Is Dexter Morgan a Postmodern Everyman?

2010-07-02
By

“All men are rapists”
–Marilyn French

“Marriage. Children. You never expect it to end in tragedy. Unless you’re me.”
–Dexter Morgan

Slice of LifeOn Sunday, December 13, 2009, 2.6 million television viewers turned on Showtime to watch the season 4 finale of Dexter.  According to the Hollywood Reporter, it “was the most-watched original series episode ever on the network, and the most watched telecast since a Mike Tyson fight in 1999.”

If you haven’t seen the show, watching Dexter for the first time is a little bit like having your first cigarette, or that first taste of gin when you were 15.

It’s sickening.

Later on, as the early warning signs pass away, you might end up acquiring a taste for the very thing that made you want to vomit in the first place.

Dexter is like that.

Dexter Morgan appears an ordinary but successful urban man, fully engaged with the wheels and levers tact and clicks of the postmodern world: He is a Crime Scene Investigator for the Miami Metro Police Department, specializing in blood spatter metrics. He is competent, discerning, and responsible. He is protective of his family, responsive to his co-workers, and faithful to his girlfriend.

Dexter is young, free, and shows a few trappings of material advantage. He has an apartment, and enjoys traveling the Florida waterways on his own 32′ boat — the Slice of Life.

His younger step-sister, to whom he is devoted, is likewise a career up-and-comer at Miami Metro. Police work runs in Dexter’s family. His step-father had been a detective with the police force before his death by apparent suicide.

When he was 3 years old, Dexter and his older brother witnessed the brutal murder of their mother by a crazed drug dealer, who then locked the boys in a cargo container alone with her bloody remains.

The police officer who rescued Dexter, Harry Morgan, adopted the boy and gave him a home.

As we learn in the course of the series, the murder occurred in the first place because Harry was having an affair with the boy’s mother, who had been a police informant.

By the time Dexter reached adolescence, he was dismembering neighborhood pets. Harry finally realized that the boy was irreparably traumatized by his experience; he was bound to become a full-blown sociopath, venting rage through ritual killing.

But Harry also believed that Dexter’s irresistible urge to express catharsis through homicide could be channeled, given a purpose, and harvested for a community benefit.

In this way, Harry mentored young Dexter in the art of getting away with murder — while at once teaching him that the urge to kill must be applied only within a well-defined Code.

While Harry’s Code was shaped to accept Dexter as he is — a cold blooded killer who knows no empathy —  it also constrained him to kill only those who were demonstrably deserving of the punishment he was compelled to deliver. In other words, this reconstructed serial killer has been trained to kill justly.

Taken as a whole, Dexter is the stuff of black comedy. The role of a serial killer of serial killers is a tongue-in-cheek play on the postmodernist cycle of simulacra and simulation: Dexter is a feminist deconstruction of everyman. He is the ultimate primary aggressor. He is hegemonic by nature. His very existence is a threat to good people everywhere. And though he is a quintessential outcast, he remains a protector.

Dexter is a thoroughly postmodern man.

FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS

As Paul Nathanson and Katherine K. Young argue in their book, Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture, feminist postmodernism apes the techniques of revolutionary Marxism.

For Marxists, the word “ideology” refers to carefully concealed assumptions that most people leave unexamined…. These hidden assumptions amount to “false consciousness,” invented and propagated by members of a ruling class through a symbolic and institutional “superstructure” in order to perpetuate their own power and privilege. The masses are, in effect, prevented from understanding their own reality and thus from rebelling against it. All of history, in short, is reduced to a titanic conspiracy. Ideology is ‘their’ sinister plot designed to perpetuate hegemony over “us.”

For some feminists, all this applies to gender no less (or even more) than to economics. They want to abolish culturally propagated notions of masculinity and femininity, believing that these are insidious notions subconsciously carried, as it were, by both men and women, and thus bring down “the patriarchy.” (199-200)

Under the feminist postmodernism, men and women have been virtually divided into two unequal classes, wherein Governance Feminism codifies all men as bourgeois exploiters, and all women as downtrodden proletarians.

Marxism’s check against False Consciousness has also been appropriated by feminist institutions and applied as a punishment against allegedly unreconstructed men. With the rise of feminist postmodernism, all men are now suspected of harboring “false consciousness” to the material detriment of all women. In this way, the habitual inversion of traditional biases has become a revolutionary purpose in itself.

