Should I Apologize For Being Angry?
I have heard it muted that men will never be able to pull together and fight as one, until they stop being angry at women. The reason given for this logic is, that many other men will not join the men's movement if they think it’s made up of men who are angry at women because, their sense of chivalry will create in them an inherent need to defend women. While this logic is faultless, I wonder if its underlying premise is faulty. Allow me to explain.
I agree completely that gratuitous rage at ALL women is bizarre and probably borders on the mentally deranged scale of social sanity, if it does not correct itself in time in the men affected. I also believe however, that Radical Feminism is infested with females who ARE mentally deranged because of their blind hatred for all things male. Having said that, I also believe that men have a right to be angry at those women who have, by various means, set out to destroy everything that those men hold dear. Now, if some guy (or woman)tells me that, because I am angry at the abuses I have suffered personally and witnessed against other men, he/she will not stand with me, my answer to him is a simple and direct one;
“Good! Go away, because you are not welcome. If the pain of your past fathers, present brothers and future sons, is less important than your old fashioned attitudes towards savage females, go be a Radical Feminist!”
I firmly believe that as men, we have to get real here and understand exactly what it is we are fighting; who the enemy are; what they have done and are doing to men; how they are doing it and what we have to do to defeat it all.
There is a huge and growing roll of fallen men who have given their very lives because they have suffered massive personal and/or shared damage to their families, their finances and their reputations by females and hate filled female political philosophies. Men who, like my own father, have placed shotguns in their mouths. Men who have burned themselves to death in protests. Men who have jumped off bridges. Men who have starved themselves in hunger strikes. Men who have lost their sanity. Men who have been raped in every way imaginable by a savage, feminised system and become homeless drifters. Men who have gassed themselves in cars. Men stripped of their families, children and reputations. Men falsely accused of horrendous crimes who have preferred death to trying to live with such a stain on their character. Men who have watched helplessly as crippling child support payments have destroyed their ability to earn or keep a business running. Men who have been sent to jail for “waving” at their children in a passing car and so found themselves in breach of a “no contact order.” Men trapped in horrifying and savagely abusive relationships they cannot escape from or find any help to manage, because the system set up by women, for women, will not allow them in. Men being forced to pay child support for children they did not father. Men losing jobs because of invented sexual discrimination allegations. Men who, every day, have to read and watch incredibly insulting things said about their gender in endless press reports, magazine articles (often written by bitter females) on TV shows and in movies. In India, over a million males were forcibly castrated on the orders of a female premier. Just how damn patient do they want us to be?
No matter how much those on the fringes of the men's movement (i.e. Internet radio commentators and journalists) think men's anger is somehow, uncivilised, many men have very good reason to be furious and it’s that fury that drives them on. What those detractors should be thankful for is the massive restraint those angry men are showing. Those men have every right to storm the courts and government buildings and start shooting. The fact that they do not is a testament to their incredible patience and wonderfully noble characters! Forty years of insults and assaults by women and feminised men is enough to make any man angry. For me, the problem is not so much the angry men, as the men who don’t get angry.
The assault against the male gender has long gone past the cafe chatting stage. Those who observe the men’s movement and “tut, tut” at the rage they see and hear, as they sip their coffee in the Internet cafe or office canteen, should understand just how close to a world wide and massive male rebellion we are all coming. If it does blow up, it will be very ugly indeed. While that prospect is frightening and one that must be headed off if possible, it will not be done by side line commentators telling men to cool it. These men are not going to cool it. What must be done is to find constructive ways to channel that anger. That has to start with education.
Know your enemy is the first rule of warfare and, make no mistake, this is a war! What is more, it is a war that MUST be won! Our enemy is not all women but some women and some men.
The modern missiles aimed at men are bigotry, lies, deception, disinformation, misinformation, hate dressed up as equality, political propaganda of the worst kind and wholesale political manipulation of the populations around the world. All of these things are falsehoods and all are missiles of the mind. Therefore, the fundamental weapons of our warfare are truth, justice and personal integrity. Shields of the mind.
The instrument of the weapons formed against men is Radical Feminism. Therefore, they are our enemy.
The history of what they have said and done are our ammunition.
