lumigan tramadol tadalafil

How to Build a Man Bomb

2010-05-12
By

We have seen it through the ages countless times before. Whether in the French Revolution, or the dense and decaying inner city enclaves of Los Angeles and Detroit, the suppressed outrage of marginalized populations can erupt into mob violence, setting buildings and entire cultures ablaze.

The same precursors are always there, though by tradition, and perhaps by design, we ignore them. The discrimination, oppression, bigotry and other human failings we justify or disregard are the tools in the Great Societal Bomb Making Kit; a kit that has been a permanent fixture in human civilization. It is as though the occasional burning city, streets littered with the dead, or even toppled governments are every cultures proof of human authenticity. And we ignore the ticking down of the timer until the body bags begin to fill.

Until it is too late.

And now, in keeping with the annals of our rigorously ignored history, we are setting about the business again of orchestrating a future catastrophe. After a bloody revolution for our freedom, the scourge of slavery, an even bloodier civil war, and a civil rights campaign that we handled with police dogs, riot guns and water cannons, we have put ourselves right back on the course of an inescapable social crisis.

This time we are building a man bomb. And when this one detonates it could make the American race riots look like a Thanksgiving Day parade.

The misandric Zeitgeist, the system of feminist governance that most are sill loathe to acknowledge is about to head toward its inevitable and ugly conclusion, and the results of that will inflict another deep wound on the psyche of the western world.

In the men’s rights community, a minority in its own right, we have long lamented the cruel and destructive war that has been waged against men and boys for the past half century. We’ve shouted endlessly at a deaf world that we were on the path to destruction, and we have watched our predictions of men being reduced to indentured servants to a malicious matriarchy come true, even as society continues to dismiss and humiliate us for speaking.

The buzz words and catch phrases have gone largely unchanged. They are now part of the common lexicon for those no longer blinded by the wool of a matriarchal matrix being pulled over their eyes. VAWA, child support, Title IV-D, false allegations, family court corruption, paternity fraud, male bashing, assumed guilt, man bad/woman good paradigm, phony wage gap, phony DV stats, media bias, etc., etc., etc.. All these terms and more are familiar to men and women who have seen through this transparent culture of hate and into an awareness of the problems we face but do not acknowledge; problems we suffer from, but from which there is no relief.

Some have reacted with anger, some with hate, some with righteous indignation and others with resignation and hopelessness. But during these dark years there has been little public outrage, thanks to the benefit of human denial. For many men, it is always the other guy who gets raped in family court. It is someone else that lands behind bars on a false rape charge; some other unfortunate loses his career and reputation because the culture and the legal system assumes he must be guilty of whatever claim is made against him by a woman.

We have been a culture of head shakers, quick to say “tisk, tisk,” and move on about our business, blind and indifferent, because it is not happening to us.

But there are forces in play today that will almost certainly unleash a fury that few can comprehend, and that nobody wants.

A recent Wall Street Journal article, Meet the Unemployable Man, predicts that over the next several years, one in six men between 18 and 54 years old, or 18 million, will be unemployed, and unemployable.

That is 18 million men who will look for work and find none; millions of others who once carried briefcases or hammers and nails, but who will, in the days ahead, push brooms make French fries. There will be 18 million men who become the other guy. And that is in addition to the millions of other guys that are already walking among us.

In other times, this would just be a run of economic bad luck which would pass with better times. But all the indicators are that better times will not find these men.

The typical escape route from poverty is education. But that route, too, for men, is being cut off by the very forces that are the source of the problem. Men are now only 40% of college students, with the indicators pointing to even more drastic reductions in the future. College, like employment, will soon be a woman’s world.

And the 18 million men with nothing to do but worry and stagnate cannot be expected not to notice. And they may well begin to notice a great many things that they never did before, because they were happening to the other guy.

The ticking should be as thunder in our ears by now.

Oh, but wait, some might say. We can fix that. We can address what is happening to these men before their being marginalized and disenfranchised results in problems that no one can ignore.

We can, but it is not likely we will. Look at how the educational establishment is reacting to the proposed male studies initiative, an idea that actually would seek some answers. Men’s studies activists like Michael Kimmel and American Men’s Studies Association President Robert Heasley, are doing everything in their power to ensure men remain in trouble. These feminist ideologues appear roundly offended that any amelioration of these problems would come to men, and are proving it daily in word and deed.

