Abuse Industry Teaches Women to Fear Men, Teaches Men to Fear Women

2009-11-09
By

Recently I attended a domestic violence conference hosted by a church in my community. “The Church’s Role in Addressing Domestic Violence in the Faith Community,” the glossy brochure explained.

The program featured a Proclamation by President Barack Obama filled with heart-rending language about the “devastating impact” of domestic violence on women and children. The conference included a workshop a dramatic presentation of The Yellow Dress, a play based on stories of women who were victims of dating violence.

I opted to screen a video called “Defending our Lives,” featuring the accounts of five women incarcerated for murdering their partners. All insisted their lethal actions were taken solely in self-defense.

But from the beginning, it was clear an ideologically-fueled agenda was lurking in the background. Because research shows, over and over, that women are equally likely to aggress against their intimate partners.

The video commenced with a stark warning; “There is a war against women in this country.”

Oh, really?

The video then claimed domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women. That myth has been debunked by persons like professor Richard Gelles of the University of Pennsylvania who derides such claims “factoids from nowhere.” (The actual causes of female death are accidental falls, motor vehicle accidents, and over-exertion.)

And then the coup de grace: “Battered women who kill have longer sentences than serial rapists.”

The source of that outrageous factoid? Well, nobody seemed to know — and no one really cared. After all, we’ve got an epidemic of domestic violence on our hands, so any make-believe statistic will do.

The effect of the conference was to teach women to distrust and fear the men in their lives as latent, if not actual abusers. Husbands, boyfriends, brothers, even teenage sons – all are now suspect.

Also attending the conference were a State’s Attorney and an aide to a federal Congressman. Realizing that women outnumber men in elections, politicians have become sympathetic to women’s concerns these days.

As a result, almost every state in the country has domestic violence laws on the books that represent a flagrant suspension of American civil liberties. All a Scream Queen needs to do is play the abuse card, conjuring up a creative allegation that she knows may never require proof.

Two years ago a man in Stamford, Conn. was arrested for allegedly kicking his wife and throwing her down a flight of stairs. But it turned out to be a bogus accusation – the woman filed the charge hoping the restraining order would give her a leg-up in an impending divorce and custody hearing.

Not only did she file the spurious accusation, but then Superior Court Judge James Bingham denied the man’s request for an evidentiary hearing.

Obviously there are fundamental Constitutional issues at stake. Doesn’t the Fourth Amendment require probable cause before an arrest is made? Don’t Fourteenth Amendment due process protections apply? Isn’t stealing a man’s children with the blessing of the family courts a form of “cruel and unusual punishment”?

So this past week, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled the man should have been granted an evidentiary hearing based on the preponderance of evidence standard.

Amazingly, the Connecticut Coalition Against Domestic Violence, which receives $2.4 million federal funding each year, argued against the Supreme Court ruling, saying it would have a “chilling effect” on victims. In truth, the ruling will have a chilling effect — on false accusers who should be stoutly punished for their scurrilous deeds.

Each year, over two million domestic violence restraining orders are issued in the United States. Half of them are based on not even an allegation of physical aggression, according to a study by the Massachusetts Trial Court. Dads are stigmatized as abusers, families dissolved, and kids thrown into single-parent households.

Eventually word gets out. Men get wind that marriage is a raw deal. Lose your kids, your home, and your assets, thanks to a baseless accusation.

Men begin to distrust and fear women.

That’s the bitter fruit of our nation’s $4 billion domestic violence industry.

822 views

  • julie

    I totally agree that men have to communicate with the churches and be pro active in the work the church does because the church has been a rock for men’s support in the past.

    However, with the amount of men leaving the church and the amount of women doing most of the charitable work is was inevitable IMO for the churches to become feminised.

    ***Realizing that women outnumber men in elections, politicians have become sympathetic to women’s concerns these days.***

    I’ll put this down to humor. There is no way politicians are thinking they will pander to women because more women than men can vote.

    Feminism is an interest group. Just one among many and not as powerful as others in America. The funding they get from the public and government and the work they do is large enough for them to be recognised but not too great that politicians can’t change their views.

    Politicians include feminists because they are an interest group and have access to a number of voters. It has nothing to do with women as a collective.

  • ExChurchMan

    “I totally agree that men have to communicate with the churches and be pro active in the work the church does because the church has been a rock for men’s support in the past.”

    No. No we don’t. We can turn our backs and walk away, just as so many of us have done with women in general, or at least with women from the Anglo-sphere. For you or any other woman to presume to tell men what we have to do is hilarious. What are you going to do if I don’t jump through your hoop? Make me sleep on the couch?

  • julie

    “I totally agree that men have to communicate with the churches and be pro active in the work the church does because the church has been a rock for men’s support in the past.”

    ****No. No we don’t. We can turn our backs and walk away, just as so many of us have done with women in general, or at least with women from the Anglo-sphere.****

    Well, of course you can do whatever you want to do or not want to do and you can justify it anyway you want. :D

    *** For you or any other woman to presume to tell men what we have to do is hilarious. What are you going to do if I don’t jump through your hoop? Make me sleep on the couch?****

    Sooo, you want to know what I will do if men don’t react a certain way to my comment?

