Allan Carlson Calls for Rolling Back No-Fault Divorce at
US Senate
June 13, 2003
by Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D.
No-fault divorce should be ended and fault grounds restored to divorce
proceedings, according to Dr. Allan Carlson, President of the Howard
Center for Family, Religion, and Society (
http://www.profam.org). In a lecture delivered
in the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, entitled "Marriage
on Trial: Why We Must Privilege and Burden the Traditional Marriage
Bond," Dr. Carlson outlined trends in the deterioration of marriage
and offered several policies recommendations. Repealing no-fault
was his first recommendation. Dr. Carlson said it was imperative
that parties in divorce proceedings be required to take legal resposibility
for their actions.
In response to Dr. Carlson's lecture, Dr. Wade Horn, Assistant Secretary
of Health and Human Services, described the Bush administration's proposal
for the federal government to encourage "Healthy Marriages". Dr.
Horn heads the Administration for Children and Families (ACF),
which will oversee the Healthy Marriages program under the auspices
of the child support enforcement system, which it also administers.
Dr. Horn said it is appropriate for the government to be involved in
marriage counseling in part because the government already regulates
the private lives of noncustodial parents in matters of visitation and
child support. In his remarks, Dr. Horn made no reference to Dr.
Carlson's call to reinstate fault grounds in divorce.
The lecture was sponsored by the Family Research Council (FRC).
High-profile conservative political groups like FRC have been relunctant
to take on issues of divorce, custody, child support, and parental rights.
But this may be changing. By sponsoring Dr. Carlson, FRC (where
Dr. Carlson currently holds a fellowship) may be indicating a broadening
of its approach to protecting the family to include the threat
from unregulated divorce.
Dr. Carlson is not a conventional conservative. He is a highly
respected scholar known for avoiding doctrinaire positions. Like
the English controversialist G.K. Chesterton, whom he quoted in today's lecture,
Dr. Carlson attributes much of the deterioration of the family to the
effects of industrial capitalism. His recent prominence in Washington
could be influential in shifting the terms of debate on family policy
toward areas that have previously been avoided by both major political
parties.
Stephen Baskerville