The members of the matriarchy, like social terrorists, are partnering with and guiding government toward the inevitable explosion, and when it goes off, they will be the first to point the finger at men, even at MRA’s, for the fallout.

It won’t help them, though. Because whatever tragic end this comes to, it will not be at the hands of MRA’s, it will be in spite of our efforts to prevent it.

If the streets erupt again, as they have so many times before, they will be filled with average men who never heard of the men’s rights movement. They will just be poor men, many of them young and fatherless due to the current system, acting out their rage against a world that includes and idealizes women, but that treats them like social pariah.

They won’t be thinking of VAWA or domestic violence hypocrisies, because they will be in large part the same men who have denied these problems all along.

We may see them in a tax revolt, or at tea parties gone violent at some point in the future when things are much worse than they are now. Or they may not have any political affiliation at all. But one thing is certain, that many desperate men are not going to remain silent. They will act as men have always acted in similar circumstances throughout history. And during the process, they will be looking again at many things they have ignored in the past. There will be volumes of information, long ignored, that will suddenly make devastating and dangerous sense to them.

It is a testament to men, and an exposure of lies perpetrated against them by gender ideologues that we have come this last half century without blood in the streets. It has always been in men’s nature to take care of others better than themselves, and they have proved that with their silence in the face of so many constant abuses. Betting on that silence to continue when men are hungry is foolish.

It is possible that none of this will come to pass. I do not pretend to be a social prognosticator and I do not have a crystal ball. But I can add two and two and still get four, even in this crazy world. And I know that anyone, even men, if backed into a corner and kicked long enough and hard enough, will come out swinging. The 60’s were not just peace, love and dope. They were cities on fire and bodies on the ground.

And because of that I write this genuinely afraid. The men’s movement, the only bomb squad we have, had better catch on in grand fashion, I think. And even if it does, we better hope it happens before the society we live in finds itself at ground zero when the clock ticks down.

Paul Elam is the Editor-in-Chief of Men’s News Daily and the publisher of A Voice for Men.

2,542 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    Jerry Parizi
    2010-05-12 at 10:12 pm Lets have 10 Million Man March !

    Good idea but how would you get it done? I spoke at the Million Dad March in Washington several years ago but we were a few short of a million. Like about 999,800 short. If no one knows about it, no one will come and the main stream media will not touch it although they do have all sorts of PSA for feminist marches and these groups will get federal funding at least through the organizations that sponsor it such as NOW. Our tax dollars are funding the feminist agenda.

    As to the work stoppage, I agree. In fact, I was talking to a wonderful handicapped woman in the UK one night whose website was part of the inspiration to start Shattered Men and we discussed what would happen if ALL the women would not work for 24 hours and than one week later ALL the men would not work for 24 hours (one week later to use the same day of the week to keep as much equal as possible) This woman stated that when the women did not work, few would notice. Oh some stores may be closed for the day and hospitals may have a tough time with some direct care but everyone would get by but than she said the day no man worked, the world would come to a standstill.

    Personally, I think we would find that men and women need EACH OTHER!

    One last thing, we would most likely not get a million men at a march because unlike most women, men believe in meeting their responsibilities and most of the men who would need to be there are already dead broke because of being taken to the cleaners by an unjust justice system. Ironically, many of the women that started this mess had husband who gave them the money and my guess it was to keep them out of their hair.

  • keith

    Is there any websites out there to explore passive aggressive civil disobedience. Like mailing all your junk mail to the local crown prosecutor. Or to judges care of the family court. Or faxing a roll of toilet paper to individual congressman that voted to pass VAWA.

    If there isn’t………maybe it’s time to share.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/2010/05/12/how-to-build-a-man-bomb/ John

    You Guys are bunch Yupers ! Just yup ,yup ,yup !Lets go to Washington DC. and cicks some ass! Lets colect Money and start a TV station or a Real Newspaper or a national Radio station ! Lets Unit and do somthing . There so many Men with a lot of mony and potential.
    Stop with the wining and do somthing .

  • NotNOW

    Paul,

    This is truly excellent. I am sorry I missed this and am too late to participate in the active commenting.

    The economy is coming apart at the seams; right now, in fact. The next leg down seems to have started last week with the Greek pseudo-default.

    The jobs that have been “saved” are women’s jobs: government office jobs. The ones that have been largely spared until now are also women’s jobs: health care.

