Health Briefs: Eat Your Broccoli!
July 16, 2004
by Robert A. Wascher, M.D., F.A.C.S.
NEW CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINES (Circulation):
Based upon previous research, the National Cholesterol Education Program
(NCEP) recommended, in 2001, that patients with elevated risk factors
for cardiovascular disease should attempt to lower their blood LDL (the
“bad” cholesterol) levels below 100 mg/dL. Since 2001, multiple
research trials have evaluated the health impact of cholesterol-lowering
medications, and the statin class of drugs in particular. Several of
these studies have shown that lowering LDL and total cholesterol levels
below previously established target levels result, in turn, in an additional
reduction in the risk of heart attacks. Based upon the results of these
recent clinical studies, several modifications to 2001 NCEP recommendations
have just been added. These include a reduction in the target LDL level
(from <100 mg/dL to <70 mg/dL) in patients considered to be at
very high risk for heart disease and heart attacks, a reduction in the
LDL target level for moderately-high risk patients (from <130 mg/dL
to <100 mg/dL), and the inclusion of diabetes as a “high risk
category” factor. As always, the NCEP strongly urges lifestyle
changes as the initial strategy for LDL reduction. Such lifestyle changes
should include a nutritious low-fat high-fiber diet, plenty of exercise,
reduction of excessive weight, and control of elevated blood sugars.
DOCTORS WHO DON’T WASH (Annals of Internal
Medicine): Mom knew what she was talking about whenever she told
you to wash your hands after playing outside, or before eating. We know
that the most effective (and simplest) way to prevent the transmission
of infectious diseases from one person to another is to wash your hands
thoroughly with soap and water. One would think, therefore, that physicians
and other healthcare providers would lead by example by frequently washing
their hands before and after contact with their patients. Sadly, this
has been shown, time and time again, not to be the case. A new study
evaluated 163 physicians in a large university hospital. On the average,
only about 57% of the doctors were observed to regularly wash their
hands before or after patient contact. (Not surprisingly, one of the
most powerful factors that predicted physician hand-washing was the
awareness that they were being observed by the study’s research
team!) Other factors associated with good hand-washing habits included
a sense of being a role model for others, a positive attitude towards
hand-washing following patient contact, and easy access to hand-washing
soap or hand disinfectant. Factors associated with poor hand-washing
habits included a heavy patient workload, activities associated with
(ironically) a high risk of disease transmission, and certain medical
specialties. Ironically, not only were anesthesiologists, ER doctors
and ICU doctors more prone to omit hand-washing than other specialists,
but surgeons also fared badly as well! In view of the rising morbidity
and mortality caused by hospital-acquired infections around the world,
and the emergence of resistant strains of disease-causing bacteria and
fungi in even our best medical centers, the findings of this little
study are cause for continued concern. Clearly, as supported by this
study and previous studies, healthcare workers, including doctors, have
to be better trained (and monitored) regarding the absolute importance
of frequent hand-washing between patient contacts.
DIET & BENIGN BREAST DISEASE (Cancer Epidemiology
Biomarkers & Prevention): A number of recent studies have looked
at the impact of diet on the risk of developing breast cancer, with
some evidence for a slight increase in risk associated with high fat
diets and increased alcohol consumption. However, there has been little
study of the impact of dietary habits on the risk of developing benign
breast disorders that are, themselves, linked with an increased risk
of developing breast cancer. This study used data from the huge Nurses’
Health Study II to assess the impact of specific dietary factors on
the development of the so-called “non-proliferative” and
“proliferative” benign breast diseases, including atypical
hyperplasia (AH), which has previously been associated with a 14-25%
risk of having or developing breast cancer. The dietary factors studied
included the dietary intake of fat, fiber, multi-vitamin supplements
and caffeine. Overall fat and fiber intake was not associated with an
increase in the risk of benign breast diseases, although increased vegetable
fat intake was associated with a decrease in the incidence of benign
proliferative breast changes without atypia (i.e., ductal and lobular
hyperplasia, without atypia). High caffeine consumption was, however,
associated with a 146% increase in the relative risk of developing AH,
while the use of multi-vitamin supplements was associated with a 43%
reduction in the relative risk of developing AH. (These findings support
our clinical advice to women with severe fibrocystic breast changes,
which are part of the spectrum of benign breast diseases, to decrease
caffeine intake and to take supplemental vitamin E.)
