lumigan tramadol tadalafil

You’ve Come a Long Way Baby- And There’s No Going Back

2010-03-28
By

Sometimes the world can make you shake your head so hard your ears could fly off. That is the exactly how I felt when watching this video of Lou Dobbs and feminists trying to out stupid each other over understanding a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania about the declining state of women‘s happiness, years after realizing the dream of women‘s liberation.

Try it on yourself, but it’s pretty short, so try not to roll your eyes during the really good parts.

(video courtesy of NightwingTV)

OK, so women aren’t as happy as they used to be since feminism came along. There are a few men that aren’t either, but for now let’s focus on the bewildered, head scratching Dobbs and try to give him a hand at seeing the obvious.

To get it, he will first have to let go of the fantasy that feminist have been selling for roughly as long as there have been feminists. That is, that doing what men do was ever a road to happiness in the first place. What women have just started discovering after forty years of feminism is what men tried to tell them when they started burning bras and whining about male privilege.

Namely that male privilege, at least for 99% of men, doesn’t exist and never did.

Men, for the most part, live life working at jobs they hate, measuring success by keeping their heads down in the workplace, trying to make some alpha jerk like Lou Dobbs happy, and staying out of trouble. Then they go home and live by pretty much the same rules with their wives or girlfriends.

The independence, freedom and personal power of a man’s world that feminists promised came with every paycheck is actually a cruel illusion, behind which is a lifestyle more servile than powerful; more stress than self actualization, and more a monotonous daily grind with pit stops at a mailbox full of bills than a breezy walk through the halls of privilege. Things have only been otherwise in the twisted imaginations of those hoodwinked into thinking this was the way to personal fulfillment.

Sure, there are men who get satisfaction from their work. But any man, and now any women will tell you that the person who makes a good living doing something they love is as rare as a winning lotto ticket.

It‘s difficult, I am sure, for Mr. Dobbs to see this, as he lives the exceedingly uncommon life. But I tell you what, Lou, try dragging your fat ass away from that cushy position you are in and drive a cab or a semi for 12 hours a day to make your rent and see how quickly it cures that itch on your head. Or get yourself a union card and spend every day in a coal mine, breathing black death and feeling the walls tremble around you as you work. Oh, and remember while your doing it that you still won’t be seeing many, if any, of those inexplicably disgruntled women down there in the depths with you.

If the lighter, easier work that women have chosen isn’t making them happy, despite so many of them popping anti depressants like Chiclets, just imagine what trading in their staplers and post-it notes for shovels would do for them.

And it needn’t even be that extreme. Try being an attorney who went to law school with high ideals of justice and now spends every day, spirit fading away, as he lives life forsaking every value he ever believed in and being trapped into staying because his manly obligations are like an anchor around his neck. Or how about a sales rep, being told every day that they are only as good as their last bad moment, being pushed for more no matter what they do.

Imagine being really powerless. Imagine being Tom Joad or Willie Loman or Walter Mitty.

This is what women protested their way in to; right into the trudging, laborious life that used to be done for them by men. And now this is where they are stuck, just like bugs on flypaper.

And so now they are unhappy? Who would have ever imagined, eh?

But the best is yet to come. When women finally enter the rest of the man’s domain, they will finally see the fruition of the feminist dream. It will be written in the blisters on their hands; in their backs aching and skin burning from digging in the heat of the sun. And their pain will echo and reverberate in the male dominated halls of dispassion.

For when women truly take up residence in a man’s world, their struggles, like men’s, will become invisible. No university will do a study about their happiness. No porcine newscaster will be scratching their head in disbelief and pledging to find answers.

And the last thing those women will find when they rage against it all is anyone who cares.

Paul Elam is the Editor-in-Chief for Men’s News Daily and the Publisher of  A Voice for Men.

1,548 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Mr. Knight

    Women currently have the option to pursue a career full-time or to stay at home and be a parent full-time.

    Men should have that same option.

  • bizzman662

    Govenor Ritter just signed into law that WOMEN will not pay more for health insurance than MEN anymore….(not like they did in the first place)….but as we heard MANY times on the House Floor last Sunday….

