lumigan tramadol tadalafil

2010: Not The Time For “Faux Conservatism”

2009-10-15
By

Our nation is coming apart at the seams, and Barack Obama is proving to be absolutely inept, or worse, at dealing with the situation. Instead of honestly assessing things and advancing solutions conceived in the best interests of the American people, he presses mindlessly forward with his ultra-liberal agenda, ignoring or deriding those who make any effort to forestall his destruction of the great institutions of this country. In league with him are the leading players of the Congress, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D.-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D.-CA), both of whom have exhibited a vile degree of contempt for real America, and both of whom are pivotal figures in next year’s elections.

Reid, as a four-term incumbent and currently the most powerful member of the United States Senate, faces an uphill battle next year, currently trailing in double digits behind potential Republican challengers. And while Pelosi, despite her deranged political philosophy, is secure in her equally disturbed California congressional district, the fringe-left Speaker of the House has become a paragon of everything grassroots America reviles and hopes to expunge from this thoroughly corrupted and perverse government.

In many respects, 2010 is shaping up to be a pivotal juncture in the course of the nation. The intense anger and outrage expressed at the massive “tea party” gatherings throughout 2009 are likely to metamorphose into decidedly anti-liberal voting patterns next year on election day, which could likewise translate into major gains for the Republican Party. However, such a scenario is by no means secure. And as usual, within the GOP are forces that, if allowed to act unchecked, may yet sabotage the entire situation.

Democrats are on the ropes. So once again, those vaunted Republican “moderates” are attempting to come to their rescue. Whether motivated by stupidity, cowardice, or an underhanded intention to ensure that liberalism ultimately prevails in America, the usual suspects, while identifying themselves as Republicans, are giving aid and comfort to the left, at the ultimate expense of their supposed colleagues on the right. It is high time that their duplicity be exposed and underscored, so that their malevolent impact on conservatism can be finally neutralized.

At a critical milestone in the Democrat attempt to implement a government takeover of America’s healthcare industry, Senator Olympia Snowe (R.-ME) came out in support of the measure in the Senate Finance Committee. Thus she provides the bogus fig leaf of “bipartisanship” that Democrats so fervently desire.

Elsewhere, “Republican” forces are working hard to counteract the enormous influence of Christian and pro-life conservatives in the Party. Somehow, despite the mountains of historical evidence to the contrary, those morally rudderless pragmatists believe this would be a great boon to Republican electoral fortunes, doggedly refusing to accept that by remaking the party according to their “centrist” philosophies, they would ensure the abandonment of the party by enormous numbers of true conservatives.

Thus, their efforts continue. And in them the real animus towards Sarah Palin among GOP “moderates” becomes evident. Despite her lack of an Ivy League pedigree, or perhaps owing to it, Sarah Palin sees moral issues in black and white and, unlike her Beltway insider antagonists, is not afraid to say so. As such she poses a great threat to the Republican “business as usual” Washington crowd that occasionally plays to the right (especially at election time), but ultimately seeks its own advancement.

Over time, an entire class of posturing “conservatives” has been revealed. In the wake of the 2006 electoral disaster, in which both the House and Senate changed from marginally Republican to solidly Democrat, prominent Republicans including Senator John McCain and former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey of Pennsylvania seized on what they believed was the opportunity to purge the GOP of its Christian/conservative influence. Both offered disparaging words about the supposed political liability of the “religious right” on the gloomy Republican electoral results. And as the abundance of evidence proves, both were inarguably wrong.

In truth, conservatism must be solidly based in traditional Judeo-Christian morality if it is to be conservatism in any sense. So-called “fiscal conservatives” (Senator Snowe considers herself one) merely profess the ludicrous notion that they can confront liberalism’s resultant social rot at a far lower cost than that expended by the Democrats.

Predictably, when disastrous expansions of the nanny state result from such double-minded “governance” on the Republicans’ watch, they lamely attempt to defend themselves by claiming that their spending levels are still far lower than what the opposition would have perpetrated.

It is sad that this posturing among Republican “moderates” is as vapid as the current day “defenses” of policy offered by Barack Obama. In the face of massive job losses during his term in the White House, he insists that had it not been for his trillion-dollar “stimulus package,” the numbers would have been far worse.

