lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Kimberly Munley, Jessica Lynch and the Path to Being a Media Heroine

2009-11-13
By

The media loves a hero with lipstick. Female Rambo’s sell, big time, translating into the holy cha-ching for news outlets and talk shows. Problem is, the media is so eager to exploit the heroics of a (hopefully photogenic) gun toting girl, they tend to get carried away with themselves and do silly things, like print packs of lies. That happens when you are more interested in headlines than practicing journalism. And nothing makes headlines quite like a real life Wonder Woman, or even the concocted possibility of one.

The latest firearm femme is Kimberly Munley,  the erstwhile savior of Ft. Hood, Texas, credited with stopping murderous madman Nidal Hassan all by herself, even as she was peppered with bullets in the process.

According to the military, and subsequently regurgitated by the media with little or no investigation, it was like a scene out of Dirty Harry, with Munley playing the role of super cop so well that Clint Eastwood would have bowed and handed over his .44 magnum in red faced shame.

It turns out that this isn’t how things happened at all.

Who’da thunk, eh?

The name of the person, ahem, man, who actually took Nassan down is Sgt. Mark Todd, a retired soldier working on the army base as civilian police officer. He was the one who got the job done and ended the nightmare at Ft. Hood.

Currently, there is no question of Munley’s bravery. She apparently did her job and probably deserves our admiration. Pardon the insertion of words like “apparently” and “probably.” History tells us that we need to reserve judgment till the facts are in; facts that the media tends to treat like the loose change in a million dollar transaction.

But even if Munley’s actions ultimately prove exemplary, we need to acknowledge that were it not for the confusion created by the pursuit of a sensational story about a heroic woman, the headline would have simply read, “Gunman Taken Down by Police,” and Sgt. Todd would have been lucky to even have his name mentioned.

And now that the hero has been identified as a man, we can watch the media lose interest in that part of the story like a car salesman loses interest in people with bad credit.

One would easily view this as a testament to the fact that bravery from men in uniform is commonplace. After all, how many bother to remember the name of the second guy to walk on the moon? We are a culture that remembers firsts. We love the groundbreakers, the top dogs, the Super Bowl winners, and have collective amnesia about anything else. When it comes to an absolute victory by the heroic actions of a woman under fire, we are still awaiting the benchmark event.

And in our desperation for it we are giving the media a pass to create one for us out of thin air.

We saw a sadly similar story in the matter of Jessica Lynch, the American Soldier who became an iconic figure in the Gulf War via that Hollywood style propaganda machine we also call The Pentagon. And why? Not because she did anything of military significance, but because the managers of the war recognized that a flesh and blood ballerina barbarian was a bonanza of 24 carat PR. And they knew the story, at least initially, wouldn’t face much scrutiny from the media, or from an American public that would race mindlessly to embrace the whatever they were told.

And I specify “American” because it was an American fabrication. Or as Group Captain Al Lockwood said regarding American and British military handling of the story, “We had two different styles of news media management. I feel fortunate to have been part of the UK one.”

Who knows if the British are more patient for a real heroine, or if they are holding out for one of their own.

Still, Lynch was such a great opportunity for America that the military reported she had been shot during the firefight that led to her capture, then stabbed and beaten by her captors. None of it was true. Gleefully undeterred by the facts, officials made a short, expertly edited film production of Navy Seals and Army Rangers converging on and aggressively securing the hospital where Lynch was being held. Rather where she was being compassionately treated by civilian doctors for injuries she suffered when her vehicle crashed.

The problem was that there was no enemy around to pose a threat, or to justify the orchestrated, Entebbe style raid. The enemy had already moved on, leaving Lynch behind to be taken care of at the hospital. A fact, it seems, that the military was well aware of before going in after her, and one that found its way to the cutting room floor before the official story was OK’d for release.

It was a story so staged and scripted that you could almost hear a The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shout, “Cut! That’s a wrap!” after the first news conference on the “rescue.”

It was, however, a win-win for everyone. America had its heroine, and The Pentagon had its feel good moment; an entertaining and uplifting anecdote from the war at a crucial time when support was starting to lag.

And it worked for a while in spades, though it left an American public largely ignorant of the fact they were duped.

