Women Legislators Attack Men’s Dating Rights

“At some point, even law abiding people are going to stop following the law.”

What, you think the law abiding follow the laws either?

They may try, but even cops say that it is impossible to be in full compliance with the law all the time.

http://elusivewapiti.blogspot.com/2009/08/dont-talk-to-police-part-ii.html

Especially since there are so many now, one is bound to run afoul of one.

It abhores me to see that there are people out there that will continue to twist or fabricate laws to promote their special interests. Even to the extent that may come back to harm their own children and their childrens’ children. The gradual abollishment of dating rights directed at men international/domestic, will be first that will lead eventually, to the abollishment of womens’ rights. Also later to the erradication of marriage completely…..? As American citizens are willing to give up their rights to the ‘powers that be or will be’, of taking away rights and liberties, then the controll goes to the ‘State’ not for its civillians to have their say! Is this the coming of the ‘State’ pedicted in George Orwells’ 1984?

What absolutely angers me about this whole thing are the lies that all of this legislative effort are based on. I don’t mind protecting women, foreign or American, from people with criminal histories. But please stop with the “mail order bride”, “men ‘purchasing’ brides” and “bride trafficking” propaganda. We all know that what is being attacked is a simple “personals ad” column where men and women place and answer ads for friendship, dating and possible future romance. Yes, marriage is often a goal, just as it is in the newspaper personals. But no one is being purchased, sold or trafficked.

@ Dave Root:

Thanks for the breakdown.

Clearly feminists are insatiable in their need to hurt men.

The problem is that misandric laws like this are passed with no fanfare, and the public is none the wiser. After 15 years and even more billions, I still can’t find member of the public who has ever even heard of VAWA, much less IMBRA.

Any law limiting who I can talk to (free speech!) is unconstititional and I will not obey it. I will seek out ways to break this and other similar laws.

Paul Schmidt,
Babb, MT

Richard
Even though your comment was directed to the author of the article, I decided to visit your link. It’s a virtual treasure trove of humourous and hard hitting pictures about feminist. Not for those who are faint at heart or young children. Link for those who dare:

http://www.rip-factor.com/formen/index.html

@ Dave Root and PK,

yes, a little more research into it shows that the laws there (US) far exceed those in Oz in this matter (as far as I can tell).

The Australian Govt has tried to cast it as “human trafficking” by citing singular more extreme cases…, but as far as I can tell it is nothing like what you have –

THe scary part is, is that Australia usually sooner or later follows the US in many ways… yikes!

And just when I thought the burden of regulations here couldn’t get much higher. There is however a growing resistance to feminist rants, and the rule of the regulator (instead of law).

Anyway, I’ll butt out of this one,

Dave.

To Dave@2010-01-22 at 5:46 pm

The “marriage broker” would be the RSVP service you mentioned. And the miles of paperwork would be were they would catch this.

I don’t understand how that could work?
I am in Australia which is also a feminist controlled country . I personally wouldn’t touch an anglo-australian – they are similar it seems to US women. Also, keep in mind that I am married to a south pacific island lady.

To test this:
I went on to a large and popular dating site here in Australia called RSVP – just to try this out (www.rsvp.com.au).

I entered both Papua New Guinea and Malaysia as seperate searches for females in certain age ranges, and got quite a number of results.

Now, on that site you can then let them know you are interested- they view your profile- and if all looks good you can chat,send messages etc. then go off-site and communicate that way.

Keeping in mind at all times that there are many Internet love scams and scammers.

I can’t see how the government could then stop me visiting the country of a prospective partner, possibly even marrying her there, and then going through the usual miles of paperwork to allow her entry to your home country, or to stay in hers ( I know a number of men who have done that).

There are immigration agents that can help with that but they are not marriage-brokers.

Did I miss something??