    Anyone who believes that the government can enforce martial law on a nation this size in the face of spirited resistance is an idiot. This is the most heavily armed nation on earth. The mighty US military can barely pacify Iraq, the size of Texas. For the government, fear is their most potent weapon. If genuine forceful resistance materializes we will have a horrific event attributed to it by government with the aid of a complicit media. Anyone involved in a political movement must be cautious who they hang out with going forward.

    The time to choose sides may be fast upon us.

  • Skeptik

    I’ve been following this thread with great interest.
    Despite the fact that there are many divergent suggestions for courses of action it is very heartening to see such a large number of responses ALL apparently agreeing there is such a thing as a Man Bomb which is ticking away as we speak. I tend to agree that an all out revolt would give the powers that be the perfect excuse to issue in even more draconian laws (martial law, curfews, special passes to enter certain ‘security areas’, search without warrant, ‘emergency’ ‘courts’ without juries all possible?) I say that because even in this time when such a revolt isn’t happening they seem to show no compunction for acts of gross injustice against men in USA. Therefore it stands to reason that given an excuse to get even heavier they will. I think therefore an approach similar to Ghandi’s in India against the corrupt British could well be the best path to take. Non Violent Civil Disobedience, or as Ghandi called it Sattyagraha has a long history of being effective as a tool to topple oppressive regimes.
    I have a strong hunch that some of us are thinking about this backwards in a way though.
    My idea is this –
    Women hit the streets in protest at thier sense of injustice precisely because ironically they were protected and hence safe enough to do so.
    With men that dynamic doesn’t prevail. many a man knows in the back of his mind if he protests in similar fashion to the public protesting of women in the 60s and 70s he may find that after being clubbed and tazered, then arrested by the cops then ‘mysteriously’ the next day his bank loan isn’t approved, that certain of his ‘friends’ don’t call on him for socialising, that his promotion gets inexplicably cancelled, that walking into certain rooms he’s met with an icey silence etc….covert and very damaging social exclusion bigtime……you get the picture.
    So I’m guessing that whilst there will be some public protest as was the case with Fathers4Justice in UK and now USA, the men’s movement will be an altogether less visible, quieter yet nonetheless as momentous a social movement as WAS the women’s movement which now thankfully is under such fierce and persistent criticism it is gradually in abatement.
    It will be I suppose more often a case of one man refusing to marry and becoming MGTOW, another petitioning lawmakers, another refusing to buy female sexuality with payments of ‘gifts’, dinners etc, another man refusing to do overtime so he can spend more time with his kids, another man counselling his sons to find a bride overseas etc etc. Each will be a point of light as indeed are the many men who post here each with their own preferred course of action. All these points of light coallesce into a brilliant torch.
    The point being that there doesn’t have to be one almighty blow, but rather death by a million (different) cuts for misandric feminism and chivalry to eventually be wiped out.
    That way we avoid being divided and thus conquered by keeping our eyes fixed on the fact that whilst we’re often all taking different actions those actions are all collectively attacking the same problem. It’s heartening therefore to see the great level of civility and respect each man (and the occasional woman) is showing one another on this thread. I don’t sense as I have done in the past any chest thumping ‘my idea is best, yours is stupid and you’re a dumb jackass’ putdowns.
    No this is different this time.
    I think we all know the stakes are VRY high now and so we avoid such divisiveness and row together.
    Thankyou gentlemen and supportive women for giving me hope.

  • Kris W

    Maybe that result(open revolt led by males) is what the power that be want? Let’s face it they want total power, trying to seize total, absolute power without justification poses a problem for the “elite”.

    Communism is one way the elite are trying to restore feudalism(notice how communist’s seem to target the “bourgeois” aka middle class? And notice how the feudal powers despised the bourgeois as well{they led to the downfall of feudalism}) by destroying the middle class.

    An open revolt would give them the opportunity to invoke “martial law” with the intention of never revoking it. National Guard unit’s provided us with a vision of that desire in the aftermath of Katrina when they illegal seized weapons from law abiding citizens.

    The only thing we can do is follow a path similar to the one walked by Gandhi. They are expecting violence, in fact they are counting on it and perhaps even trying to create it. We should and must disappoint them.

  • keith

    @ Chris

    “Its this apathy in men that makes women the filers of divorces, our willingness to put up with things and still go about our job of provision and protection.”

    It may be more than apathy. There may be what most men don’t like to admit to, which is fear. For most men I believe, even the powerful ones they intuitively understand that their provisioning defines their significance. In fact the more a man provisions the more he is. Remove a man’s ability to provide and what is left. Do we as men marginalize our own, after judging his ability to provide. Absolutely. Once judged in this way you are no longer a part of the herd.