People seem happy with it, though. Our proclivity to embrace fantasy where it comes to women appears bottomless. We have turned an entire collective consciousness into an episode of Xena- Warrior Princess, lending us to sit with happy, vacant, smiles, shirts covered with popcorn as we watch her battle ten men at a time, nine of them standing in the periphery, making jerky, ambiguous movements while they wait in queue to be the next one she dispatches with ease.

We love Laura Croft and are transfixed by Uma Thurman slicing her way through legions of martial arts experts with her Hattori Hanzo sword. Female butt kicking is high profit hokum for the big screen, and perhaps staves off our appetite for the time when the real life Dirty Harriet finally makes her debut.

It would seem harmless enough. After all, it’s only human nature to indulge in fantasy. Whether that is Sigourney Weaver walking over dead marines to wipe out a horde of aliens with acid for blood or Buffy the Vampire Slayer destroying armies of the undead doesn’t make much difference.

But in the real world we should take pause. Nine soldiers lost their lives in the battle that resulted in Jessica Lynch’s capture. It was a battle in which by her own account she never fired a shot, but rather hit her knees to pray when the bullets started flying.

And rather than do the right thing, which would have been to go pick her up from the hospital and quietly retire her back to civilian life, we turned her into Sally Stallone and toasted her bravery. We made her a hero of fools.

In the other tragedy, 13 people lay dead at the end of Hassan’s rampage. A somber enough event to warrant some respect for the truth, and a good measure of diligence in getting to it. But in the end, it was the headline, the right headline, that mattered, not the story behind it. And it is a shameful example of media gone awry in the pursuit of realizing a fallacious dream.

Like all forms of fraud on behalf of women this ultimately hurts them.

Someday, the inevitable will happen, and a woman will emerge as a bona fide hero on wheels. But once the public has been taken through so many more rounds ala Jessica Lynch and Kimberly Munley, she will only be taken with a grain of salt.

And that will be insanely attributed to sexism against women, which the media will gladly, and redundantly, report.

Paul Elam is the Editor-in-Chief for Men’s News Daily and the publisher of A Voice for Men.

1,322 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @Al

    My critique was not of officer Munley, but of the military media machine that is, in fact, looking so hard for a female hero that they got the story all wrong. Additionally, I have seen no evidence whatsoever to support your assertion that Officer Todd was able to take down Hassan because of Munley’s actions.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/massive-media-fail-female_b_355600.html

  • Al

    Mr Elam,

    Officer Munley went forward and directly engaged a gunman, who in fact succeeded in putting several bullets into her which have her in severe pain and using a wheelchair.

    The mail follow-on officer was able to put his hands on the MAjor exactly and only because Officer Munley had occupied Hasan’s attention by taking those bullets.

    I’m quite confused about which part of that scenario, you consider to be not worthy of national-level praise.

  • Davy

    O.K. I’m a vet. Any person who stands up to serve our country, who puts themselves in harms way to protect and defend us, has earned our undying respect and gratitude. Private Lynch and Sgt. Munley both rise into this category. What happened to them both, and with which they both have publicly disassociated themselves, were lionizing untruths by the military, the media, and certain unscrupulous people wishing to gain pr advantage;
    untruths that have caused exactly the results that untruths always eventually cause: loss of Trust. We have all been betrayed here by a seriously dangerous evil. Trust is the foundation stone of all our relationships. We need Foundational Trust between the genders merely in order to proceed… along any path. Intentional disruption of Trust via lies or deliberate distortions of absolute truth, are thereby attacks upon the foundation of Trust that we need to function as a society. I’m saying our society is being deliberately attacked, and this wedge issue right here, women in the military, is being used against us all, men and women. We cannot afford the military to be divided against itself into two opposing camps. Nor can we afford our society to be thus divided. Who benefits when this wedge is activated?

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Maj M

    First, and I was remiss for not saying this in my first response, thank you for your service. And no apology is needed as I didn’t feel accused. You just confirmed what I thought I saw in your first post. It was the concerns of a soldier expressed about a comrade.

    I think you make a valid point. I could have been a little more generous with Lynch. She was, after all, wounded in the course of doing her duty. But there were other conflicts, such as questions about whether her weapon jammed or not, and if she ever tried to fight back.

    Since there was no proof of that, and since she wasn’t the problem here in the first place, I didn’t see a need to mention that sort of thing.