Calling them to account socially, legally, morally and financially is our goal. That includes anyone: Journalists, judges, lawyers, publishers, politicians, TV executives, teachers, policemen and on and on, who have pressed these injustices onto innocent and helpless men and families for personal, political, or corporate advantage and gain. We have to make the supporters of this foul Radical Feminist political movement into social pariahs. We must do this as a warning that will sound loud and clear throughout history, that the likes of these vermin will not be tolerated again. Just as we did with that other bigotry called, Nazism.
A friend of mine was in the army. I asked him, “What would you do if you are on a battlefield and you see a women charging towards you with a gun and the intent to kill you?”
“I would shoot her.”
“No hesitation?” I asked.
“Nope. None.” He said, emphatically.
“OK.” I replied. “What would you do if you were in a corner at home and your wife was standing over you with an axe with the intention of burying it in your head?”
He thought hard before replying. Finally he asked, “I can’t get away?”
“No. You are slumped in a corner and she has the axe raised.”
There was a long silence, then he said, “I would pray.”
Chivalry aimed at the wrong people will utterly destroy men who won’t fight back. If they want to stand by and watch as vicious, politically motivated attacks destroy all they are and all they love, then they have no place in the men's movement at all. On the other hand, if they understand this is a real war, then they can shoot back with legal weapons and need not fear. The enemy has to be stopped and curling up in a trench and hoping, that if he is polite, she will not bayonet him with a false allegation or a new law designed to rip his life apart is, frankly, stupid! It was that attitude that got us into this mess in the first place.
Violence is not the answer, but neither is Chivalry. This gender war is costing too many lives to be fought as if it was an 18th century battle between gentlemen. It isn’t! Men did not start the war but men have to win it. The time has come to fight back with the best weapon we have... The truth! Sometimes the truth is a cruel weapon.
I understand there are women in the men's movement who find men's anger difficult to deal with. Perhaps they have had too many compliant men around them for too long, I don’t know. But those women who do join us had better not start to lecture us about how it’s so very important to be nice. Nice, will cost you your family, property, reputation and all you have earned, if you are male. If history has shown anything to men, that is it. Save your lectures for kindergarten kids. Don’t make the mistake of talking down to us because, if you do, we will turn against you also. Roll up your sleeves and fight beside us or get out of the way. If you do that you are welcome, if not, then go away! There are not many social workers found on battlefields and we don’t want to be ‘mummied’ out of our anger thank you very much!
Should I apologise for being angry? Hell no! I have every right to be angry.
George Rolph
27 Comments:
chivalry died in the mid-70s - so it's use and reference here is for historical value. Things have changed.
My biggest question is 'how do I raise my 2nd grade son'? Does he open doors for girls or knock them down on the playground until the laws change?
What amazes me - male teachers and administrators in schools who allow any rabid comment about men to go without comment, while so cautious about sexism toward women.
Check your school libraries or what your feminist teachers are sharing and simply ask, with all their emphasis on diversityk, and inclusion, if they have points of view that disagree with the feminists views of men, women, and gender?
Most schools have dozens of books that support feminism and few, if any, that suggest that men have sacrificed health, and lives, to support women and families, or to suggest that it is male support of women that allows more "choices" for women only, ... and maybe less income but they have his anyway, or that of male taxpayers, ... I could write twenty pages about what I have seen in my 59 years, born with a twin sister, having a wife my age when young, both women not drafted while friends of mine drafted, boys killed, ... when women could legally get married in Washington state at 18, boys could not until 21, but we could be drafted. Females knowing I was AWOL reporting me to the dean to make sure that as a male "I did my duty" ... jobs that would not hire men when I got out of the army, all the complaints I heard from females were decades old, while it was males that had "involuntary servitude" couldn't drink in a bar but could be send to Viet Nam, boys told that if they didn't have money they wouldn't get a girl friend, ... male friends committing suicide, college teachers trashing men, praising women, ... the medica praising women, trashing men, males getting sexually abused by adult females (Antoine Fisher, the movie. Read "Guilty by Reason of Insanity" read Irving Stones new book "Until I find you" ... those guys, me, and a friend of mine... while none of us are statistics in cops, or feminist studies, while we are taught that women just don't do these things) My comment became a rant.
