MND Guest Commentaries & News


1/30/2006

California AG Lockyer Cited in Conflict of Interest Allegation

California Attorney General Lockyer Costs Taxpayers $1.2 Billion Dollars To Protect Wife From $87 Million Dollar Liability In Lawsuit; Governor Schwarzenegger Requested to Appoint Special Counsel to Replace Lockyer

By John C. Zenith

Orange County, California - On October 14, 2004, Nadia Davis-Lockyer, wife of California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, was personally served as a named Defendant in a State-wide lawsuit seeking to recover more than $12.3 Billion dollars on behalf of the State of California Taxpayers for the period 1992 to the present. Since August of 2002, Attorney General Bill Lockyer’s conduct and that of the CAGO has repeatedly effectuated the suppression of evidence and obstruction of prosecution of the action, despite his obvious Conflict of Interest.

In a moment of ethical clarity, the top Law Enforcement Officer for the State of California wrote:

"[C]onflict of interest laws are grounded on the notion that government officials owe paramount loyalty to the public, and that personal or private financial considerations on the part of government officials should not be allowed to enter the decision making process.’” (Bill Lockyer, Cover Letter to Conflicts of Interest Handbook, CAGO, 2004)”

The above quoted passage and various other articles, all written by Mr. Lockyer, will hold a position of prominence in the future annals of political "Do-as-I-Say, Not-as-I-Do".

The conduct engaged in by the Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the CAGO, with respect to the California ex. rel. Carl vs. Coast action, appears to be in violation of:

ALLEGATIONS:

  • Cal. Gov. Code § 87100: Governmental Decisions Subject to Conflict of Interest Associated with Financial Interest of Immediate Family Member,
  • Cal. Gov. Code § 81002(c): Failure to Publicly Disclose Conflict of Interest Associated with Financial Interest of Immediate Family Member,
  • Cal. Gov. Code § 81002(c): Failure to Recuse Due to Conflict of Interest Associated with Financial Interest of Immediate Family Member,
  • Cal. Gov. Code § 1090: Financially Interested in Contract,
  • Cal. Gov. Code § 1098: Disclosure of Confidential Information,
  • Cal. Penal Code § 137(c): Influencing Testimony,
  • Cal. Penal Code § 182(5): Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice and Subordination of Perjury,
  • Cal. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 5-220: Suppression of Evidence,
  • Cal. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-100: Revealing Privileged Information Without Informed Consent,
  • Cal. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-310(C): Representation of Clients Who’s Interests are in Potential Conflict,
  • Cal. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3-310(A): Perform Legal Service With Competency, Disclose Conflicts, Disclose Pre-existing Relationships,
  • Business & Professions Code § 6068(e): Dual Representation of Clients With Potential Conflicting Interests


Attorney General Lockyer and the CAGO have been previously supplied with substantial evidence of criminal conduct, including fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, perjury, destruction of evidence, suppression of evidence, subordination of perjury, and voter fraud. All felonies in the State of California. All without any meaningful criminal investigation.

Reports have been received regarding: destruction of records and documents at the hand of individual educational institutions, the identity of informant(s) in educational institutions who observed destruction of such records is being withheld by the Attorney General Bill Lockyer and others, and the California Community College Chancellor’s Office has informed Qui Tam counsel that records we requested have some how mysteriously disappeared.

Members of the litigation team have been threatened, and the attempted murder of one team member recently attacked, fortunately escaped with only requiring stitches rather than a funeral.

The immediate attention and action of the California Governor is needed in this matter, so as to insure that the interests of the People of the State of California are properly represented. The Attorney General’s actions to date in this matter have been. and are presently, barred by operation of law. It is requested that the California Governor immediately appoint an independent Special Counsel for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation of the underlying conduct previously referenced and supplied to the CAGO, and to fulfill the statutory role of the AG in connection with Cal. Gov. Code § 12650 et seq., as it relates to the current State-wide recovery action.

The on-going conduct of the Attorney General Bill Lockyer and the CAGO, if allowed to continue, will result in a lost recovery by the State, and therefore to the Tax Payers, of in excess of $12.3 Billion dollars. This is no small amount, especially given the current budgetary crisis plaguing the State of California.

To view the entire text of the letter to the California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the associated attachments, or obtain more information on the State-Wide lawsuit, please visit www.home.earthlink.net/~cal-ed-fraud.


Relevant Links:

"Conformed Complaint Carl v. Coast", Dated: December 24, 2002

Press Release for Second Letter: "California Attorney General Lockyer Costs Taxpayers $1.2 Billion Dollars To Protect Wife From $87 Million Dollar Liability In Lawsiut", Dated: January 30, 2006

Second Letter to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger: "California Attorney General Bill Lockyer's Abuse of Public Office For The Purpose of Shielding His Wife, Nadia Davis-Lockyer, from an Estimated Joint and Several Liability of In Excess of $87 Million Dollars, Costing California Taxpayers in Excess of $1.2 Billion Dollars:", Dated: January 27, 2006

Attachment 1 - Proof-of-Service, Nadia Maria Davis-Lockyer, Dated: October 14, 2004

Attachment 2 - Figure 1: Estimated Damages Calculated for Carl v. Coast Action:

Attachment 3 - Figure 2: Estimated Damages Calculation By District for Carl v. Coast Action For 03-04 through 92-93:

Attachment 4 - Figure 3: Estimate Damages Associated with SAUSD Portion of Estimated Orange County's CCD's K-12 P.E. Concurrent Enrollment Damages for Carl v. Coast Action For 02-03 Through 98-99, Corresponding to Former SAUSD Board Member Ms. Nadia Davis-Lockyer's Tenure:

Press Release for First Letter: California Governor Schwarzenegger Has Been Requested to Appoint Special Counsel For The Two-Billion Dollar State-Wide "Phantom-Classes" Lawsuit Due to California Attorney General Bill Lockyer Misconduct and Personal Confilict-Of-Interest, Dated: October 11, 2005

First Letter to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (REDACTED): "Request for Immediate Appointment of Special Counsel", Dated: October 19, 2005

Background Reference Material on Attorney General Bill Lockyer

Prior Newspaper Articles on Statewide Lawsuit

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home