Is Al Gore Sane Enough to Stand Trial?

2010-08-12
By

Al Gore’s bogus green enterprises have pulled in some major public funding based on fraudulent claims; leading to the suggestion that he may eventually stand trial. There’s something more. In his obsessive lectures, it seems he’ll not be content until he’s destroyed the economy and forced his political enemies, those who he credits for bringing his 2000 presidential dreams to an end, to their knees.

Is it a simple kind of Napoleon complex? Or is there something psychologically deeper? Will he be allowed to stand trial if Senate investigations lead to indictments?

I have reflected on one of his commentaries that I saw on YouTube. He had become frightened of the carbon dioxide in the soil and what might happen if it gets out. Carbon dioxide – CO2 – the stuff plants need to live and grow – stuff that’s been around since before the beginning of life – stuff life can’t do without.

You probably know that the basic scam started well before Al Gore got involved. Scary stories about global warming or a coming ice age sold books. There was even a very successful movie – Soylent Green, based loosely on a 1966 science fiction novel Make Room! Make Room! by Harry Harrison. I remember the era well. Men with long hair, the smell of marijuana in the air, and people were bad, mmkay. Their up-tight, middle-class values and ways were destroying the Earth. Right on!

CO2 is scary? Science tells us that oxygen burns explosively. You might as well be just as scared, if not moreso, of oxygen. People can drown in water. It’s actually happened. It’s not however, rational to fear such natural life-essential molecules as they normally exist in the atmosphere or in the soil.

I’d have to guess that most people believe that Al Gore is merely using his knowledge of political corruption for profit; and getting an extra kick from screwing his old political foes. But it seems to me that a slick politician, with all his marbles in the right place, wouldn’t go over the top too much for fear of looking like a loony.

Then I listened to his state of the movement address.

“The United States government, in its entirety, … has failed us.” “In the last few months and weeks, the United States Senate has failed to meet the challenge of the climate crisis.” “I hope I’m wrong about that but I want to be realistic because we need to redouble our efforts for the battle that lies ahead. It’s not over. …. we simply have no choice but to win this battle. Even while we are so painfully and profoundly aware of the crisis in which we find ourselves, even as we recognize the common thread linking the climate crises and the economic crisis and our national security challenges, the Senate has still failed us. The United States government as a whole has failed us.”

Certainly, at first at least, it probably seems to most of you like typical Al Gore global warming drivel. But have we, like the frog in hot water, merely grown accustomed?

I thought again about what he’s been doing, obsessively, for several years. He’s made the effort, semi-successfully, to build a vast army of ding-bats to spread his message and do battle with his mortal enemies; including some that can’t defend themselves, like carbon dioxide. The “vast army” is actually smaller than he’d like to imagine and the most involved are actually paid mercenaries, some on his own payroll. (Gore’s “vast army” of global warmers conjured up thoughts of Aragorn’s undead army of oath-breakers in Lord of the Rings, but I just couldn’t figure out how to fit that into the sentence.)

A lying politician? Perhaps so. But for years he’s been begging us to believe that he believes. A cry for help? Maybe that’s true too. If he is indicted, I’m not betting against an order for a psychological evaluation. The test is whether he can distinguish right from wrong. I’ve never seen any evidence that he can.

Tags: ,

  • Roger F. Gay

    Note: Obama and the Democrats seemed to have dumped global warming from their political agenda this election season. Is that what ticked Gore off so much? Are we reaching the end of Al Gore’s final chapter?

  • Pingback: Global Warming Hoax Weekly Round-Up, Aug 19th 2010 « The Daily Bayonet

  • Roger F. Gay
  • Roger F. Gay
  • Roger F. Gay

    Dan – It’s the corruption. The corruption is way more damaging to the environment and all the people of the Earth than CO2 (for which there is no actual evidence of damage at all). The Global Warming thing is, and always has been a political propaganda issue. Al Gore is in a situation that may lead to criminal trial. Those are actual facts, not the propaganda stuff that has captured your interest.

    I recommend: Deprogramming Yourself After Global Warming Scam

  • squiggy

    Dan? If you’re going to place comments on websites, you might want to get at least the small facts straight. Don’t blow it on stuff that is common knowledge.

    At a minimum, go look up the TV shows you’re throwing out. We all know what these shows are about, and if you get it wrong, it makes it impossible to believe anything you say.

  • Mustafa Bin Drunk

    GLOBAL WARMING IS A GOOD THING BECAUSE IT POSTPONES THE END OF THE CURRENT INTERGLACIAL PERIOD

    COASTAL CITIES ARE A SMALL PRICE TO PAY FOR THE BENEFIT

    BURN FOSSIL FUELS TODAY AND FARM CANADA AND SIBERIA TOMORROW

  • Dan

    Im a huge Lew Rockwell fan and a strong supporter of Ron Paul. But sadly the Libertarians clash with my environmental views. I believe poster “Jan” (above) is completely correct…this article is nothing more than a bash job on Al Gore with no scientific fact behind it at all. Guys, the science is in. Get over it and accept were wrecking the planet on which we live. We’re clearing forests like crazy (AxMen, AmericanLogger), inflicting holocaust on Lobster populations (DeadliestCatch), and dumping oil in the Gulf (CNN,FOX,MSNBC..). The evidence is so strong…we’re now watching it on prime time cable television at home:( If MND.com wants to remain a credible website it should be careful how it presents stories. There’s fair news then there’s cheap hate swill.

