SIMPLE TEST FOR PRE-DIABETES
The current epidemic of obesity in the United States has, not surprisingly,
also been accompanied by a rising incidence of diabetes. The rising
incidence of obesity in our society is so pervasive that physicians
are beginning to see a dramatic upsurge in obesity-related illnesses
in children and adolescents, as well. The diagnosis of type II diabetes
in adolescents, formerly referred to as adult onset diabetes, is now
surprisingly common.
A pre-diabetic condition, termed insulin resistance, is thought to
be a serious warning sign that the onset of true diabetes is just
around the corner. Insulin resistance occurs when the body’s
cells no longer respond normally to insulin (insulin stimulates the
body’s cells to take-up excess sugar from the blood). In full-blown
type II diabetes, insulin resistance becomes severe enough to allow
blood levels of glucose to rise to dangerously high levels. While
not all obese people will develop diabetes (and not all type II diabetics
are obese), there is no longer any question but that obesity is the
single greatest risk factor for developing type II diabetes. Other
obesity-related diseases include cardiovascular disease, high blood
pressure, stroke, arthritis, sleep apnea, blood clots and other potentially
life-threatening ailments.
A new study in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine looked at
258 overweight volunteers without a history of diabetes. The study
sought to identify easily measured blood tests that would reliably
identify patients with pre-diabetic insulin resistance (also referred
to as the “Metabolic Syndrome”). If patients with insulin
resistance could be reliably identified using simple and common laboratory
blood tests, then such patients could be singled out for especially
rigorous management of their risk factors for diabetes, and before
they developed clinical signs of diabetes.
The study determined that three common blood tests accurately identified
those overweight patients who had already started to develop insulin
resistance, but who had not yet developed type II diabetes. These
three tests were: blood triglyceride level, blood insulin level, and
the ratio between blood triglyceride and the so-called “good
cholesterol” in the blood, HDL. A triglyceride level greater
than 130 mg/dl predicted insulin resistance, as did a triglyceride-HDL
ratio equal to or greater than 3.0, and a blood insulin level of 109
pmol/L or greater (triglycerides are fat molecules that are absorbed
into the blood from the food that we eat, and are particularly abundant
in red meat, oils and dairy products). The combination of these three
simple blood tests was as accurate in predicting insulin resistance
as the current (and far more complicated) clinical standard, the Adult
Treatment Panel III. Of course, significant obesity remains the single
greatest marker for risk of developing type II diabetes, and both
patients and healthcare providers must continue to stress the importance
of maintaining a healthy weight through a combination of regular exercise
and a well-balanced diet.
EARLY WARNING SYMPTOMS OF HEART ATTACK IN WOMEN
Women and men may experience different outcomes following heart attacks,
based upon previous studies. Several of these studies suggest that
women are more likely to die than men following a heart attack. A
new study in the journal Circulation also suggests that women may
also experience different symptoms than men prior to the onset of
a heart attack, as well as at the time of the actual heart attack.
The study evaluated 515 women who were diagnosed with an acute myocardial
infarction (heart attack). A specialized survey was administered 4
to 6 months after the women were diagnosed with a heart attack.
The survey revealed that 95% of the women had experienced one or
more specific symptoms prior to the onset of their heart attacks.
The most frequent symptoms experienced more than one month prior to
heart attack were unusual fatigue (71% of the women), sleep disturbances
(48%), and shortness of breath (42%). Only about 30% of the women
reported experiencing chest pain in the months and weeks prior to
their heart attacks, unlike the majority of men who report chest pain
in the period leading up to their heart attacks. At the time of their
acute heart attacks, fully 43% of the women reported that they did
not experience any significant chest pain, a symptom that is the hallmark
of men who present with an acute heart attack. At the time of their
heart attacks, 58% of the women experienced shortness of breath, 55%
experienced physical weakness, and 43% felt excessively fatigued.
In contrast to men, women generally experienced more significant symptoms
in the weeks and months leading up to their heart attacks than men,
while the severity of their symptoms at the time of their heart attacks
was considerably less acute than for men. Among the women evaluated
in this study, those who experienced more severe prodromal symptoms
prior to their heart attacks also tended to have more severe symptoms
at the time of their actual heart attacks. This study concluded that
women tend to have more significant prodromal symptoms prior to heart
attacks than do men. An important caveat is that the women appear
to be significantly less likely to experience the severe chest pain,
either before or during a heart attack, than is classically seen in
men. This study raises the question of the possible importance of
gender-related differences in the symptoms of cardiac ischemia (inadequate
blood supply to the heart) and heart attack in the disparate outcomes
seen between the two genders following heart attacks. Additional research
will be necessary to further tease-out the relevance, if any, between
symptom differences between men and women, and the higher mortality
rate associated with acute myocardial infarction among women.
