lumigan tramadol tadalafil

When Glands Trump Minds: Battling Mohammedans with Yahoos and Rubes

2010-09-09
By

Much hoorah, there is, over the mosque that may or may not be built in New York. I don’t give a tinker’s damn (whatever precisely that may be; I presume that tinkers’ oaths were thought more efficacious than others) whether they build it or not. The matter does however put to rest for me any hope of rationality in human affairs. This, I grant, could be accomplished with a very small bed.

At this writing, the government’s war for oil and AIPAC has more or less solidly metamorphosed, among the rubes at least, into a war against Islam. Men of thunder and portent peddle the notion like starving encyclopedia salesmen. No less a political howitzer than Pat Buchanan says that the mosque should not be built, because of the religious motivation of the Saudis who attacked the towers. His view has been eagerly received by the populace. Now it seems that yahoos at some fourth-grade church in Florida plan to burn a Koran to commemorate 9/11.

Splendid, this. We are telling 1.3 billion Moslems that America is not fighting Al Qaeda, or the Taliban, or Terror. No. It is Islam itself we hate. How very wise. This will make it so much easier to win hearts and minds in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Those security forces that GIs are supposed to be training—the ones with the AKs—they will know that their trainers are their enemies. Curiously, this is just what bin Laden tells them.

Glands again trump minds, if any. Consider that ten minutes before the first tower got hit in New York, the thought had occurred to practically no one in America that Islam constituted a mortal threat to all that we hold holy, chiefly chain restaurants and iPods. But Islam afterwards offered to fill this void that the Russians had wimped out on. For a brief period after the implosion of the Soviet Union, Americans had no threat to worry about. They found it deeply puzzling. Weren’t we supposed to be afraid of something? It didn’t feel right.

Then came New York, and suddenly we saw it: The Clash of Civilizations. Islam was out to get us. Why hadn’t we noticed? A roaring hatred for Moslems sprang up from people who had never met a Moslem, who had a garden slug’s grasp of history.  A deep satisfaction came over the land. We had been made whole again.

Battling Mohammedans quickly became an industry. The government at first tried to peddle Terrorism as the enemy, not Islam, but it didn’t stick. Something more robustly flackable was wanted.

I find Buchanan, of the American Conservative, proclaiming that Islam is a Culture of Jihad, and most militant. No doubt. Very. Would it be poltroonish of me to note that just now Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking Afghanistan and Iraq, having recently bombed Somalia? That they use robotic aircraft to murder Yemenis, that they hunt down Moslems in the Philippines (where after 1898 Americans engaged in atrocities that would win the admiration of the Japanese), encourage Israel to ruin Lebanon and to run a concentration camp for Moslems in Gaza, enthusiastically murder Pakistanis from the sky, and threaten Syria and Iran?

Those Moslems. Militant, they are. The bastards.

The Islamic countries listed above are only those currently attacked by America. Let us look at the matter in another way. I append here a list of all Christian countries conquered by militant Moslems since 1529:

Next, a partial list of Moslem countries conquered by Christians: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq (the first time), Iraq (again), Iran, Pakistan, East Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen, Oman, Abu Dhabi, Dubai….

This list does not include such minor Christian  conquests as North, South, and Central America, India, China, Southeast Asia, black Africa, and such. Unconscionable, Moslem aggressiveness is.

Buchanan regards the events of 9/11 as no end grievous. So do I. Yet perhaps people who live in glass pots and kettles shouldn’t call names. The UN’s figures give 600,000 Iraqi children dead because of the American embargo, which didn’t allow, for example, chlorine to sterilize water. This is equivalent to 6.4 million dead children in the United States. Hmmm: If Moslems had killed this trifling number of our sprats, might we wax grumpish?

Yes, I know, the UN is a commie Marxist socialist anti-American conspiracy, and not as trustworthy as the American propaganda apparatus. All right. Let’s assume that the UN lied by a factor of ten, and thus only 60,000 Iraqi children died thanks to us. Thus, if 3,000 Americans died in New York, we owe the Moslems some 57,000. No?

If I may sally briefly into unloved seriousness:  What puzzles me, as one who has lived extensively abroad, is  how little Americans are able to see things through the eyes of others, how little empathy they have (this latter defect being characteristic of both psychopaths and narcissists).

Consider a headline from Anti-War.com of a sort appearing almost daily: “US Drone Strike Destroys House Full of Children in Pakistan.”

Apparently no one in the Great Rubber Room north of Mexico has an inkling why this might arouse hatred in Pakistanis. Can you imagine the fury that would ensue if a Moslem blew up a house full of American kids in, say, Queens? But when we kill their kids, no one cares. “Yeah, well. Tough. Giv’em a few dollars.” Buncha dirty raghead larvae. No better than cock roaches, right?.

Now, we’re going to have a pop quiz. Take out a sheet of paper. Question: Can you think of any reason why Moslems might be unhappy with America?

Right! They hate our freedoms.

In which case they daily have less to hate us for.

It doesn’t pay to underestimate an enemy, I hear. All right: Moslems are so very dangerous not just because of their many extremist groups—Salamists, Al Sushis, the Falafel, and the Wasabi for example—but because of their immense industrial strength, which doesn’t exist. With the possible exception of Turkey, not one Islamic nation is in the First World. I picture bearded, turbaned warriors wading ashore on aquatic camels, causing no end of panic in Atlantic City. I mean, what do camels eat?

The horror.

Herewith a searing insight for the ever-puzzled State Department: Actions have consequences. If you support Batista, you will engender Fidel. If you support the Shah, you will get Khomeini. If you attack Moslems, you will get bin Laden. It might be better to stay home and read a book.

