The Follies of Child Support: Dead-Beat or Dead-Broke? - Carey Roberts - MensNewsDaily.com™
MND
COMMENTARY
The Follies of Child Support: Dead-Beat or Dead-Broke?
March 11, 2004
by Carey Roberts
Persons who are looking for an example of how good intentions can turn
into a nightmare should consider the case of Joseph Doe. When Joseph
was 14, he was plied with liquor and raped by Laura Evelyn, then 21 years
of age. Evelyn became pregnant and bore a child. That was back in 1984.
When the child support commissars in Michigan recently found out about
the case, they demanded that Doe pay child support.
You may wonder how this can be, since the offspring is now full-grown
and no longer in need of “child” support. But draconian
child support laws make no provision for that. Doe would be required
to pay for all back payments, plus interest.
How could this banana-republic justice happen here in America?
All that changed on May 4, 1992, when Newsweek magazine depicted on
its cover an affluent white man. He was framed with a Wanted poster
bearing the caption, “Deadbeat Dads: Wanted for Failure to Pay
Child Support.” Almost overnight, Deadbeat Dads became Public
Enemy No. 1.
But the Newsweek picture was wrong. Instead of a well-heeled businessman,
it should have shown a guy wearing a faded T-shirt. Color him disheveled.
Call him “dead-broke.”
In his acclaimed book, Divorced Dads, researcher Stanford Braver concludes
that “unemployment is the single most important factor relating
to nonpayment.” And according to a study of non-paying dads released
by the Urban Institute last year, “only 1% have recent net incomes
in excess of $50,000.”
So much for the two-timing executive driving off in his red convertible
with trophy girlfriend in hand.
Teresa Kaiser, former director of the Maryland child support office,
freely admitted to her audiences that support formulas are set way too
high for low-income dads. So the child support “crisis”
is actually an artifact of unrealistic payment guidelines.
But seduced by the stereotype of the dad willfully neglecting his kids
and tantalized by the prospect of reducing ballooning welfare budgets,
the child support zealots moved ahead.
First came wage garnishment in 1977. In 1980, child support agencies
were granted access to IRS wage information. Paternity
identification programs geared up in 1988.
But the early returns were not
encouraging. In 1989, moms were getting $2,252 – only $37
more than they had received in 1983.
So the Clinton administration shifted the campaign into high gear.
The 1996 Welfare Reform Act established two vast databases that made
almost every American a potential suspect for non-payment of child support:
the National Directory of New Hires and the Federal Case Registry.
Clinton-era bureaucrats dreamed up other programs that, in retrospect,
were simply irrational. Driving licenses were revoked – just try
earning a living wage if you can’t operate a car or truck.
And debtor’s prison was re-instituted. As you read this article,
15,000 destitute dads are spending time behind bars. Is that where they’re
supposed to get training for the jobs of the future?
Last October the Census Bureau issued its report,
Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2001. The report
reveals that from 1994 to 2002, the percentage of mothers who received
child support actually dropped, from 76.1% to 74.7%.
Thirty years and many billions of taxpayer dollars later, we must face
the truth: We have unfairly marginalized millions of poor dads from
their families, while betraying the hope and trust of struggling moms.
In the process we have infringed on the rights and privacy of average
law-abiding Americans.
In short, the American child support system has been a depressing failure.
The case of Joseph
Doe was finalized last month in the Michigan Court of Appeals.
State prosecutor Carl Marlinga successfully argued, “At stake
here is not the mother profiting from criminal wrongdoing; what’s
at stake here is the child, who is entitled to an appropriately supported
upbringing regardless of how he was conceived.”
That statement, notably short on compassion and reason, is the totalitarian
mindset at work. And that’s what the $4 billion-a-year child support
dragnet is doing to us.