Cornyn Introduces Continuity of Congress Amendment
By Jim Hauser
Talon News
November 6, 2003
Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), chairman of the Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee
on the Constitution, introduced a constitutional amendment and implementing
legislation Wednesday to provide for the continuity of Congress. The
measure is intended to ensure that vacancies in Congress, specifically
the House, would be quickly filled in the event of a large-scale disaster
such as the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
The Constitution spells out a specific order of succession for the
presidency and allows state governors to make temporary appointments
to the Senate. The Constitution only allows vacancies in the House of
Representatives to be filled by special elections which can typically
take months to conduct, potentially leaving Congress without the quorum
required to pass legislation.
"Although Congress is not in session year-round, the ability to
convene immediately in a time of crisis cannot be understated,"
said Cornyn in a press release. "Three days after 9/11, Congress
appropriated $40 billion in emergency funds and approved legislation
supporting the use of military force. And a week later, Congress enacted
further legislation to stabilize and secure the economy and airports,
and to compensate the victims of the 9/11 attacks."
Cornyn's implementing legislation would allow the states to choose
alternative methods for quickly filling vacancies. One method would
allow interim appointments by the governors or state legislatures. Another
possibility would allow emergency interim appointments to be made based
on a list of succession that is pre-determined by members of Congress.
A third solution would require that special elections be held within
days or weeks instead of months.
Cornyn was quick to point out that any emergency interim appointments
to fill vacancies in the House would only be temporary. The legislation
would require that any such appointments would be followed by elections
within a 120 day time limit. Vacancies created by the incapacitation
of a member could be reclaimed by that member immediately following
recovery.
On three occasions during the Cold War, the Senate passed constitutional
amendments to allow temporary appointments to the House, but the measures
did not clear the House. Following September 11, 2001, Rep. Brian Baird
(D-WA) and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) each introduced constitutional
amendments to allow governors to make temporary appointments to the
House in the case of mass vacancies.
John Fortier of the American Enterprise Institute points out that the
biggest problem with Cornyn's amendment proposal is rooted in the Constitution
itself. In a recent article titled "The Continuity of Congress,"
Fortier notes that "when vacancies happen in the representation
of any state in the Senate, the executive authority of such state shall
issue writs of election to fill such vacancies; provided, that the legislature
of any state may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments
until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may
direct."
"By contrast, the Constitution makes no provision for temporary
appointments in the House," said Fortier. "All vacancies are
filled by special election. Article I, Sec. 2, cl.. 4 reads 'when vacancies
happen in the representation from any state, the executive authority
thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.'"
A group calling itself the Committee to Preserve an Elected Congress,
headed by conservative columnist Phyllis Schlafly, is strongly opposed
to any measure that would allow the appointments of House members. Schlafly,
in a recent statement, said the group was formed "to combat the
surprising attempt by men who should know better to change the U.S.
House of Representatives from an elective to an appointive body in the
event of a national emergency."
In a World Net Daily article that appeared in June, Schlafly was quoted
as saying, "[T]he direct election of Members of the House accountable
to 'we the people' is the centerpiece of the American constitutional
system and has been a major factor in preserving our American liberties."
Sen. Cornyn acknowledged that some disagreement remains on "what
form the solution should take."
"Some members of Congress desire emergency interim appointments,
while other members believe that expedited special elections are sufficient,"
Cornyn said. "My proposal specifically refrains from choosing sides
in this debate. The constitutional amendment simply defers the question
to Congress, and the implementing legislation simply defers the question
to the states."