Look, But Don’t Look

2010-01-29
By

Are women objectified? We hear it everyday. We hear it so much that for some, the statement simply goes in one ear and out the other. It has become common knowledge that women are being objectified in commercials, billboards, movies, and everywhere else an attractive woman just happens to be standing and men just happen to be looking.

Why is this common knowledge? Well, if there was anything anyone could possibly claim feminism is solely responsible for, this is it. There is little need to revisit the past to examine the cause and effect of this issue as there is plenty of evidence right now of the inherent bigotry against men and women feminists are still spreading through endless propaganda.

Basically, if an attractive woman, and only an attractive woman, one with the figure of say, a swimsuit model is posing for a picture in any kind of provocative clothing then she is being objectified. Forget the fact that this woman chose to do this knowing  that her looks would sell whatever product she was posing for, forget the fact that this woman more than likely takes care of her body by working out and eating right keeping herself fit and healthy, forget everything that makes sense, forget logic, and forget reason. Now that every rational explanation as to why women are not objectified in the media has been set aside, let’s look at the feminist reasoning as to why every woman that is attractive is being objectified. Those reasons being; because men are in charge of the photo shoot, commercial, or movie where the woman has to parade herself around in front of the camera and patriarchy, their fall back reason on any issue for blaming men.

Men are in charge: This is a flat out lie. A rather pathetic lie if you really think about it. Maybe seventy years ago men were in charge of the majority of photo shoots, commercials, and the like but this, the famous feminist attempt at using the past to justify bigotry in the present even though they usually lie about the past and what really happened in no way justifies anything done today, is irrelevant as the fashion industry right down to who is telling women what color scheme to wear is heavily populated by…that’s right, women. Yes women and the new age sensitive men are the ones snapping the shots, tucking in waste lines, and hiking up models’ dresses in order to flash more leg for the camera. Women run the fashion world and women set the standards for what models look like. While there are still a larger number of men in control of movies the fact remains that women are right there behind the cameras with them. There are plenty of female screenwriters, directors, and costume designers. Karyn Kusama, director of Jennifer’s Body is one such director who is considered to be a feminist by many. This movie, written by, Diablo Cody another woman that puts shame to the feminist men control everything propaganda didn’t seem too angry about the attractive Megan Fox and Amanda Seyfried making out and dry humping in their night attire on a bed while young boys gazed wide eyed in theaters. Kusama didn’t seem too upset about the focus of the movie being Megan Fox in as little clothing as possible and fondling with teen boy fun parts. Granted the movie did actually have a plot but oh how feminists were in an uproar about this one. First they conducted their usual bashing of Megan Fox making sure to in some way link every insult about her intelligence and acting ability to her looks and not surprisingly professing that the only reason she is so popular is because of her looks. Whether this is true or not matters little to me, however, wasn’t it feminists who said that women should not be ridiculed for being attractive and wearing provocative clothing? I guess they are the only ones allowed to do the ridiculing. Anyway, yes, as one would imagine, the accusations of objectification was made even though men in film making had nothing to do with the plot, little to do with the cast, and vaguely any interest in regards to the creation of this film. However, the whole men are the root cause of all women’s problems stereotype shined bright throughout the film. That one feminists had no problem getting behind.

Male dominated audience: Another lie. Women spend $4 trillion annually, accounting for 83% of all U.S. Consumer spending – or, an astounding two-thirds of the nation’s gross national product. This figure probably wavers but the point is still the same; advertisers know that women are the dominant majority buying their products and thus model their advertisements to appeal to women. Most of the commercials on television from make-up and lingerie, to computers and medicine are targeted towards women. Regardless of whether men, women, or both are behind the camera telling young models to dance around in bikinis does nothing to change the fact that the products sell and women are the ones buying. Women watch television more than men. The fact that almost any sitcom or drama on television today simply must have at least one female character that can outwit, outfight, and out joke all of the male characters is a testament to that fact. Also every crime drama is littered with these characters and all adhere to typical misandric stereotypes such as men are the only ones who commit rape and domestic violence and courts view all female rape accusers as liars and lawyers are bombarded with hardships in getting convictions.