More Fred here.

Tags: , , , , ,

484 views
Didn't make Oprah's Book Club. And Ronnie doesn't care. Man up. Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.


  • Amavisti

    Stone cold common sense! You restore my faith! way to go Fred!

  • Shatteredmen

    @ Squiggy

    Actually, he has gotten several comments but maybe they “disappeared” because they were not what he wanted? I know I posted a couple of them including the fact that Fred must not have gotten the memo when he wrote: ” Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking Afghanistan and Iraq” because he must not have gotten this memo which came all the way from the top…Obama who said this is not a Christian nation.

  • Squiggy

    Fred? You know why no one has bothered to comment yet? Because it’s not nice to make fun of people who’ve lost their fucking minds.

  • Roger F. Gay

    When Glands Trump Minds … speaking of Trump;

    Donald Trump to Buy NYC Mosque Site?

  • Roger F. Gay

    Kind of makes you wonder what The Crusades had to do with Christianity. Was The Enlightenment worth the effort? Who knows? Historians are such rubes. I’m getting the sense that the path to enlightenment au jour is to not give a tinker’s damn about the issue of the day. Not caring produces immediate wisdom. Perhaps The Buddha is pleased?

  • Ken

    DEATH TO AMERICA!
    …says the “religion of peace”.

  • jjtaup

    Fred,

    You actually have something worth hearing behind this thick linguistic swamp of petulance. Too bad you aren’t saying it.

  • S Baker

    BO and other proponents of the ground zero mosque seem to be out of synch here. Once again, the alliance between progs,libs, and Rats is called into a question of hypocrisy, or maybe, a question of which side do they favor? A preacher in Florida who provokes mass murderers by burning a book of fiction and gets chastised by a prez with a muslim name is clearly much more on the ball then people give him credit for. He captured the attention he knew would come.

    The only difference in the burning of the Qur’an and the building of the mosque near Ground Zero (both legal) is that the opponents of the mosque don’t carry out mass murder all over the world because of it. If we do not allow this American citizen to do this thing (for whatever reason) we are actually caving in to the intimidation of those who would take away our freedoms. Just a random thought. Who is the rube, the preacher or the Imam?

  • chris

    Fred has officially entered the “I wanna get attention by being contrary to my readers” ville.

    If it aint the mosque of the book burnin its cartoons and ice cream and sneakers and crap man, are you even serious anymore.

    Oh I know the trap, the more we object the more we prove your newly proclaimed Jimmy Buffet in Mexico livin the NON ipod and chain restaurant life.

    Its getting older than you are man

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    “Now it seems that yahoos at some fourth-grade church in Florida plan to burn a Koran to commemorate 9/11.”

    Fred, would you complain if some Imams planned a public BIBLE burning session? Would ANYONE complain????

    As a pastor, I do not approve of this “fourth-grade” churches plan but it does show the hypocrisy of almost everyone around. First, what happened to the “separation of church and state” or does that only apply when the government wants it to? In reality, this clause came about to protect the church from the state, not the state from the church. It is NOT in any of the founding documents for this once great country.

    It also brought out something very interesting which few have picked up on….the treats of extreme violence even by the Imam who wants to build the mosque and most are ready to give into him although, in reality it is pure extortion and no one cares. Many are ready to give tax payer money to them to build it somewhere else. Again, what happened to separation of church and state?

    If a Christian pastor even dares to voice that he is opposed to a liberal candidate on solid Biblical grounds, they yank the tax exempt status from them BUT they can allow “progressive” or liberal candidates (but ONLY liberal ones) to speak from the pulpit without any problem. Well my friend, If as a pastor, I did have a local church. NONE of these people would stand behind the pulpit as I consider that….Holy ground

  • http://shatterdmen.com/ Shatteredmen

    “Would it be poltroonish of me to note that just now Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking Afghanistan and Iraq”

    Fred, did you NOT get the memo from the top…The US is NOT a Christian nation? Just ask Obama.

    Also as for Israel, picture being a small nation with other much larger nations on every single border who have vowed to destroy you and push you into the sea and who have never recanted that vow and ask what would YOU do?

    Isreal threaten Iran????? What do you think will happen if Iran gets the bomb? I assure you, they will try to use it and if they nuke Iraeal, I guess they should just lay back and enjoy it?????

    Why is it that just as in men’s rights that is it the ones who are facing so much injustice, so many double standards that are always the ones who are asked to compromise…to give up more and more until there is nothing left to give? That is what you are asking them to do.

    Fred although I normally like much of what you write, after this I do wonder what will be next? A message on domestic violence for next month using the National Organzation of Women for your resources while never once looking at the real problems?

  • Diabolos

    Fred,

    I’ll keep your name in mind should the bullets start flying as a reminder to not put you at my back. You’ll have no real understanding of why said bullets are flying our direction and you won’t have the intestinal fortitude to stand your ground with me when it happens. And that’s the nicest thing I can think to say about it. Most of this post was little more than the usual progressive talking points and a whole lot of moral relativism which also is a disease of the progressives. Debate is useless in this situation; the gun is at our heads but you refuse to see it.

  • DonnieH

    A tinker’s dam was a small bit of soggy bread or cloth that a tinker (basically a travelling repairman that soldered over holes in pots and pans)would use to dam the opposite side of the hole while heat and solder (often tin-based, hence tin- ker) were applied to the top side. After the repair, the tinker’s dam was typically tossed aside.







Right.

Man up.

Buy the book now on Amazon.com. Or listen to Ronnie tell a story at escaping-from-reality.com.

Search