lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Men, the Gender Wars Are Over — We Won

2009-12-04
By

Confidential Memo

To: All Men

Re: Operation “Feminist Movement”

Men, our long twilight struggle with the opposite sex is over. Our victory is total.

Can you believe the way things used to be? Remember when our fathers and grandfathers would drag themselves to mind-numbing jobs every day, having the sole responsibility for the feeding, clothing, and housing of their entire family?

And things were no easier before marriage, when men’s quest for sexual satisfaction was all too often hampered by the widespread moral code which taught women not to give out the “milk” for “free.”

Well, that state of affairs just wouldn’t do. So we men came together and did what we do best — formulate and implement a plan. First step, design the perfect world, the perfect male world. We decided such a world would consist of two things: less responsibility and more — and no-strings — sex.

Brothers, have we succeeded.

The amazing thing, really, is how easy it was, how fast the old world of obligation and responsibility dissolved. The first, crucial step, of course, was convincing women that they had it bad, that our jobs were “intellectually stimulating” and not the soul-crushing monotony that they in fact were.

It worked, and soon women were clamoring to join us on the job. It seems never to have occurred to them that we could have so easily prevented them from doing so — and yet we didn’t. We sidestepped without much fuss, actually, which had to have constituted the largest voluntary abdication of power in history. This alone should have tipped them off that something was amiss.

Right away, women at work began to solve our problems. First, men and women interacting more frequently inevitably led to hanky-panky, which led to the breakup of families, which led to less responsibility for us.

But that was only a start. To really fix things, we had to root out that old bourgeoisie mentality that had in previous times kept girls frustratingly modest and chaste. And what better way to do that than to convince women that the most reckless elements of our sexuality — the promiscuity — were in fact the correct behaviors, which had to be imitated in order for them to be “liberated”?

Amazingly, they bought that, too.

Unfortunately, our sister selves are less suited to such behavior, which can cause painful and lasting tears in the feminine soul. But no matter — we were also able to convince them that there was no such thing as a “feminine” soul, any more than there is a “masculine” soul, and that both sexes are equally suited to all things.

(Many of you said that women would never buy this, that the accumulated history of our species speaks to the deep and abiding difference between the sexes, a difference which has benefited both sides from time immemorial. But I was sanguine about our ruse — have I not been vindicated?)

Men, “Operation Feminist Movement” has worked, and more swiftly and completely than many of you thought possible. Mere decades ago, we spent endless hours and countless dollars before marriage courting and wooing; after marriage, we shouldered the entire financial burden for our families.

Now, after marriage, women can be expected to pay for half of everything, which is to the good, because video games are expensive. But, as more and more of you are discovering, why bother with marriage at all anymore? You can stay up all night, hang with your buds all the time, secure in the knowledge that on any given night you can be sure to find a willing woman, a woman who has likely been taught, conditioned even (by other women!) to expect nothing from you in return — and that this is a good thing.

Is it any wonder that, according to recent research, women these days are “becoming less happy relative to men” across all age, income, and marital levels? No, this shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone, although the unhappiness of the modern woman seems to be taking many of them by surprise. After all, don’t they “have it all”?

No — it is men who now have it all.

Congratulations, brothers. Our day is at last at hand, a day of no responsibility and easy mating access as far as the eye can see. Best of all, women are convinced that they have done this themselves, and for their own good.

Sure, there are downsides. Civilization has now entered into free fall; those masterpieces of art and science and literature, for which men have been almost exclusively responsible, have ceased to issue forth from our minds and hands — and is it any wonder? Such pyrotechnics are no longer necessary to impress women, which, really, was the only reason we bothered. High culture seems a small price to pay, though, for the loosening of morals and duties which has brought our present Sex and the City-fueled bounty.

So sit back, men, and enjoy the slide. It’s Miller time.

Matt Patterson is a National Review Institute Washington fellow and the author of “Union of Hearts: The Abraham Lincoln & Ann Rutledge Story”.  His email is mpatterson.column@gmail.com.

Tags:

2,683 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • James

    Great Article.

    I was frustrated several years ago about the dating scene on america until I started reading about MRA and other blogs. It was then that I realized I was trying to behave like Mommy wanted my to behave. I did an about face, and realise that I dont need a wife, dont need children and dont need responsibility except for myself. Now I live abroad, single, no children, no responsibility except to me. Laughing my way to the bank, and paying little for sex (men always pay for sex).

