Are All Men Suspects?
Recently, it was revealed that Qantas and Air New Zealand have policies prohibiting adult male passengers from being seated next to unaccompanied minors on flights. Men assigned seats next to minors traveling alone were asked by flight personnel to switch seats with women. Such a policy assumes all males are potential child molesters. It also takes fear of that possibility to an extreme in an atmosphere in which a passenger can draw attention from others simply by sneezing.
Learning of that policy makes one think about stereotypes regarding physical and sexual abuse of children, domestic violence and rape. When one hears about sexual abuse of children and teens, one often assumes the perpetrator is male. Recent cases demonstrate that assumption isn’t fair. In November, seven women, including four teachers, were charged or sentenced for having sex with boys. According to Robert Schoop, author of Sexual Exploitation in Schools: How to Spot It and Stop It, at least 25 cases in the past 18 months involved female teachers molesting students. A U.S. Department of Education report released in June 2004 revealed that 20% of respondents reported verbal or physical sexual misconduct by female teachers or aides. Sexual abuse of minors isn’t a “guy thing,” but that stereotype may affect sentencing: Women who molest children or teenagers often receive less jail time than men do for the same offenses. Yet, the children are just as badly harmed regardless of the sex of the offender. Victimized boys are likely to experience depression, anxiety and problems developing age-appropriate relationships.
The media also portrays domestic violence as male perpetrated. For example, the PBS program, “Breaking the Silence: Children’s Stories,” was presented as having no preconceived notions, yet it relied primarily on stories from women and children. It also included footage from a Battered Women’s Custody Conference, but none from fathers’ groups. While most media portrayals depict abuse by men, Department of Justice statistics indicate that 60% of the perpetrators of domestic violence against children are women.
Many media stories about domestic violence involve a husband or boyfriend abusing his wife or girlfriend. According to the CDC website, “a national study found that 29% of women and 22% of men had experienced physical, sexual or psychological intimate partner violence during their lifetime.” 22% is more than one in five men. The CDC includes homosexual relationships in this data, but it is highly unlikely that all or most of that 22% were abused by male partners. According to Melanie Phillips’ November 2000 Sunday Times (UK) article, “Man beaters behind closed doors,” a 1996 British Crime Survey reported an equal percentage of men and women, (4.2%), said that they had been physically assaulted by a spouse or lover in the past year. Phillips’ article also reports data compiled from approximately 100 British and American studies by John Archer of the International Society for Research on Aggression in which 29% of female college students reported having initiated assaults on male companions. Crime statistics tell a different story because many men do not report violence against them by women. When men do report such incidents, police and courts often assume that the men were the instigators. Frequent media depictions of men as abusers in news, tabloid t.v and dramas have led court systems to require a low burden of proof when women make allegations of abuse in divorce and custody cases.
Learning of that policy makes one think about stereotypes regarding physical and sexual abuse of children, domestic violence and rape. When one hears about sexual abuse of children and teens, one often assumes the perpetrator is male. Recent cases demonstrate that assumption isn’t fair. In November, seven women, including four teachers, were charged or sentenced for having sex with boys. According to Robert Schoop, author of Sexual Exploitation in Schools: How to Spot It and Stop It, at least 25 cases in the past 18 months involved female teachers molesting students. A U.S. Department of Education report released in June 2004 revealed that 20% of respondents reported verbal or physical sexual misconduct by female teachers or aides. Sexual abuse of minors isn’t a “guy thing,” but that stereotype may affect sentencing: Women who molest children or teenagers often receive less jail time than men do for the same offenses. Yet, the children are just as badly harmed regardless of the sex of the offender. Victimized boys are likely to experience depression, anxiety and problems developing age-appropriate relationships.
The media also portrays domestic violence as male perpetrated. For example, the PBS program, “Breaking the Silence: Children’s Stories,” was presented as having no preconceived notions, yet it relied primarily on stories from women and children. It also included footage from a Battered Women’s Custody Conference, but none from fathers’ groups. While most media portrayals depict abuse by men, Department of Justice statistics indicate that 60% of the perpetrators of domestic violence against children are women.
Many media stories about domestic violence involve a husband or boyfriend abusing his wife or girlfriend. According to the CDC website, “a national study found that 29% of women and 22% of men had experienced physical, sexual or psychological intimate partner violence during their lifetime.” 22% is more than one in five men. The CDC includes homosexual relationships in this data, but it is highly unlikely that all or most of that 22% were abused by male partners. According to Melanie Phillips’ November 2000 Sunday Times (UK) article, “Man beaters behind closed doors,” a 1996 British Crime Survey reported an equal percentage of men and women, (4.2%), said that they had been physically assaulted by a spouse or lover in the past year. Phillips’ article also reports data compiled from approximately 100 British and American studies by John Archer of the International Society for Research on Aggression in which 29% of female college students reported having initiated assaults on male companions. Crime statistics tell a different story because many men do not report violence against them by women. When men do report such incidents, police and courts often assume that the men were the instigators. Frequent media depictions of men as abusers in news, tabloid t.v and dramas have led court systems to require a low burden of proof when women make allegations of abuse in divorce and custody cases.
