Radical Feminists Infest Canada
June 1, 2003
by Bernard Chapin
I never thought I’d be as grateful as I am today that my grandfather
accepted the Ford Motor Company’s transfer from Canada to the USA back
in 1925. He was a Canadian citizen living in the province of Ontario
when Ford announced that the American plants needed more skilled laborers.
Luckily, he gathered up his family and crossed the Ambassador Bridge
to settle in the country in which he is now buried. Had he not left
when he did, I’d probably be a citizen of Her Majesties Matriarchy–
otherwise known as Canada.
For some bizarre and twisted reason, Canada the creator of hockey–which
is the world’s greatest sport–has decided to informally become a matriarchy.
They have embraced the idea that men are second class citizens as Flynn
documented in his 2002 book, Why
the Left Hates America, “Canada, for instance, prohibits speech
that ‘degrades’ or ‘dehumanizes’ women.”[p.167] How disgraceful is it
that a country would specify one group of citizens as being the ‘anointed’
ones. We should heed the Canadian warning and make sure that no hate
crimes legislation is adopted here (as it specifies certain members
of our population as being ‘chosen ones’). I cannot believe that Canadian
men would legislate their own inferiority by accepting that chromosomal
makeup has something to do with their legal rights and protections.
Today, I read in Canada’s
National Post that the radical feminists want to
define any type of male organizations that dare to refute their outrageous
lies as being enemies of the people. This news article is referring
to a federally financed report which analyzed the radical feminist accusations
and, of course, decided that the feministas had cause for concern due
to the presence of ‘masculinist groups’ on the internet. The whole basis
of the report is that men’s groups demean women but, of course, they
do not. The only people who are being ridiculed are a small subset of
women known as radical feminists. The overpaid authoress of the report
unwittingly admitted this fact when she stated, “In conducting this
research, we found attacks on feminists on a lot of sites. We were only
reflecting what we saw on their sites.” Again, she makes the mistake
of unveiling her nefarious intention by substituting ‘feminists’ for
women.
The cowardly radical feminists fear being criticized so much that they
attempt to formulate any discussion of their insane power hungry characteristics
as being a hate crime. This useless report confirmed it by saying, “Among
the report's recommendations is that an organization similar to Hate
Watch be established to monitor men's groups on the Web, that inciting
hatred on the basis of gender should be a hate crime and that women's
groups establish a network to counter the masculinists' views.” They
already have two such networks and they’re called the North American
universities and media. What the world definitely does not need is another
parasitic governmental enforcement agency such as the one their taskforce,
of course, recommends.
Let me state plainly here, in case any bureaucrats are monitoring my
speech, that the radical feminists are one of the greatest threats to
freedom in the northern hemisphere. They attempt to equate every criticism
of them with a criticism of “women” in general. They have a sadistic
need to control others and their mechanism for garnering this control
is to prohibit other viewpoints through judicial fiat.
Their goal has never been equality. The purpose of radical feminism
is to gain superiority. Indeed, they are offended by the very notion
of equality as Schlafly in her 2003 Feminist
Fantasies observed: “In the 1990’s, the feminists no longer
even pay lip service to a gender-equality goal (except, of course, when
it suits their purposes). Their goals are the feminization and subordination
of men, and their tactics are to cry ‘victimization’ and ‘conspiracy.’”[p.145]
If these womyn didn’t tell so many lies about men then they wouldn’t
need to try to outlaw websites and free speech. They are the privileged
elite of Canada and the feminazi report they authored speaks down to
the herd from the apex of their own supremacy.
There is only one thing to do as a response, which is to criticize
them more. What they fear the most is criticism. That’s what really
stirs up the hysteria within their own organizational psych wards. They
hate being laughed and this is the best reason to sit back and howl
every time one of them tries to ban Frosty the Snowman as being the
embodiment of a fictional patriarchy.
My advice is to never surrender an inch of ground to these people.
They exist to destroy the polarity between men and women. They are evil
and you and I should not meet the devil halfway by considering any of
their statist laws or suggestions for better living. Their programs
are unabashedly socialistic but they are so uneducated that they do
not understand that only capitalism can provide the resources for the
fulfillment of all their sick legal fetishes and enactments.
Canada has bought into their vicious lies and mass produced them through
their legislatures. Stand ready and make sure that we do not.
Bernard Chapin
Bernard Chapin
works as a school psychologist full-time, a college instructor part-time
and writes whenever possible.