    Once I trowed away the idea that I needed to provided a permanent income for a depreciating asset that does not perform, I started to see life diferently and the results started to show up. So reboot the computer (brain) and put a new operating system on it. The code is very simple.

    No need for a wife.
    No need for children, they are over rated.
    Pay little for sex, and always state (to her) it should be done for love
    only.
    Dont treat woman nice. My expirience tells me that the more you
    give into them, the less they will like you. The more you ignore
    them the more they like you.
    Live on half of what you earned and save and invest the rest.
    If you already screw it up. Leave the country for a third world nation.
    Its better to earn a living on a third world nation than living in
    america paying confiscatory child support and Alimony.
    Realized that children belong to women not men. Its her body, HER
    CHOICE and thus her responsability. I still can understand men saying
    Zip it up or pay child support. How come they dont have the
    cojones to tell women to Keep their legs closed or pay for them.
    So if she opens up you zip it down, but dont get her pregnant.
    Get a vacsectomy and dont tell anyone (girls). After all you dont want
    children, just sex (for love off course).
    Dont let any women move in with you.

    Greetings from Brazil and enjoying the ride towards a more barbaric culture. If women want a more civilized society, then they should build it for themselves or pay for it.

  • Jay R

    Jaclyn,

    Thank you for the support. We in the MRM welcome sympathetic women who see that feminism leaves most women unhappier, and worse off. Some of the guys will give you “the business” as a test, but don’t take it personally.

    We men have won? True, if victory means the single life, constantly dodging involuntary fatherhood while careening from one meaningless, degrading “hookup” to the next, all while civilized society crumbles around us.

  • Sage99

    21
    Jaclyn
    December 6th, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    Let me have a wild guess here Jaclyn – you have not yet had your first meal ticket baby – have you? Better have it soon, the male pill is on the way!

  • Sage99

    Mike Hunter
    December 5th, 2009 at 8:57 am

    I think it was a light hearted joke article Mike, not to be taken seriously.

    Let me give you some advice. You are proberbly young and fully occupied with the stress of the present. But consider this. If you resign yourself to another 19 years of bleak living, and spent your energies in building up a good career, then you have a good life to look forward to – unlike your worthless scrounger of a woman, who you need to cut out of your life as soon as possible.

    In around 5 years time a male pill should be available then you can freely associate with women, confident that you will not get caught again in the same trap. And remember that you are not alone, there are men like you throughout the Western world.

    Today belongs to the feminist, but tomorrow belongs to men. Read my article above.

  • Sage99

    A very witty and clever article by Matt Patterson – I really enjoyed it and it made me laugh out loud.

    But I’m afraid that the reality for many men is a grim one. Today’s powerful woman has ruined many men. But how has this come about? The important point of WHY the balance of power has shifted so much to women is not examined. But I think I may have the answer. Please read on.

    The male contraceptive pill; and freedom for men –

    The male pill is on it’s way, and will be with us in less than 5 years, if not from the US or Britain, then from China and India.

    The pill for men will be the biggest step for freedom that men have ever had – freedom from the serfdom imposed by fatherhood. So if the present tyrannical feminist British women want their babies, they will have to offer a far better deal to men than at present.

    For example –

    The present marriage laws, and the infamous and secret ‘family courts’ will have to go, and quickly, and the dictatorial marriage and ‘common law’ marriage expectations drastically changed.

    The constant demeaning of masculinity, particularly on TV in programs such as ‘One Foot in the Grave’, ‘Men Behaving Badly’ and the present ‘soaps’ in general, where men habitually behave in an infantile manner, and are presented in an appalling way, will have to be recognised as highly offensive to men, and dispensed with.

    The most powerful of the British feminist weapons – the wild and malicious accusations of ‘rape’ and ‘child sex’ – will have to be brought back under civilized law where the accuser will be required to have hard evidence and be held responsible for their actions, both in the making of the accusation, and their part in the incident. The male sex drive is an extremely powerful force, and a woman who provokes it to the point where a man loses his self-control has only herself to blame. The accused will have to be considered innocent until – and if – proven guilty.