In their recent appearance at the Male Studies Symposium at Wagner College, Nathanson and Young repeated their description of the three pillars of human social maturity, to whit: for an adult human to become fully individuated, he or she must do something that is

  1. Distinctive,
  2. Necessary, and
  3. Socially Valued

Unlike other serial killers, whose work would not be considered socially valued, Dexter is arguably fully individuated by the standards of Nathanson and Young.

Dexter’s work as a killer-of-killers is certainly distinctive, as his “extra-judicial authority” is arguably necessary and socially valued. Certainly his father’s training could be considered a social compact, even though it only took place between two people. Two people are enough to create a social consensus, if two are all there are.

ORIGINAL SIN

In his book The Decline of Males, anthropologist Lionel Tiger pointed out that postmodern men share a universal stigma of “Male Original Sin” — a social debt that each man must carry for the collective misdeeds of other men from ages past, and for the ongoing sin of False Consciousness.

As a consequence, writes Tiger, “Male behavior is treated as intrinsically questionable if not outright pathological.”

As other men carry the burden of False Consciousness, Dexter must carry the burden of being a killer. He suffers his public role in silence and shadows, puzzling and calculating, hiding the truth to save his skin.

Like all men under feminist postmodernism, Dexter’s False Consciousness was passed in secret through the paternal line — hidden even from his own sister. Similarly, Harry’s training of his son in the Code constitutes a form of paternal intimacy — something like a father training his son for membership in a  sacred trade — or a secret society. Dexter was never alone with his murderous impulses; his dad shared the burden of his original sin, and eased his passage into adulthood.

Considering Dexter as a American male role model, let me quote Nathanson and Young again, this time from their book, Legalizing Misandry (p.172). They are talking about the idea promulgated by the radical feminist theory that “all men are rapists”. The reasoning here is that women who appear in pornographic photos or movies are incapable of giving their informed consent to publishers.

And therefore their participation is coerced. This is the same argument used else against any sexual relations between men and women, according to which women are “powerless” almost by definition. Therefore they are incapable of giving their informed consent. And therefore, all sexual relationships between them and men are coerced — which is to say, they are rapes.

The authors cite a case argued by Catherine McKinnon, for which she won a court victory in 1988: Louise Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards. The upshot of this case was that porn in the workplace was recognized as a form of sexual harassment.

Certainly the character of Vincent Masuka — who is always making sexual innuendos — would not stand a harassment claim under the current feminist legal regime. The depiction of Masuka as a sexual harasser is too acute to be real, yet Masuka “gets away with murder” in virtually appearance on Dexter.

If Dexter is a black comedy, it is also post-soap opera meets Julliard.  With 12 episodes per season, Dexter’s pacing is sometimes dreary, and the ritual murders blur in memory. Having seen three full seasons, I don’t remember them all. But I do remember a few hard laughs, and the challenge of being puzzled.

If you can stomach it, Dexter is a deeply satirical series lampooning the state of men under postmodernism.  Adults only.

Dexter season 5 is set to premiere September 26, 2010.

Mike LaSalle is the publisher of MensNewsDaily.com. He writes on science, religion and popular culture.

(article updated 5July2010)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2,019 views

  • keith

    Great article Mike.

    I have often considered that (tel)e(vision), is an incredible device to form social consensus. I wonder to what degree it competes with our personal dreams. That night time state of repose, to which our imaginations script an outcome to empower our psyche to will.

    There is a number of interesting points that inspire a state of contemplation. The “ongoing sin of False Consciousness”. I love this term, it smacks of a mystical psychiatric shaman, waving his stick in the air to chase the spooks away. As a retrograde recidivist of False Consciousness myself I am quickly running out of ideologies to confine my retro-active reasoning and logic.

    I followed a link provided “unreconstructed men”, an article mentioning Jane Elliot and her “Blue Eyes” training model. I watched this several times finding it quite interesting, but always with an uneasy feeling. Most I believe would say that the uneasiness I feel, is the result of confronting my own racism and bigotry. However, I find there is one issue blatantly overlooked by Ms. Elliot and seemingly most if not all that subscribe to this model as a social insight. The most powerful force in the “blue eyed” model is Jane Elliot. I would compare her role to that of the government. Without the ability to incite division which the government clearly has, the definition of division radically changes. The only difference between a prisoner and a slave is the enactment of legislative law to establish definition. The force of this definition resides in the social consciousness as an absolute and is confirmed as an absolute over time.