Yet even with all of the proof that women are the primary targets of media advertisers and that even feminist directors and female writers have no problems with having their actresses show some skin and make out to sell tickets, the majority of feminists still claim that whenever a woman puts on shorts and walks down the street be it on TV, in a movie, or in real life that woman is somehow being objectified by men. They even go as far as claiming that women are exploited by men and only men throughout the media, especially in pornography. Speaking of pornography, let’s bust another feminist propaganda bubble.

Pornography: One of several professions where pay gaps show women making more than men but pay gaps are for another article. Feminists claim that half of the women who enter the porn industry do it out of desperation and poverty. The other half are forced in by abusive boyfriends. As comical as this sounds this is their belief. Well I admit it is the growing anti-porn feminist belief. The pro-porn feminists believe that women are empowering themselves by taking control of their sexuality for money. Some would claim this had been done over a millennium ago through prostitution but I digress. There is one common agreement between the pro-porn and anti-porn feminist camps though, women are being objectified and exploited.

Why? Because of the same debunked claims as above, men are in charge of all porn.

How? Because of some of the things that are done in porn such as fake rapes, domination, urinating and the like. Granted there is, in my opinion, some pretty sick things done to women in some pornographic videos. However, it isn’t sick to everyone and I realize I do not have the right to decide what is and what is not decent for everyone. Feminists can not comprehend the idea of not forcing their opinions on others and they constantly ignore the fact that all of the things that are done to women in porn are not only done to them by men but women as well. Also all of the things done to women in porn are done to men as well by men and by women and just as with the models in commercial advertisements, these men and women choose to do these things. Some even enjoy the idea of people watching them. Also women, feminist and non-feminist, are no strangers to watching porn.

When the issue of objectification is analyzed on all sides one will find that women are not the only shirtless models posing in front of products on television and in magazines. When one analyzes the reasons why feminists are so angry about attractive women being the center of the advertisement world the true nature of their protests reveals itself rather simply. While I cannot say what the standard for attractiveness is for everyone, what we see on television is what the majority believes to be attractive or they wouldn’t be the ones in lingerie and diet commercials. Now the stereotype that all feminists are unattractive can be thrown out the window, which is why I believe the inherent anger they feel when a woman makes money off of her looks goes deeper than simple jealousy. You rarely see feminists protesting against physically fit men advertising for exercise equipment, beer, cologne, and an assortment of other things. To them that is just fine. However, whenever a woman dares to put on a bikini and stand or dance in front of anything then the patriarchy has reared its oppressive head and the model has somehow been indoctrinated since birth to believe that her looks are what matters most in life and the only way she can make money is by showing her tight stomach rather than being the CEO of Better Than Men Industries and breaking the glass ceiling. Feminists are angered by beauty pageants, Playboy, and America’s Next Top Model but are fine with Mr. Universe, Playgirl, and…America’s Next Top Model. This article could have fit right in with my recent Double Standard Supporters piece because as always, feminists dig their own graves with their advocacy for ending what they believe to be discrimination against women but ignoring the exact same circumstances with men. The goal of feminists, I believe, is to make the public disgusted with seeing women dancing in music videos and wearing provocative clothing in commercials and movies, only attractive women of course, because they want parents to teach their daughters that it is wrong to use your beauty to get ahead in the world. How can women dominate the business industry and all of the high end corporate positions if a lot more women than men prefer to just take their clothes off and walk up and down a stage for a few minutes? Since feminists know they can’t force every individual man and woman to do what they want, they will endlessly spew their lies in order to make people believe that what feminists want, is what they want. They cannot accomplish their overall main goal of ousting all men from any position of power if women don’t feel like trying to take them. I have no real positive or negative opinions towards the fashion industries or the practice of taking pictures of pretty people and I don’t think it is my business or the business of anyone else what a woman or man chooses to do with their life. Feminists, digging their own graves, believe otherwise.