    It is all part of the overall problem, IMO. When high command uses soldiers as PR pawns, nothing good comes of it. I found pics of Lynch on google with the caption of “media whore” and “traitor” on them. As far as I could tell, the only time Lynch talked to the media was to set the record straight.

    I had hoped that my last phrases about Lynch would serve only the purpose of demonstrating that Lynch was not the individual that she was manufactured to be by the DoJ. And not to infer cowardice, but just being human. I say that as someone who served in peacetime, so I have no way of knowing what I would do under fire.

    In hindsight, as always, I could have done better at this one than I did. It is true of all of them.

    Thanks for pointing it out.

  • Maj M

    @ Mr Elam
    Thanks for the re-direct – and I definitely agree with the major thrust of your article about how the media and DoD play up the “heroines”. The reason I took issue with the last part of your description of Ms Lynch’s actions – which were indeed practically verbatim, was that the tone made it sound to me as if you were trying to describe a pathetic excuse for a soldier when in fact, given her injuries, firing a rifle would have been nearly impossible.
    “She was in pretty bad shape. There was blunt trauma, resulting in compound fractures of the left femur (upper leg) and the right humerus (upper arm). And also a deep laceration on her head,” Houssona said. “She took two pints of blood and we stabilized her. The cut required stitches to close. But the leg and arm injuries were more serious.”
    That said, I don’t know the sequence – whether or not the crash came first, when her weapon jammed, etc.
    “But she told Sawyer that she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time, and that her gun had jammed during the chaos.
    “I’m not about to take credit for something I didn’t do,” she said.
    “I did not shoot — not a round, nothing. I went down praying to my knees — that’s the last thing I remember.”
    Your words: “It was a battle in which by her own account she never fired a shot, but rather hit her knees to pray when the bullets started flying.” Without a little bit of context, I was concerned that the last phrase made her sound cowardly (which I am not prepared to judge), hence my phrasing as “uncharitable”.
    Again, I agree with your piece, and am probably guilty of asking for a little too much nuance, and of being quick to defend my brothers in arms. I apologize if you felt I was accusing you of any dishonesty.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Maj M

    The onus in my piece was clearly put on The Pentagon and the Media, not on Lynch. As to her actions, whether you think my describing them was uncharitable or not, they were her actions.

    I didn’t embellish anything. In fact, I got the information from directly quotes by Lynch herself.

  • http://bradmillershero.blogspot.com/ nobody

    The issue with the Ft Hood officer who stopped the shootings was that women aren’t allowed in active duty in the army. If women and men were treated equally in the armed forces, nobody would have cared about the officer’s gender.

  • http://www.unitywall.com TXM

    When Soldiers work closley together, we know the truth about each other. We know more than we ever cared to know! We know who is a micro-manager, we know who malingers, we know who’s gay, we know who’s sleeping with who, we know who are high performers and we know who just do the minimums to get by.

    Pat Tillman was a stud. A big-time football player, a Ranger, he was more Soldier than I’ll ever be. But he didn’t die in “glorious combat” he was shot down by our own guys. The part that makes me VERY mad is that they tried to lie about it.

    They tried to lie about Jessica Lynch too. I remember thinking “all right!” because they gave credit to a Soldier (so often they do not) and being VERY dissapointed when the truth came out.

    This time, when I first heard about SGT Munley, my first reaction wasn’t one of pride. My first thought was “BS! Something doesn’t seem right about this.”

    My reaction was not inspired by anything she did, or didn’t, do. It was because I have learned to mistrust the media reports. Too bad for SGT Munley, too bad for women.

    All I want for them to do is tell the truth about these events. We will know the truth about each other, we always do. Its too bad that so many are jealous and hungry for military glory. There is nothing glorious about taking a bullet, bomb, or anything else. The important part is that tens of thousands of men and women of good conscience volunteer to serve this country. That story just isn’t sexy enough, I guess.