    Why would any man leave his single focus of providing and belonging, to subscribe to a better or more just social outcome. Even the formation of unions were an answer to the threat of men’s ability to provide for their families. Men go to war and even Iraq is a war of provision. 911 was an attach on our financial institutions (world trade towers) and the ability of men to provide. Providing defines our fundamental nature to belong and participate in any social group, including the family.

    Men are nurtured throughout life to be isolated. If a toddler cries, a boy is left to sort it out himself or shake it off, a girl is attended to. Even the modern concept of a “time out” believed to be more just than corporal punishment is nurturing by isolation. I suspect more widely used with boys. Team sports is further used to isolate the individual in a male. With marriage “a man shall leave his parents and cleave to his wife”. Providing and all the subsets of it, protection, chivalry, heroism are shortcuts to belonging and used to avoid isolation. Why would any man risk isolation to join a movement going where?

    Interestingly, the coming employment crunch, or unemployment of large numbers of men, may either remove the current level of safety on the streets generally or coalesce into a political movement. Either way we will have more corruption and a more robust black market and underground economy. Any effects on Feminism or it’s ideology may just be happen stance. Men as a collective have not achieved the status of a pathological special interest group. We remain pathological individuals.

    The conversion of a man’s ideology occurs more as a result of hydraulics. Once squeezed and pressed by current institutions, he seeks “safe” socialization anywhere it can be found. Even commenting on blogs sympathetic to his plight. Such as myself.

    I have witnessed as you similar behaviors with my 25 year old son. He has asked females that felt it was socially acceptable to male-bash to please leave. No argument or hostility just get out. He works in retail sales and has mentioned occasions to me where he has directed women shoppers to leave the store, because their attitude and treatment of the staff was unacceptable and disrespectful. I believe he has formed a personal “zero tolerance” position and sticks to it. He’s my hero, but I am biased.

  • chris

    Years ago here we debated this basic issue…would there be acrimony in the fix, or would the pendulum gently swing back. Only a couple of us insisted that there was necessarily gnashing of teeth in what has now become, not a pendulum swing, but a toppling. Oddly its not straightforward that we will topple some definable entity, a noun as it were, but turn in great numbers in a different direction with an almost “like it or not” attitude, and a very loose metaphor of the tea party type movement.
    Any time men try and make a movement we fall into chivalry driven modes about how we can better our innate selves. Million man marches, Promise Keepers in the church, and daily the whole “men step up” meme is what wafts off a gathering of men, to date.

    Nope. The conversion rate right now is very low. To try and rationally convince a man who has not to his knowledge been touched by the mess is like arguing flat earth. Ive managed a couple of conversions in 5-6 years. Ive seen countless ones born of the trauma we all know…but just ideological awakenings, not so much. Somebody mentioned gen Y, and there is hope in that group indeed. My HS sons group sees this stuff at an intuitive level I am amazed by. My son has gone without dating, and has opportunity, but simply cannot stand the way the girls are.

    That, the dearth of men willing to prostitute themselves, will be effective, but not enough. Some will see that the effort creates failure in their own marriages, among us middle aged men. Divorce rate will rise initially, women finding themselves single, but finding the grass not just lacking green on the other side….they will find it scorched. Its about choices, they need to see that the BEST choice is totally different than today.

    Its this apathy in men that makes women the filers of divorces, our willingness to put up with things and still go about our job of provision and protection.

  • keith

    One can almost hear the individual tick..tick..tick, as the male consciousness coalesces into an informed social animal. When the dietary fiber of propaganda used to keep him regular is removed, the msg (male social guilt) offers little nutrition to the surviving psyche. When the arguments over, detail and nuance are exhausted and pointless. We have checked ourselves for culpability and weighed our meaning and gestures over and over to make sense of it. Slowly men have surrendered each institution of accusation, marriage, family, children, employment. Once you have achieved a solitary and distinct insignificance, I’m sure you will hear the ticking too.

    Maybe you can slip over to the “manhood academy” and purchase some “authority”. Just remember it’s not cheap and you will definitely be making monthly payments. Oh and the fact that you might want to go get some “authority” might be an indicator that you don’t have any, and that you know it. Or why not scream at that bitch that’s responsible and earn that restraining order. For me, I think I’ll slip down to the hardware store and pick me up some tar and a couple of feather pillows. I got my eye on a few politicians and I think it’s time for them to share my experience.

