Update on C-reactive Protein
Over the past year, there have been a number of studies published looking
at the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the pathogenesis of heart
disease. A study in the New England Journal of Medicine last
year revealed that CRP levels in the blood were more predictive of future
heart disease than the standard cholesterol blood tests currently in
use, and LDL (the “bad” cholesterol) in particular.
Two studies appearing in the current issue of the American Heart Association’s
journal Circulation add to the evidence that this inflammatory
protein may play a critical role in the development of cardiovascular
disease.
The first study looked at CRP levels in more than 14,000 clinically
healthy women, and followed the women for a minimum of 8 years. The
women were assessed for the presence of upper body obesity, elevated
triglycerides in the blood, low levels of HDL (the “good” cholesterol),
high blood pressure, and elevated blood glucose levels, both at the
beginning of the study and at regular intervals during the course of
the study. The presence of 3 or more of these findings in a patient
has been termed the “metabolic syndrome,” and is associated with an
increased risk of premature death. Other studies have linked high levels
of CRP in the blood, in turn, with an increased risk of developing the
metabolic syndrome. The study volunteers were also assessed for the
development of heart attack, stroke, surgery to correct narrowed coronary
arteries, and death due to cardiovascular causes.
At the beginning of the study, 24% of the volunteers already met the
criteria for the metabolic syndrome.
The study determined that CRP levels in the blood were significantly
and proportionately related to the number of existing metabolic syndrome
risk factors in the study volunteers. During the 8-year course of the
study, patients with the metabolic syndrome and CRP levels higher than
3.0 mg/L had a much higher incidence of cardiovascular disease events
than did metabolic syndrome patients with a CRP less than 3.0 mg/L.
Thus, it appeared that elevated CRP levels were associated with the
presence of an increased number of risk factors associated with the
metabolic syndrome, and also portended a worse prognosis among patients
already diagnosed with the metabolic syndrome.
Also published in Circulation is an interesting study that assessed
the relationship between alcohol and CRP levels in the blood. We already
know that elevated CRP levels are associated with an increased risk
of cardiovascular disease, while many studies have shown that moderate
alcohol intake can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. More
than 2,800 men and women participated in this study as part of a larger
study that looked at the effects of statin drugs on CRP levels. CRP
levels were measured, and dietary surveys were utilized to assess alcohol
intake.
After controlling for other factors, the study found that the moderate
consumption of alcohol was associated with a significantly lower level
of CRP in the blood when compared to only occasional alcohol intake.
CRP levels in people who consumed less than 1 drink per month averaged
2.60 mg/L. CRP levels following 1 to 3 drinks per month averaged 2.20
mg/L, 1 to 4 drinks per week was associated with average CRP levels
of 1.70 mg/L, while 5 to 7 drinks per week resulted in CRP levels of
1.60 mg/L, and CRP levels in people who consumed 2 or more drinks per
day averaged 1.80 mg/L. These results held up irrespective of gender,
smoking status, use of hormone replacement therapy (in women), the use
of statins, and cardiovascular disease status.
Previously, the moderate reduction in the risk for cardiovascular disease
associated with alcohol use was thought to primarily result from alcohol’s
ability to “thin” the blood, thus reducing the risk of occlusion of
already narrowed coronary arteries by blood clot formation. This new
study suggests that an additional therapeutic effect of alcohol on cardiovascular
health may be mediated by an antiinflammatory effect through a reduction
in CRP levels.
Both of these studies add to the growing evidence that even mild elevations
in CRP levels may be associated with a significantly increased risk
of cardiovascular disease, and that measuring CRP blood levels is a
powerful prognostic test for risk of cardiovascular disease. At the
same time, relatively modest reductions in CRP levels may have a beneficial
effect on the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Based upon these findings, many cardiologists are now beginning to
recommend that measurement of CRP levels be incorporated into routine
cardiovascular disease screening tests.
COX-2 Inhibitors & Arterial Function
Also in the current issue of Circulation is a study that looks
at the effects of the so-called COX-2-specific inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex)
on coronary artery function. COX-2 inhibitors, which include the drugs
Celebrex and Vioxx, are anti-inflammatory medications that are commonly
used to treat arthritis and other causes of pain. Unlike aspirin and
other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (e.g., ibuprofen, Naprosyn,
indomethacin, etc.), that block all three forms of COX (COX-1, COX-2,
and COX-3), COX-2-specific inhibitors selectively block the formation
of COX-2 alone. Although there is some recent evidence to suggest otherwise,
the COX-2 inhibitors were supposed to be associated with a lower incidence
of gastrointestinal upset and bleeding when compared with nonspecific
COX inhibitors, and they have been extensively prescribed since their
approval by the FDA.
