|
Health Briefs
July
28, 2002
by Robert A. Wascher, M.D., F.A.C.S.
Breast Cancer: Nature vs. Nurture
At the present time, only two
gene mutations (BRCA-1 and BRCA-2) have been identified as risk factors
for inheritable breast cancer, and only about 10% of all breast cancer
tumors have either of these two gene mutations. Therefore, it is assumed
that families who have multiple close relatives with breast cancer, and
who are all free of BRCA mutations, may have as yet undiscovered genetic
mutations in play. A new study in the current issue of the British
Journal of Cancer has found evidence, albeit indirectly, of additional
inheritable gene mutations in a study of 2310 identical and fraternal
(non-identical) twin women. In this study, fraternal twin sisters of
women with breast cancer were found to experience 1.7 times the risk (or
a 70% increased risk) of developing breast cancer when compared to a non-twin
woman with the same personal and family history risk factors. When the
identical twins were assessed, the twin sisters of women with breast cancer
were found to be at 4.4 times the risk of developing breast cancer (or
a 340% increased risk). Using complex statistical calculations to assess
potential known and unknown risk factors, the researchers found that the
most likely explanation for these findings was the existence of as yet
undiscovered breast cancer susceptibility genes.
As the human genome, or genetic code,
is fully unraveled, additional genetic abnormalities that predispose to
an increased risk of breast cancer are certain to be found. Understanding
the basis of these genetic predispositions offers the best hope of improved
screening, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.
Cardiorespiratory Fitness & Inflammation
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a blood marker of inflammation that has been
linked to an increased risk of coronary artery disease in a number of
research studies. At the same time, it is well-known that increasing
levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with a decrease in
the risk of coronary artery disease. A new study in the journal Circulation
has assessed the relationship between these two “heart health” factors
for the first time. A total of 135 women volunteers were assessed for
CRP levels in the blood, and for cardiorespiratory fitness through the
use of a treadmill exercise test. This study determined that decreasing
levels of aerobic fitness were associated with higher levels of CRP in
the blood. The authors conclude that higher levels of fitness appear
to reduce, by some unknown mechanism, the inflammatory changes that increase
CRP production. Thus, this study provides yet more evidence of the pervasive
health benefits that arise from regularly engaging in at least moderate
exercise!
Kidney Transplants from Cadaver Donors
There are more than 30,000 people in the United States who are currently
awaiting the availability of a suitable kidney for transplantation. Just
over 10,000 donor kidneys are matched up each year with people who have
suffered the irreversible failure of their own kidneys. Although hemodialysis
can prolong the lives of most people with kidney failure, dialysis cannot
replace the function of normal kidneys, and is associated with many serious
and even life-threatening complications. At the present time, donor kidneys
are taken from volunteer “living donors” (usually, but not always, a family
member), or from brain-dead volunteer donors with still beating hearts.
In the latter case, the kidneys are removed from a person who has no remaining
brain function, but whose heart continues to pump blood to the kidneys
and other vital organs. In most cases, brain-dead patients rapidly experience
a progressive loss of heart function as well, often within a few hours
of losing brain function. This factor often translates into a very brief
window of opportunity during which the donor kidney can be recovered and
prepared for transplantation. After the heart has stopped beating, the
kidneys begin to deteriorate due to loss of blood flow, and have generally
not been considered transplantable at this stage. In this week’s issue
of the New England Journal of Medicine is a Swiss study that looked
at the transplantation of kidneys from donors who had lost all cardiac
function as well as brain function. The authors transplanted 122 kidneys
taken from donors with a heartbeat and 122 kidneys from donors without
a heartbeat. They then followed both groups of transplant recipients
for 15 years. Recipients receiving kidneys from donors without a heartbeat
experienced a significant delay in the onset of function by the transplanted
kidney in 48% of cases, while the kidneys taken from donors with a heartbeat
had delayed function in 24% of cases. However, and most importantly,
the long-term rate of kidney transplant survival was essentially equal
in both groups of patients: 79% for the kidneys taken from donors without
a heartbeat and 77% for the organs taken from donors with a heartbeat.
This is very good news, indeed, as it has the potential to dramatically
increase the number of donor kidneys available for transplant each year.
This study, although involving a relatively small number of patients,
should have a rapid and dramatic impact on the practice of kidney transplantation.
Various other organs used for transplants have different individual tolerances
for the duration of blood flow loss. Therefore, additional research will
be necessary to determine whether or not other commonly transplanted organs,
such as the liver, heart, pancreas and intestines, can safely endure brief
periods of ischemia (loss of blood flow) and still retain their ability
to function following transplantation.
Aircraft Cabin Air Recirculation &
the Common Cold
All travelers know that flying on an airplane full of sneezing and coughing
fellow passengers means that you will likely be reaching for your hankie
the following day too. There has been a great deal of controversy over
the practice by most major airlines of recirculating cabin air. Since the
air at flight altitudes is very cold and very dry, it must be processed
for the comfort of airplane passengers, and this costs money in the form
of increased fuel consumption. So, many airlines economize by recirculating
up to 50% of the cabin air, and then mix this recirculated air with small
volumes of fresh air from outside the aircraft. It has long been assumed
that this practice increases the risk of infectious disease transmission
due to the decreased number of cabin air exchanges that occur with recirculation,
and based upon studies of workers in buildings that also recirculate air.
In this week’s Journal of the American Medical Association, 1,100
airplane passengers were asked to complete a questionnaire prior to boarding
a flight from San Francisco to Denver, and were again interviewed 5 to 7
days after completing their flight. Recirculated air was present on the
flights traveled by 53% of the study volunteers, while 47% of the study
participants flew on planes with 100% fresh cabin air. Basically, the study
found no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory infections
between either group of travelers. Both groups experienced an approximately
20% incidence of cold symptoms following their flights. While this study
does not address other health-related concerns about recirculated airplane
cabin air, it does tend to dispel the notion that recirculating virus-ladened
air (at least up to the 50% level) increases the risk of upper respiratory
disease transmission. It appears more likely now that the factors most
responsible for respiratory virus transmission on airplanes include the
confinement of large numbers of people within a small space (and for hours
at a time), and the transmission of viral particles by person-to-person
contact. These are, of course, the same viral transmission risk factors
that predominate among earthbound people.
Dr.
Robert A. Wascher
Dr. Robert A. Wascher is
a senior research fellow in molecular & surgical oncology at the John Wayne
Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, CA
|