Eat Your Broccoli! (Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers
& Prevention): Previous studies have suggested that the so-called
cruciferous vegetables might contain substances with anticancer effects.
This class of vegetables, unfortunately, includes some of the less popular
members of the vegetable family, including broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels
sprouts, bok choy, radishes, cabbage, chard, collard and mustard greens,
arugula, kohlrabi, turnips, watercress, kale and rutabagas. This new
study looked at the effects of pretreatment of colorectal cancer cells
with extracts from mixed cruciferous vegetables and bean sprouts, followed
by treatment of the cells with DNA-damaging hydrogen peroxide. After
incubation of the cultured cancer cells in the vegetable extract for
24 hours, the cells were then treated with hydrogen peroxide, which
causes DNA damage through the generation of oxygen free radicals. Tests
were then performed to measure the degree of genetic damage caused by
the hydrogen peroxide. This experiment revealed that the cells pretreated
with the mixed vegetable extract sustained significantly less DNA damage
than did the control cells that were not pretreated before exposure
to hydrogen peroxide. Based upon these results, the researchers then
fed 113 grams of supplemental cruciferous vegetables and bean sprouts
to healthy young volunteers each day for 14 days. After 14 days, the
white blood cells of the volunteers who had consumed the vegetable supplements,
once again, showed evidence of reduced DNA damage when compared to the
control group of volunteers who did not receive the vegetable supplements.
This is an intriguing little study that adds to previous data suggesting
that cruciferous vegetables and bean sprouts may possess anticancer
qualities, and provides a possible mechanism for this protective effect.
Millions of moms around the world have been vindicated by this study!
Stress & Blood Pressure Variations (Circulation):
There has been some previous evidence that people without chronic high
blood pressure, but who experience large increases in their blood pressure
during periods of stress, may be at increased risk of developing chronic
hypertension later in life. The results of a 13-year study of more than
4,000 adult men and women, ages 18 to 30 years, are now being reported,
and seem to confirm this hypothesis. Serial blood pressure measurements
of all study volunteers were taken in response to 3 psychological challenges
over the course of the study. The study found that the greater the rise
in blood pressure during these psychologically stressful tasks, the
higher the risk was of developing chronic high blood pressure later
in life. Moreover, those volunteers who experienced the most dramatic
blood pressure elevations during stressful tasks were also at high risk
of an earlier onset of chronic high blood pressure when compared to
subjects with minimal blood pressure elevations while stressed. Therefore,
this study suggests that blood pressure “lability” during
early adulthood, particularly in response to stressful tasks and events,
may be an early marker for the subsequent development of hypertension.
Additional research will be necessary to evaluate the benefits, if any,
of initiating early antihypertensive therapy to patients who are currently
“normotensive,” but who have significant stress-induce blood
pressure lability, and who are, as this study suggests, at high risk
for early-onset hypertension.