    “Being a WOMAN is NO LONGER a Pre-existing condition”……

    He also RAISED the fee to get married in order to fund the VAWA and Shelters here in Colorado….

    So we TAX marriage in order to FUND divorce….since the VAWA is the weapon of choice when kids are involved……

    THIS IS OUR PROBLEM……MEN that PANDER to the FEMINISTS at OUR EXPENSE……

    Destroy the Family….and they (the man haters)GET EVERYTHING….

    Just some thoughts….

    “The VAWA….taking Familes out 1 MAN at a time since 1991, and only getting better”……

  • keith

    Maybe we should stop rolling our eyes on what we know to be obvious. Maybe we should be asking some real political questions here.

    Is this a political statement, that will demand more cookies from the cookie jar.

    Is this an electoral majority stating they are displeased with their portion.

    Will another study appear with bullshit results to justify more demands from your wallet and your taxes.

    If mens happiness index remains flat or with little change, politicians have no obligation to address a silent minority.

    Did anyone notice that there was no children’s index measurement.

    I don’t believe for a minute this clip represents a position of women. This is a ploy and a preparation to demand more at the expense of MEN and CHILDREN.

    It’s time for men to shout louder and longer and drown out this crap. Snickering won’t help.

    Sorry but I see pure propaganda here. Screw em.

  • bizzman662

    Great Article!

    Bravo!

    That was AWESOME!!!!!!

    I especially liked the part about Dobbs getting his fat butt up and doing some ACTUAL work!

    Bravo!

  • Red0660

    “Men have lower expectations and the least happy men just kill themselves or end up in jail.”

    SPLENDID OBSERVATIONS GOOD SIR.

    MALE SUICIDE RATES: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/S5Dy0GPw9kI/AAAAAAAAAY4/SzMTAr36pE4/s1600-h/ScreenShot007.bmp

    NOTICE IN PARTICULAR WHEN THE MALE SUICIDE RATES WENT FROM MIRRORING WOMENS TO BREAKING OFF AND BECOMING DRASTICALLY ASYMMETRICAL STARTING IN 1970 STARTING WITH THE SECOND WAVE FEMINIST ASSAULT…WHAT BEGAN TO HARM MEN???

    MALE INCARCERATION RATES: 1970 AND BEYOND..WHOA!

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/Sphvf0rmKqI/AAAAAAAAAQM/yZV1lyC8YSk/s1600-h/ScreenShot026.jpg

  • Red0660

    -”They can decide to get married with kids or no kids. if so, to stay at home or continue their career.”

    Women should not have this option as FEMINIST DOCTRINE SAYS. WOMEN AGREE otherwise they would not have formed ranks and supported feminism in such numbers. Women have saturated the workforce driving down male wages. Now only privileged women can stay home..

    “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.”

    -Simone de Beauvoir (author of the feminist celebrated book The Second Sex)

    FURTHERMORE LETS LOOK AT MORE FROM FEMINIST THINKERS….

    “Nowadays the working woman hastens out of the house early in the morning when the factory whistle blows. When evening comes and the whistle sounds again, she hurries home to scramble through the most pressing of her domestic tasks. Then it’s off to work again the next morning, and she is tired from lack of sleep. For the married working woman, life is as hard as the workhouse. It is not surprising therefore that family ties should loosen and the family begin to fall apart. The circumstances that held the family together no longer exist. The family is ceasing to be necessary either to its members or to the nation as a whole. The old family structure is now merely a hindrance.” “Communism liberates women from her domestic slavery and makes her life richer and happier.” -Alexandra Kollontai -Komunistka, No. 2, 1920, and in English in The Worker, 1920

    LISTEN, I took a Women’s Studies course in college and know full well what modern women think.. Look at the policies and laws women lobby to create!!!

    -”They can stay single with a partner having a kid or not.” They can even stay single with a kid of their own with no dad’s name on the hospital form.”

    “Maybe when women are left with many choices to choose from their is more thinking and worrying on their part to decide while for men the options are simple.”

