California Governor Gray Davis has just vetoed a bill that would have
restored due process of law to thousands of wrongly-accused men. These
men must pay the state’s crushing child support for children whom
DNA testing shows they did not father. He did it, naturally,
"for the children."
Or so he says. More likely he did
it for the federal money. In fact, Governor Davis confesses the bill
would put California "at risk of losing up to $40 million in federal
funds."
Given California’s zeal in jailing
men who cannot pay impossible child support burdens, it is inescapable
that innocent men will go to jail to fill the state’s coffers. (The
state will then get more federal funding for the prisoners.)
Most child support orders are entered
by default. The men never have a chance to prove their innocence and
never know they are accused of fatherhood until they are ordered to
pay. By then it is too late.
The injustice of forcing men to pay
for children they did not father has kindled public indignation. But
it is only the tip of the iceberg.
Child support was created for men
who abandon the offspring they have sired, a relatively small number.
But it has been hijacked by special interests and turned into a subsidy
on divorce, forcing millions of men to pay for the stealing of their
own children. In the case of false paternities, child support often
subsidizes adultery.
States also receive federal payments
based on how much child support passes through their hands. Officials
therefore have an incentive to squeeze child support out of any parent
(or non-parent) they can find. Like most states, California makes
a tidy profit. Through federal taxes, we are all paying to subsidize
divorce, unwed motherhood, and adultery. Our taxes make family breakdown
profitable for state governments.
No policy based upon lies, deceptions,
and false accusations can benefit anyone: it cannot be good for the
children, and it cannot be good for government ethics.
None of this is really "for the children";
it is for the grown-ups. Governor Davis does not love other people’s
children. But his government can make money off them. Once the government
can exploit children for profit, the government will get children
wherever it can find them. And no child is safe.