Pit bulls are not hunting dogs, they are not house dogs; they have
been selectively bred for one reason: they are killing machines.
Generally nice dogs with a playful but rough side to them, pit bulls
need training from birth to turn them into thugs willing to maul
other animals.
Once used to kill small animals, pit bulls now are mostly bred
for dog fights (done for profit). Given this practice is illegal,
it has been driven underground. Hoodlum gangsters usually
breed them, and the dogs fight until one or the other dies.
The pit bull trainer’s goal is to get the dog to maul another dog.
To do this, they keep the dog starved, beaten, and angry, but loyal
to them. And when they want them to maul something, the dogs
do, at the conditioned reaction to some type of stimulus. If a pit
bull loses a match, if it doesn’t die in the ring, it is left to
die of hunger or is lit on fire, out of shame.
What pit bull trainers do to their dogs is what feminists do to
women. Feminists are in the business of training women to
become political thugs.
Like a pit bull trainer encouraging hatred in their dogs, feminists
encourage hatred in women. In order to keep their "cause"
going and their numbers high, feminists need to keep women angry.
Not just their cause, but certain feminist's careers, tenure, and
livelihood are invested in ensuring that women are being oppressed,
and that they stay upset over it. The goal is to mobilize the angry
women into action.
While at a feminist event I saw a ribbon once, which asked, “Where’s
the Outrage?” The outrage we are supposed to feel is outrage
over sexual assault and violence. To solve sexual assault
and violence, they don’t advocate reasoned analysis, nor thoughtful
planning, but outrage. Indeed, what will “outrage,” an ugly
emotion which means “resentful anger over a violent act,” do to
help the problem at all? Nothing, except make a person miserable.
The ribbon single-handedly exposes feminists: their goal is
not to create solutions to problems, but to manifest hatred in people.
That is nothing, however, compared to what they do to actual rape
victims, when they get their hands on them. Rape is their
cash cow issue. Feminists encourage rape victims to re-live
their tragedy in their head over and over again, keeping the scabs
open – the pot of anger brimming. One example of this is "Take Back
the Night."
I have argued before that Take Back Your Night is unjustly accusatory
towards men. It is, however, most people remain loyal to it
out of chivalry towards women and compassion for rape victims.
Don’t. This event is just as abusive to the women and the
rape victims who participate.
At Take Back the Night, feminists unite on college campuses and
women get up in front of a mass crowd of people and describe abuse
of all kinds: incestuous abuse, sexual assault by a friend, being
raped or knowing someone who was raped. They dwell on the tragedies
that happened to them and keep bringing up the feelings of anger
and hatred from the incident over and over again.
Slight common sense can tell you that this is psychologically destructive.
The only thing that encouraging women who have been raped to re-live
their moment again can do is re-send thoughts of terror and horror
through that women's mind and soul. These women are severely strained
in their ability to put the tragedy in the past and move on with
their lives. It's like picking at a scab, if you keep prodding it
– it never heals.
However, feminist encourage this kind of behavior to keep the anger
flowing, the hatred brewed – the 'cause' going. Feminists politicize
the issue of rape to advance their agendas. They use rape victims
as political pawns, as pitbulls are to their trainers, allowing
these women to live in psychological hell – in order for them to
enhance their agendas and careers.
Indeed, rape is the perfect issue for feminists to pounce on.
Everyone agrees it is wrong, and no one would dare speak up, for
fear of being insensitive to rape victims. Don’t let them
fool you. They are using rape as an issue to advance
their agenda; they do not care about rape victims. If you
ever talk to one of these malicious women, it appears as if they
are actually happy when statistics show rape is increasing.
Does someone who cares about a solution to a problem get happy when
the problem worsens? No, the issue was exploited by them because
it allows them to arouse female anger with protection, knowing no
one would ever dare touch the issue.
Another campus event, started just this past year, will also work
towards this goal of festering anger. It is called the “Day
of Silence.” For 8 hours during the day, students take a pledge
not to talk. In an article write up at the Penn State University,
they describe its purpose: “The participants' silence [is] representative
of the silencing of people on campus based on a variety of aspects,
from sexual orientation and gender identity to race and religion.”
The day ends with a "breaking of the silence"— a meeting where “participants
are encouraged to examine their lives and the lives of others to
determine why oppression occurs and how to prevent it.”
