lumigan tramadol tadalafil

Freedom to Carry

2010-01-10
By

The lamestream media told you:

Nothing.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Will “Freedom To Carry” replace “Right To Carry”? It’s moving that way in Texas and elsewhere.

With state legislative sessions starting nationwide, the right to keep and bear arms is front and center in people’s minds and some state legislatures.

So-called “right to carry,” which requires government interference, paperwork, applications, approvals , taxes called “fees,” mandatory classes, written tests, shooting tests, plastic-coated permission slips, fingerprinting, photographs, entries into criminal databases and expiration dates for your “rights,” well, this has definitely moved the right to bear arms significantly ahead. Is it time to go further and reach “Freedom To Carry”?

Also called Vermont- or Alaska-style carry, basically the government stays out of your face as you exercise your fundamental human and civil right to own and carry property. Having a firearm, if you’re doing nothing wrong, is not a crime. What a concept. A woman can put a handgun in her handbag and go about her day without fear of arrest.

Under the infringement of so-called “reciprocity” schemes, your human and civil rights as an American have been reduced to a list of government-approved states for licensees only, when you leave your home state. The 98% of the public that refuses to jump through the hoops, be taxed, get on the criminal database and get “rights” papers is left out in the cold when they travel under the current model. Enormous police effort that could be going directly toward reducing crime is instead being diverted into registering, regulating and tracking the innocent.

The biggest argument against government-free Constitutional Carry is that it does away with the required training for a carry license. Training is good, we all agree. But are too many trainers now lined up at this government-made trough to feed? Are they afraid they won’t be able to make money like regular entrepreneurs, if government doesn’t force people to attend their classes?

There is also a fear that if people bear arms without the enforced classes, the dumb idiots will kill people out of stupidity — sort of like the argument the anti-gun-rights people make about guns in general. That’s false of course, since less than 2% of the public gets a license and hence the required class, but half the public has guns. The 50% of the people who have guns without the king’s permission slips seem to get along just fine without being forced to take a class under penalty of arrest.

This however is the silver lining of Constitutional Carry. With your rights restored, and training provided on a voluntary basis, trainers will be free to offer classes to the general public the way General Mills sells cereal. Everyone should have some. You want some of this?

Instead of focusing on a tiny fraction of the public and leaving everyone else in darkness, we can finally move to school-based education. No student should be able to graduate without a healthy understanding of firearms, their social utility, and a demonstrated ability to safely discharge a firearm at a target. Use the Arizona high-school marksmanship act as a basis, it’s a sizzler: http://www.gunlaws.com/HighSchoolMarksmanship.htm

It is so totally American, and by replacing the current state of TV-fueled gun ignorance with enlightenment and understanding — accidents will drop, safety will improve, national readiness will skyrocket, and the fear that there won’t be enough training opportunities will fall apart as the stale BS it is.

If you do one thing this season, push for Constitutional Carry in your state. Draft a bill. Introduce a bill. Use our approach in Arizona and seek to simply repeal the unconstitutional obnoxious offensive ban against your civil rights. You’re an American. You can do this.

Call — don’t write — your local gun-rights chapter, even if you’re not a member, you fool. Find them in our National Directory. Tell them you would support Freedom To Carry in your state. Tell them you would join (or donate) if they draft a Constitutional Carry law. Get this ball rolling. You’re an American. You can do this.

1,136 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Jack Smith

    I carry concealed, loaded and locked. That is my Right. Right I received from my Creator. My life and defense of my life is my LAWFUL Right. I do not consent to LEGAL Rules and Regulations written by my subjects.

    I am the man. I am the Posterity you read about in Declaration of Independence. I am We the People who wrote the Constitution for the United States of America. This government does not serve me. This government legally UNLAWFUL! This reminds me of nazi German Nurmberg “Laws” making legal to kill Jewish men, women and children. We hang almost all nazis.

    One day we will hang all usurpers, domestic enemies, who disregarded Constitution and subverted it through Commerce to todays fascist state of affairs.

    If you are a subject (14th Amendment), than stand asside and STFU.
    If you are a man, than carry if you wish to defend your Life, Liberty and puruit of happiness (property).

    This invoke a question: “Are you willing to shoot a police officer who violate your Lawful Rights in the name of Legal Authority and instead of bringing the Peace, creates violence?

