Purging the Political Correctness
Within
October 16, 2002
by Wendy McElroy
Political correctness is not just an
ideology; it is an attitude. And although the ideology may be dying
out, it can live on in the attitudes many of us have absorbed from our
culture -- a culture that has been ravaged and dominated by political correctness
for decades. We need to exorcise its spirit.
As an ideology, political correctness
says that some ideas, attitudes and peaceful behavior are unacceptable
and should be legally discouraged. Acceptable ones should be encouraged
by law. Thus discrimination against "minorities," such as women
(who are actually a majority), is prohibited in both the public and
private sector. Discrimination in favor of minorities is mandated
through the de facto quotas imposed by policies like affirmative
action.
But political correctness is also an
attitude. The politically correct arrogantly expropriate "the truth"
and deny the possibility of honest disagreement. To them it is a given:
anyone who dissents does so because of ill motives -- e.g. economic
greed, patriarchal power-lust, racism. To the PC, society is a battleground
on which classes of people representing good and evil conflict: black
versus white, female versus male, Western culture versus the "emerging
nations." The coin of the realm is collective victimhood, not individual
responsibility.
I demand a civil
society that respects the individual and acknowledges the existence
of honest disagreement between human beings of good will. But getting
there means rooting out not only the ideology of political correctness
but also the attitudes many of us have adopted almost by osmosis from
our culture.
The attitudes include:
Gender bashing. "Men versus women"
permeates every corner of society. (Indeed, so many PC laws now favor
women at the expense of men that there has come to be truth to the analysis.)
A gender conflict mentality has set in. Women say hateful things about
men under the guise of humor, things they would never say about
other classes of people, like Jews or Hispanics. For their part, men
trash all women
because one woman treated them badly. The merits of individual women
and men are entirely ignored. But individual women and men constitute
our families, friends and neighbors.
The antidote to gender bashing is to
get personal. Whenever you hear a remark that slanders all men or women,
replace the noun with the name of someone you love. Do they deserve
to be the brunt of hate speech? Don't let your husband or child be slandered.
Psychologizing disagreements.
This involves ignoring the content of what is said and analyzing, instead,
the psychology of the speaker. For example, a man opposes affirmative
action and is immediately labeled a "racist" or "misogynist." A woman
questions the wisdom of working while her children are young and is
accused of trying to shove women back to '50s. The PC camp has made
this approach into a staple of social discourse.
The remedy: When you hear an argument,
refuse to psychologize the speaker. Show respect for ideas and ask yourself
whether there is anything -- any statement, however minor -- with which
you agree. Or construct a counter argument. Don't turn the intellectual
realm into a research project in aberrant psychotherapy.
Making the personal
political. "The personal is political": This slogan has come
to mean that politics is determined by our personal lives -- which,
in turn, determines the lives of others. Thus, the PC argue for laws
to ensure that individuals make the "correct" personal choices so that
the "correct" political consequences can sculpt society. Your choice
to be a heterosexual, a stay-at-home mom or to dissent on affirmative
action becomes my business. This leads to the PC attitude that
everything a neighbor (or a stranger) does is your business ... and
the appropriate target of legal control.
The solution: Mind your own business.
Respect the private lives and choices of others.
Celebrating victimhood. An automatic
hush of respect falls over a discussion whenever someone declares herself
to be a victim. I know. I was severely beaten by a boyfriend and my
victimization
-- if announced -- makes me an incontrovertible expert on domestic violence.
Only it doesn't. Being on the wrong end of a hurled fist doesn't make
me an expert on anything except how much it hurts. I know no more about
domestic violence -- and arguably less -- than the woman who chose to
walk out at the first signs of physical abuse. Society's canonization
of suffering is unhealthy and bizarre.
The cure: Show compassion for victims
but not deference.
Zero tolerance. On some social
issues, a declaration of "war" may make sense. But, with most social
problems, human beings with human frailties are involved. Declaring
war only makes every member of society into a combatant, with no prisoners
taken. How about reconsidering concepts like negotiation, forgiveness,
compassion, and empathy? How about making the law a last resort rather
than a first option?
Sweeping up the debris of political
correctness means demolishing the laws, the institutions and the tax-funded
bureaucracies that are its structure. But it also means eliminating
the vicious attitudes of intolerance and anger that are its spirit.
Wendy
McElroy
Wendy McElroy is the editor
of ifeminists.com. She is the
author and editor of many books and articles, including her new anthology
Liberty
for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century
(Ivan R. Dee/Independent Institute, 2002). She lives with her husband
in Canada.