Come November of 2010, people will indeed be looking for a real and positive “change” in the composition of this out-of-control federal government. And at this opportune moment, it is no longer sufficient for Republicans to campaign solely on the faults of the Democrat left. If true conservatives in the Senate and House are going to present themselves as a worthy alternative to the abysmal status quo, they must immediately begin defining themselves and the GOP as starkly contrasted from the Democrats. And, they must not allow imposters from the Republican Party’s liberal wing to seize the debate and thereby blur the differences between right and left.

Christopher G. Adamo has been active in Wyoming politics for many years and is a managing partner in Best American Buy (www.bestamericanbuy.com), an e-commerce business that markets American made products including the incomparable Abigail Adams Bedspread Set from Bates Mills. Contact information for Chris Adamo, and his archives, can be found at www.chrisadamo.com

183 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • When they kick out your front door, How you gonna come? With your hands on your head, or on the trigger of your gun

    “Despite her lack of an Ivy League pedigree, or perhaps owing to it, Sarah Palin sees moral issues in black and white”
    education is irrelevant to a mind’s inability to conceive of more than two categorizations.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Jay Black

    I appreciate your candor and sincerity. I’d like to see more of it in all of our political leaders. And I also appreciate that you were able and willing to field my questions honestly and without avoidance. In that light, you would have my vote in a heartbeat.

    I only encourage you to consider, sir, that choosing the lesser of evils is still choosing evil. I hope the day comes when MRA’s collectively figure out that picking one horse in a two horse race only leaves them shoveling manure while others party in the winners circle.

    Of course that is just an opinion. But one thing is clear that I think we really can agree on. As I read through this thread I am seeing very the awareness from readers that the polemics of the day are not serving us very well. In fact, such arguments are becoming philosophical antiquities; outmoded artifacts of an outmoded paradigm.

    Mr. Black, Paul and criolle, your words have been heard and will be considered past the conclusion of this thread.

  • Jay Black

    I admit I’m caught up in the Obama Zeitgeist to a certain degree. I was a supporter of his when nobody thought he had a chance. I live in SC, so everyone around me is pretty conservative, very Republican. My mom said, “He’ll never win, he’s a Muslim.”, to which I said, A. He’s not. and B. Just watch. I’ve always been for the underdog often times, being an underdog myself. When he won, I guess my wagon was hitched to his, so I concede the bias I have. I concede its not rational, something I otherwise pride myself on. I guess its a gut feeling, which sometimes you just can’t ignore those, as they just stick around, always nagging at you. After all, thats how I knew something wasn’t right with male vs female relations even in elementary school. I had no information or facts, I just knew something didn’t seem fair. I hate how he supports and bends over for Feminists, it makes me sick to my stomach, but I can’t help but feel he ultimately is looking out for the little guy. And I hope, dare I say, I have faith, that he will see the err of Feminist’s ways and stand against them. I admit my position is weak, so I’ll just concede that I’m betting on the dark horse, no pun intended, at which point, if he does win, my payout will be huge (psychological payout that is). Bush just left such a bad taste in my mouth that any enemy of my enemy is a friend, and that just happened to be the Democrats. But have faith in me. I’m paying attention, and results is what I’m looking for, and I’ve been known to change my mind rather quickly when evidence opposes my view. Just the fact that I’m aware of my bias should give you some relief that I’m not a sheep marching to the melody of the piper. I just like the song right now, as it has a nice beat….but I’m more than willing to turn the station if and when the time comes. He has enough die hard enemies and empty headed followers that I don’t think my dissent would matter much right now to the big picture. Its just too early in my opinion to take a strong stance, which is nothing more than an opinion. Ultimately, I’d like a strong third party, non-party, candidate to sweep in and set things right. I’d vote for you Mr. Elam. But right now I’m forced to side with the lesser of two evils.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Jay Black

    I am curious about something you said. “..but I am still holding out on having a strong opinion of him…”

    How much need he aggressively expand on what you call Christian war mongering before you can solidify an opinion?

    How many feminist causes must he endorse and promote before you are less impressed with his charisma and more concerned with his feminist agenda?