Bye
SD
ranting is ok ,necessary even.
I think it important to realize just what the situation is today.
Here is a recent post from a feminst blog, which I crossposted
to another feminist blog as an example, and found that the other
blog fully supported this as well...
=======================
# Q Grrl Writes:
August 15th, 2005 at 2:03 pm
God, you are slow.
Yes. I hold all men responsible for rape. All rapes. All men.
And yes, for the second time, I equate “men” with “rapists.”
You are the ones who have, time after time, convinced me to think this way. You don’t like your reputation? Confront that asshole men who have given it to you. Until you do that, tough. I’m sorry your fee fee got hurt, but I’m not responsible for that.
========================
You see, it's not what you do or what you don't do, it's the fact
that you are male, and that's pretty much all there is to it.
As for the women who object to this sort of thing, there are a very
very few of them, I've crossed paths with a few, but I think it true
that the majority of women are happey to blindly blame all men, even
the innocent, and see nothing sexist or questionable about it.
There's nothing men can do or say that will affect the basic issue,
the problem is not what men (or any man) says or does not say, does
or does not do. The sin is simply in being male.
As usual, YMMV.
How about a female who agrees you should NOT appologize, and you should be very, very ANGRY. Domestic dispute cases are even worse in the military. Enforced support is even worse in the military.
I have a male friend of my husband, he lost visitation and contact rights to his 8 month old son because... " he was being activated to Iraq for 2 years, but it woud be easier for his young son to 'lose' memories of his father now over later when it could be more painful emotionally to an older child." His parental rights were not severed and he still has enforced support, just no access to his child.
Another friend, his wife came on post, physically abused him in front of his entire unit at formation, three other soldiers had to restrain her, MP's arrive, friend, not his wife, is restricted to post, he loses access to his kids, she is not arrested, two of the other soldiers are charged by her with unlawful imprisonment and battery because she was taken to the ground in order to get her off her husband.
Be angry, be very angry, better yet, be effective in changing this insanity. I am raising a son.
Well now lets be honest here. Your race is one of most inestimable perfidy, treachery and underhandedeness. Why do you complain now about feminism when your own governments have been returned to office to impliment feministic policies. Policies that allow your governments to intrude in other poeples business at home and abroad, killing and dividing thousands within their homes, families and countries. The truth is you ALL have grown fat on spreading misandry across the world, so please shut up and order your internal culture which promotes the disesase of feminism first.
"Your race is one of most inestimable perfidy, treachery and underhandedeness..."
Riiiiight. Can you 'racist'?
The truth is you ALL have grown fat on spreading misandry across the world,
How much does it pay?
What about medical and dental?
He opens the door for his fellow second grader and if she doesn't say thank you, he lets it go as she walks through and walks away without looking back....
a source of very valuable information if you want to fight back in NUMBERS:
www.antipeonage.0catch.com
I think you might mean 'mooted' rather than 'muted'. At least us mentally deranged types have retained our ability to spell.
I think you might mean 'mooted' rather than 'muted'.
Mooted is correct. Thank you for pointing that out. It has been corrected. However, spelling ability does not enter into it (though I must admit that at my age, spelling is sometimes a problem!) rather, it was the wrong word choice. Even more serious I suspect! Still, no one is perfect right?
George Rolph.
I think George's point is absolutely right. I used to believe what I was told, that anger is a negative emotion that does no good and should be avoided. But I have come to disagree with that. Nature allows us anger for a good reason.
I now regard anger as a valuable catalyst that can impel us into decisive action. Get angry, and you have a surge of energy that gets things done. Wild rage that beats against the wrong thing, and wastes its energy, is no good and can be damaging. But direct your anger properly towards what is hurting you or your loved ones, and you can achieve spectacular effects. It is absolutely possible to control your anger and use it in this positive way. And for men who want to eradicate the evils of feminism in our midst, it is an imperative.
Right on George, we should all get angry. Pussyfooting around never got anything done. Nice guys finish last.
