you can see the contents page here:
    http://www.mensadviceline.org.uk/pages/screening-tool.html .

    The Men’s Advice Line was accredited with the Quality Standard by The Helplines Association last year.

  • Amfortas

    By the Lord Harry, we need some WINS like this.

    Spread the good news around.

  • http://wadvpress.org John Lucas

    They’re (MAWAD) hoping for an appeal, as the evidence was so overwhelming in this case that they would make themselves look bad if they even tried. This case was judged by a summary judge who stomped out all hopes of an appeal with his resounding decision. They have 4 months to decide, but it would be suicide for them if they even tried.

    I’ll soon be obtaining the depositions from the Family Services coalition and it is indeed damning. I want to get this info out there ASAP. You’ll see why from their answers that an appeal would be futile.

    John Lukas
    WADVPress
    http://wadvpress.org

  • Mr.K

    @ John Lucas
    Good opinion by a judge who believes in the rule of law (not the court of public opinion or trial in the media)
    I tried to scan the PDF fromat for defense lawyers but couln’t find them. Since at issue was a statute of West Virginia, was it defended by WV Attorney General and do they plan to appeal?
    The defendants tried the ususal legal ruse of “lack of standing”, but the fair judge ruled how can one apply for services since they are not provided.
    In this case a federal judge ruled unconstitutional a requirement to vote for equal number for men and women. A clear violation of 5th, 14th and 19th Amendments, But the appellate court reversed. This so called “50 % gender quota” is the feminist power base in the Democratic Party. Link
    http://openjurist.org/836/f2d/837/bachur-v-democratic-national-party

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    More than a glimmer, I’d say. In MRA terms this is historical. It is the first two major court decisions against feminist driven, misandric application of bad science and propaganda in the public at large.

    It is a public, LEGAL acknowledgement that domestic violence is not what the DV industry has been concerned with and that the industry itself needs deconstruction and reassembly to be made right. It is the essential proof that what MRA’s have been saying is correct and has been all along.

    It may not be enough, but it is also ammunition for those seeking to block VAWA reauthorization in 2010.

    I cannot think of a more auspicious way to acknowledge and celebrate Domestic Abuse Awareness Month than this great court decision.

  • John Lucas

    Yes, they do, Teri. And thanks for stopping by to check us out!

    John

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-15873-Family-Rights-Examiner Teri Stoddard

    First a win in Sacramento, CA, and now this. Finally… our boys have a glimmer of hope for their future.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search