    The female contraceptive pill in the 1960s Britain gave British women direct power over sex availability without fear of pregnancy for the first time in human history. There was a popular phrase in the 1960s – ‘free love’, but there was nothing ‘free’ about the ‘free love’ of the 1960s. It came at a price, a price controlled and set by women who seized upon this new ‘pillow power’ with vigour; and some have used this power – unwisely – to disadvantage them in every way possible, thus asserting a position of dominance over men in which she has reduce them to a level of disadvantaged cowed subservience – and infantile behaviour in an attempt to present themselves as children entitled to the protection of their maternal instinct.

    The ‘Mad Maternal Instinct’ – the all powerful evolutionary force in women that regards masculine Men as simple mating objects when in lust, and when not, as dangerous predators to be avoided or driven off and away from the precious family group.

    The timing of the 1960s pill and ten years on the recognition of the feminist movement is a coincidence that supports the view that they are connected in a cause and effect relationship.

    But with an equivalent male contraceptive pill, men can make it quite clear that they are not prepared to have children unless they want to, and are offered a satisfactory position in the family group and society – enforced by law. Hence the counter balancing of the power given to women – ironically by male scientists! – by the 1960s female contraceptive pill.

    Once the power of the 1960s female pill is counterbalanced by the male pill this yoke of female dominance is likely to be flung off with surprising speed, and retribution and revenge on the British feminist female – and feminist male – is likely to be wreaked, as some wiser and more sensible women have been aware of for some time.

    Sage99

  • Jaclyn

    This article is funny, and has a lot of truth to it at the same time. I just wanted to say to all of you who are discouraged, that there are still women who want to be at home and have a nice loving family, and who want to see the pathetic ignorant feminist movement fall. We normal women appreciate the work men do, and would never look down on it or think we could do a better job.

  • http://www.mediaradar.org Andrew Ess

    Tom of Covent Garden quote, ‘How do you sell feminism, to women..(with a caveat)..”feminism is a liberated force for men (as I´ve always argued), then more feminism would liberate us further.” Strange words oft repeated in history, but namely in context that these would be bourgeois notions or statist positions of sexual interchangeability on demand. P 161 DSM-IV 2nd Ed companion describes extremely well the condition of Social dysfunctionality with a descriptor that places emphasis on a compendium of conditions that place doubt on Tom’s outlook. Surely we males as a price of relative human freedom have laid our lives down for idealism, that we should believe that all that has gone before us and all that is to come is for the better good. For that we do not need the state to enforce or instill in us choices or so we would like to believe. If Tom would also have us believe that the state proxy under the guise of feminism is anything but the wholesale removal of independence under some doctrine of necessity is not totalitarian then I fail in understanding the point. It would do well for Tom to visit our newer houses of Justice to understand that the systematic failure or complicity of legal operatives to defend the totally innocent is without doubt a failure of monumental proportions. Meritless and without common civilized decency, were even the policy to be enacted on animals there would be an outcry of inhumanity against the helpless. If in Tom’s future Dystopia he/she see’s a common interchangeability between the sexes with equality, then he see’s one from a different planet. If it is the case that the superior sex is female, then the future model will provide the state with the vehicle it needs to provide it’s controlled spawn and population control. We certainly do live in very interesting times.

  • Dittohd

    Our victory is total? No-strings sex? Give me a break!

    Just get a woman pregnant or be the victim of a woman who’s desperate enough to want a child along with free support with no strings, who’ll surreptitiously transfer your deposit from the condom to herself and get pregnant without you even being aware of what she did and see how fast you end up with mandatory support payments based on a nice, big percentage of your income, possibly through your child’s college days, with the threat of prison if you don’t pay up, with virtually no chance of getting the obligation lowered even if unexpected adverse circumstances warrant it. And see how rosy things really are when you want to be involved in your child’s upbringing but she now has a new boyfriend and considers you to be a fifth wheel.

    But then again, maybe you’re living in another country. Certainly not here in the U.S., or Canada, or England, or Australia. Where do you live?

  • Tom of Covent Garden

    If feminism is a liberated force for men (as I´ve always argued), then more feminism would liberate us further. The problem with truth-telling articles like the one above might be to demotivate the average woman motivated by a false sense of victimhood, who thought getting into feminism would gain her more power. How do we sell feminism to women on the basis that they are not victims and on the basis that feminism will liberate men? It would be beneficial if we could eliminate the need for victim-female strategic frames, with their misandric collateral damage. What feminists or others do you know who are already using non-misandric and factually acurate motivational speech aimed at women? Is it working?