I wonder if they ever considered real victims of oppression, including
the Iraqi people living under Saddam, the people and family members
from the World Trade Center attack, or soldiers giving their lives
for us. Somehow, I doubt it.
However, notice what happens with the Day of Silence. For
8 hours in the day, students are unable to function as adult human
beings. Imagine the feelings of inadequacy and helplessness
that you would have to face if you couldn’t talk for a day.
The goal is to make the students angry.
Indeed, from the newspaper the day after the event: “Many
participants said they truly knew what it felt like to be oppressed
after not talking all day, and they did not enjoy it.”
The purpose of it is to stir feelings of inferiority and hatred.
And, in the end, they all come together, in a group, angry as ever,
shouting, getting the troops ready to sick the oppressors of the
oppressed.
Catherine MacKinnon, a contemporary feminist icon encourages girls
to "Try thinking without apology with what you know from being victimized."
Don't think clearly – try thinking when you were angry!
Those on the outside can see this kind of destructive behavior,
but those on the inside have come out of the jungle to report about
the beast too. In Tammy Bruce's book, The New Thought Police:
Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds, while
she, a former Los Angeles NOW president, was within the feminist
establishment, they encouraged their organization to "rub salt in
the wound." Tammy elaborates:
"Rubbing salt into the
wound' means maintaining the pains of your constituency. It can
take many forms, but primarily the strategy involves twisting any
and every event under the rubric of human relations into an assault
on women, blacks, gays, or whatever groups is your bread and butter.
If the events of the day provide a real example of bias, they must
be exploited -- and if they don't, then an appropriate incident
must be invented to remind your constituents of their victimhood.”
Need I say more?
By keeping female anger flowing, they keep their numbers high of
women who support whatever cause they are crusading. The angry mob
is always there for them, ready to sick whatever person they deem
evil.
As an undergrad in college, I was invited along with some others
to debate a group of feminists. If you think college is about
intellectual discussion, think again. Instead of allowing
us to talk, the audience would howl and cackle, like a bunch of
primates in the zoo whenever something bizarre happens, drowning
out whatever we had to say. At one point, a woman in the audience
got up and screamed at us, "All I see up here is a bunch of homophobes!"
They asked us if any of our panelists had rape fantasies. They knew
no bounds, they provided no logic – they were like 2 women fighting
in a bar, scratching, clawing, throwing glass cups and kicking below
the belt. Moderators there did nothing to stop it (I later found
out the man who organized it was a raging socialist). They were
political thugs; their mission to silence the opposition.
This type of behavior is not bizarre, it’s typical. Feminists
are known for the mob-like tactics when confronting people who disagree
with them. They shout down speakers; they cuss at people; they scream
their heads off at all dissent. They are, as Tammy says, thought
police. And they do it for the most self-righteous of reason: they
think that they are crusading for rape victims, for the poor, for
all the poor baby bunnies of the world.
Don’t ever let them fool you. Rape victim or not, their thuggish
tactics are not acceptable, and the savage beasts should be quickly
reprimanded for their behavior.
It is the conditioning by feminists (and others) that causes them
to be such unruly monsters. One feminist wrote about crusading
against pornography, they “successfully aroused female anger.”
A woman’s emotions are considered up for sale to feminists, to be
used by them for whatever agenda they want.
Sorry, feminists, but female emotion is not for your taking.
If you ever want to know why feminists, and increasingly more normal
women have a chip on their shoulders – that is why. However,
don’t blame the women, blame the leaders.
Pit bulls have a tendency to stay loyal to their owners.
Despite being starved, hit, and lit on fire or left to die if they
lose a match, pit bulls still remain loyal. Similarly, these
young women being exploited seem to cling to their feminist leaders,
not just as their protectors, but as their only savior. The
real oppression they feel is not from the patriarchy, but from their
own leaders. Feminists are worse to their own than they are
to men.
Don't be suckered by people telling you that because you critique
feminist approach to rape - that you are insensitive to rape. This
simply isn't true of just about anyone. Rape is a horrible crime
that should never happen to anyone. This is why it is so contemptible
that feminists exploit the issue, and the victims.
What they really need to do is not to take back the night, but
their sanity, self respect, and well being.
Amber Pawlik