The problem with the anger is that it seems directed at ALL women, not just the feminists. I resent the implications that those females who are gainfully employed got their jobs as a result of preferential hiring. I worked hard to excel in college and on the job, (in my case most or all of the other applicants were also female). Believe it or not, some women never pretended men were the fathers of their children when they weren't. There are also women who never married with the goal of divorcing the men in order to steal their money, kids, car, etc. Some of us have never even been on dates with men we didn't like just for a free meal. Most women do not speak ill of men nor do they use them for financial gain. I believe feminists are a fringe group that is over-represented in the court, education and social service systems.
How women percieve mens anger is their problem, not ours.
I agree with almost everything that "anonymouse" above has said, but she obviously missed the part where I said, "Our enemy is not all women but some women and some men."
Frankly, I don't give a damn about how it "seems." I know what and who I am angry at and I am sick of trying to explain it to people who will not listen until they get the answer they want to hear.
As I said, either join us or get out of the way.
Radical Feminists that have infested the UN, Unesco, Schools, Universities and governments all over the world and are helping to write laws that actively discriminate against males, can hardly be called a "fringe group" They are becoming a dangerous presence that MUST be stopped.
Many thanks to Paul Parmenter. A man who "get's it." Could you get in touch please Paul?
Yes, indeedy. Right on, and remember, those who point fingers, and attempt to shame us due to our "anger", and just using their lack of truthfulness on the issues to try and mute us.
We SHOULD be angry, and if you don't know about this, educate yourself. If you are educated, with an open mind, and you are not outraged and angry, then you need to sit on pins to gits yer sensitivities honed.
The Geezer
Who blogs at www.hatemalepost.blogspot.com and at www.thespinmeister.blogspot.com
Sorry Paul Parmenter, Just realised I did not leave you any indication of who to contact. Sorry mate. It's late. I'm getting old. There was an earthquake. My car was stolen. (To misquote the late great John Bulushi from the Blues Brothers. Lol)
George Rolph here at grolph12@hotmail.com
Yes Indeedy Geezer (Love the name). Education and anger = informed weaponry and effective fighting.
They say, "The MESSAGE should not be one of anger, but merely to say to them, 'We need Congressional hearings into reform.'" I ask, "Is that how the feminists get thier way?"
One man said...
They say, "The MESSAGE should not be one of anger, but merely to say to them, 'We need Congressional hearings into reform.'" I ask, "Is that how the feminists get thier way?"
Did the feminists gets their way by being polite? Hell no! They burned down Castles. (In the UK). They set fire to post boxes. They broke windows and on and on. In more modern times they shrieked loudly at just about everything. They know that anger is an effective tool so, why do you think they keep telling us not to be angry?
Michaek Buerk (a retiring BBC newsman) recently caused outrage by saying the pendulum has swung too far in womens' favour. The BBC (which is run by a woman) savaged him, as did most of the mainstream media.
The level of vitriol that women journalists directed against Mr. Buerk would make a neutral observer believe that Mr. Buerk was the devil incarnate, rather than a happily married man who made mild comments (with which his wife agrees) on the current state of gender relations.
This reaction only demonstrates how threatened the feminist movement feels when the spotlight moves even for a moment away from womens' perpetual victimhood status.
I understand. After all, for the past thirty years, womens' victimhood status has allowed women to justify their shitty treatment of the men in their lives (cheating on their husbands, emascalating their fathers and brothers, basically acting as a complete BEATCHes just cos).
Even more importantly, victimhood status allows feminists to justify defining and resolving every gender issue solely as a "womyn's issue." As any good attorney will tell you, the person who defines the issue wins the argument. If all gender issues are viewed purely through the prism of how they affect women, clearly they will be resolved without taking men into account.
God forbid that society stop even for a moment to consider the effects of the recent momentous changes in our society (most engineered by man-hating feminists) on the other half of the population. That would indeed be a travesty . . .
Back in the day (when feminists actually had a point) men's response to feminist thought was a mixture of derision, anger and personal attacks directed against any person brave enough to make the rather obvious points that needed to be made. Women's reaction to Mr. Buerk's comments demonstrate just how far things have changed.
Young men will evenually come into their own (despite feminists' best efforts) and, when they do, I doubt there will be much sympathy for the man-hating agenda of feminists. Or, arguably, for women in general.
Feminists talk of a gender war. So far, the only gender war has been the war waged by women against men, particularly against young men and boys. If and when men declare war back on women we'll see how things turn out. Meanwhile, sleep well, sisters.