There has been some evidence that COX-2-specific inhibitors, particularly
in higher doses, may actually increase the risk of coronary artery
disease (Lancet, 2002). In this new study, 14 male patients
(average age was 66 years) with severe coronary artery disease were
evaluated. All patients were already taking daily aspirin and a statin
drug. The patients were given Celebrex for 2 weeks, and then were switched
to a placebo (sugar pill) drug for 2 weeks. At each 2-week interval,
the ability of the large artery in the arm to dilate, CRP and LDL levels
in the blood, and prostaglandin (the inflammatory substances that the
COX enzyme generates) levels were measured. The study found that the
use of Celebrex was associated with an increased ability of the brachial
artery to dilate (and, hence, to carry more blood). CRP and LDL levels
also decreased significantly following a 2-week course of Celebrex (prostaglandin
levels did not, however, change).
The results of this study, therefore, challenge previous studies that
have associated COX-2 inhibitors with an increased risk of developing
coronary artery disease. Almost certainly, however, the final word
is not yet in on this subject. The current study only looked at 14
patients, and then for only a relatively brief time. A larger scale
study, and one with more extensive follow-up, should be performed to
further confirm the findings of this small pilot study.
COX-2 Inhibitors and Gastrointestinal Complications
While we are on the subject of COX-2-specific inhibitors and their
safety profiles, a new study in this month’s journal Gastroenterology
looks at the incidence of GI complications associated with this class
of antiinflammatory drugs. As I have already mentioned, recent studies
have called into question the premise that COX-2-specific inhibitors
reduce the risk of GI upset and bleeding. In the new Gastroenterology
study, more than 8,000 arthritis patients were randomized to receive
either Naprosyn (a nonspecific COX inhibitor) or rofecoxib (a COX-2-specific
inhibitor). All patients were studied for at least one year, and the
incidence of serious colon complications was assessed, including hemorrhage,
perforation, obstruction, ulceration, or diverticulitis (inflammation
of the colon). In this study, the use of rofecoxib was associated with
less than one-half the risk of serious colon complications that were
seen among patients taking Naprosyn. While this study looked only at
the incidence of complications in the lower GI tract, it does appear
to generally support the claims of the pharmaceutical industry that
COX-2-specific anti-inflammatory medications are less toxic to the GI
tract than the nonspecific COX blockers. It is curious, however, that
this study did not comment upon the incidence of upper GI complications
among the two patient groups….
Telomere Shortening & Risk of Death
Telomeres are highly specialized structures situated at either end
of every chromosome. These chromosomal caps gradually shorten during
the aging process, a process that is thought to be pivotal in the eventual
age-related death of cells in our body, or senescent cell death. In
many cancer cells, elevated levels of enzymes that maintain telomere
length are often found, and this process is thought to play an important
role in the immortality of many types of cancer cells.
In the current issue of the journal Lancet is a very interesting
study. In this study, 143 volunteers over the age of 60 had blood drawn
to assess the length of the telomeres in their blood cells. The volunteers
were then followed, clinically, for evidence of serious illness and
death. The study found that the volunteers with the shortest telomeres
had a more than three-fold increase in the risk of dying during the
course of the study as did the volunteers with the longest telomere
length. Interestingly, the risk of dying form an infectious disease
was nearly 9 times as great among the “short telomere” volunteers when
compared to those with longer telomeres.
This is a fascinating study that directly associates telomere length
with the risk of death in otherwise healthy older people. It is particularly
interesting that short telomeres were so strongly correlated with an
increased susceptibility to infection, and to death from infection.
It has long been known that our immune systems deteriorate as we age,
leaving us more vulnerable to infection as we grow older. This Lancet
study offers a highly specific and intriguing potential explanation
for this phenomenon of age-related immune system deterioration. Perhaps
these findings may, someday, lead to the design of medications that
will be capable of restoring the aging immune system to its prior youthful
vigor and effectiveness.
Dr.
Robert A. Wascher