I say let it ride. Marriage is irrelevant anyway. Let the feminists do to America what they are doing to Britain and when the US inevitably fades into irrelevance due to its weakness ans societal paralysis, we men can take the country we built back from the weasels.

there were a couple of n.o.w. females on a news show yesterday talking about how many more women need to be elected to office all across the country. why? so you can ignore the Constitution and attach middle of the night amendments (imbra) to unconstitutional laws (vawa) to secretely remove God given rights from men? this is the evil that is feminism. using ignorance/lies/shame/distortions or whatever works, to garner power and control men.

i went onto an online overseas dating site last night and looked at the questions that we must answer, and the info we must give to overseas women before being allowed to communicate with them. the info does not stop with “normal” info. they want to know EVERYTHING about you. even info as to everywhere you have lived in your entire life. very personal info. not only enough info to steal your credit, but so much that some here may not be able to provide for national security reasons. and they must give us nada about the women?

the marriage strike appears to be working. this legislation is a knee jerk reaction to ‘nip it in the bud’. so much for working for the good of ALL of the people in your districts. all the women who have backed this bill have shown themselves for exactly what they are. evil.

without u.s. men supporting them, u.s. women will become obsolete. i guess affirmative action can only give them so many handouts. they want all the wealth produced all the time. their greed has no bounds.
and we are just supposed to shut up and pay women as designed.
NOT ME! never again.

Why don’t they just neuter us all? Then we’d be French.

Sounds like a totally sexist law.

Both the state and federal marriage broker laws have more to do with political posturing and funding for women’s activists groups than protecting women from violence. The NOW cartel knows fully well that their original goals of economic ,social and political equality between men and women have already been attained.

They simply cannot continue their con game on the domestic (USA) front much longer. Future growth for the unaccountable and notoriously corrupt domestic violence industry relies on their ability to extend their tentacles into the international arena. Hence you have laws by women activists with an ostensible stated purpose, to help women, which masks the true purpose- to regulate (prevent) relationships between American men and foreign women.

Many American women are concerned that an increasing number of American men are seeking and then marrying foreign women. This is seen as a threat by many American women, for two reasons.

First of all, these foreign women are quite attractive and represent competition for American women. Secondly, from a financial standpoint, an increase in the number of American men who date and then marry foreign brides would automatically decrease the chances that American women will ultimately collect child support and alimony.

Domestic marriages between American men and women have a 50% success rate whereas these International marriages have a much greater success rate. If most American men would marry foreign women this would drastically reduce the number of divorce lawyers. This is precisely the reason why the largest law firms in the country have been aggressively lobbying for laws that prevent American men from dating foreign women.

So I would view the real purpose is to prevent American men from ever having the opportunity of meeting foreign in the first place. Ban the practice of International dating and romance altogether.. that’s what they really want.

@Keyester.

Nah – there is nothing more pressing than destroying men’s well-being and happiness.

I have met some women who seriously believe that it is their civic duty to punish ALL men for things in the past that never actually happened.

Politics are a total joke – they should be called anti-male-sexualtics.

Governments that are based on Matriarchal Tyranny must limit the mating options available to their male citizens in order to sustain themselves.

-Dr. Rookh Kshatriya – http://www.anglobitch.com (sorry for the profanity there – but his site is actually of a high intellectual calliber).

Nonsense like this has been going on for a long time.

I heard that they are also making it harder for successful men to leave the country.

Successful men have nothing to gain by staying here – if they get successful, there will be a plether of women wanting to marry him (i.e. steal half of his success).
Successful men are also portrayed as super-villains inthe media if they are single (nancy grace & the duke lacrosse nonsense).

I know way too many men that have left the country, and gotten young, thin “super-model-quality” women – whom they are happy with, and who are happy with them. These men are among the most kind, non-violent, noble, and loving men I have encountered.

Actions like this from today’s feminists demostrate an extreme desparation.

The feminists have farted in the room – and now, everybody is leaving.

Its actually quite comical.

Feminists are trying to take away all choices for men. Here in Oz, if two gays live together…..then split up…..it goes through the family court and one can lose his assets and have to pay alimony. This is because feminists want every alternative relationship a man can have to be equally as dangerous as they have made relationships with women. I have not spoken to one gay guy that wanted these laws and every gay guy I have spoke to actually did not want these laws. Feminist are even interfering in men having sexual relationships where there is no woman involved. They don’t want men to be able to thave access to any alternatives except the bitch man hating feminists in the west……it’s as simple as that. They will probably make a law against jerking off sooner or later. Don’t laugh, they have tried to ban the new generation of super real looking love dolls……even though they all have vibrators and dildos in their bedside draws.

Just another step forward in the total dis-empowerment of men, the ultimate goal of the man-hating terror-reign.
If men are so dangerous and evil, the next step will be to check and control all men who want to initiate contact with a any woman, or better, let’s just monitor all men all the time, haha..
They are evil entities anyway.
Then we have the feminists utopia with men as nothing more than complete slaves.

I think a lot of American women are offended that more and more American men are finding foreign women more desirable.