    ———————————————–
    LOL, you know why men’s choices are simple??? because we have none.. Men exist to enable women’s choices. This is what women call “Women’s Liberation”

    -”They have come a long way and we should admire them not try to minimize their accomplishments.”

    Again, don’t fool yourself, women are not “liberated from men” or “independent” but rather have enabled the illusion of such by increasing the ways or “choices” in which they can be dependent on the resources of men.

    They have done this namely by decreasing their liabilities and obligations to men in marriage to ZERO. All risks to women have been turned into capitalized liabilities of men to support her and “her” children….Men now exist to enable women’s choices….PERIOD…Men have no choices. YOU CALL THIS AN ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR WOMEN???

    40% of all births in the U.S. are now to single women. With all due respect sir, do you believe women and “their” children will one day miraculously “liberate” men and allow us to be “independent” of their dependency?

    TAKE A LOOK SIR!:

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/S3-wdTWLnhI/AAAAAAAAAXI/G7im7izaETs/s1600-h/ScreenShot013.bmp

    TAKE ANOTHER LOOK!

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/S3-6RxZOOkI/AAAAAAAAAXo/e3TEsaBSYpM/s1600-h/ScreenShot014.bmp

    NOW, LETS LET WOMEN HAVE THEIR LIBERATION BY DEMANDING OURS!!!!!!!!!!!!

    rebukingfeminism.blogspot.com

  • Red0660

    “Women could be less happy than before but they are in a better position now to create their own happiness instead of depending on the man in their lives.”

    Let’s apply this to ourselves men! We to can be independent and liberated from women and family!

    “Men could be less happy than before but they are in a better position (given women’s independence from dependency on men) to create their own happiness instead of depending on the woman in their lives.”

    Lets go our separate ways! Oh wait, women are not independent or liberated from men they have simply given themselves more “choices” on how they can extract resources from men..specifically after divorce..

    REMEMBER WHEN YOU CHANGED DIVORCE LAW LADIES???
    MEN DO…. TAKE A GOOD LOOK LADIES!!!!

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_IU3iQnIt6Nc/S3-6RxZOOkI/AAAAAAAAAXo/e3TEsaBSYpM/s1600-h/ScreenShot014.bmp

  • Ken

    “Women could be less happy than before but they are in a better position now to create their own happiness instead of depending on the man in their lives.”

    Then why aren’t they?
    Who is stopping them?

  • Ray Merk

    Excellent article. A few comments though.

    <>
    Women can learn to build cars and roads. Not too many people are ever threatened by a house fire, so that’s almost a moot point.

    The real issue here is not about roads and house fires but that men and women are not meant to be independent *emotionally*. We need each other.

    Also, even if a woman can be independent, children cannot.

  • Dusty

    Nice article Paul, there’s only one problem with it.. there’s too much logic and commonsense involved for it to sink into the minds of liberal man-haters, such as Dobbs and company.

    All I have to say for the crybabies who expected a free lunch (and got it) is this: You got exactly what you wanted, so don’t blame it on us (men) if you’re just getting around to discovering that having is not as pleasing a thing as wanting.

    I’m certain that, somehow, in some bizarre, ultra-weird way, some wing-nut feminazi will invent a way to pin the blame on men for their unhappiness at having gotten the same things in life as men, which they demanded in the first place.

    Yupper, can’t wait to hear the BS on how it’s all the fault of men for that one..

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Mike M

    I think you have bought into one of the great postmodern mythologies of feminism, e.g. that women will ever be “independent” of men.

    First, we will set aside the questionable logic of asserting that social creatures, designed to pair bond, are in a better position to find happiness be severing ties that are ingrained in their nature. Suffice it to say that it is a major fail to see the traditional male-female connection as a one way street of women’s dependency than the symbiotic arrangement it always was.

    But what you really miss here is that women’s independence, much like happiness through work, is just another feminist illusion created for the gain of political power.