The burden of proof has also shifted in cases of date rape, sometimes to the point at which the man must demonstrate that he took “reasonable steps” to make sure the woman consented. Despite media attention and PR campaigns by various organizations, society is questioning the authenticity of some date rape claims. In an Amnesty International survey in Britain, 20% to 34% of respondents believed a woman was partially or totally responsible for being raped if she acted flirtatiously, dressed provocatively, was intoxicated, had many sexual partners or failed to clearly say “no.” The head of Amnesty International UK said, “the government must launch a new drive to counteract this sexist ‘blame culture.’” Rather than establishing a “blame culture,” society may be simply making a distinction between forcible rape, an inexcusable act, and date rape, often a “he said/she said” situation. The idea that a woman’s dress or behavior may imply consent isn’t unreasonable. It also isn’t new. Young women were once taught not to drink to the point at which their judgement was impaired. They were also taught not to lead men on if they had no intent of fulfilling implied promises. If a woman doesn’t want sex, she needs to say so rather than allowing a man to initiate sex with her while expecting him to be mind reader. Regretting sex doesn’t make it rape.
Child molestation, physical abuse and rape are heinous crimes. Yet, media emphasis has not reduced the incidence of these crimes. It has made people fearful and gives the impression that men are violent creatures poised to explode and exploit. The Qantas and Air New Zealand seating policies are signs of a culture of suspicion.
Copyright Eva Ellsworth, 12/11/05, all rights reserved


9 Comments:
Eva, you are clearly a heretic and a danger to society. You should be burned at the stake for such outlandish views. The femihordes will be after you to set fire to your petticoats for this.
Eva, like WOW! It is so refreshing to hear a WOMAN make such logical statements that BOTH men as well as women are EQUALLY capable of evils such as child abuse & molestation. Too often, feminist-pigs & the feminist-infested media are quick to point the finger at men.
At least YOU are more reasonable. Great article, Eva! The kind I like to read again & again. Please keep up the excellent work. We desperately need more women to realize that not all men are evil and that women are just as capable of unspeakably evil deeds as the men.
Dear chrislf,
The truth is never heresy.
You are entitled to be a feminist sexist, but you are not entitled to pretend that your beliefs are anything other that willful hate.
Isn't it interesting to point out that conservatively probably 90-95 percent of the individuals that either fly, control, fuel or rescue the individuals of the plane are male.
By the way what happens if that child just happens to be sitting next to the air marshall like happened last week in Miami.
Hey David,
I think there was some sarcasm to what chrislf said...
I just find it odd for some reason why the media continues to put out lies like Men are dangerous sex criminals when the facts and data are out there for everyone to see!!
Can the media be that STUPID??
David, i enjoy reading your articles, continue the good work and the fight for fathers rights.
Women were once taught to guard against being used by men, now it's considered a badge of honor.
Also, it's not men who are saying "every man" is a potential molester. It's always women saying men are a threat. And look who they targeted: a father of two young children, not some slimy player or married swinger.
The underlying meaning of this incident is that women adore bad men and get some bizarre satisfaction out of controlling or condemning good men.
I don't think it's odd in the slightest that men are generally considered possible sex criminals. Our society is completely feminized. The media reports everything in such a way as to influence female emotions. It works every time. Women like being afraid and feeling emotion, talking things out. The problem is that it can lead to hysteria.
I wrote to both airlines complaining about their discriminatory policy and this is air new zealand's response:
Dear Mr Lee
Thank you for e-mail regarding our unaccompanied minor policy.
We acknowledge that this is a difficult issue, and we hope that we can go someway towards explaining our approach to you in order to address your concerns.
Air New Zealand takes its responsibility for unaccompanied children extremely seriously. The parents of unaccompanied children place their trust in us to maintain the well being of their young family members travelling in our care.
So there is no confusion about our process and policy, we would like to point out that:
? Unaccompanied children are pre-seated at the time of flight editing
? We endeavour to provide an aisle seat close to the galley and ensure the adjacent seat is empty
? When a flight is full, we endeavour to seat the unaccompanied child next to a female customer
? When several unaccompanied children are travelling, we try and seat them together
Our long-standing policy reflects an approach adopted by leading airlines around the world.
Mr Lee, thank you for writing to us to express your concerns. This matter is now the subject of a formal complaint to the Human Rights Commission and Air New Zealand will be cooperating with the Commission in order to reach a resolution that meets the needs of all concerned parties.
Yours sincerely
Christina McGibbon
Customer Support Specialist
If parents are that concerned, then they shouldn't let their kids fly on their own. It's time to parent your own children and not force others to take care of them!!
Re David Usher's comment.
David, David. the Femonazi-fighting is getting at you, mate. Warning! Warning! Sense of Humour Failure imminent.
( I was being ironic / sarcastic / approving of Eva's article)
Post a Comment
<< Home