    Answer: Nothing!!!
    You can sleep in your bed safely knowing that some chick far far far far away from you is not going to do anything about it. lol

  • L. Steven Beene II

    Julie said:
    “I’ll put this down to humor. There is no way politicians are thinking they will pander to women because more women than men can vote. ”

    Respectfully Julie, but you MUST be kidding.

    It’s not only that more women CAN vote, but that women’s groups seek funding for women, whereas there are fewer men’s groups, and they do not have the infrastructure of lobbyists working for them.

    But, since I have made the assertion, the onus is upon me to back it up. Allow me?

    1) The first and biggest, IMO, “stick” in their arsenal is the over 800 “Womyn’s Studies” programs and the professors who are in it. Groups like the AAUW (American Association of University Women) – and others – can produce all sorts of scholarly studies and produce a ton of indoctrinated women (and men) to fill the ranks.

    2) That goes hand in hand with the VAWA recipients, many of the upper ranks have womyn’s studies majors, or sociology/psychology/etc majors who can find ready made jobs for themselves. And, quite simply, once they are IN those jobs the only way to KEEP them is to provide the stats in #’s of victims of ONLY women. You have to walk in lock-step with the ideology or your out.

    3) Many DV shelters ENCOURAGE “advocacy” of their “victims”. Whlie there are, without a shadow of a doubt, many many victims, there are also the “perpetual victim queens” whose whole identity becomes wrapped up in the emotional high, moral certitude, and raw destructive power these women can wield against the hated “other” : men. Nice little indoctrination camps they got going there.

    4) What politician is going to be the “champion of the falsely accused”? Ok, stop laughing. No really, it’s just simply not going to happen. He could have the “voice of God” ™, video, and “absolute proof” – but in the end this little hate movement is not going to admit that their whole ideology is ….. WRONG!? Sure, and next week I’ll be a fighter pilot and look like Tom Cruise. Meanwhile – back at Camp Reality …. it’s the safer path to acknowledge, at face value, the victims of male aggression, and give lip service to MAYBE a FEW men are abused too …. but only because the women who did it was abused by a man while she was a child.

    5) Ever heard of “EMILY’s List”? It’s the most powerful lobby for women in the U.S. In many ways it’s a good thing, in THEORY – but the reality is far far uglier. EMILY’s List stands for (Early Money Is Like Yeast) – they give money to female candidates who are willing to toe the feminist line and advocate for more money for women’s groups.

    These groups are not simply “women’s” groups, but are women’s groups who help spread the very factoids you read above. Not to forget the “court watchers” – women sent from the shelters and other groups to sit prominently in the front row of court proceedings and take notes of any PERCEIVED misogyny or “anti-women” ruling the judge may hand down – and to publish and put on the internet the “evil woman-hating judges’ ‘bad decisions’ ” to deter him from doing so.

    In the circular evil this has become, EMILY’s List procures the money, the shelters produce the stats of #’s of victims, the universities produce the “scholarly tracts” of “proof”, and EMILY’s Listers go and ask for more money for more programs, while womyn’s studies programs are kept artificially afloat (not many people take them VOLUNTARILY), and the cycle continues.

    Ending the violence and healing the victims – a very distant second.

    Julie, I could go on and on, but your basic premise is, and I say this with all due respect, hugely naive of the reality of this very powerful special interest.

    In reality it’s become a hate movement.

    I hope I have added to the discussion.

    Steven

  • jon

    great article. I’m glad somebody is pointing out that the church is frequently part of the problem. I had a very religious upbringing and I remember hearing a lot of these factoids growing up. Most of them weren’t true but the gossipy women and apathetic men would never have thought to check facts.

    I’ve been around a ton of male clergy and they tend to be almost hostile to regular guys. I’ve had a few theories about why but I haven’t settled on an opinion. I’ve wondered if they’re just gullible and they actually believe the sob stories they hear from women who blame their husbands/boyfriends for all their problems and bad behavior. Clergymen also tend to be overly-sensitive, emotional men who relate better to women than men. Maybe it’s just the natural instinct to side with the ladies for the sake of popularity. Who knows but there is definitely a problem.

  • julie

    L. Steven Beene II, you have a lovely way of challenging a comment.

    I don’t know what else to say but that you comment was incredible. I can see what you mean.

  • Enduser

    I had my wife (now ex) file a restraining order against me for the express and stated reason that i wrote her an email that said simply: “Please stop bothering me.” I kid you not. She cited no violence, no threats, but said that my message made her feel afraid.

  • Jay R

    L. Steven, thanks for setting Julie straight!

    Julie, thanks for being set straight!

    The MRA movement’s biggest problem is the staggering sums of money to be made promoting misandry in the name of protecting those poor, defenseless womyn. This is why, even in a “Woman’s Nation,” women will ALWAYS have a “long way to go.” Men, on the other hand, still have a long way to fall.

  • Jay R

    Carey Roberts,

    Great post. I would, however, characterize the situation slightly differently:

    “Abuse Industry Teaches Women to Fear Men, Requires Men to Fear Women.”

  • http://www.societymirror.info/abuse-industry/ Social Mirror: On Your Face » Blog Archive » Abuse Industry Teaches Women to Fear Men, Teaches Men to Fear Women

    [...] Abuse Industry Teaches Women to Fear Men, Teaches Men to Fear Women November 11, 2009 – 8:17 am By Carey Roberts [...]






Search