Democrats: The PC Anti-White Party
January 16, 2004
by
Bernard Chapin
Last
week a long lost friend emailed me after coming across several of
my internet columns. He said, “It sounds like you’ve become
a Republican” and then nothing else. It took me a while to realize
that he meant it as an insult because, in many parts of the country,
the word “Republican” is a pejorative by itself.
I told him that not just I, but he, and every white person in the
country should join the Grand Old Party, or, at the very least, resign
their Democratic Party membership as soon as they can.
I often overlook the fact that I am descended from liberals. My parents
and just about everyone I knew growing up voted Democrat. The same
was true about the people I associated with in college. My father
was a good man and an old school liberal but he made the mistake of
thinking government spending correlates with helping people. He was
wrong, but I am confident that if he were alive today and could hear
the way in which the Democrats pander exclusively to their militant
left wing, he would melt his party card.
Just to participate in the ranks of the donkeyites, you have to automatically
embrace multiculturalism and diversity as your secondary religions.
Many liberals have made the pursuit of diversity a replacement for
religion as religion mandates judging yourself and others. To them
judgment is as outdated a concept as property owners alone voting.
I can not bear to be around this crowd and they cannot bear to be
around me as the “all cultures are valuable except the west”
outlook runs contrary to the realities of the life on this planet.
I have hated political correctness from the first moment it corrected
me, but it took several years to realize that this anti-American,
anti-male, anti-Caucasian plague originates from the left. I finally
recognized that liberalism and PC are forever intertwined. I will
have nothing to do with them and neither should you.
Luckily, others are slowly recognizing this as well. Voting trends
illustrate that white men are beginning to see that the Democratic
Party exists only to marginalize them: “In 2000, however, Al
Gore lost too much white support to sustain this delicate coalition.
George W. Bush beat him by 12 points among whites generally and by
24 points among white men.” [Jason Riley, Opinionjournal.com,
January 13, 2004]
That’s great news and I hope that the divide in white voters
becomes even greater in 2004. Hopefully, there’ll be more scenes
like at the 2000 Democratic Party convention, when a female Senator
stood up and received a huge ovation for bemoaning the low overall
number of female senators. Why would they equate gender with how one
performed as a senator? They do this because, on the left, it is widely
assumed that women are a fount of goodness in the world and men are
a source of evil.
Yes friends, stupid and repugnant ideas never die, they just fade
away into the Democratic Party platform.
These minority worshipping aristocrats care more about chromosomes
and skin color than they do in representing the American people on
the whole. The other day, Wesley Clark stated that, if elected, he
would provide yet more goodies for Native Americans. Who would this
come at the expense of? Everybody else.
Howard Dean, in the last debate, stated that altering the flawed
racial consciousness of white Americans was the way in which to improve
race relations. Ah, it’s all our fault. Personally, I think
getting whites to stop obsessing and deferring over the subject of
race is the way to improve racial relations. Start acting you’ll
like not morally inferior and soon we’ll no longer be expected
to apologize for things we’ve never done.
The real source of racism is people like Dean. He’s willing
to evaluate the worth of citizens based on external characteristics
alone. We should be grateful that Al Sharpton was there the other
night to illustrate to the frontrunner that those who sleep with dogs
really do get fleas.
Apparently, Dean is not enough of a racial apologist for some of
the other candidates. Sharpton argued, “It seems as though you
discovered blacks and browns during this campaign.” Meaning,
that he didn’t spend enough time obsessing about whether his
cabinet, in a state with a black population of less than one, had
enough diversity in it.
Aren’t these fireworks merely an attempt to cover up the fact
that this party has no new ideas with which to impress the electorate?
While it’s nice to see Sharpton attack Dean, he could not be
more wrong about their soon-to-be leader. Memorizing racial hierarchies
is a prerequisite to obtaining a Democratic Party identification card.
He could never have got as far as he has if he didn’t.
When General Clark obtained his official membership papers last year,
I’m sure he had to repeat five times “I am a privileged
white patriarch” while clicking the heels of his red shoes before
they’d let him take part in the primaries.
The irony about the Democratic minority fetish is that none of their
policies actually benefit minorities. The only groups who profit (and
I mean profit in the economic sense) are the teacher’s unions,
trial lawyers and government employees.
The liberals don’t even bolster those unions who tirelessly
campaign for them in Iowa and everywhere else polls exist. What Democratic
initiatives help America’s blue-collar workers? Increasing taxes?
Putting social security in a “lockbox” and thereby not
fixing the problem? When they advocate for the unmitigated flow of
immigrants through our borders it only harms indigenous workers. Unfettered
immigration cannot help them, but none of this prevents forty percent
of the population from voting ‘D’ when it’s election
time.
It’s even sadder that so many black Americans in particular
pledge their eternal support to this party of race hustlers and shysters.
While it’s true that Howard Dean might get 90 percent of their
vote, a Dean presidency would only hurt this predominantly middle
class subgroup of Americans.
Blacks are making it in this country and should be proud of the way
they have prospered, but Democratic politicians deny their success
the same way Marxist professors deny that the Soviet Union was an
example of their theories being put into practice. I think it was
Jay Nordlinger who once said that for liberals it’s always the
Jim Crow era and the location’s always Selma, Alabama.
To the Democrats, some Americans will forever be more equal than
others. People like me, under their reign, are destined for the back
of the civil rights and employment bus. My advice to all Caucasians
is that only if you’re a masochist should you consider voting
for this race-monger chain gang. It’s time that everyone gets
off the plantation. Let’s hope these racists get pummeled in
2004.
Bernard Chapin
DISCUSS
THIS ARTICLE IN THE FORUM!
Bernard Chapin
is a writer in Chicago.