In the Feminist Classroom Education and Truth are Not the Same

April 11, 2004

For education to have any value, it must be represented by truth. A distinction needs to be made, however, between legitimate education (truth) and what is being passed off as education - pseudo-education - and those who are pseudo-educated. (For example, all education involving the social sciences and humanities is corrupted by feminism's influence.) A difference now exists in the process of education. Being educated, is a term now used regardless of the content being taught. Many students are misinformed, and therefore 'educated' with untruth. But is it not better - more intelligent - to remain ignorant than filled with misinformation and the prejudice that comes with it?

To become educated is to attain knowledge, which is, and can only be, valid if derived from truth. Education today has been altered to include feminist propaganda. As a result, we no longer find truth respected within educational realms. As education has been used as a means of political propaganda, valid concerns expressed against it are deliberately exempt from the agenda. Rather than an education derived from knowledge, and supported by the truth, this new version, pseudo-education, has unfortunately contaminated (and dumbed down) our colleges and universities, and their 'educated' products. Although lacking real value, it still carries legitimate representation. Historical documentation, arbitrarily building a foundation of untruth to create historic reference, as well as text books and courses, has been altered to support feminism. (I refuse to recognize feminism as a philosophy, and therefore refrain from using such a term for its reference.) One soon discovers that formal education does not equate to intelligence, as many PhD's reveal their lack of intellect who endorse feminism.

Feminism is a prime example of institutionalized prejudice, which disgraces the integrity of our educational system and our country. Any dilution, or sacrifice, of advanced knowledge degenerates our civilization to a more primitive level. (Hence, very barbaric qualities have been endorsed by, and expressed within the confines of, feminism.) Unfortunately, education has been used as a means to influence and persuade, not by a founding of truth and underlying knowledge, but by distributing and applying prejudiced propaganda, with recipients paying for the diservice.

Men's Studies:
Feminism has had the advantage of establishing a precedent in education, which does not allow legitimate, unadulterated studies of men to take place, or to be officially recognized. Opposition to the feminist take-over by any legitimate studies concerning men has been addressed as a 'threat.' To fight this mounting threat, feminists created 'men's studies,' and passed them off as legitimate studies concerning men. Nothing could be further from the truth. Feminists, providing a front to cope, have titled their version of such studies something they are not. Thus, a facade/pseudo-education has also been created in the form of men's studies. But, as most understand who are in the know, being derived from feminism and women's studies, men's studies are merely feminist/women's studies for men - fraud! They consist of blaming men, and are concerned with changing men to appease feminism/women. Men's studies are totally removed from any semblance of truth or a genuine study of men. But since this disguise comes from the "authorities" under the auspices of legitimate education, it carries official weight, and is therefore more legit, supposedly, than anything derived outside this institution. But there's little to show for it, except prejudice.

The best education one can find concerning men and their issues comes from outside institutionalized education. The male's perspective, issues, or any equal consideration and representation of men are, so far, 'officially' non-existent. However, some inroads are now being made.

As a result, to have truth/legitimacy in men's studies, the discipline must develop outside 'official' educational realms from a non-partial source that has not yet been contaminated. (But with feminism's world-wide influence, does this exist?) We must also keep in mind that without total commitment and objectivity, any gender studies, even if not accepted by educational institutions, are affected/diluted and made less effective by the established prejudice of feminism.

Become educated by the truth regardless of its source. Due to emotional influence, little is done to hide the extreme prejudice in education taught by feminist supporters (both female and male). Some incorporation of legitimate men's studies, if we want to call them that, may result, but we won't see the real thing in its purest form emerge from within the realms of education. But why not be original, and instead of a take-off of feminism, call legitimate men's studies something such as 'the study of men'? This would allow people to differentiate between the two, and identify the real one from the fake.

When education is derived from truth, it comes from knowledge, which is attained from experience, witnesses, practice, observations, comparisons, cross-referencing and equal/unbiased consideration for all parties concerned, with accurate documentation included. We must not allow educational institutions to undermine their original foundation to convey misinformation and influence others by something other than the truth. People acquire knowledge through truth by cross-referencing information, and logically reversing scenarios by, for example, replacing the female with the male in given situations, which is enough to reveal contradictions and expose blatant double standards and prejudice, and therefore the illegitimacy of feminism and women's/men's studies. It quickly becomes evident that the lack of intellect is necessary as a prerequisite to educate students of feminism, or to be a teacher of the subject.

We know by logic and reasoning what constitutes truth and legitimacy. But let's take this specific matter to the next level of investigation. What could motivate this new feminist-influenced education? The answer is power. And anything, such as the truth, that threatens this power is strongly opposed. Power misused is aggression. And aggression knows no rules/boundaries, with no respect for knowledge and truth. Any information is considered useless, unless it can be twisted and arbitrarily used to influence people through education.

Truth is a threat. Consistency in a basic idea is necessary in the rational thought process followed by a sequence of logical conclussions. However, if this rational thought process is applied to certain social issues, it severely threatens the status quo. What's dictated is not to be questioned. But to question is a right, and without that right freedom is lost. This is why diversions are often used by adversaries to redirect thought, which allows the reader/listener to become distracted, losing out on an important point or message being conveyed. But when the truth is forbidden, it becomes priceless value, and the costs are unforgiving. When relating to accepting the truth, keep in mind that one's focused thought process is a valuable entity that provides the means of receiving the anti-dote to untruth. Many of those in power strive daily to not let this happen.

Not surprisingly, when approached by legitimate studies/philosophies, educators on the inside reject the truth. It scares the hell out of them. (To associate, let alone accept, it could mean the end to their careers and livelihoods.) Many don't even want to talk about it, or they provide the same general feminist rhetoric without any semblance of their own thinking ability. Feminists will often throw your efforts back in your face, and merely try to use them against you personally, when seeing you as a threat to their rule, using humiliation to intimidate and inhibit your freedom of expression. (I began to experience this deliberate oppression of men's expression when I first spoke out against feminism and, mistakenly, thought many educators within our educational institutions had more intellectual integrity than they do.) If these educators were capable of any self-reflection, they would be aware of their exaggerated inadequacies.

The common rhetoric based on feminist conjecture was to call men who spoke out against the prejudice, and who demanded equal representation to feminists, male chauvinists, and/or claim they were women-haters and had personal problems. But it soon became evident they were accusing others of their own faults. Men were isolated and condemned, and the weak were influenced by feminism. Personal lives were fragmented and unity was destroyed.

Just like Nazism, anything entitled feminism should not be condoned, otherwise it will be accepted, disallowing truth from ever emerging. I strongly encourage pro-men 'feminists' (an oxymoron) who consider themselves kind and reasonable people to not associate themselves with feminism. Any use of the term connotes sex bias to begin with, and the practice expresses extreme hate and prejudice against men and humanity. No self-respecting person (man or woman) would want the title or association. It certainly presents a red flag concerning one's integrity. As we know, and the comparison is often made, feminism reveals many parallels to Nazism. Isn't for one to say "I'm a feminist, but a different type of feminist," the same as saying "I'm a Nazi, but a different type of Nazi"? (Hey, don't get angry, I'm just asking.)

Feminism, unfortunately, is 'fashionable' in today's society, offering the unifying value of hatred within the university/college click, with a sense of belonging that is also present in other associations. But this is shallow, unethical and a disgrace, not only to our educational institutions, but to our country and humanity. Feminism's influence through education contaminates all fields and professions. A better, more responsible educated individual now results outside of these realms. And that person knows the truth hurts, only because we've veered from it.

Allan Millard