| MND COMMENTARY |
by Ian Williams Goddard In April 2000, Lon White and others reported a dose-dependent positive correlation between tofu consumption and brain atrophy in a large sample of men over several decades.1 While correlation does not prove causation, study size and duration along with the robust dose-dependent relationship caused me, even as a vegetarian, to avoid tofu and other soy products. Correlation-based hypotheses should be tested against the availability of possible causal mechanisms. In addition to possible causal mechanisms previously cited by this author,2 recent findings significantly increase the case for a causal mechanism of soy-induced brain atrophy. Pro-Atrophy Pharmacology Indicated Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) facilitates the survival and genesis of brain cells.3-4 The neuroprotective effects of caloric restriction are attributed in part to increased BDNF.5 On the other hand, reduced BDNF is known to cause brain-cell atrophy and is associated with Alzheimer’s disease.6-7 Now, a study in "Neuroscience Letters" reports that soy significantly reduced BDNF in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of male rats.8 Since reduced BDNF can cause neural atrophy, these findings appear to provide compelling evidence for a causal mechanism that might explain the positive correlation between tofu (soy) consumption and brain atrophy demonstrated by White et al.1 Bad For Boys, Good For Girls? While soy appears to reduce BDNF in male rats, it has also been shown to increase BDNF in female rats.9 In fact, soy appears to affect neurological parameters in a sex-defined fashion wherein females benefit and males suffer.10-13 There is little doubt among researchers that this is because soy is high in phytoestrogens, which are plant-derived substances that act like the female hormone estrogen. However, that sex-defined difference fails to explain the findings regarding the wives of male subjects in White et al., who reported: "A similar association of midlife tofu intake with poor late life cognitive test scores was also observed among wives of cohort members, using the husband’s answers to food frequency questions as proxy for the wife’s consumption."1 White et al. proposed that long-term consumption of weaker soy estrogens may displace the body’s own stronger estrogen along with its benefits. Evidence Against Soy-Dementia Hypothesis? A possible signal contrary to a soy-dementia link is the low prevalence of dementia14 and high consumption of soy in Okinawa, Japan.15 However, that negative correlation, like any correlation, does not prove causation. For example, perhaps soy does cause dementia but other factors in Okinawa offset the effect. Also, White et al. explored correlations of a range of foods to neurological parameters, whereas this Okinawa analysis is a sweeping generalization of only tofu to all of Okinawa. In other words, it stands to reason that the study by White et al. finding a positive tofu-dementia correlation has the greater likelihood of providing the more accurate picture. Nevertheless, in my view this Okinawa data warrants further examination as a possible route to falsifying the soy-dementia hypotheses. In closing, the findings of soy-induced BDNF reduction in male rat brain regions that are central to the onset of dementia, in addition to previous findings,2 appear to provide compelling evidence of a possible causal mechanism that might explain the soy-dementia correlation reported by White et al.1 Obviously further research is necessary before a clear picture emerges regarding the effects of long-term soy consumption on the brain. But in the meantime, my inclination is to play it safe and avoid soy.
|
|
|