  • Squiggy

    @ The Obama Timeline’s author

    Um, how could our golf scores improve, when the ball would float over the hole?

  • Squiggy

    Sorry John, but you didn’t follow your idea to it’s logical conclusion. If carbon dioxide is a “pollutant”, and “pollutants” are bad for the environment, then carbon dioxide must be done away with. Since humans (and all creatures for that matter) emit co2, all animal life must be ended.

    In order to save the Earth, all life must be destroyed. It’s the only sane, logical course of action.

  • http://www.colony14.net The Obama Timeline’s author

    After Gore and the brainwashed lefties stop global warming, can they please do something about that annoying thing called gravity? Perhaps they can persuade Obama, Pelosi, and Reid (the “axis of OPRah”) to repeal the law of gravity. That would certainly cut down on the use of fossil fuels because planes will be able to float like the Hindenburg! Just think of all the little old ladies who will not fall and break their hips! ObamaCare could move from the red into the black! And everyone’s golf game would improve dramatically!

  • John Giles

    Carbon-based life forms, animals emit carbon as a natural process and humans convert natural resources through technology into material goods by freeing carbon. These expenditures of energy threaten our environment and the essence of life itself is thus anti-life. Therefore, the only means to enhance life is for all living things to renounce energy and submit to a universal system of control, by wise people like Al Gore and Goldman Sachs, that will allocate and moderate energy; e.g., regulation of all human activity. The pursuit of individual preferences for living must come to an orderly end.

  • http://users.beagle.com.au/peterl P.M.Lawrence

    “Science tells us that oxygen burns explosively”.

    No, it doesn’t. In fact, on its own it doesn’t burn at all. Many things burn very well in it, though not explosively apart from certain gasses and dispersed powders etc. or unless they are soaked in liquid oxygen, but that’s something else again.

  • Squiggy

    Thanks, Jan. Thanks, Charlie. Thanks for trolling with us today. It’s a truly crappy day when no one comes around (preferably with a snotty, condescending attitude) and tells us how dumb we are!

    You must be right, Jan. Only scientists who agree with YOU actually KNOW SCIENCE! Never mind that ten times as many scientists say Al Gore and his minions are idiots. But don’t worry – I’m sure, when they use the word “idiots”, they’re not talking about you and Charlie.

  • Roger F. Gay

    Global warming exists. Warmers keep denying that everybody acknowledges that. They also deny that global cooling has anything to do with climate. That’s just weather. Well, it’s summer. And in my personal experience, it’s been consistently a lot of summers that have been warmer than the winters. If the warming really is all that counts, the plants burned up and we all died a long time ago.

    Climate: New Warming Expected, An Obviously Unbiased Report

  • keith

    @ Roger F. Gay

    By the way, I’m not a writer, moreover knuckle-dragger might be a more appropriate description.

    I really liked the way you segway into the lord of the rings deal. Introducing the mythical imperative of invisible armies to overcome the hoards serving the dark king. Really cool. Like the ghosts of carbon coming to free themselves. Good article. I hope your note trying to make a case for Big Al being one molecule short of a complete chain.

    HAHAHAHA

  • keith

    Y’know, if we did a little sequestering of the CH4 from livestock and specifically the herds following these messianic manipulators of science, we could move beyond the carbon footprint and move straight to the carbon ass-print.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fI8834iCgo

    Hey Chuck the overwhelming evidence to date appears to be manipulated and supporting a fraudulent presentation. That’s every man’s issue.

  • Charlie

    Sorry to see so much energy spent here on denying global climate change. There is overwhelming evidence by objective scientists documenting the problem. Not sure how relevant all this is to men’s issues either.

  • Roger F. Gay

    The Rodale Institute. Yep, that’s where we should all go for real science. Snicker. And then we’ll call Jan for the proper interpretation and related advice on what do do about tax policy and capitalism; all based on Rodale science of course.

    sequestering carbon in soil … yeah, I heard judges can order that … sequestering. Plants might not like it though. If they can’t draw CO2 from soil, they’ll die.

  • Jan

    What unadulterated piece of trash writing. Try reading a scientific report that actually corroborates what he has been saying because it is information from scientists who actually KNOW SCIENCE. And FYI, CO 2 escaping from soil is one of the biggest factors in soil nutrient depletion. Sequestering it in the soil is indeed something we must strive for to have truly sustainable agriculture. As a matter of fact, the Rodale Institute has estimated that sequestering carbon in soil (where actual roots and soil organisms thrive) in all accessible land would bring down carbon emissions by 40%, and that is actually GOOD for the soil, the atmosphere, and the food grown in it. Your zeal to attack someone who just don’t like overshadows your immense ignorance on topics you really should read up on before attempting to write about them.


Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Archives