by Fred Reed
Were
I to offer thoughts on marriage to young American men today, in these
the declining years of a once-great civilization, my advice would
be as follows: Don't do it. Or, if you do, do it in another country.
In America marriage is a grievous error.
And why so? Because of The Chip. The Attitude. The bandsaw
whine of anger, anger, anger that makes American women an international
horror. It's there. It's real.
You, a young man, may not recognize the Chip if you
have never seen normal, warm, happy women. If you are twenty-something
and haven't been out of the US, you haven't seen them. They exist
by the billion-in Latin America, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaya, China
and, last I looked, France and Holland. And of course not every woman
in America carries the Chip. None of them think they do. Yet it is
the default, the usual, what comes out of the box.
The following is a perfectly ordinary, everyday, bulk-lot
example, suitable for poisoning a cistern:
"Other than a 29-inch waist and a full head of
hair, there isn't much to recommend the twentysomething male…He
is living an extended adolescence -- an adult-olescence -- and every
immature, irresponsible, self-absorbed thing he does is reinforced
by the latest issue of his favorite men's magazine." (Susan Reimer,
a columnist for the Baltimore Sun. I bet she goes out a lot.)*
Hers is the Attitude -- and what they think of you.
It is the defining trait of American women. Exceptions exist, and
they have my apologies, but they are few, and no, sport, your Sally
probably isn't one of them. They're coiled to bite. As soon as problems
arise in the marriage, they turn into Susan.
Susan Reimer is what is out there, guys: bitter that
no one wants her (as who in his right mind could?), sure that no one
is good enough for her, never having grasped that those who would
be loved must first be lovable. Understand this: Susan is America.
Some hide it better, springing it on you after the ceremony, but Susan
is the rule.
The Susans do not like men. Sometimes they actually
take courses in disliking men ("Women's Studies"). Yet they
want to marry one and have babies. For them, the contradiction actually
makes a kind of sense, because (and they know this, believe me) they
will get the house, the children, and the child support.
For you, it makes no sense. You will get raped in the
divorce courts. You don't know how bad it is. Don't do it.
A prime effect of marriage is backbreaking financial
overhead: the excessive house in the prestigious suburb, the pricey
but boring cars, all that. But if you don't fall into the trap, keeping
your expenses down means you can live in Alaska or overseas and enjoy
existence. There is more to life than debt service. Yet, although
these are bad times for marrying, they are extraordinarily good times
for being single.
Now, children. This is sticky. You may want them, or
think you want them, or think you may want them. She wants them.
My advice is to move to almost any country where English isn't spoken
and women don't want their husbands to be the mothers of their children.
Any country inhabited by the Chinese would do nicely.
Incidentally, remember that it is never now or never.
Your prospects improve with time. At thirty-five or fifty you will
be perfectly able to find a good woman if you know where to look.
See above list.
Remember also that these are not good times for having
children in America. It is almost irresponsible. The schools are scholastically
poor, drug-ridden, given chiefly to political indoctrination, and
hostile to male children. The universities are little better. Divorce
is hell on children and their fathers, and nearly universal. The country
lunges to police-statedom and isn't, I suspect, as stable as it might
be. Worse, worst, there is Susan Reimer. Her name is legion, and she
seeps everywhere, like the effluvium of unwashed socks.
Further, there is no social duty to have children.
Some argue that the white population is in decline. Tough. If the
country chooses to make having kids undesirable, then let it decline.
It is not your problem.
Now, you might well wonder, why are American women carrying
the Chip? Practically, it doesn't matter: They do carry it, and will
continue. Still, it is partly because from birth they are fed the
notion that they have been oppressed, battered, cheated, deprived,
harassed, used as sex objects, not used as sex objects, on and on.
Being rational, you are perhaps inclined to point out that never has
a female population been less any of these things, but don't bother.
It will have no effect. The Chip is an emotional artifact to which
they respond emotionally.
The bedrock of The Attitude is that everything is the
man's fault. Wonders Reimer, "What is the answer, especially
if the 20- and 30-year-old male is such poor marriage material?"
She does not wonder, "If I am such a grindingly awful termagant
that men on three continents are crossing their legs and feeling queasy
over my mere column, and won't come near me except in a Kevlar bathysphere
with a disinfectant system, maybe I'm doing something wrong. Gosh.
I wonder what?"
Yet something more is going on, though one does not
easily see just what. Note that in recent decades we have seen the
invention by women of bulimia and anorexia, which no one had heard
of in 1965. Men made them do it. At roughly the same time women began
getting breast implants, which men also made them do, and then suing
about it. In the same period they began having induced memories of
being raped or satanically abused by their fathers. Men again. The
psychotherapy racket grew like kudzu, a sure sign of deep unhappiness
over something.
All of this is recent. You have to be fifty to remember
women who were resilient, sane, psychically strong and, within the
limits of an often sorry existence, content. But whatever the answer,
guys, the problem isn't yours.
Spend a year overseas, however you have to do it. For
smart, classy, just plain glorious women who often speak English,
try Singapore. Argentina is splendid. Many places are. You would be
amazed. See what's out there before you marry a gringa with her Inner
Susan, who will one day burst from her chest like one of those beaked
space-aliens in the movies, dripping venom. They're death.
*Orlando Sentinel, July 1, 2003
Fred
Reed
©Fred
Reed 2003
Fred Reed,columnist for The Washington
Times, former Marine, streety police writer, occasional terrified
war correspondent,and afficionado of raffish bars, offers weekly his
unique, often satirical and arguably opinionated views on ...everything.
You'll grind your teeth. (He denies that
he gets a kickback from the dental lobby, though no one believes him.)
But you'll think. "I'm an equal-opportunity irritant," says Fred democratically.
Visit his website here.