  • Maj M

    Sgt Leigh Ann Hester. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Ann_Hester
    What the wikipedia entry doesn’t mention is how she left cover and got in the trench and closed with the enemy.
    I’m on my 4th Iraq/Afghanistan trip and I’ve seen only one woman, a junior enlisted probably still in her teens, react poorly to the stress. After the umpteenth mortar attack, EVERYONE’S nerves are frazzled. Well, almost everyone’s – there are some sick b**tards like me that kinda like the excitement.
    Just remember that individuals’ tolerance for stress/fear and their capacity for courage (call it toughness) spans a spectrum, most likely resembling a bell-curve distribution. Imagine one for women, and one for men. I’d be willing to bet that for the type of people who WANT to join the military, there is a fair amount of overlap between the two curves, which implies there are plenty of women “tougher” than many men, though on average, men are still “tougher”. If training is done correctly, the people who can’t handle it are weeded out. No need to categorically include/exclude women with respect to combat roles.
    That said, the media do tend to play up the heroine aspect, with the connivance of the Public Affairs offices in DoD. But Ms Lynch had no say in the matter, and stood up for her friend Shoshana Johnson when Ms Johnson’s disability benefits seemed unfairly low compared to hers. In this post, I think the description of a badly injured Jessica Lynch choosing to pray instead of fight is uncharitable at best. I’d like to know the author’s qualifications in determining what was appropriate under the Code of Conduct.

  • Greg Sr NY

    Robert(a), The Kool-aid dripping down your chin is a dead giveaway. That is Kool-aid, isn’t it? Wise up baby-cakes.

  • DonnieH

    Dear Robert,

    The point is not that Lynch/Munley couldn’t, it’s that they (apparently) didn’t, yet the media pretended they did.

    PS- your shaming language and absence of support are techniques females often use. I’m just sayin’.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Robert

    Perhaps you could grow some data to support your statement.

  • Robert

    You bunch of crybabies! Grow some balls and accept that men and women are equal in many abilities and both are capable of anything!

  • Kathleen Scheller

    You left out a glaring example of this “rush to glory.” During the December 1989 U.S. invasion of Panama, initial reports from Pentagon sources indicated that Captain Linda Bray had led a military police squad into fierce combat, capturing a dog kennel and crashing a jeep through a fence. At the time, Captain Bray’s actions were publicized by the Pentagon and hailed widely as proof that women are well suited for combat, and in fact legislation was immediately introduced by Rep. Pat Schroeder for opening combat roles to women — based on this supposed event.

    Later it was revealed, however, that these initial reports were wrong: 1) Bray in fact had been a half-mile from the scene when the action occurred, 2) there were no casualties, as the compound was found deserted and 3) not she but her male subordinate had driven the jeep through the fence. This is not to say that Captain Bray did not act honorably; simply that Army inaccurately glorified her role, as it did Jessica Lynch’s in Iraq, and now Kimberly Munley’s role at Fort hood.

    In addition, as the accurate information about Panama emerged, it was revealed that during the invasion, a female truck driver taking male troops into a combat zone started crying. Another woman who had been performing the same job also broke into tears; and the two women, who were refusing to continue as drivers, were relieved of duty. After reporters learned about the incident, the Army took pains to convey that the women had not disobeyed orders or been derelict in their duty. On the contrary, according to an Army official quoted in the Washington Post: “They performed superbly.”

    Since men, too, have been relieved of duty after breaking down emotionally during combat, the point is not to single these women out. The point is that the Army was dishonest about the incident. To call the performance of a soldier who breaks down and cries during combat and refuses to follow orders ’superb’ is ludicrous and patronizing.

    Now Sgt. Munley will join the unfortunate list of this “Rush to Glory” imposed by an opportunistic military and an undiscriminating media. And the losers are, as usual, the women involved, who were simply performing their jobs well, — which should be enough.

    If there is indeed a case to be made for women as full partners in the military, these false glamorizations do military women a disservice in the long run. Eventually, nothing positive is believable.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Mr. K

    We used to have an expression in the treatment field when dealing with the antics of the personality disordered women that Dr. Palmatier writes so incisively about.

    You don’t treat borderlines. You ignore them.

  • Mr.K

    @ Paul Elam, Your analogy explains why therapist can get along with a spouse while the spouses can’t get along with each ather.
    Quote:
    “Modern feminism is a cultural neurosis, and good men and women are well advised to adhere to the old adage, you can’t argue with a sick mind.”
    The therapist can give acceptance, understanding, responsivesnes and co-operation. But the spouse who lives with a neurotic can’t pay the bills, afford to satisfy the fantasies, measure up to the Ophrah propagated ideal spouse,
    So if there is an answer, what is it?

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ CW

    I don’t know Chris Heard, but I do understand the sentiment of his post well enough. If he is like most MRA’s I know, he understands that engaging your post, point by point, is, pardon the pun, pointless.

