Family Court Resolution
August 24, 2003
by Bernard Chapin
Many readers may remember my friend Robert, and his tremendous legal
difficulties documented in Custody
Court Massacre. His divorce and child custody legal ordeal was
horrific. Luckily, it appears that some of his problems have been
resolved.
He told me on the phone, before he was last called before the judge,
“I don’t care what happens. I’m willing to go to Riker’s if I have
to. I’ve prepared for the worst.”
The previous judicial ruling stated that Robert had to pay over 5,000
dollars a month for ex-wife and child upkeep. He shared with me that
this was the same amount Latrell Spreewell was asked to pay, and there
is a hundred million dollar differential in economic power between
Robert and the famous basketball player. He had been delinquent on
past payments as his net income was less than 2,000 dollars a month.
Out of his 2,000 dollars, he dutifully forwarded her 500 dollars on
the first day of every month. He also became part of New York’s food
stamp program, and Robert brought his food stamp card with him to
present to the judge if asked.
The best news of all was that no sheriffs were waiting to arrest
my friend upon his arrival to the courthouse. He anxiously hoped
to receive a fair hearing on this occasion.
After eight hours of negotiation, both parties signed what was called
“A Global Settlement.” It turned out to be a 65 page piece of bureaucracy,
and was the byproduct of 50,000 dollars Robert spent in legal fees.
He laughed about it later as he described his ex-wife’s mental illness
as being the main impediment to the settlement. He said, “Being crazy
is an incredible weapon in the art of negotiation–just ask Kim Il
Jong.”
Ultimately, what made her sign on the line was that Robert’s parents
dazzled her with cash. More specifically, his father snake charmed
her with part of his retirement savings. My friend’s dad is a healthy
and spry 68 years-old, and he had previously hoped that his savings
would only be used for emergencies. He decided that Robert’s custody
drama was just such an emergency.
Money alone wasn’t the only sacrifice. Robert humiliated himself
by giving her the grounds for divorce. The settlement states that
he treated her cruelly and inhumanely. This was done principally
so she can petition the government for a green card. This infuriated
my friend as his reason for marrying her in the first place was so
she could gain the status of a legal immigrant.
His lawyer wrote the language in such a way that Rob hoped it wouldn’t
interfere with his visitation rights in the future. Although he told
me, “now she is officially a battered wife. It’s absurd, but it should
be enough for the INS.”
As for the son that has become the focal point of his life, the court
reduced Robert’s child support payments to 1000 dollars a month.
His father flew out to New York for the hearing, and he signed that
if Robert could not make the payments then he would do so. This satisfied
the court.
His father forwarded his ex-wife 10,000 dollars in exchange for her
dropping requests for alimony and spousal maintenance. His dad then
paid her landlord 5,700 dollars in back rent and legal fees. This
further embittered Robert as he realizes his parents are far from
rich. If his family did not live so frugally in his youth, who knows
what may have happened during this court case.
One benefit of the cash payments was that it kept his son from having
to live in a shelter because his ex-wife was officially evicted from
her apartment the week before. Unfortunately, his father had more
blood to shed before she fixed her signature to the settlement. His
parents paid her lawyer 8,000 dollars, and then an additional 12,000
dollars to prevent her from declaring bankruptcy. The 8,000 dollars
to her lawyer was well spent, as Robert said that, if it was not paid,
her lawyer was going to quit the case. His ex-wife’s lawyer forced
her to sign the papers. He noted that his former spouse’s childbirth
provided her with funds that she never would have seen under any other
circumstance.
As far as child visitation is concerned, the hearing was a godsend.
He received two additional overnight visits per month. This increased
the monthly days he spends with his son from six to eight. Robert
was further allowed three total weeks of visitation over the summer
months (as he is now studying to be a teacher). Extended holiday
time increased to six days. In total, he now gets nearly 38 percent
of his son’s time. This is not enough in my friend’s mind, but it
is a far better state of affairs than he ever thought he’d see before
the hearing.
In the end, Rob’s dad saved him from jail, and also saved his son
from living in a woman’s shelter. My friend was satisfied that the
little money he does make will now go to his son as opposed to his
attorneys.
Robert ended his letter to me (we also talked on the phone) with
the phrase, “Thank God it is over.”
Yet, as I began to write this piece, I received an email from him.
Apparently, his ex-wife was not satisfied with his level of suffering.
As he sat with his son one night in his living room, six policemen
[six!] came to his apartment and presented a court order from the
previous settlement stating that he was not to be with his son on
that particular day. To no avail, he tried calling his lawyer but
no one answered the phone. He impotently watched the police carry
his screaming son down the stairs to his mother.
I’ll let his words end my tale: “What really got to me was that she
was down there at the bottom of the stairs smiling. She was wearing
a huge grin that I rarely saw when we were married. It made me sick.
I wish she’d pay for what she’s done.”
Bernard Chapin
Bernard Chapin
is a writer in Chicago.