Panetta Said Bush Did Not Lie About Intel
October 29, 2003
by Michael P. Tremoglie
Leon E. Panetta appearing on C-SPAN's Washington Journal this Monday
morning ( 10-28-03 8:20 AM EST ) said that he was in the White
House and that President Clinton received the same intelligence information about
the danger of Iraq's WMD's as President Bush did. He believes
that President Clinton did what he thought was best and that President
Bush did what he thought was best. Panetta was responding to a caller
about the Iraq situation. He stated that either there was a massive
intelligence failure or the intelligence community was lied to or both.
Panetta is a former Democratic congressman, the former Clinton White
House Director of OMB, and Clinton's former Chief of Staff. He
is saying that Bush was not lying and that there is no Neocon/Zionist
conspiracy.
He joins many other moderate Democrats, foreign policy experts, and
Nobel Peace laureates who have maintained that Iraq possessed WMD’s
and the potential to use them. Despite what liberal Democrats, liberal
journalists, communists, anti-Americans and other Bush haters have been
claiming, President Bush was not lying.
Panetta reiterated what he said in February, " I think that Saddam
Hussein is a threat in that part of the world. I think that, indeed,
he should be required to disarm in fulfillment of the UN resolutions
and also because for years we have basically known that he's had weapons
of mass destruction. (link)
He also reiterated what many people in the Clinton administration said
during their term and since. People like Madeline Albright who, in November
1999, said, “Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons
of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” Or Clinton’s National
Security Adviser Sandy Berger who said in Feburary 1998, “He (Saddam
Hussein) will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has
ten times since 1983.”
Panetta confirms what Democrat Senators Daschle, Levin, and current
presidential candidate Kerry, who wrote, five years ago, to President
Clinton, “We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent
with the U. S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons
of mass destruction programs. “
Or what another Democrat senator and presidential candidate Bob Graham
who wrote two years ago, “There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein has
reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological,
chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf
War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems
and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
Or what future presidential candidate and Democrat Senator Hillary
Clinton said a year ago, “In the four years since the inspectors left,
intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild
his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability,
and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, and comfort, and sanctuary
to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that
if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop
nuclear weapons.”
All these officials of the Democratic Party, those who should know
because they were able to review the contemporaneous intelligence information
presented to President Clinton and President Bush, have all said what
President Bush said.
There is no conspiracy. The only lies are those told by the Bush-haters
and the Hussein-lovers.
Michael P. Tremoglie
Michael P. Tremoglie is a writer whose work has appeared
in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Philadelphia Daily News, Pittsburgh Tribune-Review,
Front Page and Insight magazines. He is working on his first novel 'A
Sense of Duty'. E-mail him at elfegobaca2@earthlink.net
|