    Take your average “independent” woman. She lives in a home built and maintained by men, which she cannot do. She drives a car designed by men and powered by fuel that men gather and distribute, on roads that were built by men. When there is the threat of fire or crime to her person or her home, she must call on men to rescue her.

    The list could go on forever, but we can simply just think for a moment of where her “independence” and indeed the independence of all women would be were it not for the men that continue to do the heavy lifting for them in all the ways they choose not to see. The fact is that a woman would not be able to file her nails without a man to make an emery board for her use.

    Women can be independent, as you say, but the fact remains that their worlds turn, or don’t, because of what men do every day. In other words, women depend on men. A paycheck and an insulated lifestyle won’t change that.

    Even in the ways men traditionally took care of women more directly are now being done by state functionaries. When that women who now has the freedom to have a baby, even while ignoring the dire need for a father in that childs life, she can get the courts to act as surrogate father and garnish the paternal victims income for her benefit.

    So much for independence.

  • Ray

    “Comparable worth,” or as I call it “Commie Worth,” is based on equality of outcome, not equal opportunity to compete for work, or perform the same work. Marxist/Stalinist feminists want the same pay and benefits that men get in jobs like plumber, roofer, brick layer, refrigeration and A/C, etc. without having to do all the hard dirty work, or suffering all the downsides of the job.

    http://tinyurl.com/yzeu7d

    Accordingly, “comparable worth” just comes along and equates secretarial typist as work being equal to plumbing, and establishes under law that it must be paid the same wages, rather than allowing a free market (what supply and demand establishes for work) to establish salaries.

    Under “comparable worth” women will not have to suffer all the negative health effects, and you better believe they’ll still have all the flexible hours they’ve always had (as primary care givers) to set their work schedules, not work o.t. and have a generally better quality of life than men. Yet, by law, they’ve been “historically oppressed” and are “entitled” to special treatment as a “protected class” of people.

    Equality of outcome under comparable worth, means that the disposable sex (guess who) still does all the deadly and dirty work, works long and inflexible hours, and is maligned for being abusive after being conditioned behavorally to endure some of the most abusive work conditions imaginable.

    If men are conditioned properly from early childhood, and rewarded intermittently in adulthood with sexual favors by the Princess class, they will (overall) continue to willingly perform their conditioned tasks interminably, until death – or at least until trapped into their roles without any hope of “CHANGE,” in my opinion.

    http://tinyurl.com/yknvnqv

    I fully expect to see aspects of comparable worth “CHANGED” into law under Obama’s agenda before his term expires.

  • Mike M

    For women to be independent of men is progress. But with liberty come’s decisions and women now have to decide between numerous options that were more simple to choose in the past. They can decide to get married with kids or no kids. if so, to stay at home or continue their career. They can stay single with a partner having a kid or not.
    They can even stay single with a kid of their own with no dad’s name on the hospital form. Maybe when women are left with many choices to choose from their is more thinking and worrying on their part to decide while for men the options are simple. Women could be less happy than before but they are in a better position now to create their own happiness instead of depending on the man in their lives. They have come a long way and we should admire them not try to minimize their accomplishments.

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Adi

    I agree with you. That is just what I was saying.

    The personal return on employment is just one area where women’s expectations have proven to exceed what realistically should be expected.

    I think what differs here is where those convoluted expectations originated. For instance, we can easily see women’s expectations of men in the romantic sense are quite bizarre. There is a number of reasons for it, from childhood fairy tales with Prince charming being the answer to all their dreams, to self help guru’s who tell women to expect it all, to the unfortunate numbers of men that buy into all that nonsense and break their own backs trying to accommodate those insane benchmarks.

    But I think this particular area of women’s dissatisfaction was almost exclusively manufactured by feminists (with some pitch hitting by Dobbs, et al).

  • http://menarehumanstoo.blogspot.com/ Adi

    I’ve seen that video a while back already. I like your article as usual Paul but I think the explanation is very very simple.
    Happiness is a function of your expectations. And womens expectations from life are somewhere in the clouds compared with mens.
    Also, having more choice, does lower your overall satisfaction. Because you keep looking back asking yourself if you’d have been better off making the other choice.