    I agree with your final analogy on bees and cancer, but unless I am mistaken it appears as though you are willing to ignore carcinogenic policies of an openly misandrist president simply because he isn’t a right wing conservative.

    I submit that the core of your post is where you hit the nail on the head. If there is an identified enemy, it would be feminism. To that end, any chosen side in the generic political landscape is going precisely in the wrong direction. It amounts to little more than arguing politics as instructed in the current feminists paradigm. They win no matter which side we embrace.

    It is time to rethink all of it, not just the halves we like to vote against.

  • Jay Black

    I ditto the above. I like many Republican platforms, but the party has been corrupted by big business interests and a moral superiority complex. Jesus would have been a Democrat, lets be honest. How come the Christian right is the biggest supporter of war-mongering? Christianity is about pacificism. And don’t pull out that Old Testament stuff, unless your Jewish. Jesus was the new way, the new path, a rejection of the old ways, thats why the Jewish establishment detested him so much. And regardless of the nobel intentions of many Republicans, after Bush and Cheney, Republicans deserve a time out in the corner. I’m sorry, but its true. Obama ain’t perfect, but I’m still holding out on having a strong opinion about him, other than at least he has some charisma, which isn’t a bad thing for the leader of the world’s most powerful country. Lets focus on one enemy at a time, our most feared enemy, Feminism. Terrorist are like bees to our countries flesh, their hard to ignore, but Feminism is like cancer, and if you ignore cancer long enough, its too late.

  • criolle johnny

    Years ago I argued that we should gather all the crazies and put them in one room. Imagine, gathering all the foaming-at-the-mouth, rabid, right wing-nuts and all the loonie-wack-job, high-as-a-kite left wingers and lock them up together!

    They would never get anything done! They’d be so busy screaming at one another all day long! The rest of us could have a life!

    I never in my wildest dreams thought someone would lock them up in Congress where they could do so much damage!

  • Paul

    I can not say from men’s point of view that this articles extolling the virtues of any one political party over another has any relevance. I just don’t think that MRAs who try to argue in terms of party politics are not understanding the situation at all. To me they might as well be saying nothing at all.

    It worries me that MND has these articles which go nowhere while The Spearhead does seem to get the picture, and as far as argument goes is transcendence.

    As for extolling the virtue of the Judaic-Christian tradition, all I can say is that this traditions is absolutely hateful. It is this tradition that has given us feminism in the first place. Throw them away as quickly as possible. Worst still they have given us monogamous marriage which is the most disgusting of institutions.

    I know there are pother commentators who post here who feel as I and can express themselves better than I do. I hope they will not be silent.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    Some observers would argue, and I would be one of them, that it was the co-opting of politically conservative ideals by the religious right that not only resulted in huge republican losses in recent years, but that actually constitutes the “faux conservatism” that ultimately rang hollow and unsupportable by the majority of American voters.

    And it would appear to me that this is the actual lesson in history that, if not learned, will result in simply more loss of political ground. I would say that was a good thing but for the fact that the illusion of options we have left us only with Obama. Yes, he is worse, but not by much.

    With the exception of a nationalized healthcare agenda, the Obama administration appears at this point to be little more than a continuation of the Bush years. If I were to bemoan the nanny state that is the supposed creation of democrats, I would have to practice doing it with a straight face.

    After eight years of a Bush administration that spent like teen age lotto winners, authored a horrendous expansion of governmental power over the rights of citizens, and engaged in a spending spree at the end of the last term that involved a staggering percentage of America’s future, I am loathe to think that more of it is any better with another Christian republican at the helm.

    And since I am not inclined to embrace a lesser of evils rather than fight for the outside chance of real change, then I can’t support someone because of the letter behind their name, especially when an “R” represents no less oppression for men than a “D”

    How many so called “real conservatives” fought hard against VAWA? How many of them have done anything to stop title IV-D profiteering by corrupt family courts? How many of them have campaigned against the travesty of the false allegation industry? How many of them have done anything for men at all?

    How about roughly none of them? Yep, zero seems to be the right number.

    And these people are to be our conservative role models?

    Perhaps if we stuck with the fundamentals of small government, personal liberty and dispensed with religious qualifications that would make our founding fathers scream in agony, we can then return to the conservatism that birthed a great nation.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search