The Mainstream Media Queers Marriage
March 3, 2004
by
Nicholas Stix
Since Watergate, establishment American journalists have taken as
their first commandment, Marx’ eleventh and last thesis on Feuerbach:
“Philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, but
the point is to change it.”
Marx was calling for revolutionary action. Today’s pampered, pc journalists
engage instead in radical misrepresentation, act as mouthpieces for
their revolutionary allies, and silence their opponents. And so it
is, with radical homosexuals’ attempt to destroy, or as they would
say, “transform,” civilization through its most fundamental institution,
marriage. And the mainstream media have signed on to the program.
On Thursday, February 26, WNBC-TV’s 11 p.m. news devoted
a long story (maybe three minutes, instead of the usual 20 seconds)
to Rosie O’Donnell’s so-called wedding in San Francisco. Co-anchor
Sue Simmons said that O’Donnell had “tied the knot” with her “longtime
partner,” Kelli Carpenter. O’Donnell and Carpenter were shown at the
illegal ceremony in San Francisco, and we got to hear O’Donnell say
that “We were inspired to come here by the sitting president and the
vile and vicious and hateful comments he made.”
At no point during the celebratory story, did Simmons report that:
1. The “marriage ceremony” violated California state law; or
2. That O’Donnell was lying about President Bush.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom first broke the law on February
12, when he illegally ordered city officials to “marry” men to men,
and women to women. (As of this writing, Newsom is culpable for over
3,400 counts of violating California law.) Pres. George W. Bush gave
his speech in support of a Federal Marriage Amendment on February
24. It was Bush who responded to Newsom’s (and the Massachusetts Supreme
Judicial Court’s) rape of the law, and who did so without rancor.
And yet, the media have repeatedly quoted “marrying” gays as saying
that they were reacting to George W. Bush, without letting the facts
get in the way.
Like the WNBC story, last Friday’s New York Daily News
front
page story on the O’Donnell “wedding” could have been written
by any of the many homosexual organizations which have long sought
to ram gay “marriage” down Americans’ throats. Nowhere in a story
that covered almost an entire page, half of it a huge photograph of
Mr. O’Donnell and his bride kissing, did reporters Mary Pappenfus
and Dave Goldiner mention that same-sex marriage is illegal in California.
The front page headline read, “ROSIE TAKES A BRIDE Says ‘I do’ with
Kelli in Frisco.” The huge, boldfaced headline on page five, where
the story continued, was “ROSIE TELLS BUSH: NUPS TO YOU!”
Given Pappenfus and Goldiner’s refusal to mention that little matter
of the law, two of their paragraphs seem a bit odd:
“More than 3,300 gay and lesbian couples have gotten hitched over
the past two weeks, since new San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s defiant
decision to allow same-sex nuptials.”
In defiance of what, pray tell? And then, two paragraphs later:
“Gay marriage opponents are hoping to get the courts to order a stop
to the same-sex weddings and California Attorney General Bill Lockyer
will ask for a ruling today whether city authorities are violating
the law.”
What law? Pappenfus and Goldiner write as though same-sex marriage
were the most normal thing on the face of the Earth, which a lunatic
fringe of perverts – “gay marriage opponents” – seeks to desecrate.
Pappenfus and Goldiner didn’t write a news story; they penned a Valentine.
“The bride said, ‘I do.’
“Then Rosie did, too.
“Angered by President Bush’s crusade to make it illegal for them
to marry, Rosie O’Donnell and her lesbian partner, Kelli Carpenter,
joined the rush down the aisle in San Francisco yesterday….
I always thought people got married for love. Apparently O’Donnell
did so out of her hatred for George W. Bush. (I’m not counting O’Donnell’s
submissive “wife,” Carpenter, who seems not to have a will of her
own.)
“In tying the knot, the country’s most famous lesbian couple took
center stage in the debate over gay marriage sparked by Bush’s call
Tuesday for a constitutional amendment banning it.”
Apparently, there was a national consensus that homosexuals have
the right to marry members of the same sex (since 1776?), until that
“mean-spirited” George W. Bush went and sparked a debate. Note too,
the President’s “crusade to make it illegal for them to marry …” So,
it must have previously been legal for homosexuals to marry each other.
Got it?
“’We really did it, we got married,’ O’Donnell said. ‘This is my
brand new wife….’
“O’Donnell made it clear that it was her anger at Bush, as much as
her love for Carpenter, that prompted her to board a plane for the
West Coast. ‘One thought ran through my mind on the plane out here
– with liberty and justice for all,’ O’Donnell said.”
This from a woman who pays armed bodyguards to accompany her everywhere,
while she does everything in her considerable power to disenfranchise
non-millionaires from enjoying their Second Amendment right to keep
and bear arms.
But what can you expect from a mainstream media that was queered
years ago? When it comes to coverage of homosexuals, as with Islamists,
you couldn’t trust mainstream “reporters” to give you the correct
time of day. If it weren’t for that grand old scourge of the socialist
media, Accuracy in Media founder Reed Irvine, we wouldn’t know, that
according to New York Timesman Richard Berke (who is now
the paper’s Washington editor), 75 percent of the top honchos at the
Times on the editorial side were gay … and that was in 2000!
