Stealing from NASA

2010-04-17
By

NASA is a public activity, paid for by Americans. Stealing from NASA is stealing from The People. It’s not a policy choice, it’s a crime.

Barack Obama spent Tax Day “reassuring” Florida voters that money will keep flowing to NASA. (article) But instead of pursuing cutting-edge space technology and exploration, there will be a focus on things such as monitoring the Earth’s climate.

“In space, no one can hear you scheme.” But the public has reached the point that they could recognize the Al Gore “Earth has a fever” con-game from there. In this age of sophisticated technology, images from space are clearly showing train loads of cash being hauled away by sneering little mobsters. We have the ability to target them, but it takes authorization from the mobsters themselves.

Power and financial control will shift to another far-left radical in the Obama line-up, the “godfather” of the global warming scam and advisor to Al Gore, James Hansen. (NASA Climate Data Verses the Conspiracy to Commit Good Science, Hansen Nailed for US Climate Data Manipulation, Global Warming: Survival of a Junk Scientist (James Hansen)) Hansen has been director of the NASA funded “Goddard Institute for Space Studies” at Columbia University since 1981, but also accepts large payments for political lobbying related to the global warming scam (Follow the Money : James Hansen Gets Another Pay-Off), and has for many years profited from sales of his own global warming scare-mongering books.

Since Climategate, the public has grown more aware of what many scientists already knew. There is no real evidence of catastrophic man-made global warming. Climategate emails and data served as confirmation of a multi-billion dollar con-game facilitated by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and driven by far-left “environmental” activists and scientists who were profiteering. The IPCC is a political mechanism for bypassing and stifling scientific scrutiny and maintaining the scam. It tied in with billions of dollars in funding under political control. Real scientific inquiry was ridiculed and the scientists ostracized for questioning artificially composed and fraudulently supported “scientific” dogma. There never was a “scientific consensus” behind Al Gore’s claims. A small number of people who controlled IPCC report writing, manipulated results in contradiction to even the minority scientific peer-review that did take place. Much of the “science” in the reports is not science at all, but hyped up unsupported advocacy and newspaper reports that simply repeat propaganda myths.

There is no great question to be settled. There is no evidence of catastrophic man-made global warming. That is the answer. There is nothing that “climate science” can potentially offer in support of Cap-n-Trade or other “do something about climate change” politics. There is nothing for government to do about climate. There is no unusual reason to worry about the weather.

But let’s say we just think weather is fascinating and recognize that there is some economic advantage to better understanding it; such as by accurately predicting world-wide crop yields so that you can make a killing on the futures market. Why not make understanding the weather a new scientific frontier much like the space-race used to be? Why not set a national goal like reliable prediction of global weather patterns for the next six months along with extremely accurate prediction of energy consumption and agricultural output?

Because they couldn’t achieve the goal. No great scientific advancements can reasonably be expected by shifting NASA’s focus to monitoring the Earth’s climate. For the most part (most, not all), “climate science” is an illusion and will remain so far into the future. One day, scientists will know much more about the weather, when technology is sufficiently advanced to provide and process huge amounts of data and that process has taken place over many, many years – at least. Or, simpler and more direct methods (such as watching sun-spots and improving crop-yield models) that rely on existing technology will rapidly out-pace Especially Big Science (fiction) projects in advancements – without multi-billion dollar annual budgets and without multi-trillion dollar hits to the world economy.

The solution to the current “climate science” problem is nowhere to be found in refocusing NASA’s budget. The solution is in refocusing the budget for weather research. Fire, rather than promote, the con-men, eliminate the fake and get back to real science on a credible budget. But that of course, may require that we first remove the mobsters from higher political offices.

Related: Obama and Goldman Sachs

551 views

  • Mr. J

    “NASA” has been a largely useless money-hole for a long time anyway, might as well add one more stupid thing to the mix.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    I don’t know J – putting up and maintaining communications satellites and such is pretty serious stuff.