  • http://www.mediaradar.org Andrew Ess

    Like all cultures who live under an Administrative and elitist type of class there is an idea that what is termed feminism and it’s objectives in anything but some form of newer secular religion is good for us. We can recount this experiment under different historical fact and anecdote, particularly from Western philosophical and political anecdote.
    Males still of an independent nature have always won, and we face the dilemma that many cultural social formations have faced. As likened to a Roman General in the decline of the roman empire, Will anyone mate with these wanton wenches created by our senates for the sake of continuance in producing children. Guess what we didn’t buy it then and we don’t buy it now.

    The sad part is with the doctrines of necessity practiced by our leaders, we face an insurmountable NWO order dictatorial policy.
    There are no safe havens or lands to which we can escape to and start anew.

    The option to politically fight or flee is removed unless we bring back peoples articles of governance and throw out these political neer do wells or there gregarious perversions. We have surpassed the marker for socially being at the pinnacle. In the misunderstood metaphor from the parables of a famous teacher, ‘Am I my brothers keeper’, from that point we define ourselves. For to be a keeper of a fellow human we must endeavor to lift them to their full potentials not exploit them en mass just because we can. We must understand that unless there is another planet where two philosophies of life may be separated forever, we must make our last stand.

  • Mike Hunter

    I don’t know what world this writer is living in. I’m a single man and I certainly don’t feel like we’ve won.

    I’m currently living with an ex-[EXPLETIVE DELETED] buddy who “accidentally” got pregnant after she “forgot” to take her pill. She then tried to convenience me that having a child with and marrying an irresponsible pothead, loser with an attitude was a good idea. After it became apparent to her that I wasn’t going to see things her way she simply professed: “I’m having this baby and keeping it, no matter what you say or do, and you’re going to pay child support”. Apparently the fact that she had no moral qualms having an abortion when she became pregnant after sleeping with her previous ex-boyfriend didn’t matter.

    I then faced the choice of dropping out of College with two years to go; working a minimum wage job for the rest of my life so I could pay child support; and having nothing left to live on. Or going though nearly two years of hell by staying with this harridan.

    I’m about to graduate from a good public University in a week DESPITE the fact that this worthless piece of [EXPLETIVE DELETED] my over on a weekly basis. Her most recent [EXPLETIVE DELETED] is getting convicted of a DUI, and totaling my car in the process. Of course her bad judgment will end up costing me a shitload of time and money I don’t have, paying off her court costs, fines, and driving her to probation.

    Of course any normal guy would kick her to the curb in a heartbeat; I don’t have that option because I can’t afford to pay child extortion.

    I graduate from my university next week and I did the math, assuming that I can find a job that pays $25,000 a year; and that much isn’t even guaranteed in this economy, my take home pay will still be LESS then someone working MINIMUM WAGE! Although I will finally be able to leave this bitch.

    Heres a quick breakdown:

    -
    Income Tax (total): 13%

    Sales Tax: 6.5%

    Child Support: 22% Using the formulas in the state of Florida this stays roughly constant regardless of income.

    Total Tax/Child Extortion burden: 41.5%

    So nearly half of the time I’m working for someone else. Either an unaccountable government bureaucrat; or an ungrateful, irresponsible, unaccountable con-artist.

    Not only that if I ever become sick or injured, quit my job, take a lower paying job, or if the judge thinks for any reason that I am “voluntarily underemployed” he can refuse to lower my CS obligation, or simply raise it higher. When I can no longer pay it I get my license suspended, thrown in jail, and tagged with a felony.

    How I can earn money to pay more CS when I can’t drive to work, have a felony on my record, or am sitting in jail is a problem I haven’t been able to find a solution to. I haven’t been able to figure out how I’ll be able to retire when anything I save for retirement will automatically be seized to pay for any past due CS, even if the CS obligation is unreasonably high.

    Was I naive to trust a woman? Of course. But so what? Naitivity doesn’t excuse fraud.

    Not to mention that scores women KNOWINGLY have UNPROTECTED sex with total strangers that they meet at a bar or club, and become pregnant. When they do they are all able to unilaterally surrender their parental responsibilities. If they are legally allowed to do so why should I be afforded the same legal protection?