Peter O'Neill said, "Feminists talk of a gender war. So far, the only gender war has been the war waged by women against men, particularly against young men and boys. If and when men declare war back on women we'll see how things turn out. Meanwhile, sleep well, sisters."
It is so good to hear [read] men talking like men again. Well said Peter!
War HAS been declared. Now it's just a matter of organising the forces into effective fighting units.
You are EXACTLY right. Rad Fems freak out when the spotlight moves. What really encourages me and many others is that the spotlight is shifting more and more around the world. The fems resort to insult because they want to head off argument. They know that when their strange ideologies are placed under close scrutiny, the world called, "The Patriarchy" that they created will be seen for nonsence it is. The patriarchal world they invented has NEVER existed. It is a creation of sick imaginations in which, "all men are rapists and that's all they are" etc,.
It is a creation in which men and women are supposed to hate one another so that the rad fems can swell their numbers with frightened women and the men will be too frightened and shamed to speak out. However, it is also a world that has come to the end of it's evolution.
The majority of men and women are NOT feminists because they can smell BS when it comes along. Even though they are sometimes unable to articulate WHY they know it's BS, instinctively they shy away from it. That means that the majority of the world's population are on our side! Even if they have no idea yet.
You have hit some important nails on the head here Peter.
Thanks.
Please get in touch if you want to. Maybe we can talk some more on these matters?
Thanks, George. I could not agree more. I believe that a new revolution is at hand. Feminists like to style themselves as rebels (agianst the fictional patriachy). In fact, feminism is very much part of the establishment. Feminists are the Romans to our Barbarians.
That's why they get so hysterically angry every time anyone calls them on their BS.
I'll send you an email so we can get in touch.
Best regards,
Peter
I found this on the Times Online web site:
Debate
August 23, 2005
Are 'real men' in decline?
The BBC newsreader Michael Buerk has renewed his assertion that women are setting the agenda, and that female values are now considered superior to men's. Outperformed by girls at school, emasculated by women at home and at work, the hapless joke figure in TV commercials - is it time for men to say enough is enough? Do women have too much power and is it time for men to reassert their masculinity? If you're finding it hard being a man in a woman's world, let us know why by using the form below
The comment that "women have had to endure prejudice and oppression for thousands of years" is typical of the illogical arguments used by feminists to justify the unjustifiable - that women should have special privileges and perks simply because of their gender. No, women have not been oppressed. They have been protected (by men who have fought horrific wars for them); watched over (by men who fill all the emergency services); housed (by men who have built all the homes you can see the length and breadth of the country); provided for (by men who have worked all the hours God sends them); fed (by men who have transformed the land into farms); cosseted (by men who have invented all manner of machines and made discoveries to make women's lives easier); educated (by men who have developed all the great disciplines and schools of learning); entertained (by men who have invented devices such as TVs, radios and computers); given power over their own bodies (by men who have led the way in medicine, contraception and obstetrics - we gave women the pill too, remember); and of course, simply loved (by men who have made endless sacrifices for them). You see, it has really always been a woman's world. But if they just don't appreciate any of it, and figure that being taken from hiding in caves and cowering from wild animals to living safe, well-fed and pampered existences at men's expense has been a journey not of privilege but of oppression and suffering, well that's just too sad for words. So perhaps we really should reverse the roles for a change. Over to you, ladies. Paul Parmenter, Norwich
Here Paul eloquently describes the reality that feminism would like us all to forget. Paul is exactly the sort of man the mens movement desperately needs. He is is able to cleary define the issues. Put those issues into words and then (most important of all) he is prepared to act on his principles by putting pen to paper.
Many good men do this every day. Mike LaSalle has done it by producing this site, for example. These men are leading by example. It's up to every one of us to follow these examples and do all we can to fight back against the lies being told about us in every medium there is.
We should NEVER underestimate the power of a single e-mail to help initiate change. I know for certain that e-mails I have written to various journalists, proffessors, authors, editors etc., have been read by many more people than just the intended recipiant. Again and again I have recieved replies to e-mails written, often months ago, from people I have never sent an e-mail to. Often they thank me for providing the information. Many times they want to know more. Sometimes they give opposing points of view. All of these things are valid for our cause because they create discussion.
