The Bush Campaign Ads: Irrational Hatred and Phoney
Outrage
March 8, 2004
by
Edward Daley
Once again the forces of extreme liberalism, moral ambiguity and
pacifism have banded together to create the illusion of indignation
over something that our president has done, and for obvious political
reasons. I'm talking about the recent "outrage" over George
W. Bush using images from 9/11 in two campaign advertisements released
last week. (Video
1 | Video
2)
When I first started hearing family members of certain victims of
those horrific attacks saying that they were upset by the "unconscionable"
use of those images by the president, I was shocked. I've seen the
ads in question, and the few seconds of footage showing firefighters
carrying the body of a fallen comrade draped in an American flag out
of the wreckage of ground zero, and the shot of the flag waving in
front of that wreckage, seemed perfectly appropriate to me. After
all, 9/11 is one of the single most politically influential events
of modern times, shaping not only the way our leaders have dealt,
and will deal with, the various nations of the world, but the way
we all live our very lives here at home.
The atrocities of that day were broadcast on practically every television
network there is to most of the people on earth, and made the front
page of the majority of newspapers on every continent. Within the
first few hours of that attack, most Americans saw the images of the
twin towers falling over and over again, as the major news networks
played them on an endless loop in small windows beside their commentators'
faces. Each day that followed brought more footage shot from nearly
every angle possible of the disaster area, and countless individuals
were interviewed who witnessed the event first hand. Ceremonies of
all kinds were later performed in honor of the victims, and songs,
poems and tributes of every description were created regarding it
from the most diverse of perspectives.
Do I really need to articulate how profoundly affected the lives
of all Americans were by that day in our history? Is it now necessary
that I point out to anyone how many months went by before people stopped
talking about 9/11 on a daily basis? Is there anyone anywhere who
cannot appreciate what has transpired throughout the world because
of the worst terrorist attack of all time? I can't think of a single
aspect of our lives which has not, in some way, been effected by 9/11,
yet now I'm supposed to believe that the man who has dedicated himself
to making sure it doesn't happen again is wrong for mentioning it.
Am I somehow supposed to think that it's now inappropriate for the
president of the United States to discuss, during his reelection campaign,
what he intends to do in order to assure that such a catastrophe doesn't
happen again?
Apparently, or so a few left-wing activists contend. You see, the
folks who have been speaking out against President Bush's use of these
images are not simply the family members of 9/11 victims. No, they
are also supporters of a rabidly anti-war and anti-Bush organization
called the 'September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows' (http://www.peacefultomorrows.org)
which has opposed both the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan
from the day of its inception in 2002. Claiming over 120 families
as members, it is a project of the 'Tides Center' (http://www.tides.org/index_tds.cfm)
which is funded by foundations chaired by none other than Teresa Heinz
Kerry, the wife of the president's primary political opponent, John
F. Kerry.
This should come as no surprise to anyone who, initially, was just
as bewildered and dismayed by the words of people like Colleen Kelly,
the leader of SEFPT, who came on national television on the day the
president's ads were released and said "'It makes me sick...
Would you go to someone's grave and use that as an instrument of politics?."
Like myself, many people just couldn't understand why anyone related
to a victim of the 9/11 attacks would react in so irrational a manner
some two and a half years after the fact, especially when George W.
Bush is the only president we've had who has ever taken substantial
steps to defeat the terrorist threat which caused the death of their
loved ones in the first place!
Kristen Breitweiser, who's husband died in one of the World Trade
towers, stated "It's offensive that he would have the audacity
to use 9/11 in a political campaign", adding that "Three
thousand people were murdered on Bush's watch." Is this woman
suggesting that our president was responsible for the attacks? It
sure seems that way to me. If that's not the case then why bring it
up? Does this woman blame former President Franklin D. Roosevelt for
Peal Harbor? Did she think it unfitting of him to speak about that
tragic event while running for reelection? As I listened to the remarks
of these women and several others that same day, I felt certain that
there had to be some ulterior motive behind their sudden and seemingly
well coordinated attacks against Mr. Bush so soon after his ads were
made public. Of course, now I understand that there was such a motive,
and that the well established political opponents of the president
were standing in the wings right behind these purported grieving family
members.
What's worse is that no one in the popular media even mentioned that
the people they were interviewing were members of a radical left-wing
group that has savaged the Bush administration for well over a year.
They also failed to mention that this group is funded with money donated
by a foundation run by John Kerry's wife! Was that not what they considered
to be pertinent information before they decided to fill the airwaves
with these incomprehensible snipes at our president?
And why do the members of SEFPT hate George W. Bush so much that
they would undertake such an obvious charade anyway? What is the rationale
behind their extremely hostile personas? If anyone is using this issue
for solely political reasons, it's these people and everyone like
them in the Democratic party who seem to have nothing better to talk
about than what they perceive is wrong with President Bush... that
and the fact that John Kerry fought in Vietnam. God forbid any of
us should forget that historic event!
Edward Daley