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    Normally I do not correct typos but this does make a difference.

    “Obama said it when he was running for office…redistribute the wealth. Well they have been doing that for some time…taking it from me and giving it to women.”

    That should be they are taking it from MEN and giving it to women, not taking it from me (although this is happening too)

  • pj1

    Consider that NObama at the behest of NOW did not implement economic recovery for blue collar jobs because it benefited blue collar men, who happen to be the largest group of workers negatively impacted by the current recession by far. Think about it, NOW advocated for no federal funds to benefit “burley” men and instead the money went into human “infrastructure” in industries that were not hit hard, and had mostly women in it. This is exactly what has happened in education.

    The Federal government is feminist. Our laws are feminist. Our educational institutions are feminist. There is a coordinated effort driving this and this ugly monster lives in the ivory towers of academia where this beast thrives in an environment separated from fiscal realities and peer reviewed accuracy. It is a giant, networked monster deeply embedded within the infrastructure of this country and it is spreading out into the rest of the world, and it is continuously at work rigging society against men and in favor of women on all levels of society.

    This is where the dismantling needs to begin. Male Studies is the right idea. Currently it is a small platoon against a giant international army…

    Until the message gets to the ears of the average Joe who has been brainwashed to be as motivated at Homer Simpson nothing will change.

    I agree with the premise of this article. When enough men realize that society has been designed to marginalize as many men as possible, there could be trouble. These are the same men NObama cast a blind eye to recently…

  • Bruno

    The fact that women are allowed to grab the power, is actually ridiculously absurd.
    The not-so-clever ones, will feel entitled to the dominant position in our society, because they have been reading and hearing all their lives that women are superior to men.
    The more clever ones, are asking themselves: “How on earth are we getting away with this? Why don’t these idiots see that it’s all a scam?”

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Tom

    Just for the record, MND does not officially endorse any political candidate in any political party, either in the UK or the US.

    MND is a community of writers that are given some degree of latitude to express their own opinions, but who do not speak for MND collectively. With that in mind, our editorial and submission guidelines, which are an invitation for anyone to submit here, are linked at the top of the site header.

    Had you or anyone else submitted an article that posed a well articulated argument as to why a vote for the liberal dems would further the agenda of men and boys it would have been given due consideration.

    My opinion as editor, which I have made no secret of since coming on board, is that mainstream political parties, and your liberal dems are certainly no exception, are all toxic to the cause we support here. That being said, some partisan sentiments will be reflected by some writers.

    I do take some counsel in your words, though. It may be time that any purely mainstream political advocacy be held to different standards and scrutiny than we have in the past, and I will seek our publishers guidance on this.

    In the end, my opinion is that the greatest threat we have to the rights of men comes from Marxist elements that affected the overall western political landscape.

  • Bruno

    The irony of this all is, that men don’t actually need a riot or a rebellion.
    All we have to do is stop uplifting, helping, and supporting women.
    Because they need us much much more than we need them.
    When was the last time that a technological innovation, a brilliant idea came from women? You’ll have to think really hard.
    Almost 100 % of the technological innovation was made by men.
    And after all, technology is the only progress there is in civilisation.
    Because politics, morality, philosophy, that all stays the same for thousands of years.
    If it was not for the technological obsessions of men, all women would still be running in the woods, dressed in dry grass, searching for mushrooms.
    The fact that they need us much more than we need them, is something that women are extremely aware of, it is their greatest vulnerability, therefore they try to hide this truth with all their might. And men fall into this trap of course.
    So this is the reason why women play hard to get, try to be as sexy as possible, and at the same time make sex scarce, pretend to stand above men morally, pretend to be superior in every way, morally, intellectually, socially…
    And walk around with jewels, make up, perfume, red fingernails, high heels…
    Pretend that they are some kind of super-beings, while at the same time they are oh so afraid that the truth would come out.
    That they have in fact very little to offer to humanity and civilisation.

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    The government thrives on conflict. That is why I contend that they know that what they are doing is causing conflict. They know that there are an equal number of men who are abused yet they come out with trash like the VAWA. Obama said it when he was running for office…redistribute the wealth. Well they have been doing that for some time…taking it from me and giving it to women.