Thousands of people will read Paul Parmenter's comments both here and in the Times. Those people will begin to think and talk about the issues he raises. And, let's not forget, many, many, women are sick of the feminist message also. In other words, EVERYTHING we do has an impact somewhere and on someone.
I sense there is a sea change coming. People are beginning to wake up and radical feminism's days are numbered. The average person is NOT a nasty, man hating loony, living in a left wing bubble of minority rule. Most people are reasonable people and reasonable people have rejected the men-hating message of todays' sick feminist philosophies. In turn, this means that most people are the men's movement's natural supporters. What we have to do now is tap into that vast resource.
In an effort to help this process along, I recently wrote to every premier league football club. I sent them two articles (including the one above) and asked them to get in touch with their local men's groups and support them financially. I also asked them to use the articles as discussion points and pointed out that the majority of their supporters are male and the clubs are in a position to do much to help these men. The same letter was sent to football supporters clubs and the various FA. organisations.
The cost of this to myself was minimal and if just one person, at one club or organisation acts, it will spread our message a long way.
If writing is not your thing it does not matter. Contact authors like myself and ask permission to cut and paste their articles into e-mails and send them to newspapers, churches, sports clubs, TV stations, radio stations, journalists etc., world wide using the Internet. The impact can be massive.
We are having an impact! Let's go on doing it and let's put MENS RIGHTS firmly back on the agenda. We owe it to our sons and we owe it to all those men who have died to satisfy a savage feminist minority.
Beaten men crawl in the dust....Proud men fight back!
George Rolph.
I found your article both admiring and disturbing. I find it admiring because I think that men should be sticking up for themselves; however, I also found it disturbing because I think you're missing the point (and it is one that is rampantly present in other gender/ethnic-based crimes). The problem is this:
The paragraph in which you described the suffering of men is true, and very horrible; but at the same time you are forgetting all of the trifles that women go through as well. The things women have gone through over the past century have improved, but history has shown a horrible irreverence to everyone. Every race and gender has endured hardships, and men are playing catchup as retribution of the women.
That said--the disturbing part--that this is NOT a war. It SHOULD NOT be a war. The problem is, with women finally achieving closer humane rights (I know you think we're overpowering, but the barrier is far from equal), men are having to overcompensate to try and regain the world that they once lived in and often get trapped in horrible the situation. The desired result, therefore, is not WINNING a war, but rather, equalizing the playing field. Nothing should be about a dominant race or gender. It should be about equality and all people living in harmony with one another. The playing field is far from equal for women in many cases, and like many of the situations you described, likewise for men.
Therefore, I challenge that you do not wage a war against gender or humanity. Rather than starting another war that we people do not need...fight for equality among all. Look at what you me can stive to do better to make this world equal or women where it is not. And women, strive for yourselves to make this world equal for men where perhaps you have taken too much power. Why must we always fight each other? Life shouldn't be a competition...but it's events and situations like this that make it a horrible war.
Hi Tori
I was very interested in your reply. You say much that I disagree with and I want to take each point in turn.
You say, "The paragraph in which you described the suffering of men is true, and very horrible; but at the same time you are forgetting all of the trifles that women go through as well."
I am forgetting nothing. I am well aware of the things women have gone through. It's hard to be alive today and NOT be aware of it. Millions of articles, TV and radio programs, books, Internet sites and on and on, remind us all everyday of just how tough life has been and still is for women. The problem is not that women have suffered, but that they talk about it as if ONLY their suffering matters. Worse, much of what they claim is female suffering imposed upon them by "patriarchal males" is, in fact, pure feminist fantasy. The world that feminists claim has existed for 2000 years in which the poor "sistas" have been put upon by evil males, has simply not existed. However, I will not go into that point right now.
You go on, "That said--the disturbing part--that this is NOT a war. It SHOULD NOT be a war."
And...,
"The playing field is far from equal for women in many cases, and like many of the situations you described, likewise for men."