And as William McGowan painstakingly shows in his book-length expose,
Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American
Journalism, the mainstream media flood the zone with stories
in which gays are portrayed either as victims
or heroes, while “killing” unflattering stories about them. (The
New York Times refused to review Coloring the News.)
The queered media has graduated to foisting hoaxes on the public,
in which “journalists”
lie about popular, heterosexual athletes, such as Sandy Koufax
and Mike Piazza, claiming they are homosexuals, in order to mainstream
homosexuality.
(A critic might point to the Catholic Church’s pedophilia scandal
as an instance of negative coverage of homosexuals. If only it were
so! Instead of telling the story of the thirty-year takeover of Catholic
seminaries by activist, heterophobic, promiscuous homosexuals who
harassed and ran off heterosexual seminarians, and who in all too
many cases later inflicted themselves on young boys, the media presented
gay, anti-church religious who have undermined the Church as heroes,
denied the gay-sex abuse connection, and made the story one about
the “evil” Catholic Church! Had the Church really been so “intolerant”
and “homophobic,” the homosexual child sex abuse scandal would never
have occurred. An excess of tolerance toward gays proved the Church’s
undoing. Michael S. Rose has told this story, in his book, Goodbye!
Good Men, which, however, has been greeted by mainstream media
silence.)
Moving right along, Jason West, the radical Green Party mayor of
the New York State college town, New Paltz, decided to make the town
San Francisco East. West began illegally “marrying” same-sex couples
on February 27. Following state law, the New Paltz town clerk refused
to grant the couples marriage licenses, Ulster County District Attorney
Donald Williams Jr. said he’d warned West that the ceremonies would
be illegal, and the state health department announced that such marriages
would violate state domestic relations law. West, who apparently has
no interest in legally marrying heterosexual couples, performed the
illegal weddings anyway, claiming, with a straight face, "I broke
no law. I abided by the constitution of New York State and my oath
of office."
The faux nuptials were played and replayed ‘round the clock Saturday,
on New York City’s all-news cable TV station, NY1, with the screen
identifying each “just-married” interviewee as a “newlywed.”
The New
York Post is the only major media outlet I am aware of, to
write “marries” in scare quotes.
Newsday, the radical leftwing daily that for over thirty
years has dominated the Long Island market, claimed that “legal experts”
insisted the “marriages” West performed may be legal.
After Mayor West’s little publicity stunt was over, at least for
the moment, Newsday “reporter,”
Sumathi
Reddy gave him the same sort of obsequious treatment in the March
1 edition that Rosie O’Donnell received from the mainstream media.
“Jason West, 26, a house painter who made headlines last year as
the state's first elected Green Party mayor, is in disbelief.
”He's amazed that his decision to perform same-sex marriages Friday
drew a media blitz. He's amazed that the village has been bombarded
with couples eager to be married here. Perhaps most, he's amazed that
his actions have so quickly caught attention at the state level, making
it difficult for the reluctant State Legislature to ignore the divisive
issue and provoking a public clash between two of the state's top
officials - Republican Gov. George Pataki and State Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer, a Democrat with his eye on the governor's seat in 2006.”
Gimme a break! You’d think Reddy were auditioning to run West’s next
election campaign.
(On Tuesday, Ulster County District Attorney Williams charged Mayor
West with 19 counts of illegally “solemnizing a wedding without a
license,” a misdemeanor for which Williams does not seek to jail West.
Openly gay New York State Senator Tom
Duane of Manhattan immediately demanded that Williams be jailed
and prosecuted: “Really, the Ulster County D.A. should be prosecuted
for malicious prosecution, which is a felony in New York.”
Early Wednesday, a story at the WABC-TV
Eyewitness News web site failed to mention Duane’s demand.
WCBS-TV reporter Hazel Sanchez covered
the charges against West, but did not mention Duane. We’ll have to
see how much play Tom Duane’s demand gets in the media.)
I’ll have to leave for another time, the story of how the New
York Times flooded the zone, beginning in November, with pro-gay
marriage articles in both its op-ed and “news” pages.
The scorched-earth campaign on behalf of gay marriage by America’s
pc, corporate media, has only led to greater opposition among the
public to the illegal practice. And yet, America’s media elite are
not interested in what most Americans think or do, however, but only
in giving them their marching orders.
I don’t know whether the media’s support of the gay war on marriage
will succeed. But this much I predict: After this latest episode,
the elite media will find their audience and profits yet again diminished,
as ever more disgusted Americans seek out more reliable, alternative
media.
Nicholas Stix
New York-based freelancer Nicholas Stix has written
for Toogood Reports, Middle American News, the New York Post, Daily
News, American Enterprise, Insight, Chronicles, Newsday and many other
publications. His recent work is collected at
www.geocities.com/nstix and http://www.thecriticalcritic.blogspot.com.