    Many in the government want more population control. They want to get the population down by a great number and they are doing it by our health care. It is also clear that they think that males are the disposable gender in that most of the health care is going toward women while little is spent on men. This alone will be the bomb that goes off when more and more men realize their value in the eyes of the government is nothing more than what is in their wallet. From everything I have seen recently, it is also clear that the powers that be do not value anyone’s life if they are not members of the elite but they value a man’s life even less. In many nations, when it is only males being killed, there is little outcry but when women are harmed or even unconvinced, there is lots of outcry. In fact, many other s than Hillary Clinton think that women are the ones that are most harmed by wars. It does not matter that half the male population were killed, the emphasis is always on the harm done to women.

    Paul, you said: “And I know that anyone, even men, if backed into a corner and kicked long enough and hard enough, will come out swinging”

    I also contend that is exactly the reason more women do get seriously injured in domestic violence. The man got tired of being battered and not having anything done about it and then he comes out swinging. Yet our laws are geared to making sure one of the parties (most often the man) will reach a breaking point and come out swinging.

  • tom of covent garden

    @Paul

    I am seriously suggesting that in some small part, MND has had a negative effect, by backing Cameron, the blatant man-hater, and no, not just the rhetoric of man-hate, the policy of man-hate. Who knows, 2, 5, 10, or even 50 votes might have been tipped their way by the article, but if you’d linked up with http://www.therightsofman.typepad.co.uk, in backing the Lib Dems, then maybe it would have tipped 50 the other way. If there HAD been more agreement on the basis of policies towards men among the men’s websites, maybe a mainstream media outlet would have picked up on the men’s movement backing the Lib Dems, which might have brought hundreds more votes. It appears you put Conservatism before men’s rights. There is widespread agreement in the MRM it seems to me, that the backward chivalry of the right is far worse for men than victim-feminist rhetoric and inertia on the left, yet you let some conservative anti-fem crowd-pleaser grab the wrong end of he stick. I don’t really understand what MND should have to do with conservatism, or party politics in general. You should be like the greens, generating sound policy for the other parties to steel. If the men’s movement is split between the left and right, how effective is it going to be? Screw the anti-equality conservative men. They’re not in your movement, so I don’t see why you should pander to them, while their pro-patriarchy, blame it all on feminism delusions give the men’s rights movement a loser image. Cut the dead wood adrift. Get Factory on the case. The social policy of the left, i.e. including sensible feminism, is rated as somewhat effective, to the point where the incoming conservative PM praised the outgoing government’s work in this broad area. Even the right wing press in the UK now have broadly been won over to the pro-equality solutions, in line with gender-developmental progress ambitions. The first policies Cameron has jettisoned in the coalition deal, include the housewife-incentive tax break. He reeled the stay-at-homes in to vote for him, but knows housewhoring breeds fascism, so has rightly pulled the rug. But anyway, you can redeem yourselves by generating some heat in conjunction with other men’s websites, so Cameron gets the message and jettisons the unfair retirement age increase for men only. And why don’t you link to http://www.therightsofman.typepad.co.uk?

  • http://avoiceformen.com/ Paul Elam

    @ Tom

    Are you seriously suggesting than an article from MND is responsible for the outcome of the UK elections?

  • Ken

    Redress of any social inbalance is usually not pretty.
    This cuts to the essence of the men’s rights movement though. It isn’t about misogyny or even man vs. woman. Men take into account what’s best for ALL of society. It’s men, women and children. This misandrist path we’re on now is not a good one. Not because men want to overlord women, but because the role of men, manhood and masculinity is being overtly diminished. We all know deep down inside the longer term affects of this vacuum. Gangs, organized crime and whatever other skullduggery men find themselves in when confronted with a life without purpose and hope. We may even devolve into a sort of modern barbarism within this century.

  • tom of covent garden

    So why on Earth did you run a story recommending the British vote Conservative, despite the fact their leader openly calls for men’s retirement age to be raised another year?

    We now have that chivalrous openly anti-male sap as a prime minister, thanks in some small part, to MND not coordinating with http://www.therightsofman.typepad.co.uk.

    Tools!

  • Rodney

    Plus generally speaking… current policies victimize more women then men. Women are an excuse (path of least resistance) for authority to seek reasons to pragmatically expand it’s power. A beast unto it self.

    Gender common ground and exploiting of the female demographic because it’s vogue best left to shady back rooms and shadows until the right time.

