lumigan tramadol tadalafil

UN Women: Discrimination at Its Finest

2010-07-07
By

Last week the General Assembly of the United Nations voted to create the UN Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. When reading about these developments the first question that springs to mind is whether this body will primarily work towards gender equality or the empowerment of women, since these two goals can range from being fully compatible to mutually exclusive, depending on the issue at hand. Luckily, the UN is very honest and upfront about the purpose of its new organization, since its everyday name will simply be UN Women. We are thus dealing with an organization that has been formed to help women, and not primarily to promote gender equality–a distinction that politicians and the media alike would do well to embrace.

So what will UN Women actually do? Even though their website confuses women’s issues with gender issues time and again, as if the word “gender” were equivalent to “women”, it’s evident that they simply want to help the women of the world through working with women’s issues in a variety of settings. Focus areas listed include:

  • Poverty and the Economy
  • Education and Training
  • Health
  • Violence against Women
  • Armed Conflict
  • Power and Decision-Making
  • Institutional Mechanisms
  • Human Rights
  • Media
  • Environment
  • Girls

On the one hand I think it’s great that they want to help women in all of these areas. I certainly do not want to see women’s human rights violated or women dying in armed conflicts. On the other hand, where on earth did they get the belief that these issues only pertain to women? Men’s health are worse than that of women, and men die several years before women do (due to stress and not biology). Armed conflicts primarily kill men, and men are the primary targets of violence even in peacetime. In the Western world it is boys and young men who are falling behind in the educational system, and the collapse of the economy has primarily led to male unemployment. Human rights issues pertain to men just as much as women, perhaps more, since men are usually the ones who are imprisoned by corrupt, non-democratic governments. The negative media image of men has been carefully mapped in books and research reports about misandry.

In other words, the very focus areas of UN Women are just as relevant for men, and yet I wouldn’t recommend holding your breath waiting for UN Men to be formed. Currently there seems to be a broad international political consensus that gender issues are about women only, which is what has led to UN Women and frightening reports that ignore the very existence of men.

In the 1995 movie The Usual Suspects, the arrested Verbal says about the legendary criminal Keyser Soze: “The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist”. Well, the greatest trick that feminism ever pulled was convincing the world that men’s issues didn’t exist.

1,021 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/ menareangrynow

    @Philip

    Thank you for the swift reply.

    The reason why I had mentioned abortion being a fascinating thing for ethics, is because it creates self-contradictory situations that pull on human emotions from every direction. Take for instance the feminists. In North America they push for Abortion to be made a reproductive right for women; but, in Asia they are disgusted that baby boys have a lower rate of being aborted. Why are they upset with Asian women for aborting the babies they don’t want, when they claim it’s a woman’s choice in every other continent? Seems racist to me, to hold Asians to a different standard than they hold every other race to. Is it a woman’s choice to kill their kid? If so, then why are they decrying Asian women choosing to have the kids they want? Or is it that the Asian women were only supposed to make the choices that feminists agree with…It’s a fascinating subject.

    As for contraception, of course monogamy is great for avoiding disease(presuming nobody lies about a certain rash…). Since when has the UN ever advocated cheating and adultery, though, you know? All they want is to teach people how to use condoms; because, they are also great at avoiding disease. It has nothing to do with some UN plot to destroy families or make men look bad. It’s about helping people learn how to not catch dangerous viruses, and emphasizing cleanliness.

    Also, I’d like to know what’s with this talk of gas chambers? Since when has the UN ever supported the use of things like that?

  • Philip

    @menareangrynow

    The UN is trying to empower women over men, you only have to read the Focus list in the article to see that. To ignore men IS to dis-empower them.

    I see contraception as a bad thing as long as monogamous relations are being ignored.You do know that a monogamous relation is far better at VD prevention than using condoms? So why promote condoms only, ill tell you why, its more blame the men and destroy the family unit.

    Abortion is just ethically wrong to me and looks like the first phase in destroying human worth. Already it seems like infanticide has all but been legalized and there is a big push to legalize euthanasia, so whats next?

    A lot of the big international organizations are pushing for world population reduction, especially the environmentalists and Earth first types (UN plays a big part in this). At the moment is all softly softly lets be nice and good to ‘persuade’ people to have less children. But what happens when that does not work fast enough? I don’t see how world population supposed to be reduced to 500 million, like the message says on the Georgia Guidestones, not without using gas chambers and the like.

    That’s my take on it
    Phil

  • http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/ menareangrynow

    @Philip

    “Sounds like more UN population control to me, promoting female empowerment, contraception and abortion.”

    As long as the UN isn’t trying to empowering women over men, I have no problem with the UN trying to empower women. After all, aren’t we all deserving of a little help? When it comes to contraception, I can’t imagine how you’d see this as a bad thing. Condoms, for example, have been shown to be very effective at reducing the spread of aids. The reason why Africa has such a high rate of HIV transmission between partners, is in part because of the Vatican telling African Christians to not use condoms. If the UN were to intervene and promote safe sex to Africans, it would save many people from catching the disease.

    Abortion is an interesting subject, ethically. I’d be curious to hear your opinions on it, in full. As well as why you seem to think the UN is trying to reduce population. Some clarification on these two subjects would be helpful.

  • Philip

    Sounds like more UN population control to me, promoting female empowerment, contraception and abortion.
    Like Hitler said “control the wimmin then you’ve got the children and the men will follow”
    Phil

  • http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/ menareangrynow

    @DcFather

    “The U.N., like feminism, is merely another Communist outpost, with a slight variation in the cadre of useful idiot followers.”

    Could you please explain why you see the UN or feminism as communist in nature? If you recall the Korean War or the Vietnamese War, the UN helped to form massive coalitions against communist countries. I don’t think they have a particularly socialist record, either. The UN is often calling for free trade agreements between countries to help foster peace. Seems like an awfully capitalistic way to promote that…

    When it comes to feminism, you have a stronger argument, considering the influence of Marx’s writings on the radical segments of their movement; however, if you’ll look, there are many feminists who are ‘capitalist pigs!’ For example, the iFeminists, led by Wendy McElroy, are heavily influenced by the writings of Ayn Rand. I think you’d find a myriad of opinions on economics, depending on which feminist faction you’re talking to.

  • http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/ menareangrynow

    I remember when the earthquake hit Haiti, and the UN’s response was to create female-only food lines. They completely ignored the men, and doubtless many starved, as a result. The UN ignores us men and treats us like second class citizens, like we don’t exist.

    I did a video reporting on the UN’s involvement in the Haiti Crisis, if anyone wants to see it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry_gzPL_tG0

  • DcFather

    The U.N., like feminism, is merely another Communist outpost, with a slight variation in the cadre of useful idiot followers. While there may eventually be a week or two where everybody lives large at the expense of white males, those living the victim life will fall the hardest and fastest whence we soon collapse.

  • Skeptik

    Thanks for this Pete.
    Having been appointed to the UN recently I’m sure former Prime Minister of NZ Helen Clarke would be in on this piece of misandric corruption.
    Watch her. She decimated NZ manhood and by extension NZ society for 9 very long years in power there.
    As they say – keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search