Somehow, although I don’t know how, I get feminist updates from feminist.org. I received the following in my inbox recently:

“Imagine being confined to a cell for 17 hours a day, and having little or no access to reading, writing, or learning--or talks with friends. Imagine that the Bible is the only reading material you are given. When there is a copy of a magazine, imagine that you have to share it with 699 other women.

Now imagine receiving your own personal copy of Ms. magazine, and knowing that more will come.

You can make this happen with a tax deductible gift to the Ms. Magazine Prison and Domestic Violence Shelter Program, a fund dedicated to creating a link with women in prison and women who have reached the safety of a shelter but rarely have access to supportive books and magazines.”

Oh boo hoo. Those poor criminals being locked away in a cell for 17 hours a day. I feel so bad!! However, at least feminists know their target market for potential new feminists: it’s not female scientists or female CEOs but female criminals.

“Our current resources allow us to just skim the surface. Of the tens of thousands of women in prisons in the U.S., Ms. is reaching only 15,430.”

Come on fellow feminists! Don’t you know how vast a resource a bunch of angry, hardened criminals are to feminism!? Start recruiting and fast!

Steinem and others are boasting this is in the name of caring for forgotten prisoners but it, of course, is not. If they cared about these women, perhaps they would get the prisoners something fun to read – such as anything in the world except Ms. Magazine.

Feminists know that angry criminals who hate society are exactly the kind of thugs that will do feminist grunt work for them. That’s why they are trolling among prisons. Take the heart-warming story Steinem tells us of the woman she met who found Ms. Magazine in prison, and it supposedly changed her life around.

“Years ago I met an elegant African American woman in her late thirties who told me that she had first read Ms. in prison. She had been convicted of prostitution, and after reading a few issues of Ms., she began to wonder why she was serving time, yet her pimp and customers were not. She went to the prison library to find law books, only to be told that in her state, men's prisons had law libraries but women's did not. She organized other women prisoners to protest. When law books arrived, she began researching questions for herself and other prisoners; questions of unequal justice, child custody, and others. After her release, she found a clerical job at a women's law firm, and went on to finish high school and attend college at night. "Now I'm a lawyer," she said. "I thought you just might like to know."”

A lawyer. Of course. It’s just one of the many kinds of political thugs that feminism needs as they infiltrate all of society, law, and media with their agenda.

Feminism is a hate movement. It is not a movement that much cares about female success, female happiness – or female mental/emotional/physical health for that matter. Feminism is based on Marxist principles. The one tenet one must accept to be a feminist is the idea that women have been and are oppressed. Given most women do not feel oppressed and in fact are pretty happy with their lives, feminists have to either a.) Go after the fringe of society that feels oppressed because of some type of mental or situational crisis or b.) Keep women as damaged and broken as possible to make them join the hate movement known as feminism.

Prisoners are just one segment of society that feminists can troll to find angry, victim-minded women. That’s why they are spreading their propaganda there.

Feminists will also create angry, victim-minded women. Breaking down the family structure so unstable children are being formed or telling women to gorge themselves with food are other ways to create women without self-esteem – women who will join the hate movement known as feminism.

Crying women are oppressed is of course a self-fulfilling prophecy. And, indeed, after creating women who are impotent in every way possible, then they can tell them it is the patriarchy’s fault. Genius.

Feminists have worked to take women backwards in the past 30 years. Feminists do not speak for the best kind of woman but the worst. For evidence, observe they will come to bat for Andrea Yates but are literally silent when it comes to exalting any kind of virtuous female. Feminism does not stand for career women. There are only certain kinds of career women that feminists like: lawyers, professors, writers, and politicians, i.e. those that will spread their agenda. Rather, women like Catherine MacKinnon, Hillary Clinton, Steinem, et al. It’s never achieved women that feminists exalt, like Margaret Thatcher or Florence Nightingale but political thugs.

This stunt from Steinem and Ms. Magazine exposes feminists for what they are. They are not interested in helping women. They are interested in exploiting pain and anger for their own personal agendas.