    What you wrote is still all true though – just not my explanation for women’s supposed decline in happiness.

  • http://www.unitywall.com TXM

    The only way these knuckleheads are going to learn the hard lessons is to let them have these jobs. They won’t listen to any advice, and I have no sympathy for them.

  • NotNOW

    Women’s entry into the workforce was needed in order to lower labor rates in the U.S. The much-lamented result is that two must now work where only one needed to work before. To sell this to women, working for the greater good of the corporate kleptocratic state (and paying taxes, of course) had to be equated with joy, self-actualization, and taking control of one’s life (from men, of course).

    Women must be taught, though, that their enemy is not the DC/Wall Street axis of evil, but the man that comes home each night and shares her meal.

    Divide and conquer, and all (especially the children) are prostrate before the almighty state.

  • Squiggy

    I wish I could remember which comedy troupe did this because it’s perfect.

    They did a skit for a woman’s “self-help” book, and one of the chapters had to do with “changing her man”. As it said – if she could just stick with it, she could change him, from someone who drives her crazy, into “someone she wants nothing to do with”.

    This is what “women’s lib” has done. It’s made women hate their home life, and now their life outside of the home, too. Way to go feminists.

  • nathan

    well, i do agree, scaling happiness is a relatively difficult thing to do across time periods

    the question still remains why

    the problem with the have it all mentality is that there are 24 hours in a day and men never really have it all either-they toil away most of the time end up home drained of energy seeing their families only a fraction of the time they would like.

    Yes it does range from family to family but the fact still remains, there are 24 hours in a day, 16-18 if you want a good nights sleep; a sacrifice has to be made somewhere and if you are too dumb to realize that-man or woman-its your own damn fault

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    I use to spend time “slumming” in several feminist forums. My wife could always tell when I was setting them up (but few of them could realize it) I once asked…is it true that women can do anything a man can do? Within a short time, I had several replies stating “Yes…only we can do it better!” My next statement was….”Then why do you need all of the affirmative action’s and lower standards to do it?” I also asked if it were true that girls mature faster than boys. Needless to say, I got a lot of yes and that shows women are superior. I than asked why boys were charged with sex crimes while the “much more mature” females were never charged for the same thing. My comments would soon vanish as well as my membership in the forums simply for pointing out to these feminist that I do believe they want rights and responsibility. They want all of the rights, while men have the responsibility of assuring they have those rights which far too often are at the expense of tens of thousands of crosses and stars of David’s seen in our national cemeteries….with well over 90% of those below them being male.
    Yes, they have come a long way but although most women regret making the trip, I still contend that is has been men that have paid the highest price for these women’s delusion that the grass was greener on the other side of the fence.

  • 3DShooter

    As I’ve said for many years now . . .

    If women want equality, let them have it good and hard.

    Women never wanted equality – they want ever expanding privilege . . . on the backs of someone, anyone, else and that anyone else is usually a man.

  • Ken

    The original protest was women should be given “equal opportunity”, something they had all along. What we’re left with is nothing more than entitled, embittered, self-righteous females competing against beta males throughout the corporate salt mines. And neither one likes the other very much. The sexes were never meant to be equal, but there is no prolatariat without women working side by side with men is there? And how many women have ascended to greatness in the last 30 years, (without the benefit of marriage or Affirmative Action)? What have they done but continue to be unhappy, about something? They need to stop being told they’re just as good as men at everthing. They’re not. They’re just deluding the ranks of the lowly beta male, pushing him down further. And he’s getting tired of pretending and he’s angry.

  • steven deluca

    Lou Dobbs is going to find out why, by golly. Maybe he will talk to a few men while he is at it. Men have lower expectations and the least happy men just kill themselves or end up in jail. Those men likely were not asked.

    Is it possible that part of this has come from women just expecting too much from life because of romance novels and sappy women’s films? Mayby they need to just appreciate the little things of life.

    SD

  • steven deluca

    Paul,

    One of your best. I hope lots of young men and women see it.

    SD







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search