    And I think he summed you up quite well. I see in your words only an individual with such a staggering depravity of vision that they can live life in a misandrist culture and remain constitutionally incapable of seeing or acknowledging any of it.

    It is just the wailing of another generic feminist “unit” with a world view about as broad as the edge of Uma Thurmans sword. Most of us here have seen and engaged this enough times to embrace Mr. Heard’s good sense to just reduce your ideas to what they really are and move on.

    If you can’t see the anti-male, pro female PC mandate in modern media, then any keystrokes expended on pointing it out to you are useless.

    Modern feminism is a cultural neurosis, and good men and women are well advised to adhere to the old adage, you can’t argue with a sick mind.

  • Mr.K

    CW writes like a lawyer
    [Latin, Below, under, beneath, underneath.] A term employed in legal writing to indicate that the matter designated will appear beneath or in the pages following the reference. (Infra)
    [Latin, Above; beyond.] A term used in legal research to indicate that the matter under current consideration has appeared in the preceding pages of the text in which the reference is made.(Supra)
    Explanation “If you can’t dazzle then with your brilliance, baffle them with B.S”.

  • CW

    Chris Heard’s comments reflect the standard MRA/Conservative avoidance methods:

    - Do not address actual content to which you respond, even if the person in question has. This is crucial. (See his entire post)
    - Characterize the content as being false or misleading without addressing anything and thus not substantiating such characterizations. (The first part of his last paragraph)
    - Put up straw arguments, or completely misrepresent what was said without addressing specific content, to make it more convenient for you. (In this case the latter. See his first paragraph and the first part of his second paragraph)
    - Finally, be sure to insert self-supporting claims as fact. This is the “truth” you’re trying to protect at all cost and the reason for avoiding, misrepresenting, and distracting from the content that may refute said “truth”. (The last part of his second and third paragraphs)

    Oh, and TPTB = The Powers That Be. I’m sure it has been said before, but you probably didn’t bothering reading it and called their content misleading anyway…

  • Chris Heard

    CW’s left-leaning comments reflect the standard feminist modus operandi:

    Protect women from responsibility for the bad and insist they be credited with the good, in both historic and contemporary times.

    Hold women to lower standards of accountability and demand that they be given special recognition just for being women, even though they’ve only done what men routinely do without such recognition.

    Use factoids, misinterpretations, and misconceptions to promote an ideological perception that women are innocent victims of men even when the evidence indicates otherwise

    Incidentally, what is TPTB?

  • paul parmenter

    Mr K: the title “Royal Highness” is one that is bestowed on certain members of the royal family. The Duke of Kent is a cousin of the Queen.

    The title doesn’t mean much except to those who think ancient titles are important. The Duke of Kent is a pretty regular guy but who just happens, by accident of birth, to have a high rank and a privileged lifestyle. You can look him up on Wikipedia.

  • Mr.K

    High Cost of War:
    I never knew that it costs $1 million per year to deploy a soldier in the current Afhanistan-Iraq war untill I saw this NYT article

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/politics/15cost.html
    quote
    “Even if fewer troops are sent, or their mission is modified, the rough formula used by the White House, of about $1 million per soldier a year, appears almost constant.”

  • CW

    This is such a non-issue issue. First off, if you want to observe examples of misattributed and false credit, just look at the men in your history books: Christopher Columbus is the best example. If you want more recent ones, look at Flight 93. The male passengers who made calls are lionized. Even the “roll it” got made into “let’s roll”, and thus a rebellion (from which female passengers have been erased) that we will never know existed. Yet how often do we hear about the brave flight attendants who said they would boil water to throw on the hijackers? Anybody? Bueller?

    Second, it was military and Pentagon (mostly conservative male) who pushed this falseness – first that she was treated horribly and slapped around, then that she had the courage to fight back – about Jessica Lynch despite what she maintained and for which she gets hatemail. The story was less about her being a “hero” and more that she was the damsel in distress rescued by brave soldiers so I don’t get why this is even an example except that you have to make things up in order to have any. Meanwhile, *actual* female heroes such as Shoshana Johnson and Lori Piestewa (RIP, after whom Lych named her child) were ignored because they didn’t fit that Conservative Masturbatory Fairytale crap TPTB wanted to present to the country. You conveniently forgot Pat Tillman (RIP), likely because he’s a man and that isn’t convenient for you. Just like the story about Jessica Lynch being more about her being a victim is, as is the fact that she criticized and fought against the falseness to the very end (didn’t mention that either. Classy.). But rather than going after TPTB who did this to Jessica Lynch, the soldiers that lost their lives, and the American public all to put a false face on this war using cowboy crap, you cherry-pick a couple successful female-starring action movies and even dig at a young, chaotic tragedy and Kimberly Munley who nearly lost her life.