  • george

    I think we should spend 90% of our money on the space program. Of course, I don’t have or make any money, so it would not be mine. Space is great!

  • Mr. J

    Roger, I don’t know what percentage of their “budget” is for doing that, my guess is it isn’t very much…it looks like the “catch” is that since they do that then they think they have a right to demand that we throw endless money at them for whatever foolish rabbit trails they want to go down.

  • Roger F. Gay

    J,

    It’s not the people at real NASA who want to spend the money this way. This is an Obama & Gore & Thugs set-up. Real NASA people are not to blame.

  • http://harryhammer.wordpress.com/ Harry Braun

    How about spending a little less on bombs?

    There’s a trillion dollars a year to play around with in the defense industry.

    Scientists learn heaps from NASA.

    So far, the only group of people in the world to display grotesque arrogance and lack of respect for scientific organizations are the Young-Earth Creationists. YEC’s believe the earth is only 6000 years old when in fact about 40 different lines of scientific evidence all corroborate each other and prove that it’s closer to 4.5 billion years old. As far as the science goes, these people are off by a factor of 750,000 to 1. It’s like asking someone how far they think the moon is from the earth and they tell you it’s 3 miles away.

    The Republican party is inundated with Young-Earth-Creationists who abhor science. Many of them think we should let the earth fall into ruin because then Jesus will come back. Many of them also believe that rules to protect the environment aren’t just wrong, but, evil.

    Read: Why Wouldn’t You Trust Climate Scientists?

    http://harryhammer.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/why-wouldnt-you-trust-climate-scientists/

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/mike-lasalle Mike LaSalle
  • There is no great question to be settled. There is no evidence of catastrophic man-made global warming. That is the answer. There is nothing that “climate science” can potentially offer in support of Cap-n-Trade or other “do something about climate change” politics. There is nothing for government to do about climate. There is no unusual reason to worry about the weather.
  • That is the correct answer.

    I am appalled by the prospect of NASA being turned to underwrite the obscenity of the Government trying to control the weather.

    This — above healthcare — makes the case for me that the Obama Administration is pushing us into world government/big brother territory.

    You could argue that healthcare is a national crisis — like the bank bailouts.

    Government can be useful in ameliorating catastrophic human events. Eg., it would have been catastrophic to have a 30% unemployment rate.

    Likewise the increasing cost of healthcare in the past decade has depleted American incomes even faster than the cost of importing energy.

    These are catastrophic historical events. However ham-handed Obama may have been in dealing with these events, he was fairly elected by the people, and therefore I can’t fault him for acting the part of a reformer.

    But climate is another matter. Climate changes over time. We happen to be in an interglacial period at this moment. Climate will change one way or other.

    It is also a fact that our scientific understanding of weather as a global chaotic system is practically nil.

    Science is based on data. We have not been collecting detailed, localized climate data long enough to even begin to understand the nature of Earth’s 5-billion year old weather cycle.

    Unfortunately the Climate Change scammers have no time for such Inconvenient Truths.

    They are motivated not by science but by power, and by dreams of social utopia.

    If President Obama intends to turn NASA into an organ of the Climate Change scam, this is a smoking gun that proves he is more interested in perpetuating power than in genuine reform.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    Harry;

    How about turning our attention to what government is doing instead of looking for some other group of ordinary citizens to fight with?

    Goofball federal programs have but one purpose. They provide the mechanisms for funneling money to members of the gang from everybody else.

    It’s not about guns and butter. It’s about how much theft we can all stand before realizing it’s not politics, it’s organized crime.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/rogerfgay/ Roger F. Gay

    “Mainstream media” realizes it’s finally time to really talk about spending. Notes that politics of the past played “between the 40 yard lines” (although the field was being moved). http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/04/18/fox_news_sunday_panel_on_vat.html






  • Search

    RSS Amy Alkon

    RSS Donna Laframboise