Hernia Surgery & Chronic Pain (Archives of
Surgery): The repair of inguinal (groin) hernias is one of the
most common surgical procedures performed by general surgeons. There
are several approaches to the repair of these hernias, although most
surgeons have switched to the use of an implantable mesh panel that
is tacked or sutured to the weakened area of the deep tissues in the
groin. These mesh repairs can be performed though a 3-inch skin incision
in the groin, or through the use of several smaller incisions and a
laparoscopic video camera. There are enthusiastic proponents of both
techniques, although the majority of all inguinal hernia repairs are
still performed through the “open” technique of making a
single incision in the groin, dissecting out the site of the hernia
(a weakening in the support layers of the abdominal wall that allows
internal abdominal organs and structures to “herniate” out
of the abdomen), and suturing or tacking the mesh panel in through the
skin incision. For most patients, recovery from a groin hernia repair
occurs fairly rapidly, and the vast majority of all such patients will
make a complete recovery. However, 15-20% of patients will experience
at least occasional but mild discomfort at the repair site one or more
years after surgery, and 2-3% will experience chronic and severe postoperative
pain. As there are several sensory nerves that transit the typical areas
where groin hernias occur, it is not too surprising that the surgical
manipulation of these nerves during the course of a mesh hernia repair
may predispose them to injury. Moreover, the mesh panels are eventually
overgrown with inflexible and tough scar tissue, and may therefore entrap
sensory nerves during the healing process. Some surgeons have, therefore,
advocated the routine excision of at least one of these three nerves,
the ilioinguinal nerve. This nerve passes right through the areas where
most groin hernias occur, and where the surgeon performs most of the
steps necessary to repair these hernias. The data on this practice has
been rather contradictory so far, with some studies suggesting a reduced
incidence of postoperative pain (though, not surprisingly, an increased
incidence of permanent numbness in the groin), while other studies have
shown no benefit from cutting this nerve. This Italian study, a prospective,
double-blind, randomized trial, enrolled 813 patients with inguinal
hernias over a 5-year period. The patients were randomly assigned to
have their hernias repaired using the open technique, either with or
without excision of their ilioinguinal nerve. Unfortunately, in this
study, the patients who underwent resection of this sensory nerve did
not experience any significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative
pain syndromes, although they did, of course, experience a far greater
incidence of reduced or absent sensation in the groin. My criticism
of this study is that it only addressed resection of one of three known
sensory nerves that supply sensation to the groin area. Indeed, in patients
with debilitating postoperative pain following inguinal hernia repair,
the reoperative resection of all three nerves in the groin is often
very successful in relieving their pain, albeit at the cost of permanent
numbness in this area (fortunately, however, the sensory nerves that
supply the male and female genital organs originate outside of the sites
of groin hernias…).
Obesity and Prostate Cancer Outcomes (Journal
of Urology): Previous studies have suggested that severely obese
men (BMI > 35 kg/square meter) who undergo surgery for prostate cancer
have a higher likelihood of positive surgical margins (i.e., incomplete
removal of their prostate tumors), and a higher incidence of prostate
cancer recurrence, than non-obese men. What has not been clear, however,
is the relationship, if any, between these two adverse factors. A new
study looked at the role of obesity alone as a risk factor for recurrence
of prostate cancer following radical prostate surgery. A total of 1,250
men who had undergone radical prostatectomy were evaluated retrospectively,
731 of whom had completely negative surgical margins and tumors that
were confined within the prostate gland. Despite complete surgical removal
of their tumors (i.e., with negative surgical margins), the obese men
with negative surgical margins and tumors confined to their prostate
glands still experienced a 4-fold increase in the risk of cancer recurrence
when compared to non-obese men with identical stages of cancer. Thus,
this study concluded that severely obese men (BMI > 35 kg/square
meter) were at significantly higher risk of developing prostate cancer
recurrence than non-obese men, despite having tumors that had not yet
invaded the tissues outside of the prostate gland, and despite complete
surgical removal of their prostate gland tumors. These findings suggest
two important conclusions. First, difficulty in obtaining a negative
surgical margin due to severe obesity is not the only obesity-related
factor that is correlated with a higher risk of cancer recurrence. Secondly,
and in view of the previous conclusion, severe obesity appears to be
associated with a more aggressive biological prostate cancer behavior.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. More than 230,000
new cases of prostate cancer, and 30,000 deaths, are expected to be
diagnosed during 2004. Clearly, as the US struggles with an unprecedented
prevalence and level of obesity among all age groups, the public health
impact of this obesity epidemic will be felt at many levels. The apparently
worse prognosis experienced by prostate cancer patients who are also
severely obese is just one among a growing list of diseases that are
adversely associated with obesity.
Dr. Robert A. Wascher
Dr. Wascher is an oncologic surgeon, professor of surgery,
oncology research scientist, and author. Dr. Wascher lives in Honolulu
with his wife and two daughters. Visit Dr. Wascher's Archive.
|