Those who really degrade women: When feminists attack pageants and commercials they go full force. Lingerie and swimsuit models become anorexic little boys. Yes, feminists make the claim that beautiful women who keep themselves healthy and physically fit in reality look like small 13-14 year old boys that no man would ever want. Their advice? Eat…eat fast and eat a lot until the jiggling roles on their sides illustrate the true beauty of the female form…on the inside of course because that’s all that matters. While it is true that not many would want a relationship with an attractive person that turned out to be a jerk, the fact remains that the word attractive has nothing to do with being better than someone else, it is simply what attracts one person to another. People look before they speak and everything else falls in line. Feminists know this and the attractive women I have seen amongst them have no shame in shaping their bodies to the same proportions of those 13 year old boys and dressing in the same manner of those exploited porn stars. What is their programmed defense when asked why they choose to wear these things? I can wear what I want. Oh but as we already know there is a double standard with any feminist claim. For once I would like to walk down the street without hearing cat calls. The comedy never ends with them. Women will dress themselves in clothes advertised and sold with the intent of attracting men and then get enraged when men are attracted. This is another feature in our daily television line-up. While there are male and female feminists, the female majority takes the cake with this blatant double standard and they hold no shame. Why should they? Just as men compete with other men, women compete with other women and feminists are no exception. Since their organizations have immense political influence they run their media campaigns damning women who dare choose to model their looks. At the same time, feminist women will strut their stuff in clubs and bars, eager to fill their anger/pity quota for the day by scoffing at any male who attempts to even talk to them. After a hard day of turning down any man that doesn’t grovel at their feet, feminists will return to their blogs and support groups asking questions such as why are men always staring at my chest? As if having their breasts sticking out had nothing to do with it.

The stereotypes I have been pumping out may seem a bit far fetched but as with my recent revelation that feminists deny and are genuinely ignorant of the obvious double standards within physically demanding professions, I have noticed that when it comes to stereotypes, feminists deny them but embrace them at the same time.

I personally do not believe in objectification based on the simple fact that everyone who is supposedly objectified be they a man or a woman chooses to do whatever it is someone else feels is objectifying them. Claiming that you know what’s best for someone is a job for parents, not feminists, and should be directed towards children, not adults. When men and women who are supposedly objectified deny their objectification, feminists will be the first to tell the women that they are being objectified but don’t know it. Basically feminists feel they have become the authority on what women can and can’t do. Furthermore they feel that whatever they claim is a form of male oppression, even when it makes absolutely no sense, is nonetheless male oppression. While I don’t believe in objectification, for those who do it is obvious that if women are indeed being objectified, then so are men as they are subjected to the same performances as women.

However, since I don’t feel anyone is being objectified or exploited, unless they truly are forced to do these things, the whole notion, created by feminists, is ludicrous.

By Jared “Jmnzz” W.

Blog

Channel

955 views

  • Keyester

    While it’s true women dress provocatively to attract the attention of men, they do so to increase the likelihood of attracting THE man that interests them. If this means enduring cat calls from lowly construction workers while out for lunch, or having to rebuff advances from what she deems to be “lesser males”, then so be it. She’ll contend with this as bothersome, if not flattering, and complain about it to her friends later.

    Meanwhile she yearns for the attention of the handsome lawyer or doctor, not specifically ALL MEN who might gawk. It’s only the low mate value pigs busy objectifying her. She may tease them into humiliation depending on what kind of mood she’s in. It’s female sexual power.

  • steven deluca

    There are many women who are physically attracted to men. Men who have broad shoulders and narrow hips have sex earlier, more often, with more children that short, fat, dumpy guys in all cultures.

    Boys in our culture are taught that women’s bodies of a certain shape and age are far better than any male body could be.

    My children’s mother was surprised in Italy and Spain how many attractive men there are compared to England and America. Men in Italy and Spain, in the 70′s walked a lot and didn’t go to MacD’s.

    Cut back on the pizza and beer fat ass – jog a little, do a few push-ups and chin-ups and you too will find that ten percent of women who are aggressive sexually will be wanting your body “almost” as much as you want theirs. And if you are lucky you will meet women who want you more. They are out there.

    All through my adulthood (I am 63) I have seen men whose bodies look like women’s bodies that are over weight and hairy, tits, sagging butts, dick protruding somewhere along the line, – it’s not a pretty picture… and those guys end us saying that they wished women had the same lust for men that men have for women.

    They are convinced women don’t have sex urges. Well, do they want to have oral sex, or any sex with out of shape, unhealthy looking women you see at Safeway, or is it the one that takes care of her body, dresses well… Do you really think that chips and beer for a few years ending up with a pot belly and stilt legs, no ass, is going to make women see you as a “sex object” … You can either buy women or spend your money at the gym and show up a few days a week… buying women sucks. Having them tell you that they love your body and want you rocks. It’s a choice. I get tired of men whining about how women don’t like sex as much as men do.