    Also I bet women would view condoms differently if we instituted systematic female circumcision at birth. And the only method of female birth control other then sterilization involved covering a woman’s vagina with a sheet of latex.

    If MRA’s consider this a victory for single men then I would hate to see what they would consider a defeat. Concentration camps, and death squads perhaps?

  • Mr.K

    Former President Lyndon Johnson should have heeded similar advice during the Vietnam War as Matt Peterson is giving to men. “Declare victory and pull out” Link to Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.
    http://www.prisonplanet.com/30_year_anniversary_tonkin_gulf.html
    Quote:
    The rest is tragic history.

    Nearly three decades later, during the Gulf War, columnist Sydney Schanberg warned journalists not to forget “our unquestioning chorus of agreeability when Lyndon Johnson bamboozled us with his fabrication of the Gulf of Tonkin incident.”

    Schanberg blamed not only the press but also “the apparent amnesia of the wider American public.”

    And he added: “We Americans are the ultimate innocents. We are forever desperate to believe that this time the government is telling us the truth.”

  • Trust

    Men may have won in the sense that they can get easy sex without costs…up front at least. But let’s not forget that any time sex is in the mix, a woman has power.

    Diseases aside, women still can gain financial dominance by playing the “oops I’m pregnant” card (see * below). It also gives them recourse because they can falsely accuse you of rape, even by arguing their ability to consent was impaired by alcohol.

    * Definition of the “Oops I’m pregnant” card: Banging you silly every night for a week while conveniently “forgetting” to take her birth control pills, digging your condoms out of the trash to insiminate herself, checking her bodily fluids constantly, then calling you crying that she doesn’t know how this happened. The courts now force you to care for her for at least 2 decades.

  • Paul

    Actually there is some truth to what you say Matt. However, it does all rather depend on whether you avoid the pitfalls on not.

    If marriage is avoided then I think a lot of what you write is true. But to enjoy all the fruit of victory then you need a good education. Otherwise your life chances are less. So that’s another pitfall, you need to overcome the feminist school system which attempts to damage men as much as possible.

    I don’t think I avoided the pitfalls. However, my son could do this if he is astute enough in his judgement and does not let sexual desire turn into marriage.

    I have been pleading with him for many years now not to get married ever. In the long term I don’t know if this will work. He does not take that much notice of me.

    If he does not get married then he could be very well off indeed. He is already in good employment and the prospects look good. If he marries then at best he has half of what he could have, and a rotten sex life as well. And that the best, the worst could be much worst.

  • Izzey

    As a woman living the ‘sentence’ of a man through tragic loss..I applaud this article. I have always said that men get the short end of the stick, and a woman would never willingly take on the roles of men had they been offered the real choice.
    Well I was wrong.. many of them have, and they have high blood pressure, depression, stress, suicidal tendencies, mismanaged time, and that overall feeling that no one appreciates them.
    Touche’
    Men have a long road ahead yet…they have not mastered the true equality of the ‘princess’.. I am writing a chapter for my book dedicated simply to ‘her’. Of course I had to vomit before I could commit to such writing, myself.
    Nice writing, by the way.

  • NotNOW

    “Now if we can have the state use females for cannon fodder, victory will be complete”

    Amen, brother.

    Matt – Great piece, I needed it!

  • Geoff

    Gee I wish this were true. First off, females have many more liberties and rights than men. And, as a single man, let me tell married men that casual sex isn’t like ordering off a menu whenever you want. These women that partake in casual sex offer no material for a long term relationship. And casual sex is not as easy for men without status and money, just like before if not more now. As for the claim that women are not as happy as men: women know that by complaining they will get the attention, and men have been indoctrinated to be silent and take it like a man. And where is the evidence that men have to work less hard and less hours as their fathers or grandfathers?

  • bruno

    Very funny.
    But sadly totally wrong.
    The men’s utopia here described only goes for single men.
    Once married and with children, it’s a totally different story.
    Nothing has changed for single men, they always have had a good life.
    And for getting the women into the workplace?
    Yes, they have jobs, and yes, they get a salary.
    But which jobs are they doing?
    You can go to any industrial company, where real things are really being produced, you can see that practically all the real work is being done by men, and that most of the women are typing, chatting and telephoning until it is 5 o’clock.
    And yes, they get a salary, but guess who is financing this salary, through production of real goods?