    I do.

  • JimInMT

    NotNow at 4:14 am. RIGHT ON!

    Civil Disobediance? What a concept! WE shouldn’t EVEN need it, if we are true to the priniciples of this Union of 50 independent states.

  • JimInMT

    Jim at 6:21 am. A “required” class in anything is abdication to a king. It is anathema to our limited form of government and respect for our unalienable rights. If YOU require a class to learn when to shoot or not, that is fine. But don’t start down that slippery slope with the rest of us. I know when not to shoot: when I am not threatened. At any time I feel that my life IS threatened, I WILL shoot, your classes (and elitist attitude) be damned. Better to be judged by twelve than carried by six.

  • B. Lee Pemberton

    The reason we are today forced to kowtow to these foreign Socialists is that citizens did not put their foot down and say “NO!” to these sob-sisters who first began putting such laws in place. Now, with mystery-man Obama -the guy with no birth certificate- writing our laws we will be lucky to be allowed to even carry a toothpick!

  • CLARENCE LEE CLINE

    What a great concept. I guess I was aware of this before but not conciously. Been exercising this right in just this way for almost 60 Years. I have had to produce my gun many times to protect myself and others. I have fired my piece several times, mostly for effect. however I guess I could, with a lot of thought, say how many times I have prevented a crime by doing so. There is however, one time that I had used it and killed a man. I was able to get the police there in time to not have to pull my gun and fire it. If I had not called the police one of two would have been dead. But a sweet woman with a husband and two kids would be alive today. That is my grief. I was able to defend myself and could have legally killed the guy but I did not. He was given a life sentence and was back on the street in 7 years. remembering the look in his eyes as he died would not hurt me near as much as the guilt over the lady I knew that he killed being dead. Everyone who wishes to should be allowed to strap on a gun and carry it any time and any where. If a man challenges another and forces a draw he should die as soon as he goes for his gun. Anybody near who has a gun should be legally allowed to do this. Society would be much politer. If the criminal element were put behind barbed wire and kept there we would not have to worry so much about them attacking us. Banning anything just gives us a black market and more crime. banning Alcohol during prohibition did more harm than good. it caused the death of many people.

  • JeffBinTX

    Texas is halfway there already with legal concealed carry in an automobile without a permit. It will be important to keep the permit process (as Alaska has) for those who still want reciprocity with the states that will not adopt the 2nd amendment as your “permit to carry”. You will still need a permit from your state in order to get other states’ reciprocity – at least for some time.

  • Jim

    While I fully support the right to carry, I believe a required class to educate people on when you can and cannot use a firearm is important.

  • Phillip

    I can’t understand why so many people fail to understand the second amendment was meant to ensure that individuals have the absolute right to own and carry firearms, full stop.
    Little by little the government, by means such as the inconsistent and capricious rulings by a politically motivated groups like the Supreme Court or any of the myriad departments, agencies and bureaus that now compromise the government, have eroded all of the state’s and many of the individual’s rights “guaranteed” by the Constitution. A government that proclaims the meaning of the words of its constitution somehow changes with the current political wind is not a government that can be trusted to insure individual’s rights and freedoms.
    I sincerely hope I am wrong and if correct hope I don’t live to see it but I fear another revolution is at hand. The US came about because of actions of king George who in turn has started acting in much the same fashion.

  • NotNOW

    I’m one of those people who’ve chosen not to ask for government permission to exercise a right. I have human rights simply because I am here and have done nothing to demonstrate that I don’t deserve to keep them. One of those rights is my right to self-defense. Others include the right to travel unimpeded using the mode of my choice, and the right to own property and to not have it taken from me by the votes of others.

    The people are the sovereigns here, not the goddamned government. The government was instituted to work for us, not to be our masters. Firearm ownership and possession are badges of citizenship, plain and simple. I am one among equals, not an inferior.

    Licensing implies permission, and we are not supposed to need permission to exercise rights. License to carry firearms? License to drive? Professional license to earn a living? Business license? License to marry? Building permit?

    Liberty exists only in those spheres of private action in which the government cannot interfere. Freedom is always freedom from the government.

    I will be in my state capitol on 18 January, lobbying with other angry, honest men.

  • dogwild

    I agree, but I am not going to hold my breath.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search