    Female sexual power only works on men who can’t get laid because they are not funny, or smart, and because they let their bodies turn into something that looks unhealthy and ridiculous.

    We need more warriors and fewer momma’s boys. If it’s too late for you, at least start your son young with a healthy diet, exercise and pride in his appearance.

    SD

  • gwallan

    I wonder how many of the women/feminists pushing the men-objectify-women-by-looking position have a dildo or similar artifact in their bedside drawer?

  • Mr. Knight

    1. Men are objectified as money objects

    2. Men are objectified as wage-slave workhorses

    3. Men are objectified as canon fodder

    4. Men are objectified as servants of women

    5. Men are objectified as presumptive sexual objectifiers

  • steven deluca

    Too many males don’t realize that just as some women “work out” and “work it” – clothing, fake boobs, make up, that too many guys don’t seem to understand that too much time with beer, chips, TV, When they could also “work it” dress nice, look sexy isn’t working for them.

    I think about 10 percent of the woman are as sexually agressive as most men but they are going after that same 1% of the guys who know that in all cultures men with the T shape or V shape, get laid younger, more often, have more children that those males that are pear shaped.

    I hear pair shaped men whining all the time about how hard it is to attract a woman and that you need money, presents, Alpha status but I don’t see those same men going after dumpy looking women.

    Ya, handsome doctors get the Alpha chicks. And Delta dudes hit on Beta females and wonder why they strike out. Guys are bailing out of college, not going to the gym, don’t read enough to get past sports and politics, no hobbies, no interests and then wonder why the pretty women, or sexy women (not always the same) don’t notice them. Yawn. It’s not rocket science.

  • Mr. Knight

    Mr. Deluca,

    Notwithstanding the accuracy of your statements, are they really focused on addressing the point of the article?

  • MichaelT

    The term ‘objectification of women’ is just one of those emotionally manipulative phrases aimed at making men appear more demonic. Exactly how do you objectify someone? A person is an object whether they like it or not – everything that exists is an object. Does it mean to focus on a certain aspect of a person to the exclusion of all other aspects? If that is true then why is that necessarily a bad or disrespectful thing to do? If I am only interested in Tiger Woods as a golfer and am not interested in his family life, his affairs, his businesses or his hobbies am I objectifying him? Is my aim to hurt him in some way by not adopting a more wholesome approach to him? If I enquire about the local mechanic’s credentials to fix my car and take no interest in his wider humanity is that an objectification and is it a slight upon him? If I am only interested in sex with a consenting adult or in enjoying their beauty then why is that seen as such a bad thing?

    If feminists are forced to explain exactly what they mean by such a phrase then they are at a loss. They usually mean that a man who enjoys the beauty of a woman or who fantasises about having sex with her has as good as committed the deed. There are thousands of women who look very attractive but that is the only attractive quality they have and that is not enough for most men to want to get more involved with them. Feminists interpolate that any man who finds a woman attractive necessarily wants to do something to her against her own will. It is not the looking that is wrong but the sexual abuse that would surely follow if it were not for the restraint of the law. To condemn someone for something that they might do is surely the domain of desperate and aggressive women. If everyone was condemned for what they might do no one would leave their house.

    This tired old piece of feminist propaganda has been left unchallenged for too long. Many men feel guilty when they look at attractive women because they have been raised in an era when it is almost an admission of rape to do so. There is nothing wrong with enjoying the beauty around us in any shape or form and there is nothing wrong in wanting nothing else from another human being except sexual enjoyment. We do not have to become deeply involved with everyone we meet – relationships would exhaust us completely.

    Feminists who use this phrase to manipulate others should be called to order and made to explain exactly what behaviour of men they find to be wrong rather than hiding behind a shield they have made for themselves. It does not matter whether men or women are doing the objectifying. Objectification of another person is not wrong. It causes them no harm and does not disrespect them in any way.

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    Look, But Don’t Look is the mindset of many women in the work place who wear short skirts or low cut dresses or tight sweaters. If a man does not look, they will call him gay, if he looks for more than .125 seconds, they call it sexual harrasment.

    I have often seen Fox news and most of the women in the mornings wear very short dresses. I wonder if the men have to be very careful because if their eyes wander the wrong place, they would be charged with sexual harrasment? The feminist know that men are turned on by sight so I contend that if women dress like this in public, especially the workplace…it IS sexual harrasment to the men working there.