E. COLI OUTBREAK ASSOCIATED WITH A NON-FOOD SOURCE
Escherichia coli O157:H7 is a nasty bacterium that has been associated
with periodic outbreaks of severe diarrheal illnesses, as well as
death due to kidney failure and generalized infection. Unlike its
more benign cousins, his strain of E. coli secretes particularly dangerous
toxins (shiga toxins) that injure the lining of the GI tract, resulting
in bloody diarrhea. Abdominal cramps, nausea and vomiting are also
common. In severe cases, patients may begin to experience breakdown
of their red blood cells, loss of blood platelets (cells that allow
the blood to form blood clots), and kidney failure. In young children,
the elderly, and in patients with other serious chronic illnesses,
infection with this bad bug can be lethal. Escherichia coli O157:H7
has, until now, been thought to be passed via the “oral-fecal”
route, most commonly due to the presence of this strain of bacterium
in under-cooked meat taken from livestock that carry Escherichia coli
O157:H7 in their GI tracts. A new study in the current issue of the
Journal of the American Medical Association, however, points to a
surprising new finding: Escherichia coli O157:H7 may be present, and
capable of causing clinical infections, due to the airborne spread
of the bacterium by non-food materials.
This study assessed 23 patients who developed laboratory-confirmed
Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections after attending a county fair
over a six day period in Ohio. An additional 53 age-matched healthy
people who had also attended the same fair, and during the same timeframe,
were studied as “controls.” Among the patients who developed
Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections, 26% required hospitalization,
and 9% developed kidney failure. The people who became ill after attending
the fair were found, statistically, to have been 21 times more likely
to have visited a specific multipurpose building on the fairgrounds
when compared to the control patients who did not become ill. The
infected folks were also almost 8 times more likely to have attended
a dance in this building, and were 4 to 5 times more likely to have
handled sawdust and to have eaten inside of this same building. Based
upon this preliminary investigation, the investigators cultured samples
of sawdust from within the building, and swabbed the rafters and other
physical surfaces within the building, looking for signs of Escherichia
coli O157:H7. They found that 24 of the 54 cultures (44%) of sawdust
and physical surfaces taken from within the building were contaminated
with the same strain of Escherichia coli O157:H7 that was recovered
from the GI tracts of the ill patients. Moreover, sawdust specimens
that were collected as long as 42 weeks after the fair still contained
viable Escherichia coli O157:H7. No Escherichia coli O157:H7 was identified
in any food source served inside of the building during the fair.
Based upon epidemiological analysis of this data, it was determined
that the majority of the 23 cases of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection
probably resulted from airborne transmission of the offending bacteria,
and not from the ingestion of contaminated food. The authors point-out
that Escherichia coli O157:H7 can survive in the environment for more
than 10 months. This new finding that Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections
can probably arise from the airborne movement of contaminated sawdust
(and further suggested by the finding of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7
on the ceiling rafters as well) is worrisome news. It may, therefore,
take more than well-done hamburgers to eliminate the risk of becoming
infected with this virulent bug.
UV LIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE MAY IMPROVE HEALTH
Ultraviolet light has long been known to have germicidal effects.
Unfortunately, prolonged exposure to UV light also has the same potential
for damaging the DNA in the cells in your skin and the lens of your
eye, increasing your risk of skin cancers and cataracts, respectively.
A well-known source of disease-causing bacteria and viruses in the
workplace are the ventilation systems that keep buildings warm in
the winter and cool in the summer. (The bacterium that causes Legionnaire’s
Disease was first discovered in a building’s air conditioning
system after an outbreak of multiple cases of highly lethal pneumonia
that struck elderly attendees of a single convention.) A new study
in the British medical journal Lancet looked at the impact of employee
health following UV light installation within the drip pans and cooling
coils of office building ventilation systems. The UV light sources
were alternately turned off for 12 weeks and turned on for 4 weeks
for 48 consecutive weeks. The investigators then studied the impact
of these interventions on the employees within the test buildings.
The employees were not privy to the timing of the UV light activation
in the buildings’ cooling systems at any time during the study.
The researchers then looked at the incidence and timing of self-reported
illnesses by the workers, as well as the prevalence of disease-causing
bacteria within the cooling systems of each building included in the
study. Their findings were quite interesting.
During the periods when the UV lights were turned on, there was a
99% reduction in the concentration of disease-causing bacteria detected
on the surface areas of the ventilation systems subjected to UV illumination.
There was also a 20% reduction in the incidence of self-reported employee
illnesses during the periods when the UV lights were active. There
was a 40% reduction in the incidence of respiratory-related worker
complaints while the UV lights were on, as well. The greatest reduction
in work-related health complaints occurred among patients with chronic
hay fever, asthma, or other allergy-related conditions. These patients
experienced a 60% reduction in allergy-related symptoms while the
UV lights were active. Nonsmokers also tended to derive the greatest
benefit from the UV lights, and these people experienced 70% fewer
allergy-related symptoms during the periods when the UV lights were
active. Nonsmokers also experienced a 40% reduction in respiratory-related
symptoms overall, and a 50% decline in musculoskeletal symptoms while
the UV lights were active.
The researchers concluded that the installation of UV lamps within
the ventilation systems of buildings could significantly reduce the
incidence of illnesses transmitted by bacterial and viral contamination
of workplace environmental control systems. They surmised that the
observed significant reduction in workplace illnesses may also actually
prove to be cost-effective, despite the expense of installing UV light
systems, due to reductions in employee absences and increased worker
productivity.
Dr.
Robert A. Wascher