  • Rodney

    Need cops, judges, lawyers… professional establishment as part of ‘our’ crowd (it’s not a conflict of interest to represent yourself and a failure if ‘you’ don’t). Any gathering you are unwilling to bring your children to is one you should probably think twice in attending yourself (unless prudence calls, then bring a better gun, something completely off the radar).

    Seeing a few of the worse judges hauled out in handcuffs, put on trial by their peers would go a long way in restoring faith for many individuals. Even if the trial is not binding.

    Before such gatherings, teach people how to be arrested. Practice it so you know what to expect. Isolate groups and individuals who will cause problems, be willing to intervene with the collaberation of others to prevent/halt acts of violence or vandalism.

    Personally, I’d plan to get a reaction from whomever (authorities) and capitalize on the reaction… even if he/she/they (authorities) are in on it. Exclusively work in catch-22’s and waste no effort or movement.

    It’s ok to be angry, it’s what a person does with it. The frustration running in these circles can be lethal and I do honestly believe most people do not want to be murderers.

    Heh, and what is sort of being discussed may lead to the first free and democratic elections of my life (40 years old). Too funny.

  • Denis

    My wish for America:

    Burn

    Baby

    Burn

    Any country that treats males the way this one does belongs in the dust bin of history. I’m tired of it.

  • Matt

    Gen Y males are going to burn this country to the ground. I predict it’ll happen in about 15 years, right around the time they turn 40. By that time, they’ll have the experience and wisdom to understand just how much society has screwed them over. By that time, many of them will have gone through divorce and will be isolated from their children. By that time, the world will be in a depression so horrible it will make these days look like the Roaring ’20s. By that time, what jobs are available won’t be worth having due to the staggering public debt. (Taxes, in other words.) It’s coming. It’s going to be awesome. By “awesome”, I don’t mean cool. I mean God-awful. Their anger will be righteous. That’s why it’ll be so terrible.

  • Skeptik

    Thank-you Paul,
    I’ve linked your insightful posting to a site in NZ here -> http://menz.org.nz/ , where men face many similar problems to those in the USA. I invite readers to visit to get an idea of what is happening in the wider feminist Anglosphere.

  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/2010/05/12/how-to-build-a-man-bomb/ Jerry Parizi

    Lets have 10 Million Man March ! Lets Stand up to those feminist Natzis like Hilary Clinton !! Lets have it brothers Im ready !!!! Lets go to Washington DC and stay there for a month let them know we mean it . We are not going back to our jobs till you dont change those nasty laws in this country . Lets see what they are going to do ??/ Arrest us all ??? I dont think so….theres no room in the jails for all of us . lets have a showdown. lets see what women are going to do with no cops, no electricians , no soldiers to go to stupid wars ,with no mechanics to fix their cars , no cooks , no farmers ect ., ect lets see !!!! Im ready ! It’s going to be lots of fun . We bring tents and barbys.
    TO ALL MAN FROM USA AND CANADA ! UNITE BROTHERS ! LETS END THE THE MALEBASHING CULTURE !

    JERRY PARIZI ,TORONTO ONTARIO

  • http://www.standyourground.com Poiuyt

    This article is very, very incisive and gives vivid account of the current state of and future for males in wetsren society.

    To the calamnity list of males being pushed purely for their maleness out of work, education, the family home, public spaces, ordinary relationships, polite public conversation, the professions, natural parentage and other aspects of full humanity, can be added the following accelerating calamnity:

    By legal, cultural, systemic and systematic entrenchment of official misandry and structural genderism, males are also overtly loosing by way of political gerrymandering the demographic ability in sheer numbers and physical opportunity to vote their way out of this hell.

    Enfellonised, criminalised, civily retsrained, prohibitively ordered, probationally controlled, restrictively licensed, correctionally facilitated or socially controlled men in or out of jail, halfway houses and hostels cannot and must not vote.

    Men are progressively and ineluctably being outlawed by the system for being men.

    Now that means quite an awfull lot of and an exponentially growing number of disenfranchised males, being by definition, lost to the legitimate cause of male emancipation, by the only legal and only legitimate means of redemption via the ballot. That is via voting.

    Hence because of the above dynamic negative factors bearing on men alone, only non-legitimate and only illegal methods of male emancipation and male redemption ever increasingly becomming solely availiable, apparent and obvious solutions.

  • 3DShooter

    I agree, the bread and circuses are about to run out. We may well get to see how well the feminists fare when faced eyeball to eyeball with mobs of pissed off men.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search