    Joe P. I know many women who want and have gotten to know me better and neither of us have had any thoughts of sex. I also assure you that my first thought with any woman is what is in their brain….not what is in their pants. When both men and women learn to respect each other for other than our bodies…the battle of the sexes will be over. What you posted will keep this battle raging. Sorry…I do not buy it!

  • Denise Noe

    Bob Guccione, publisher of Penthouse: “Men like to look, women like to show. We pay women for their fun and games.”
    Asked on a talk show why he paid women more than men for nude posing, he answered, “We’re sexist: pro-woman.”

  • Mr. Knight

    The extent to which women show is the extent to which men will look.

    That is nature.

    In more civilized times, that was recognized by way of modesty in dress from the ladies.

    Now such modesty is rare, with there being flagrant ‘showing’…

    …but with men told to extreme degrees that even a glance is unacceptable.

    Thus, there is now an incongruity between showing and looking.

    Of course, no matter how much is shown, there is no excuse for crude comments or actions.

    That’s a given.

    Yet, as far as simply looking goes, the rule of nature remains:

    The extent to which women show is the extent to which men will look.

    That’s true, real, and perfectly natural cause-and-effect.

    It simply isn’t in keeping with feminism, which in practice proclaims that women can do anything without consequences, while men are cast as being wrong in every situation.

  • Phillip

    This parallels a friend’s 13 year old daughter. She wears far too much makeup (as if any makeup was legitimate for such a young child), skin-tight clothes, even to the point of choosing shirts that show both her (limited) cleavage and stomach then wadding up the back to pull them tight and fastening them with rubber bands or hair ties while wearing enough perfume for 12 women, padded bras, thong underwear and of course, oversized pierced earrings. She then complains about boy’s ogling her. Go figure. It’s like baiting a hook and not expecting fish to bite.

  • Joe P.

    You guys are too cerebral for me, yeah, Joe Neanderthal here.

    I (re) submit that a “friendship only” relationship between sexually active, unattached men and women is about as common as an eclipse.

    I mean, generally speaking, what’s in it for the guy? He likes sports, beer, the sciences, politics…..she likes all things frilly and “Everybody Loves Raymond” reruns.

    And you’re kidding yourself if you think that your good female buddy and you will still be able to go out and shoot some pool after one of you is in a romantic relationship with a 3rd person.

    Shatteredmen……when you see the blonds on Fox News, the FIRST thing you wonder about is what’s in their BRAIN?? Well, you’re a better man than me and Bill O’Reilly, who had to come up with $2 million a fews years ago to make the harassment case against him go away.

  • RZ

    I love it that some guys are asking why women would desire pear-shaped blobs of men who have no conversational talents. Hooray!

    On to the subject:
    “Now such modesty is rare, with there being flagrant ’showing’……but with men told to extreme degrees that even a glance is unacceptable.”

    How right you are. I’ve always said (and my mother and grandmother before me) that it’s not fair to wear deliberately provocative clothes, and then get all indignant when someone makes a pass at you.

    Both sexes objectify women, if you define “objectify” as “present purely as an object of sexual desire.” Women who choose to dress provocatively objectify themselves. Men who prefer pin-ups and porn stars to real women … well, if they are desirable men they make real women feel inferior to the objects. If they are the above-mentioned pear-shaped blobs, they are living in the same kind of fantasy world as women who think life should be like a Harlequin romance.

    So, there is also “objectification of men.” We can look at Playgirl, and go see male strippers. Whoopee. And of course the Harlequin romance heroes are both devastatingly handsome and filthy rich. If that’s equality… Feh.

    Joe said,
    “I mean, generally speaking, what’s in it for the guy? He likes sports, beer, the sciences, politics…..she likes all things frilly and “Everybody Loves Raymond” reruns.

    Stereotype, much? I’m not the only woman I know who hates frilly, and pink, and has never seen an episode of “Everybody loves Raymond.” I’ll take “Blue Collar Comedy” any day. And I’d rather go to the shooting range than go see the latest “chick flick.”

    Of course, I’ve been stereotyped as a lesbian because I don’t do the fashion thing, and enjoy some activities that are “traditionally male.”

    Stereotypes are stupid. (No, Joe, I don’t think YOU are stupid.)

    RZ






Search