    Which brings us to that story. “I haven’t read anything, yet, that proves Todd and Munley were acting in tandem or that her getting shot was the factor that allowed Todd to take Hassan down. It is an assumption based on information provided by the same people that reported that Hassan was dead and that it was Munley that pulled the trigger.” Well assuming the one eye-witness is correct (and he very well may be, who knows), and assuming that nobody else shot Ms. Munley several times, it’s pretty easy to deduce that yes, her intervention allowed Todd leverage.

    But nice way to use a woman who nearly died for your fake story. Real classy.

  • Mr.K

    paul parmenter Post 11
    Your link was very interesting. But since we don’t have royalty in America, what does the “Royal Highness” do in England? Quote

    “The last women to receive medals were two civilians – Miss Ellen Blyth and Mrs William Wallace – in 1888 for their part in the rescue of a schooner off the Isle of Man.

    Aileen Jones used her helm skills in ‘atrocious conditions’
    Mrs Jones, 42, will receive the medal from His Royal Highness The Duke of Kent at the Barbican Centre in London”

  • http://www.AKidsRight.Org/ John Murtari

    Yes, you are quite right. I saw a simulation they had created on ABC
    news and it was pretty heroic. I also read the updated real story –
    not so much…

    I’m not sure if I agree with all this “hero” talk. They were doing
    their jobs; they were armed security. We have a lot of folks fighting
    in Iraq. I’m former military myself. I admire them and the
    sacrifices they make — but are they all heroes? I don’t think so.

    We lessen the meaning of the word. I think heroic action is going
    well above and beyond your job.

  • paul parmenter

    Paul, we do witness the same tendency to invent or inflate female heroism in the UK as well. I am reminded of a UK lifeboatwoman who was awarded a gallantry medal for doing what scores of men do on a regular basis without recognition. It’s here:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/4559193.stm

    It all smacks of a desire to get a medal for a woman come what may, and the RNLI jumped at the first half-opportunity to do so. I remember an interview at the time in which even the woman herself was clearly stunned at being picked out for the medal. A male crew member (Emms) in the same rescue incident took a far greater risk with his life, but was only given a lesser award. I guess they had to give him something as a sop. Indeed if the crew had been entirely male, it is unlikely any of them would have got a mention at all, let alone a medal.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ActaNonVerba

    Here’s the source, from BBC News.

  • Interloper

    I think an issue is being overlooked. The Army replaced an African-American hero with a white woman who apparently fired at, but never hit the suspect. Considering the negative images of black men served daily, this is particularly egregious. Sr. Sgt. Todd is too ‘go along to get along’ to have said anything as Sgt. Munley took credit she knew she did not deserve. But, others should be speaking up for him in the name of fairness.

  • ActaNonVerba

    I knew the Jessica Lynch story wasn’t true and that she hadn’t fired a shot. I DID NOT know what you said, that she was conscious and started praying while the firefight was happening. Not to diss on Jessica, but, that sounds like dereliction of duty to me.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ vmrgi

    You might want to slow down a little. You present a plausible scenario, but not a proven one. I haven’t read anything, yet, that proves Todd and Munley were acting in tandem or that her getting shot was the factor that allowed Todd to take Hassan down. It is an assumption based on information provided by the same people that reported that Hassan was dead and that it was Munley that pulled the trigger.

    I am am quite aware that the claim of heroics was not from Munley, but from the media. That was the whole point from top to bottom.

    There weren’t any claims of heroics from Lynch. either, that I know of. But again, the focus on the deception was not on either one of the women in those stories, but on the media and the military.

    If Munley emerges as a hero in this story, I would be the first to acknowledge it, but that will not take one bit away from my central point.

    Just like police, when it comes to these matters, media has a “rush to valorize the female policy.” It is headlines first, ask questions and maybe make corrections later, after the Neilson’s are in.

