Baboon study suggests paternal care may be ancient
trait in primates
September 14, 2003
MND NEWSWIRE
In a finding that surprised researchers, a recent three-year study
of five baboon groups at the foot of Mount Kilimanjaro in Kenya reveals
that baboon fathers overwhelming side with their offspring when intervening
in disputes.
The study, which appears in the Sept. 11 issue of the journal Nature,
was funded by the National Science Foundation, the Chicago Zoological
Society, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation and the National Geographic Society.
Not that baboons have a bad-dad reputation, but their links to females
and immature baboons is rather loose by primate standards. For example,
females and males have multiple mating partners, and they do not form
permanent bonds with each other.
According to one of the study’s authors, biologist Susan Alberts
of Duke University, “This means your average male baboon has much
less certainty about which kids he fathered than your average male gorilla,
for instance.”
The fact that paternal care -- the tendency for males to care for their
own offspring -- runs so strongly through baboons suggests that such
care “may be a very ancient evolved trait in the primate lineage,”
Alberts said.
The study’s co-authors include Duke biologist Jason Buchan, University
of California at Los Angeles anthropologist Joan B. Silk and Princeton
University biologist Jeanne Altmann.
To identify true paternal care in a complex primate society, the project
needed to determine paternity for many infants. To do this without disturbing
the population meant collecting baboon feces and then, with a protocol
adapted from the study of human stools, isolating and comparatively
analyzing the DNA within it.
Such genetic information, Altmann said, is essential to know “if
what's going on is truly paternal care.”
Silk, who heads another NSF project that focuses on the adaptive value
of social bonds among female baboons, said it has long been known that
many primate males are dedicated fathers.
“Up until now,” she said, “the best candidates for
‘Dad of the Year’ awards come from species that maintain
long-term pair bonds, like the siamang and owl monkeys.”
That the more promiscuous, less committed baboons also vie for such
honors suggests that “a capacity for paternal care is not tightly
linked to social organization,” said Silk. Rather, she said, it
may be a “fundamental element” of male reproductive strategies
among primates.
“Humans,” Silk said, “represent another species with
high paternal investment.”
The study, which hinged on data collected by three Kenyan research
assistants and cooperation with the Kenyan government, monitored 75
juvenile baboons for whom fathers were clearly identified through comparisons
of DNA in fecal samples. About half of the juveniles still shared social
groups with their fathers. The observers also identified 15 adult males
who lived in groups that included their own offspring and unrelated
juveniles; all but three of the 15 provided more care to their own kin.
From July 1999 to July 2002, the observers witnessed 73 disputes in
which a male intervened in a dispute between one of his offspring and
an unrelated baboon; and in 69 of those conflicts, fathers sided with
their offspring.
While the biologists were able to analyze DNA samples from baboon scats
to identify the players, it remains unclear exactly how baboon fathers
identify their offspring.
They probably rely upon “multiple cues,” the researchers
believe. “That is,” said Alberts, “they use any information
they can to estimate their own paternity.”
An adult male, for example, may associate his monopolization of the
mother’s fertile period with the baboons born soon thereafter,
which is considered a behavioral cue. Or he may rely on phenotypic cues,
ones based on observable characteristics derived from the offspring’s
specific genetic code, such as physical appearance or an odor.
According to Jane Brockmann, who directs NSF’s animal behavior
research program, “This study puts together the behavior and physiology
of individuals with the genetic and demographic structure of groups
and populations. It will substantially increase our understanding of
the evolution of complex social behavior.”
NSF’s physical anthropology office jointly funds the project.
It is, Brockmann said, the latest chapter in an ongoing 31-year study
that has followed six generations from 11 baboon troops, representing
more than 1,000 individuals. By developing innovative, non-invasive
ways to collect hormonal and genetic data, and by developing a shared
database of behavior, Altmann and Alberts, she said, have allowed new
questions to be studied and have helped train many university students
in Kenya and the U.S.
With continued NSF support, Alberts and Altmann plan to examine more
baboon questions of their own: Does the presence of a father affect
whether an infant or juvenile survives? How do father-offspring relationships
form? Could it be that mothers play a role by selecting for friendly
fathers in the first place?
“These relationships,” said Altmann, “probably can
form in a variety of ways.”
To learn more, she and Alberts will examine physiological factors associated
with baboon behaviors and life history by using fecal analysis to assess
variations in levels of reproductive and stress hormones.
Silk, meanwhile, wants to see what causes variations among the size
and composition of social relationships among female baboons. “And
adult males,” she said, “may be an important part of females’
social networks.
For more information, see the following:
Amboseli Baboon Research Project web site, which includes
video material from the Public Broadcasting Service: http://www.princeton.edu/~baboon