  • keith

    Regarding Dexter:

    Interesting that, had his father withheld the code, (endemic of the efforts of femi-nihilism) Dexter would have been outed earlier and available for reprogramming of his “false consciousness”. No doubt redefining his early childhood experience as a more “tasteful trauma”. Note also that acceptance of Dexter by the father, allowed a transition from victim to perpetrator, with the code he transitioned to protector.

  • Kris W

    Let the feminist’s focus on totalitarian brainwashing. I would prefer to listen to the reason of truth, the path of facts.

    If a person would adhere to one basic concept, that 2+2=4; the concepts of deconstruction and reconstruction becomes utterly meaningless.

    Social paradigms and personnel ideologies can be altered, manipulated and outright distorted to the advantage of whomever is either in power or seeks power.

    Seek the truth and let the chip’s fall where they may; otherwise you will only find the chains of intellectual and perhaps even spiritual enslavement.

    The idea of Dexter being a good example of “postmodern males”, I seriously doubt that. The average male today is probably far more aware and far less violent(male violence rates have been in free-fall for the last decade or more) than other times in American history. I suspect in the near future as the old-guard Judges and Prosecutors begin to step down women may outnumber men in prisons for violent crimes.Because a growing number of female Prosecutors and Judges are coming into the field that can see through the “wall of tears” and aren’t impressed by it.

    (P.S, as for “male guilt”, as an American citizen one disavows the citizenship of their old country and all it’s prejudices and bigotries, meaning for an American feminist to seek to bash or enact “social Justice” against American males for actions committed outside{and before the Republic} can be viewed as a de-facto act of treason and should also be seen as a forfeiture of their citizenship.)

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/mike.lasalle Mike LaSalle

    Kris W –

    IMO, it’s definitely fair to deconstruct popular mass media like Dexter. The people that write, direct and produce these shows all went to Grad school. All of them were forced to imbibe Derrida and Foucault before joining the work force in Hollywood. The methods and assumptions of postmodernism are all over American media — from Hannah Montana to Mad Men.

    Dexter is unique in that it appears that the writers of the show have consciously created an allegorical postmodern tale wherein the protagonist — the hero– is the beast you are supposed to identify with.

  • PolishKnight

    Dexter isn’t that revolutionary. The concept it’s based upon, the “justified” and quirky serial killer, was shown years earlier in the John Waters’ comedic film “Serial Mom” starring Kathleen Turner as an otherwise innocent surburban mother who develops an obsession with serial killers. She takes out victims for, among other things, failing to rewind video casettes before returning them to the store, chewing gum while talking to people, and wearing white AFTER labor day.

    It’s not much more than that. No need to get all psychological about such programs and films. Same thing with feminism: Feminism is just an irrational rage of western women overprotected and indulged by western patriarchy. There is no “ideology” to it. When western men stop indulging women by treating them as absolute equals no matter how they behave, that’s the end of it. What kind of equality is it for someone to be handed equality while men have to earn their place in society via their actions?

  • Dabir Dalton

    Mike…

    Well if Dexter exclusively kills males, who in his warped sense of reality deserve to be eliminated…Then it seems to me that the men who get into this series are vicariously living out their hidden homo erotic tendencies…As Murder and Eroticism all to often go hand in hand…While women get to vicariously live out their hateful revengeful fantasies against the individual members of the male gender…Either way this television series should be condemned for promoting violence against men; otherwise if is okay to kill a man one has decided needs to die; while condemning violence against a female who would deserve to die under the same exact circumstances is the height of HYPOCRISY…

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/mike.lasalle Mike LaSalle

    Dabir Dalton-

    I don’t buy the “homo erotic” argument; that’s way too trite. Anyway, Dexter does not kill men exclusively, just mostly (as you might expect, since we’re talking about serial killers). In fact Dexter’s fairly non-prejudiced when it comes to the sex or race of his victims. He killed his ex-girlfriend, Lila, at the end of season 2. He also killed Camilla, the records custodian, towards the end of season 3.

    Also during season 3, the character of Miguel Estrada became close to Dexter, calling him “brother”. Of course he ended up dead. Dexter also killed his real brother at the end of season 1. Brothers beware: “My search for connection always ends in blood.”

  • http://libbidodominandi.wordpress.com/ Dabir Dalton

    Mike…

    Due to my heavy work schedule I don\’t watch much tv especially the misandric trash on the boob tube in this day and age…I prefer to buy the series on dvd if it really is something that I want to see so I doubt I\’d ever watch Dexter unless of course he occasionally throws one of his female victims in a bottomless pit of quicksand…






Search