  • ignacio

    It’s great to hear somebody tell it like it is. The liberal media does love to sensationalize the news and give us their attention grabbing headlines instead of the real news. I read an article by one idiot columnist who actually demanded that women be allowed in direct combat after foolishly believing the headlines regarding the Kimberly Munley story. Having served in the Army I can personally say, it’s one thing to fire a pistol, and a totally different thing to carry an 80 pound rucksack 12.5 miles, or to carry your wounded comrade miles out of insuing danger. Doing one doesn’t necessarily mean you can do the other. And modern warfare still demands upper body strengthen that most women simply don’t possess unless they’re on the juice, and wearing an Adam’s apple. Call me sexist, but above all call me a realist, especially when lives are in danger.

  • vrmgi

    Second paragraph sentence should say “One of the main problems with the “Rush in to stop the gunman”tactic is that police officers WILL TAKE MORE CASUALTIES this way.”

  • http://vrmgi vrmgi

    Munley did her job. It took great courage to confront an armed gunman who had just killed 13 people. Whether she succeeded in shooting Hassan or not, you can’t deny the fact that she made the effort to stop him. So she is still a hero. She never claimed to have stopped Hassan, that was a mistake made by others.

    One of the “Rush in to stop the gunman” tactic is that police officers WILL TAKE MORE CASUALTIES this way. This is why police used to call for massive back up and wait first. This new tactic requires police to sacrifice themselves, present themselves as targets, something that soldiers are trained to do as part of a military operation, but police generally have not done.

    Munley did just that, she rushed in, exposed herself as a target, took the hits, which DID ALLOW Sgt. Todd to take the gunman down. That’s a classic military style operation of teamwork.

  • Jay R

    Now, now, Paul. There you go again — impolitely bringing attention to the elephant in the living room which we seem determined to ignore. (That’s politically incorrect, you know!)

    I am willing to assume, unless and until proven otherwise, that Officer Munley acted very bravely under fire, and did the best she could — just like we would expect from any male police officer. She deserves kudos. Nonetheless, it appears that she was in the process of being shot to death by Hassan when Officer Todd saved her life and ended the massacre. But perhaps it was only Hassan’s focus on Munley that gave Todd a clear shot, so I am also willing to assume that the officers’ roles could have been reversed just as easily.

    “Like all forms of fraud on behalf of women this ultimately hurts them.”

    This is so true. Unfortunately, the way women’s accomplishments are inflated makes it seem as though they are participating in some type of “Special Olympics”: we are all expected to jump up and down and hug each other when a woman does something a man can do without any particular notice being taken. (“She did it — even though she is JUST a woman!”)

    This transparent campaign to put the “her” in “hero” only cheapens the truly noteworthy things that women can and do accomplish. Using a golf analogy, a woman who can compete with men while hitting from the men’s tee can never earn true respect for winning if she nonetheless competes while hitting from the women’s tee. The same is true when female marathoners are given a 20 minute head start and then declared the “winner” if a man fails to catch them.

    As a society, we parrot PC platitudes about “equality,” even while women, in effect, get to hit from the women’s tee (e.g., different police, fire and military physical standards for men and women, no female draft registration, voluntary military service only 15% female, job injury and fatality only 5% female, female preferences in education, etc.). We also have a societal “gentlemen’s agreement” to pretend not to notice as we applaud and shout (all together now) — “you GO girl!”

  • Greg Sr.

    Yeah, well….that’s the way it was with the tragic loss of 343 fireMEN, 23 NYPD officers including Police Officer Moira Smith of the 13th Precinct and 37 Port Authority police officers including Captain Kathy Mazza, two very brave women indeed among the 400 +++ MEN that lost their lives that day at the World Trade Center. But Miss Andrist and her cohorts get their jock straps in a bunch if it’s not reported “all the men and women killed that day rescuing…….”.
    …….and when will this country bent on “equality” begin mandatory Selective Service registration requirements for females??? Along with all the penalties heaped on men for failing to register? Hmmmm?

  • MSMediaIsDead

    “After all, how many bother to remember the name of the second guy to walk on the moon?”

    Yes. But wait until the first woman walks on the moon. We’ll never hear the end of it. For some reason, after men have paved the rough road, made it smooth and safe, we’re expected to believe a woman following the well-worn path is somehow exceptional. Because she’s a woman. Wow. I’m impressed. How about you?







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search