  • Mr.K

    Question to other posters?
    Do you think that a role model for ideal family mom on TV, revealing
    after 3 marriages and several children that she’s a lesbian has anything to do with the images we were conditioned by media. Link,
    http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/34228231/ns/today-today_people/?ns=today-today_people

  • http://www.standyourground.com POIUYT

    The conversation of the mens movement is appropriately one to be had between males, by males, for males, over expected behaviour of societies leading representatives, a majority of whom are themselves male.

    Mens activism cannot be limited to an opposition of femaleisms female representatives alone, as this route obscures the fact that males undersold each other and their entire gender classes interests into females pokets.They rightly laugh at those of our gender class that blindly and repeatedly return to renegotiate what they consider a done deal.

    It is for the male gender class to promise themselves and each other by word and deed, that they will stop this voluntary and automatic treachery of themselves and their common intrests.

    For example: Let it be that senator joseph biden is the worst example of gender class self treachery this world will ever know, by men democratically prohibiting such leadership to ever again emerge from their ranks. No longer should such indecent betrayers of their own sex class be allowed to win authority over men in the west.

    Only when a democratic majority of western men, implicitly understand and collectively defend their common gender class intrests, protecting them for future generations of unborn males, will it be right to claim a victory.

  • Jim

    Now if we can have the state use females for cannon fodder
    victory will be complete

  • Mike

    This is hilarious… I love this one. Truth makes the best subject matter for comedy I find.

  • http://www.angryharry.com Harry

    Well, let’s not get too carried away with the idea that feminism brought men these ‘freedoms’.

    I think that Matt Patterson is just trying to goad the feminists – and showing us a really great way to taunt them.

    But, of course, feminism did not liberate men. Science, medicine and technology are what have reduced many of the horrors that men had to face, and that have now provided men with the wherewithal to free themselves – the internet, itself, being a major part of this.

    And then there were all those freedom-loving groups that, for example, helped us to accept that other people are not that much different from us, and that also helped us to remove many of the social/emotional shackles that bound us.

    But feminism is just a hate movement. It didn’t achieve anything of value.

    What good things have feminists achieved that were not being achieved well before most of us had even heard of them?

    Nothing, as far as I can tell.

    All they have done is to disadvantage all of us in one way or another, while disadvantaging men the most.

    e.g. see my piece, …

    http://www.angryharry.com/nobenefitsoffeminism.htm

  • Ray Merk

    Excellent article Matt. I still worry about young people and civilization, but I’m at the point where I don’t care too much about women’s unhappiness. After all, what the heck can I do about it? I’ve made peace with my own unfulfilled dreams and now that I’m older it doesn’t bother me much. I even have more time for fighting for good causes like men’s rights and fighting against bad causes like so called man-made global warming. Fighting for a great cause is more important than having your own little family anyway. Might as well look on the bright side. I don’t think we can take all the credit though. Gotta give the devil her due and admit the feminists had a lot to do with it. I always thought Western Civilization had a lot to give the world, but they all hate us anyway and I don’t think they will be sorry to see us go. Too bad we won’t be around to see how they get by without us. Most of them aren’t doing much to fight world evils like evil dictators, communism and the Taliban now, so I don’t have much hope they can do it alone when we’re gone.

  • Trust

    The great achievement of feminism is that it provided men without the least bit of respect or concern for women access to easy sex without the cost of marriage, a prostitute or even dinner.

    When one considers the evidence and the outcome, one must conclude the Gloria Steinham and Marilyn Freidan we either appallingly stupid or secret agents for the dreaded patriarchy.

    (Okay, i’m being faciltious by partially quoting Vox Day.)

  • http://www.angryharry.com Harry

    “. First, men and women interacting more frequently inevitably led to hanky-panky,”

    Hanky Panky?

    Well. We’ll have no hanky-panky round here! Thank you very much.

    LOL!

    A lovely piece – that MRAs should stick under the noses of self-proclaimed feminists whenever they are crowing about their victories and/or sneering at men.

    Ouch. It will hurt them.

    And I agree wholeheartedly with the piece but, of course, MRAs must continue to counter the appalling way in which many men are being treated; in the law courts, in education etc.

    Once we have done this successfully – which we will – we can then bask more fully in our new freedoms – and, perhaps, even look forward to the day that we can extract even more juices out of, let’s just say, ‘our environment’.

    LOL!







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search