Unfortunately, IT IS A WAR. It became a war the moment feminism decided to attack the family. Men are programmed through millennia of cultural, genetic and evolutionary processes to protect their families. They fought and died for their families in almost every war that has ever been fought against man or beast. They have always done so and they always will. Since the dawn of mans walk upon the earth men have sacrificed themselves for the needs of their families. However, according to the feminist model of evolution, what men were really doing all that time was building a system in which women were trapped in a kind of domestic hell as slaves to the males. "So," proclaimed feminist "leaders," "women must be set free from nasty men." However, they get all tongue tied when you say to them, "If male intentions against women have always been so awful, why is it that the men did not grab the lifeboats when the Titanic went down?"
Feminism is a political system based, not upon the noble aims of equality for all, but the more base aims of revenge for half imagined wrongs against the few. It is a political system steeped in dishonesty which takes the faults of a few and paints the entire male gender with a dirty brush. When feminism first appeared on the political scene its aims WERE for equality. However, pretty soon the Marxist left took over feminism and hijacked it for their own ends. They needed to make women angry enough to want to become gender feminists out for revenge. They began to produce a whole library of false claims, distorted "studies," outrageous lies, fraudulent statistics and horrendous public statements, All designed to infuriate women so as to swell their ranks, their coffers and their political power. Their ultimate aim was the destruction of the family. The reason they targeted the family was because the family is the bedrock of western civilisation and if you want to pull down a vast edifice you just need to undermine its foundation. In order to achieve their stated aims, they had to make men a target for ridicule. Along the way, they also had to sucker thousands of women and it seems they got you along that way too!
You say, "The desired result, therefore, is not WINNING a war, but rather, equalizing the playing field."
Not for men it isn't!
Men were willing to help women become as "equal" as the laws of nature will allow. However, SOME women want to be MORE than equals. They want a never ending list of demands to be met BUT with none of the attending responsibilities attached. They are like spoilt children. Always demanding more but not willing to pay the price. The list of demands that SOME women make upon men stretch from the sublime to the downright stupid. Along the way they pepper these same men with insults. The war we are engaged in now is a war started by angry females, fed a diet of lies by politically motivated vultures. Women have always had a huge amount of power over men and the more level headed women amongst us know it very well. As Warren Farrell puts it, "If men have all the power how come women make all the rules?"
You add, "Therefore, I challenge that you do not wage a war against gender or humanity. Rather than starting another war that we people do not need... fight for equality among all."
This is the richest statement of all. It is also the one that I personally find deeply insulting. Let me ask you a question. Where were all the feminist voices when men who are falsely accused of rape are sentenced to years in jail but, when their accusers are finally found to be lying, they are not even prosecuted? Where were the feminist voices raised in protest against the men dying in mines; building railroads; erecting skyscrapers; dying from poverty, disease, neglect and industrial accidents in sweat shops alongside children; being railroaded in family courts and kept from their children and homes; being falsely accused of domestic abuse so she can win a good divorce settlement or change boyfriends? I remember reading about feminists who were desperate to create a more "equal" world giving men white feathers and calling them cowards if they did not enlist to get slaughtered in Flanders during the first world war. However, there were no feminist voices being raised for the equal chance to go and die alongside them! If they want "equality for all" how come they only demonstrate for the needs of half the population?
All we ever hear about today is the "heroic fight" of the early feminists to get the vote. Is it not a little strange that feminism somehow conveniently forgets to mention that men did not have the vote either, at that same point in history?
Today, feminists scream that they are just as capable of serving in the armed forces as men. However, when the army lets them all in, they start crying and demanding rule changes because its hard to be a soldier. Consequently, the armed forces, once a powerful and strong force, becomes watered down to its lowest common denominator to accommodate all those feminists drunk on a fantasy of "girl power" that they are incapable of living up too. When it begins to cost soldiers lives (and it will) I wonder how many "equality feminists" will be demonstrating for the dead guys?
You see Tori, its not the equality thing we all hate. Its the bullshit hypocrisy that goes with it. I suggest you go away and take a long hard look at the claims of the "equal rights" sista's. Go and find out how they have lied to you and distorted history. Go and discover how you have been so badly conned. Then, when you have liberated yourself from those who have brainwashed you, come back and join the fight. Feminist lectures are insulting because they are so far off the truth as to be a joke and men are getting sick of hearing them.
I know I am.
Post a Comment
<< Home