Islamist Snuff Films to Become Propaganda Weapons
December 9, 2003
by
Tom Marzullo

Still from video of a gruesome and vicious murder perpetrated
by radical Islamists |
The newest tactical plan in the Islamist propaganda campaign is to create
and distribute videos to the media showing the actual rape/torture/murder
of westerners specifically kidnapped for these productions.
This surely is a damning claim and one that needs significant backing
for any reasonable person to even consider its veracity. It is therefore
incumbent upon this writer to provide you with the information, evidence
and analysis that you require to make sense of the situation.
Be aware that this issue will also bring an immediate knee-jerk response
of the part of the Western left and the de rigor protests of Islamist
groups in general. You will hear the typically shrill cries of condemnation,
racism, bigotry that is trotted out whenever there is no evidence
to back what they have to say, so pay attention what is said as that
will be an education in itself.
Perhaps the most convincing items of evidence at hand is a Chechen/Islamist-made
video clip of deliberately slow and barbarous murder. This film was
made and distributed by the Islamists and have already briefly appeared
on the Internet on various sites that themselves just as quickly disappear.
(Warning! Extremely grisly and nauseating
video: Beheading
[425kb]).
It will also interest you to know that these types of videos were
made as fund-raisers for the Islamist cause and that it was possible
to have placed a custom order for the type of person and style of
execution.
For the majority of those Westerners who have had the gumption to
view the video clips, they represent a shocking introduction into
the twelfth century morality that seems to be irrevocably entwined
in the Islamist mentality. It is also an indelible introduction to
the use of video as a weapon in and of itself.
For those who may not recall the scenes of dead American soldiers
being abused and dragged
through the streets of Mogadishu, it is necessary to remind them
of the purpose of those videos. The purpose was to use the Western
media to revolt the sensibilities if the Western viewers and create
a response that would lead to the withdrawal of American forces from
Somalia and leave the warlords in charge. It succeeded and so presented
a workable template for the Islamists to enlarge upon.
We frequently see some of the Western media in action as the de facto
tools of the Islamists in Iraq and elsewhere. The evidence for this
lies in paying attention to the tenor and level of error of the immediate
reporting done from the scene of events. The clear preponderance of
immediate reporting from some outlets is anti-coalition and although
most of it is later disproved, it is the bulk accumulation of initial
impressions that is sought and obtained by the Islamists and Baathist
holdouts. This plays well into the chronic lack of depth and need
for immediacy endemic in the Western visual media as well as to prejudices
of many of their decision makers.
These videos already have a ready outlet in Al Jezera and other Middle
Eastern media outlets as well as the Internet, but what gains access
to the American public are our own media companies.
What is seldom dwelt upon by some members of the Western media is
their own, now well-entrenched habit of snatching defeat from the
jaws of victory, insofar as the efforts of the United States and its
allies are concerned. From Walter Cronkite’s 1968 pronouncements
to Somalia and CNN/TIME’s collapsed ‘Tailwind’
smear, it is the journalist who now takes the lead in pronouncing
the judgment of history in this latest perversion of yellow-journalism
run amuck.
The unwilling primary actors for this deliberately cold-blooded exercise
in psychological terror operations are to be western, but preferably
American military personnel, business people, non-governmental organization
(NGO) charity workers and lastly journalists themselves. The ranking
of potential victims is purposeful as it is the journalists who must
complete the distribution cycle and it would not do to unduly alarm
them, unless of course they fail to cooperate as expected.
So what we have before us are the means, opportunity, motive and
a clear history of prior similar bad acts. But we are not in court
of law yet, just the court of public opinion and perception.
So here is the bottom line for the consumers of mass media…
It is the decision of whether to continue to become shocked and dismayed
by the already-announced dissemination of barbarous images though
our own media outlets that lack the mature and objective self-restraint
required… or to finally become aware of who we are as a nation
and a culture, the true nature of whom are at war with and begin to
deal with it rationally and decisively.
As for the left’s predicted response, that will also be illuminating
exercise. Thoughtful readers will be interested to note just what
media outlets, organizations and individuals immediately stand up
to condemn this report without any rational examination of the facts
of the matter and will begin to understand that therein lies the heart
of this issue.
It always pays to know who your friends really are, but at no time
is this more important than in these days of danger.
Tom Marzullo
Tom Marzullo is a columnist/physicist/educator who
is a former US Army Special Forces combat soldier and US Navy Submariner
with special operations experience in both services. He was the leader
of the Internet-based effort by Special Forces veterans that debunked
the false CNN/TIME magazine nerve gas story, 'Tailwind' and has provided
testimony before the US Senate on military and intelligence matters.
He resides in Colorado.